xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#20931 Oct 6, 2013
18FlatTires wrote:
<quoted text>
Awwww. Your rightwing propaganda site believed Mitt when he said he didn't make money off of Stericycle. Too bad the financial records say otherwise. Just like Cheney not making any money off sending our troops off to needlessly die. Just more conniving GOP tactics.(Also see 1001 fake scandals and shutting the government down)
Really, I don't have to explain something to a guy who is too stupid to realize the only reason he is pro-life is directly due to a Christian agenda. One he claims he doesn't follow. Ever wonder what gay marriage and abortion has to do with what the GOP stands for? Here's a hint. Absolutely nothing. Now go figure out why almost every Republican you meet is pro-life and against gay marriage.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/07/...
Oh, this is fun, let me try:

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/07/04/left-wing-...
Slim Fensterbrecher

Columbus, OH

#20932 Oct 6, 2013
18FlatTires wrote:
It's because this president is the only president to continually shove down the throat of uneducated Americans that it's still Bush fault. You weak feeble minded low income liberals can't see past the truth. You wouldn't dare say anything contradictory against your party. Wake up and quit being robots people. Both parties suck. If you re-elect an incumbent you are an idiot. Both parties are acting like spoiled 12 year-old girls. The liberal media is feeding you crap and the conservative media is not telling all the facts because the Liberals won't talk to them.
Old Guy

Cincinnati, OH

#20933 Oct 6, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
The way our Constitution was originally written, the only people that had religious restrictions was Congress, nobody else. That's why you've never seen the clause "Separation of Church and State" anywhere in the Constitution. It doesn't exist. In fact, when the Constitution was ratified, several states had an adopted religion already.
But since the Constitution was bastardized to somehow mean Congress meant teachers and schools too...
Yeah, that was after some public schools started to have mandatory prayers, so that (regardless of your personal beliefs) students were forced to "mouth words." Some felt that this was offensive. In two landmark decisions, Engel v. Vitale (1962) and Abington School District v. Schempp (1963), the US Supreme Court found that forcing students to pray violated the First Amendmentís Establishment Clause. Nothing in it kept students from praying. But it did prohibit school or state sponsored prayer.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#20934 Oct 6, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, that was after some public schools started to have mandatory prayers, so that (regardless of your personal beliefs) students were forced to "mouth words." Some felt that this was offensive. In two landmark decisions, Engel v. Vitale (1962) and Abington School District v. Schempp (1963), the US Supreme Court found that forcing students to pray violated the First Amendmentís Establishment Clause. Nothing in it kept students from praying. But it did prohibit school or state sponsored prayer.
The problem here is that it was not Congress that prohibited or endorsed such prayer. Congress is a federal entity while schools were a local entity. Congress has nothing to do with states or local municipalities or how those local governments run their schools.

The restrictions or permissions of local schools have nothing to do with the federal government sponsoring a religion. Again, the intent of the founders was that the federal government not sponsor or write federal laws with religion in mind.
Old Guy

Cincinnati, OH

#20935 Oct 6, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem here is that it was not Congress that prohibited or endorsed such prayer. Congress is a federal entity while schools were a local entity. Congress has nothing to do with states or local municipalities or how those local governments run their schools.
The restrictions or permissions of local schools have nothing to do with the federal government sponsoring a religion. Again, the intent of the founders was that the federal government not sponsor or write federal laws with religion in mind.
A majority of the Supreme Court disagreed with you, and that's the opinion that counts. The Supreme Court considered the question of how the Establishment Clause applied to the states in 1947, in Everson v. Board of Education, when the court determined that the first amendment applied to the states as well as Congress.

Writing for the majority, Justice Hugo Black stated:
"The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance. No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion. Neither a state nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between Church and State.'"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everson_v._Board...
Pops

Newport, KY

#20937 Oct 7, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem here is that it was not Congress that prohibited or endorsed such prayer. Congress is a federal entity while schools were a local entity. Congress has nothing to do with states or local municipalities or how those local governments run their schools.
The restrictions or permissions of local schools have nothing to do with the federal government sponsoring a religion. Again, the intent of the founders was that the federal government not sponsor or write federal laws with religion in mind.
Sry, Not quite true. Briefly asked, why is there a Dept of Education in D.C. if they have nothing to do with local schools? I also can't see how reduced & free meals could not at least influence any school that recieves them.
That would seem a good reason for school vouchers...freedom away from the Feds!
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#20938 Oct 7, 2013
Canton4President wrote:
<quoted text>
More "predictions" from our local Nostrodumbass. What's your batting average right now, Bunny Foo Foo? I forget...
Meanwhile, back in the REAL reality, gas prices are almost a dollar less than when GW Bush was in and it was $4.00 a gallon. Refresh my memory, little McVeigh. How long ago was that?
you lie as always.

you have no memory.

I predict the government is shut down today.

It is a scream to pick Obama's lowest price in 5 years against the highest under Bush.

Since you wait 5 years to post Obama's price, why did you forget gas under $2 under Bush?
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#20939 Oct 7, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>Sry, Not quite true. Briefly asked, why is there a Dept of Education in D.C. if they have nothing to do with local schools? I also can't see how reduced & free meals could not at least influence any school that recieves them.
That would seem a good reason for school vouchers...freedom away from the Feds!
Yeah, look at Whitehat right here in Ohio, boils down to more corporate welfare. One of Kasich's biggest donor's, for profit charter schools, paid for with taxpayers money.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#20940 Oct 7, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, look at Whitehat right here in Ohio, boils down to more corporate welfare. One of Kasich's biggest donor's, for profit charter schools, paid for with taxpayers money.
what does it matter?
D Snyder

Columbus, OH

#20941 Oct 7, 2013
I would vote for Ted Strickland If he was running for Gov. again!
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#20942 Oct 7, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
what does it matter?
There's Your Sign, now we all know who doesn't live with reality. That was too easy.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#20943 Oct 7, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>There's Your Sign, now we all know who doesn't live with reality. That was too easy.
I was just quoting Hillary Clintoon.

How does it feel to be baited?

Democrats shun reality, and it was fun to see your agreement.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#20944 Oct 7, 2013
D Snyder wrote:
I would vote for Ted Strickland If he was running for Gov. again!
I would vote for George Washington for president if he was alive. Thomas Jefferson too.
UVoted4BushTwice

Canton, OH

#20945 Oct 7, 2013
Slim Fensterbrecher wrote:
<quoted text>
It's because this president is the only president to continually shove down the throat of uneducated Americans that it's still Bush fault. You weak feeble minded low income liberals can't see past the truth. You wouldn't dare say anything contradictory against your party. Wake up and quit being robots people. Both parties suck. If you re-elect an incumbent you are an idiot. Both parties are acting like spoiled 12 year-old girls. The liberal media is feeding you crap and the conservative media is not telling all the facts because the Liberals won't talk to them.
Blah blah blah...I'm not even a Liberal. What you call the "Liberal" media, we call the majority of America's view. Much like how you call the smartest people in our nation, professors and scientists, commies. Go invest in a water walking Jewish zombie. The rest of us statistically proven higher IQ folks have already put your whole belief system out to pasture.
UVoted4BushTwice

Canton, OH

#20946 Oct 7, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
I would vote for George Washington for president if he was alive. Thomas Jefferson too.
Yah but you would vote for Timothy McVeigh if he was still alive.
UVoted4BushTwice

Canton, OH

#20947 Oct 7, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
you lie as always.
you have no memory.
I predict the government is shut down today.
It is a scream to pick Obama's lowest price in 5 years against the highest under Bush.
Since you wait 5 years to post Obama's price, why did you forget gas under $2 under Bush?
So gas wasn't $4 a gallon under Bush? No wonder you continue to be an ignorant leech of your parent's bank account.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#20948 Oct 7, 2013
UVoted4BushTwice wrote:
<quoted text>
Yah but you would vote for Timothy McVeigh if he was still alive.
did you notice the 20% decline in the stock market this past couple weeks?

you still holding on?

only 4000 points to go, and it won't take long.

If the debt celling does not do it, the Fed will when they stop printing play money prolonging fantasy.
Fact

Carroll, OH

#20949 Oct 7, 2013
Gas in the summer of 2008 was 4.11 a gallon,who was in office?
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#20950 Oct 7, 2013
UVoted4BushTwice wrote:
<quoted text>
So gas wasn't $4 a gallon under Bush? No wonder you continue to be an ignorant leech of your parent's bank account.
what a tool you are.

under Obama gas exceeded $6 a gallon in California. It has been $3.50 for years here. And as we devalue the dollar, expect it to do nothing but go up.

Obama said he was going to escalate all fuel costs as his green intuitive.

Put as much green in Obama's pockets, along with those that elected him as possible in 8 years.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#20951 Oct 7, 2013
UVoted4BushTwice wrote:
<quoted text>
So gas wasn't $4 a gallon under Bush? No wonder you continue to be an ignorant leech of your parent's bank account.
$4.00 per gallon was the highest price for gasoline we paid under two terms of Bush and the economy was doing very well. Gasoline prices are proportional with world economic conditions. Bush responded to those prices by opening up more government land for drilling and exploration. DumBama responded by closing down the Keystone pipe line.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
OBAMA Outperforms Reagan 47 min Free Pizza 4 U 50
Hey pale rider 55 min They cannot kill ... 17
What's your opinion on school dress codes? 1 hr They cannot kill ... 2
Here's a Nice White Guy 4 hr Black Rhino 11
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 6 hr Dick for Mayor 3,311
To many kids dieing 9 hr Dedo 9
Two fish were swimming upstream.... 10 hr Seriouslady 179
Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13) Sun wow 2,414
•••
Columbus Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••