Comments
161 - 180 of 200 Comments Last updated Apr 5, 2013
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#163 Apr 2, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
So...the all-compassionate, Christ-like Duke isn't working pro bono?
Astonishing, I tell you.
I do frequently. Just not today while I was eating that sandwich.

woof

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#164 Apr 2, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't care whether you believe me if I tell you my back itches.
I don't falsely pretend to speak for God.
woof
Weaker.

God speaks for Himself through His Word.
The first step is to read it.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#165 Apr 2, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I do frequently. Just not today while I was eating that sandwich.
woof
Well, I hope you saved back half of that sandwich for the poor.
And then commit yourself to a greater volume of pro bono work.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#166 Apr 2, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Weaker.
God speaks for Himself through His Word.
The first step is to read it.
Then tell me O great Tippy headed wise one?

What makes you think that either you, or these two saps have the inside track on how to apply the Beatitudes?
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
For a very specific audience:
"The only way a person can apply the Sermon on the Mount is by becoming a Christian -- a partaker of the divine nature. Several years ago Archbishop Magee said that it was impossible to conduct the affairs of England on the basis of the Sermon on the Mount because the nation was not loyal to the King -- Christ (cited by G. Campbell Morgan, The Gospel According to Matthew [N.Y.: Fleming H. Revell, 1929], p. 39). He was right -- you have to know the King. Many have tried to make the Sermon on the Mount into merely a social gospel of doing the right thing and taking care of others, but the reality of two World Wars has diminished that effort. You must know the King to reflect the King's ethics."
-- John MacArthur
woof

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#167 Apr 2, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Then tell me O great Tippy headed wise one?
What makes you think that either you, or these two saps have the inside track on how to apply the Beatitudes?
<quoted text>
woof
You've read the law, I assume.
What makes you, or any other student of jurisprudence, think you have the inside track on how to apply it?
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#168 Apr 2, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
You've read the law, I assume.
What makes you, or any other student of jurisprudence, think you have the inside track on how to apply it?
I'm not deluded, pretending that the written law that I studied came directly from God. I can trace its origination directly to the 51 Constitutions. And while those certainly have been influenced by religious texts, those influences are subordinated to the Constitutional documents themselves.

With you and your saps, that's not the case. What's worse, you fools claim that only your version is the right one, and that anybody who doesn't follow your rules and believe as you do will burn in hell.

You do all of that with absolutely no proof whatsoever, expecting others to take you seriously.

woof

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#169 Apr 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Those are two when I responded to a poster in kind. Now, take the same effort and examine George's posts. He rarely makes a post without an insult so it shouldn't be hard. Then scold him as well. Until then, it is you that is the hypocrite.
No, I admit 100% I am human and have my limits, Sister Che. You, on the other hand, refuse to.

We are taught Charity and kindness are not limited to those to reciprocate or simply those who you deem "worthy," either. One would think you'd have a bloody nose from such great heights you sit. </sarcasm>
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#170 Apr 2, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I admit 100% I am human and have my limits, Sister Che. You, on the other hand, refuse to.
We are taught Charity and kindness are not limited to those to reciprocate or simply those who you deem "worthy," either. One would think you'd have a bloody nose from such great heights you sit. </sarcasm>
Just those who you agree with politically.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#171 Apr 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Just those who you agree with politically.
Yawn. I've had arguments and polite discussions with both sides.

Face it, you love to be mired in pointless, meaningless, irreconcilable circle jerk arguments because it's the only way you can get any attention here. I'm not playing any more.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#172 Apr 2, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Yawn. I've had arguments and polite discussions with both sides.
Face it, you love to be mired in pointless, meaningless, irreconcilable circle jerk arguments because it's the only way you can get any attention here. I'm not playing any more.
You engaged me, sweetheart. Good riddance.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#173 Apr 2, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, you do realize that it is very simple and inexpensive these days for men to get their "Maury Povich" moments, right?
It now takes at least two consenting humans to perpetuate a parentage myth before a Court.
woof
Proving your not the father does not always eliminate the legal responsibility.

Just one example: http://www.ajc.com/news/news/local/man-jailed...

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#174 Apr 2, 2013
^you're^

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#175 Apr 2, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
then why do we need to purchase with a tax, a marriage license?
We shouldn't need to. And in 10 states and DC they don't need to (common law marriages are still valid).
Wow

United States

#176 Apr 2, 2013
6 dudes in a group marriage.
This country's gone to complete sh_t.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#177 Apr 2, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Tony, I tend to agree. I have never understood why the state had to "license" relationships. I know I may stir up the pot with that thought, but it's just an "in" for the state to create a more complex tax code and insert more controls on its populace.
Because the government has a vested interest in steering it's People into conduct which is good -in this case, matrimonial unions which promote responsible procreation and responsible childrearing of the population's future adults.

Why can't government just stay out of all matters which weight strongly on the population? Because it's called GOVERNment, because it's job is to govern.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#178 Apr 2, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not deluded, pretending that the written law that I studied came directly from God. I can trace its origination directly to the 51 Constitutions. And while those certainly have been influenced by religious texts, those influences are subordinated to the Constitutional documents themselves.
With you and your saps, that's not the case. What's worse, you fools claim that only your version is the right one, and that anybody who doesn't follow your rules and believe as you do will burn in hell.
You do all of that with absolutely no proof whatsoever, expecting others to take you seriously.
woof
Your original question was not concerning the derivation of biblical teaching [or the law, as in my counterexample]-- but the application thereof.

Interesting that you chose to head off on a tangent affirming your belief that God's laws are subordinate to man's laws. If that were indeed the case, then the Beatitudes would be irrelevant.

But like every leftist, your intent is to have it both ways when it suits your purposes, i.e., you deny God has authority, but invoke His authority at will against others.

Cognitive dissonance of epic proportion.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#179 Apr 3, 2013
Listen4truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Because the government has a vested interest in steering it's People into conduct which is good -in this case, matrimonial unions which promote responsible procreation and responsible childrearing of the population's future adults.
Why can't government just stay out of all matters which weight strongly on the population? Because it's called GOVERNment, because it's job is to govern.
of the people, by the people, and for the people... think about what that really means.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#180 Apr 3, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Your original question was not concerning the derivation of biblical teaching [or the law, as in my counterexample]-- but the application thereof.
Interesting that you chose to head off on a tangent affirming your belief that God's laws are subordinate to man's laws. If that were indeed the case, then the Beatitudes would be irrelevant.
But like every leftist, your intent is to have it both ways when it suits your purposes, i.e., you deny God has authority, but invoke His authority at will against others.
Cognitive dissonance of epic proportion.
You seem to not have the ability to discern that this is a Nation that is built upon the concept of religious freedom and tolerance, and individual rights, and that those concepts are central to the foundations from which all statutory law flows.

This isn't 14th Century England, idiot. We threw those fuckers of our backs, and if you haven't noticed lately, its happening again.

woof
Oliver Canterberry

New Albany, OH

#181 Apr 3, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a kinky one, aren't you Walter?
He is speaking pure reality.

Scum like you are the one's who hate Judeo-Christian culture that is the foundation of Western Civilization and go back to the Third World or pre-Christian barbarism.

Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#182 Apr 3, 2013
Oliver Canterberry wrote:
<quoted text>
He is speaking pure reality.
Scum like you are the one's who hate Judeo-Christian culture that is the foundation of Western Civilization and go back to the Third World or pre-Christian barbarism.
Christian barbarism isn't any better.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
OH Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 16 min Canton 30,513
Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13) 56 min get alife 2,292
Almighty God OR rabid allah??? 1 hr citizen one 14
Obama Announcing Girls' Adoptions 1 hr citizen one 8
WHY Does America Hate Obama so much? 1 hr citizen one 24
WHY does ISIS Love Obama So Much?? DOHHhhhhhhhhh 1 hr citizen one 1
~~~~~ OJ Simpson Joining ISIS 1 hr citizen one 2
Where are all the original legacy posters? 1 hr sidekick 114
•••
•••
•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••