Canton

Canton, OH

#30946 Jul 3, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
The line is drawn when government forces an industry to participate in practices that are offensive to their religion. It's no different than if some goofy politician created a law that businesses must have devil worshiping at lunch time for their employees. What's the difference? It's like some Republican politician creating law that environmental groups must burn all their garbage outside.
Yah, that would be kooky if corporations were allowed to enforce their own personal religious views on their employees, wouldn't it?
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#30947 Jul 3, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Who said I had anything against birth control? I don't care about birth control. I would celebrate this decision even if the court ruled against government forcing industries to provide nail polish to female employees.
The decision is historical because it's a push back against an over barring intrusive government that's sticking it's nose in where it doesn't belong. Anytime we the people are able to win against Cradle-to-Grave government, it's always reason to celebrate. It's just like when the court threw out Nanny Bloomberg's soda size ban in NY. I loved it even though I've never been to NYC.
What you don't understand is that our founders never set up government to control the people. Our government was setup to govern--as in government issues. The larger the government--the smaller the citizen. And don't get me wrong, my opinion is not partisan here. I feel the same way about some Republican issues as well. It's why I'm slowly slipping towards Libertarianism. Whatever group of people are able to get more government out of our lives, the better.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal(D-Conn) pointed out that his Women's Health Protection Act, which would ban states from enacting some of the 205 and counting laws Republican controlled Statehouses have passed since 2011.
One wild guess who's against it, but there's no war on women.
House Republicans countered by submitting even more bills against women, all the while saying jobs were more on their minds than women's rights.
Who block's every viable jobs bill? Except the one's full of poison pill amendments.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#30948 Jul 3, 2014
super mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama's doing a great job, isn't he?
Birth control isn't an issue, unless it's being used to kill babies. Out of the 20 birth control methods available to women, only 4 of them were contested. The remaining 16 will still be covered in Hobby Lobby's insurance plan. So, what are you libtards whining about again? I can't remember. Oh yeah ... you have to make every one conform 100% to your ideology, under penalty of law, or you lose your stupid little minds.
Funny on how they invest in Big Pharma companies that make those products and covered all birth control until the ACA was passed.
Sally Kohn statement:
www.politifact.com
Canton

Canton, OH

#30949 Jul 3, 2014
Happy 4th of July and a special thanks to the Liberal thinking that got us away from a government mandated religion in the form of an armed revolution.
Also, let's all take a moment to thank our hero president for giving everyone here on this forum a tax cut. Because like you guys have always said...taxed enough already. Wonder how Fox News missed that story? It's almost as if...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#30950 Jul 3, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case had nothing to do with the Constitution. You're welcome.
Sure did had to do with the US Constitution and SCOTUS cases argued under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 where the 1st amendment was being violated just like Hobby Lobby's religious beliefs were being violated that they held.

The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment states that Congress shall not pass laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_Freedo...
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30951 Jul 3, 2014
Canton wrote:
Happy 4th of July and a special thanks to the Liberal thinking that got us away from a government mandated religion in the form of an armed revolution.
Also, let's all take a moment to thank our hero president for giving everyone here on this forum a tax cut. Because like you guys have always said...taxed enough already. Wonder how Fox News missed that story? It's almost as if...
I must have missed it too because I didn't get any tax cut. Instead, taxes increased on my cigarettes and I lost my health insurance. My groceries and gasoline is much higher. You can't get unlimited internet on your cell phone because somebody has to pay for those free phones the government gives out. And I also have to pay transfer fees on my credit cards which I never had to do before DumBama when he rode into town and started make laws for credit card institutions.

Man if I only had the money I had before Big-Ears invaded the White House.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30952 Jul 3, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>Funny on how they invest in Big Pharma companies that make those products and covered all birth control until the ACA was passed.
Sally Kohn statement:
www.politifact.com
Funny how that's nothing but bull:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffreybrown/2014...
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30953 Jul 3, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>Sen. Richard Blumenthal(D-Conn) pointed out that his Women's Health Protection Act, which would ban states from enacting some of the 205 and counting laws Republican controlled Statehouses have passed since 2011.
One wild guess who's against it, but there's no war on women.
House Republicans countered by submitting even more bills against women, all the while saying jobs were more on their minds than women's rights.
Who block's every viable jobs bill? Except the one's full of poison pill amendments.
Yeah. Don't you hate those politicians that block jobs?

http://majorityleader.gov/JobsTracker/
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30954 Jul 3, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Yah, that would be kooky if corporations were allowed to enforce their own personal religious views on their employees, wouldn't it?
Correct. It's a good thing they don't.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30955 Jul 3, 2014
Canton wrote:
Or like forcing your child to pray to another religion's god in a tax funded public school, or forcing a religious fairytale to be taught in the science classes of that same publically funded school. Darn those Liberals!
Right you are. Who do parents think they are wanting their children to be taught certain subjects? The nerve of some people.

That's the problem with parents these days, they think they can actually parent. Little do they know that parents shouldn't be looking out for their children, that's what government is for. What would a parent know about their child anyway?
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30956 Jul 3, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, or like the Supreme Court putting one religion above all other religions. Completely against what this nation was founded on.
It is?

Then why did DumBama give a pass on Commie Care to Quakers and the Amish?
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30957 Jul 3, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Cool, and since people are people, just like corporations, my religion tells me "Thou shall not kill". so I want every cent of my tax money that went towards paying for GW Bush's war returned to me pronto.
You have a deal. You can have your war money back and I'll take back the money my taxes went to for all these social programs.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30958 Jul 3, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case had nothing to do with the Constitution. You're welcome.
What do you think the Supreme Court is for? They are there TO judge issues based on the Constitution.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30959 Jul 3, 2014
half breed wrote:
<quoted text>Coming from a guy who admittedly gets paid to sit on his fat, diabetic @ss all day long and complain about the "evil Muslim president", that really doesn't mean a whole lot.
Make sure to invite lil Jeffy to your drunken lynch mob, you two seem to have a lot in common...
My fat diabetic @ss works all day so you have products in the store to purchase. Without us, you'd starve.
half breed

Van Wert, OH

#30960 Jul 3, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
My fat diabetic @ss works all day so you have products in the store to purchase. Without us, you'd starve.
No, without you, the trucking industry would just replace your fat, diabetic @ss and never miss a beat. Face it, you're not the center of the universe. You're just a whiny, overpaid gofer constantly playing the victim card.
Now have fun with your drunken lynch mob, ya racist douche...
Canton

Canton, OH

#30961 Jul 3, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
It is?
Then why did DumBama give a pass on Commie Care to Quakers and the Amish?
You mean that Christians and Christians are different than Christians? No more punch for Rubber Ducky.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30962 Jul 3, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean that Christians and Christians are different than Christians? No more punch for Rubber Ducky.
The Supreme Court didn't rule on Christianity, they ruled on freedom of religion.

Or are you aware of any religion that supports abortion?
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30963 Jul 3, 2014
half breed wrote:
<quoted text>No, without you, the trucking industry would just replace your fat, diabetic @ss and never miss a beat. Face it, you're not the center of the universe. You're just a whiny, overpaid gofer constantly playing the victim card.
Now have fun with your drunken lynch mob, ya racist douche...
So what are you doing for Forth of July Troll? Going to come here and shoot off your mouth?
ino

Waverly, OH

#30964 Jul 3, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
It is?
Then why did DumBama give a pass on Commie Care to Quakers and the Amish?
And unions!!! Anything that can hurt that POS Zero Care is a great day for America.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Lodi, OH

#30965 Jul 3, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Sure did had to do with the US Constitution and SCOTUS cases argued under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 where the 1st amendment was being violated just like Hobby Lobby's religious beliefs were being violated that they held.
The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment states that Congress shall not pass laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_Freedo...
Read the decision. The court applied the statute, not the first amendment.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 39 min Tatlover 5,582
Officers involved in fatal shooting are identified 50 min They cannot kill ... 3
Best site to buy fifa15 coins on fifa15buy.com 52 min aaron2015 5
Cars Make it Allright 1 hr Duke for Mayor 3
Update: dangerous Muslim travels 1 hr Duke for Mayor 31
homosexuality is a "lifestyle choice" 1 hr Restraint 165
Forecast: Temps Dip To Zero Tonight; A Warm Up ... 2 hr Wake Up WBNS 1
BizzyBee baking secrets 3 hr Big Johnson 62
Taxes----- who pays taxes? 7 hr Duke for Mayor 33
Columbus Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:43 am PST

NFL 8:43AM
Jimmy Haslam: Browns have to get a QB in 2015
Bleacher Report 9:17 AM
Jimmy Haslam Speaks on Browns' 2015 QB Situation
Bleacher Report12:23 PM
Manziel's Teammates Discuss QB's Rookie Season
Yahoo! Sports12:24 PM
Report: Cleveland Browns 'wrecked' by Johnny Manziel's rookie season
NBC Sports12:46 PM
Teammate: Manziel was a "100 percent joke" as a rookie