Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010?

[Pops]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow. Rationalize much?

Much More than you

[Pops]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
This should be good.
1) How is a tax on tanning beds racist?
2) How many people do you know that individually make $250K/year?

1)Ever see an African use a tanning bed?
2) How many people that YOU or I know that make $250K has absolutely no relevance & for you to bring it up is just a red herring.
3) Why not ask how many people that YOU or I know that live in Dallas, LA, NY or Mobile? Same as #2, "NO relevance."

[Pops]

To: Che & Duke. A sincere question here expecting a serious answer. What is the differences between Libs & Conserv's as you see it?

[Duke for Mayor]

Pops wrote:

To: Che & Duke. A sincere question here expecting a serious answer. What is the differences between Libs & Conserv's as you see it?

Degrees of and ability to feel empathy.

woof

[Pops]

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
Degrees of and ability to feel empathy.
woof

Too simple of an answer. Cop out. Get specific pls

[Duke for Mayor]

Pops wrote:

<quoted text>Too simple of an answer. Cop out. Get specific pls

You asked Pops. I answered.

I don't really engage in the "liberal"/"cons ervative" labeling game all that much.

That may be why you don't like my answer.

I find that people usually have varying opinions on different issues, and that often, they say one thing in public and do another in private (i.e. espousing an anti-abortion/pro family political position while encouraging your lover to get an abortion, all while being a married, elected official).

So I just don't think the label game is all that important.

Empathy though, I think is typically a pretty good gauge.

woof

[Anonymous of Indy]

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
You asked Pops. I answered.
I don't really engage in the "liberal"/"cons ervative" labeling game all that much.
That may be why you don't like my answer.
I find that people usually have varying opinions on different issues, and that often, they say one thing in public and do another in private (i.e. espousing an anti-abortion/pro family political position while encouraging your lover to get an abortion, all while being a married, elected official).
So I just don't think the label game is all that important.
Empathy though, I think is typically a pretty good gauge.
woof

just depends too what part of the Country you are from too because I find people that call themselves and consider themselves a modern Conservative in different parts of the country I think they are more inline as a modern Liberal or vise versa. When I go to different metro areas in the US, I am always prepared for a culture shock especially when you start talking politics which is why I can see why things are so messed up in Washington DC.

[Ohmygosh]

Wow

[victor]

Pops wrote:

To: Che & Duke. A sincere question here expecting a serious answer. What is the differences between Libs & Conserv's as you see it?

It seems to me that the true purpose

of Democrats and Republicans is chaos.

These are two opposing teams that create an

environment of confusion - so some lying j@ck@ss

can come along and be the "hero", decieve the people.

I used to believe (many years ago in my youth) that

republicans were interested in balancing the budget-

what a joke. ha

[victor]

Republicans also seem to support the interest of the ulra rich-going way overboard in that reguard.

While the Democrats seem to support the needy-welfareand entitlement program - they also go way overboard, to the very extreme.

And the real goal here is to never compromise - continue the environment where

the ultra rich continue stealing oportunity from the poor and middle class

so the poor and middle class need help to pay for basic nessesities and need government programs

that are no longer supported by the ultra rich.

The ultra rich can create a separate environment for themselves-like private schools

while the poor and middle class do without.

But, the poor and middle class will win - because we will be placed in an environment where we need to be innovative - while the ultra rich will cease all inovations as they are feeling pampered in their environment.

their minds will not be sharpened-they will become complacent

and then they will need someone else to come along to help them...

I suppose that is why they preferred becoming the king or the queen - to force the innovative ones to be their slaves. That won't last forever.

[titonton divaunte pants]

tranpsosition wrote:

<quoted text>
I've never heard this take before. A lot of folks are talking about the delay in women marrying as part of the achievement gap. With more women than men getting uni degrees, some people think that traditional views on appropriate achievement levels (that women want men who have a higher level of education and etc than themselves) are keeping women single.
I don't think either make too much sense, personally. Looking at census data, women aren't single as in alone but single as in unmarried. You've got more and more people cohabitating or living in long term partnerships without marrying. It seems less an inability to find a partner than a move to redefine partnerships in a way that fits more cleanly in with emerging goals.
Though, who knows, maybe men have just collectively decided that they deserve better than heavy (or educated) women and have decided to collectively boycott marriage as well!

Its a narcissism epidemic. Rampant among women in their 30s and later 20s.

[titonton divaunte pants]

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
You asked Pops. I answered.
I don't really engage in the "liberal"/"cons ervative" labeling game all that much.
That may be why you don't like my answer.
I find that people usually have varying opinions on different issues, and that often, they say one thing in public and do another in private (i.e. espousing an anti-abortion/pro family political position while encouraging your lover to get an abortion, all while being a married, elected official).
So I just don't think the label game is all that important.
Empathy though, I think is typically a pretty good gauge.
woof

it was a generic answer. One you might hear from a contestant in a miss america pageant, from miss west virginia.

[Reality Speaks]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
This should be good.
1) How is a tax on tanning beds racist?
2) How many people do you know that individually make $250K/year?

!.) tax tanning beds is racist on whitey.

2.) I know at least 50 people who earn 250K a year or more that I share time with.

3.) your class warfare is going to blow up in your face.

morons like you never learn.

if you do this, we will do that

take Hostees as example.

guess who is unemployed now.....and guess who was the problem in the first place.

how is that hope & change working out?

[Reality Speaks]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
That's how emails are written in kindergarten.

OK

in kindergarden I am paid more monthly than you are in a year.

now go clean your room.

[Reality Speaks]

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
Degrees of and ability to feel empathy.
woof

my MBA pays much better than your JD.

why did you waste the money for that extra 2 years of useless education?

your degree is sub standard when comparing apples to apples; and I have zero empathy regarding your ignorance.

[Duke for Mayor]

titonton divaunte pants wrote:

<quoted text> it was a generic answer. One you might hear from a contestant in a miss america pageant, from miss west virginia.

Don't you have a conspiracy to expose?

Check the ceiling fixture in the kitchen.

woof

[Duke for Mayor]

titonton divaunte pants wrote:

<quoted text>
Its a narcissism epidemic. Rampant among women in their 30s and later 20s.

I've read that it was really rampant among white males for quite a few centuries before ohhhhh...1970.

woof

[Duke for Mayor]

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
my MBA pays much better than your JD.
why did you waste the money for that extra 2 years of useless education?
your degree is sub standard when comparing apples to apples; and I have zero empathy regarding your ignorance.

I seem to remember you telling me how you paid your attorney $300/hr to protect yourself from yourself.

Now wipe the sh!t from your lips, you're embarrassing yourself.

woof

[Pops]

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
You asked Pops. I answered.
I don't really engage in the "liberal"/"cons ervative" labeling game all that much.
That may be why you don't like my answer.
I find that people usually have varying opinions on different issues, and that often, they say one thing in public and do another in private (i.e. espousing an anti-abortion/pro family political position while encouraging your lover to get an abortion, all while being a married, elected official).
So I just don't think the label game is all that important.
Empathy though, I think is typically a pretty good gauge.
woof

Very good answer. It wasn't that I didn't like your 1st answer, it was just to brief for me to discern anything. Thanx

[Reality Speaks]

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
I seem to remember you telling me how you paid your attorney $300/hr to protect yourself from yourself.
Now wipe the sh!t from your lips, you're embarrassing yourself.
woof

how can you proceed through life being wrong 100% of the time?

I forgot.....your govt handout checks.