Comments
17,721 - 17,740 of 30,474 Comments Last updated 58 min ago
Pops

Newport, KY

#19566 Jul 20, 2013
Agreed. except maybe for them wasting time (& or $). It's all about politics, their power & their money with these current putzes.
Example; Obama is supposed to be the president of 330 million ppl, all he has cared about is 51% as long as that 51% promotes his philosophical agenda. He hasn't kept but 2 of his 2008 campaign promises as I see it & 1 of those was NOT transparency & obviously the majority doesn't care or he wouldn't have been re-elected.
Eric Holder would NOT be challenging the LAWFUL Zimmerman verdict or have challenged Arizona's immigration law that basically mirrors Federal law & came about by popular vote, not just legislative vote. Obama care was NOT wanted by 50% or more in every poll. That means the remaining percentage was 'yes's' AND undecideds.
Simply to qualify my opinion, I was born when Truman was president, I remember the Nixon/Kennedy televised debates & started voting federally in the Nixon/McGovern election & in my opinion Obama is the saddest president that this country has had in my lifetime.
He is supposed to a constitutional law professor & yet he challenges the constitution every time it suits him.
He clearly plays the 'race card' ALL of the time. Example;He NEVER ran as a Afro-American or Black American or Bi-Racial American. It was ALWAYS as a Black man.
I won't even get into the Jeremiah Wright, Zimmerman/Martin issues & of course the Harvard professor episode when he gave a publicized opinion B4 knowing ANY of the FACTS.
The ONLY good thing that I can say about him is that he means well as he sees it but he has VERY dark glasses on.
Enough said. TY
Pops

Newport, KY

#19567 Jul 20, 2013
OOPS I meant to post 50%-62% polled did NOT want Obama care in multiple polls. Not simply 50%. That clearly makes ALL others the minority but Obama doesn't care about the majority.
Being president is a unique position but it IS still a REPRESENTATIVE position. NOT a singular/dictorative position.
Real Tea Party

Columbus, OH

#19568 Jul 20, 2013
Is this an Obama post or Ohio governor post?
Pops

Newport, KY

#19569 Jul 20, 2013
Real Tea Party wrote:
Is this an Obama post or Ohio governor post?
It's a post that is fluid with the last myriad of pages. Join or don't join. Your choice
LorenEberly

Sunbury, OH

#19570 Jul 20, 2013
No Child Left Behind:

USA Labor Law, The Constitution, and demands of Natural Law: what Mother Nature, God, or Whatever Power decreed to be the reality of the real world, democracy, capitalism, the US Constitution, and free, fair, and affordable commerce and common sense demands.

Demands every Business Owner and their Stockholders, corporation, farmer, business, outsourcer sweatshop, and nonprofit, tax-exempt, organization and Church; markets the cost in the wholesale and retail price of his or her product and service; of every worker, consumer, and taxpayer's wages (union contract), healthcare, pension, investment and independent business profit.

This enables the elderly, and every worker, consumer, and taxpayer to pay healthcare insurance premium or pay healthcare provider. Fund USA with same percentage of income derived from wages, pension, investment and independent business profit; needed to fund schools, infrastructure, local and national security, government services, and etc. and pay for every product and service they use for life. With money derived from wages, pension, investment profit, and independent business profit.

And enables every parent to educate, love, nurse, nurture, discipline, protect, and provide; for every child (job) they conceive. And fund schools, infrastructure, local and national security, government services, and etc.; with money derived from wages, investment profit, and independent business profit.

USA Labor Law, the Constitution, and Realities demands; does not support President, Vice President, and Governor, Representatives of US the Government, County Commissioners, Township Trustees, Mayors, City Council, School Administrators and Board Members.

Holding Union workers, consumers, taxpayers, and America’s grandchildren’s children, Government employees, Parents, Teachers, Veterans, Police, Firemen, and Fathers disqualified for affirmative action with white skin, Representatives deny Collective Bargaining Rights accountable.

To fund Illegal drug users and Illegal Immigrants, lottery, casino, and keno losers, unemployed Union workers replaced with nonunion workers, Human Traffickers, waitresses that pander for life for $2.00 per hour, slaves in tax abated enterprise zones, low-income child labor, consumers, and taxpayers, volunteers without wages, and nonunion workers willing to work for fewer wages than they can afford life. That pays with welfare checks, food stamps, housing vouchers, and Medicaid.

Pay income tax, social security tax, and road tax Amish evade paying 10% of their income derived from wages, Ponzi credit certificates, and independent business profit to nonprofit, tax exempt, Amish Church.

Pay property tax on state appraised value of their American Dream to fund schools. Pay interest on lottery winners winnings Legislators invest in school bonds. Pay for all stimulus packages, tax abatements, tax incentives, tax refunds, tax credit, and tax exemptions.

Or hold America’s grandchildren’s children left behind accountable to pay Chinese, Foreign and Domestic Investors and Stockholders interest with Ohio’s $1.35 trillion budget deficit, the $40 trillion social security and the $16 trillion national debt. America’s grandchildren’s children cannot pay this debt with the $7.25 per hour Government mandated labor wage in a hundred million years.

It’s every American Citizens responsibility to demand Supreme Court and/or Congress impeach President, and recall Vice President, Governor, Representatives of US the Government, County Commissioners, Township Trustees, Mayors, City Council, School Administrators and Board Members. That defies USA Labor Law, The Constitution, and Realities Demands.
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#19571 Jul 20, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>You are probably too young to remember that in the 1950's, 60's & early 70's there were scientists talking of a new Ice Age & they had evidence to back up the topic. It doesn't serve current talking heads to repeat that or represent that 'evidence'. There is a difference between weather & climate.
Question; Why do you persist in denigration & name calling? Is it because your maturity level is itself questionable?
Pops, you might have missed this, so I'll repost it. I'm old enough to remember those times, and the new Ice Age idea was always a minority point of view, but the popular press gave it a lot of coverage back then.
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
That "ice age" prediction was always a minority point of view among climate scientists. Most climate scientists thought (even in the 1970s) that the planet would get warmer because of the rise in greenhouse gasses. They were right.
"In the thirty years leading up to the 1970s, available temperature recordings suggested that there was a cooling trend. As a result some scientists suggested that the current inter-glacial period could rapidly draw to a close, which might result in the Earth plunging into a new ice age over the next few centuries. This idea could have been reinforced by the knowledge that the smog that climatologists call ‘aerosols’– emitted by human activities into the atmosphere – also caused cooling. In fact, as temperature recording has improved in coverage, it’s become apparent that the cooling trend was most pronounced in northern land areas and that global temperature trends were in fact relatively steady during the period prior to 1970.
At the same time as some scientists were suggesting we might be facing another ice age, a greater number published contradicting studies. Their papers showed that the growing amount of greenhouse gasses that humans were putting into the atmosphere would cause much greater warming – warming that would a much greater influence on global temperature than any possible natural or human-caused cooling effects.
By 1980 the predictions about ice ages had ceased, due to the overwhelming evidence contained in an increasing number of reports that warned of global warming. Unfortunately, the small number of predictions of an ice age appeared to be much more interesting than those of global warming, so it was those sensational 'Ice Age' stories in the press that so many people tend to remember."
http://www.skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predi...
Express Lane 2 Jesus

Canton, OH

#19572 Jul 20, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>You are probably too young to remember that in the 1950's, 60's & early 70's there were scientists talking of a new Ice Age & they had evidence to back up the topic. It doesn't serve current talking heads to repeat that or represent that 'evidence'. There is a difference between weather & climate.
Question; Why do you persist in denigration & name calling? Is it because your maturity level is itself questionable?
Yes, what did the tiny fraction of fringe group minority oil lobby climate scientists say next? As far as name calling...cut to Gov. of Cali Ronald Reagan, boldly calling the youth of the counter culture nothing short of animals. Or you could just check out what the Nazi Tea Party is currently up to.

Since: Aug 12

United States

#19573 Jul 20, 2013
Those counter culture animals are doin mighty fine and shittin in tall cotton up there in Detroit I hear.
ann

Mason, OH

#19574 Jul 21, 2013
Can you take this forum to the political section please
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#19575 Jul 21, 2013
Pops wrote:
Agreed. except maybe for them wasting time (& or $). It's all about politics, their power & their money with these current putzes.
Example; Obama is supposed to be the president of 330 million ppl, all he has cared about is 51% as long as that 51% promotes his philosophical agenda. He hasn't kept but 2 of his 2008 campaign promises as I see it & 1 of those was NOT transparency & obviously the majority doesn't care or he wouldn't have been re-elected.
Eric Holder would NOT be challenging the LAWFUL Zimmerman verdict or have challenged Arizona's immigration law that basically mirrors Federal law & came about by popular vote, not just legislative vote. Obama care was NOT wanted by 50% or more in every poll. That means the remaining percentage was 'yes's' AND undecideds.
Simply to qualify my opinion, I was born when Truman was president, I remember the Nixon/Kennedy televised debates & started voting federally in the Nixon/McGovern election & in my opinion Obama is the saddest president that this country has had in my lifetime.
He is supposed to a constitutional law professor & yet he challenges the constitution every time it suits him.
He clearly plays the 'race card' ALL of the time. Example;He NEVER ran as a Afro-American or Black American or Bi-Racial American. It was ALWAYS as a Black man.
I won't even get into the Jeremiah Wright, Zimmerman/Martin issues & of course the Harvard professor episode when he gave a publicized opinion B4 knowing ANY of the FACTS.
The ONLY good thing that I can say about him is that he means well as he sees it but he has VERY dark glasses on.
Enough said. TY
Obama's Promises (over 500)
Promise kept-241 (45%)
Compromise-131 (25%)
Promise broken-119 (22%)
Stalled-3 (1%)
In the works-24 (5%)
Not yet rated-14 (3%)

www.politifact.com
Pops

Newport, KY

#19576 Jul 21, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Pops, you might have missed this, so I'll repost it. I'm old enough to remember those times, and the new Ice Age idea was always a minority point of view, but the popular press gave it a lot of coverage back then.
<quoted text>
Nah, I remember your post well. I was responding specifically to Canton as my question at the end of that post should have indicated.
Sometimes I wonder why anyone, myself included, even cares what mean 'ol Canton has to say when he can't be civil.
Pops

Newport, KY

#19577 Jul 21, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama's Promises (over 500)
Promise kept-241 (45%)
Compromise-131 (25%)
Promise broken-119 (22%)
Stalled-3 (1%)
In the works-24 (5%)
Not yet rated-14 (3%)
www.politifact.com
I am certain that it would have to be someones occupation to compile such massive records. I have a question tho. Unless Obama uses the word 'promise', how is it determined what statements that he makes constitute the definition of a promise? Such a process could actually sway the the total numbers either way & thus the published percentages.
Seems quite tricky to me.
Pops

Newport, KY

#19578 Jul 21, 2013
Express Lane 2 Jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, what did the tiny fraction of fringe group minority oil lobby climate scientists say next? As far as name calling...cut to Gov. of Cali Ronald Reagan, boldly calling the youth of the counter culture nothing short of animals. Or you could just check out what the Nazi Tea Party is currently up to.
YOU are the only person that I asked about crude name calling & your 'explanation' is basically that someone else did it? Pretty weak.
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#19579 Jul 21, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>
Sometimes I wonder why anyone, myself included, even cares what mean 'ol Canton has to say when he can't be civil.
I wonder why so many folks here are rude and nasty. We may disagree about specific issues, but we probably have a lot in common, too. If you are really trying to bring someone around to your point of view, politeness and courtesy is the way to go.

But,(when I was much younger)I remember those who would go out to tough bars looking for a fight. That was their entertainment for the evening. I never understood it then, and I don't understand it now.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#19580 Jul 21, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>I am certain that it would have to be someones occupation to compile such massive records. I have a question tho. Unless Obama uses the word 'promise', how is it determined what statements that he makes constitute the definition of a promise? Such a process could actually sway the the total numbers either way & thus the published percentages.
Seems quite tricky to me.
Click onto the site, they have a 'Contact Us' section. Pretty sure they would answer it.
Express Lane 2 Jesus

Canton, OH

#19582 Jul 21, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>YOU are the only person that I asked about crude name calling & your 'explanation' is basically that someone else did it? Pretty weak.
"You just posted so you should be able to answer your own question...tard" -Pops

Not as "weak" as your hypocritical memory.
Pops

Newport, KY

#19583 Jul 21, 2013
Express Lane 2 Jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
"You just posted so you should be able to answer your own question...tard" -Pops
Not as "weak" as your hypocritical memory.
See what I mean? Probably not. Even after being queried about your unwarranted name calling, YOU respond with name calling. TOUCHE'
Your level of maturity is no longer in question.
Pops

Newport, KY

#19584 Jul 21, 2013
ann wrote:
Can you take this forum to the political section please
As has been said B4....join or don't join. Your choice. Some of us have become aquainted. TY
Express Lane 2 Jesus

Canton, OH

#19586 Jul 21, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>See what I mean? Probably not. Even after being queried about your unwarranted name calling, YOU respond with name calling. TOUCHE'
Your level of maturity is no longer in question.
You do realize that I posted a direct quote from you calling some else a "tard". I think the fact that MOST things fly right over your head explains a lot about your political choices. You flat out called someone a "tard" and then you want to preach to me about how civil and mature you are? Screw you. This is the part where you claim it's all a lie, just like you have in the past. Here you go, hypocrite...

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/canton-oh/TSQ...

What's going on there in post 19105? Guess your Miss Manners sob story just flew out the window.
Express Lane 2 Jesus

Canton, OH

#19587 Jul 21, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder why so many folks here are rude and nasty. We may disagree about specific issues, but we probably have a lot in common, too. If you are really trying to bring someone around to your point of view, politeness and courtesy is the way to go.
But,(when I was much younger)I remember those who would go out to tough bars looking for a fight. That was their entertainment for the evening. I never understood it then, and I don't understand it now.
I know. It's almost as if us "Socialist" "Commie" "Libtards" can't finish a sentence without calling someone names.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
gutfeld: obama climate change proposal 'nuttier... 23 min Duke for Mayor 2
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 1 hr Neutral Party 3,208
Where are all the original legacy posters? 1 hr Duke for Mayor 101
Orange barrels, gas price hike await Labor Day ... 1 hr WALK NOT DRIVE 1
Feds say Pakistan unlikely to return fugitive O... 1 hr NAIVE JUDGE 2
Was Bergdahl Planned ALL ALONG?? 5 hr gibdig 16
Almighty God OR rabid allah??? 5 hr gibdig 11
Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13) 15 hr Disgraced 2,282
•••
Columbus Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••