Canton

Canton, OH

#22107 Nov 15, 2013
Now when those same "Patriots" were voting in Bush Sr., who was a big boy in the CIA, was THAT your definition of smaller government?
Canton

Canton, OH

#22108 Nov 15, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Who took from the middle-class and gave it to the rich? How was that accomplished? I'm middle-class and was working during the Reagan administration. I don't recall ever being taxed to give to the rich. Like most working adults during that time, I was in much better shape financially than before Reagan got in.
As far as DumBama is concerned, take note of "attempted" gun grab. Meaning that he knew he had no chance at it. If we had an all Democrat government and a majority in the SC, only the criminals would have guns today. Now, would you like me to post articles on what the Democrats wanted to see happen to guns in America if they had their way? I have plenty of articles I can post.
Giving huge tax breaks to the wealthy while the middle class was sinking and then telling us that it will "trickle down" worked out for you under Reagan? Did it all that money "trickle" down? Let's have a look at the CEO flow growing exponentially while the middle class flat lined for the answer to that. I made way more money under Clinton than I did under any GOP president.
Pops

Newport, KY

#22109 Nov 15, 2013
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Your valiant fight for the Constitution would sound oh so sincere if it wasn't for the fact that your team was waving flags with Bibles in hand when the most unconstitutional act in the history of this country took place. It's called the Patriot Act. It came from the same guy who had secret torture camps. You know, real "only party with morals" kinda stuff.
IF YOU weren't so busy being mean & an idiot,(make that a mean idiot) you would realize that both paties of congress voted for that act. I believe that it passed cleanly & was renewed again later. Name calling Putz.
Pops

Newport, KY

#22110 Nov 15, 2013
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Your valiant fight for the Constitution would sound oh so sincere if it wasn't for the fact that your team was waving flags with Bibles in hand when the most unconstitutional act in the history of this country took place. It's called the Patriot Act. It came from the same guy who had secret torture camps. You know, real "only party with morals" kinda stuff.
But I do agree that the Patriot Act IS unconstitutional.
Pops

Newport, KY

#22111 Nov 15, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>I have to agree with the valid points in this post. There are some mean,'personal attacks only' posters on here.
They are why I have had less to say lately. I understand your explanation.
To Canton. You are such a $hit stirrer. You 'judged' this post as, incendiary, racy & clueless & simply provide even more evidence of lower life forms & lower levels of intelligence. Congratulations on that success!
Hey Canton

Delphos, OH

#22112 Nov 15, 2013
Is that your head i see popping up and down from the presidents desk? Awww... it is... just another one drinking his cool-aide...
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#22113 Nov 15, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>I have to agree with the valid points in this post. There are some mean,'personal attacks only' posters on here.
They are why I have had less to say lately. I understand your explanation.
That's why when I see a onesided, hateful, won't even bother to look at the middle and check things out posts, I just have to jerk on their chain.
OLFARTT

Dayton, OH

#22114 Nov 15, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>That's why when I see a onesided, hateful, won't even bother to look at the middle and check things out posts, I just have to jerk on their chain.
YOU'RE JERKIN' TOO MUCH, AND TOO OFTEN THERE, POO POO BOY.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#22115 Nov 15, 2013
OLFARTT wrote:
<quoted text>YOU'RE JERKIN' TOO MUCH, AND TOO OFTEN THERE, POO POO BOY.
Look out folks, we got a loony toony troll on board. A true racist and bigoted bible thumper that's dumber than a box of rock's. Well, he'll fit right in with some posters.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#22116 Nov 15, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>Ah, but the simple fact that they passed had to take a bipartisian vote shows the value & agreement of both parties,
But it seems like Congress is filled with psuedo-populist yahoos who wave bibles at $25,000 a year earners while they do the bidding of $25,000 a day earners
Republican Says

Van Wert, OH

#22117 Nov 15, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>Look out folks, we got a loony toony troll on board. A true racist and bigoted bible thumper that's dumber than a box of rock's. Well, he'll fit right in with some posters.
Maybe OLFARTT and Reality Speaks could get together, complain about invisible commies and uva rings, talk about their favorite pink farm trucks, then dip their ballsacks into each others mouths fer corporate freedom.
O My

Delphos, OH

#22118 Nov 15, 2013
Now that is funny!!
Pops

Newport, KY

#22119 Nov 15, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>But it seems like Congress is filled with psuedo-populist yahoos who wave bibles at $25,000 a year earners while they do the bidding of $25,000 a day earners
Congress is full of prostitutes that mostly care about 'performing' for the highest bidder(s).
Most forget WHO voted them in & just keep talking the stuff while their hands are doing something else.
I am somewhat amazed that any of them wonder why & how lawyers, politicians & used car salespeople have the reputations that they have & that jokes are made of them. History has proven the reasons for all 3 of them being the butt of jokes.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#22120 Nov 16, 2013
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Giving huge tax breaks to the wealthy while the middle class was sinking and then telling us that it will "trickle down" worked out for you under Reagan? Did it all that money "trickle" down? Let's have a look at the CEO flow growing exponentially while the middle class flat lined for the answer to that. I made way more money under Clinton than I did under any GOP president.
That's because Clinton presided with a Republican led Congress that balanced the budget, cut government and pushed Clinton to cut taxes for those wealthy people. It even led to a so-called surplus...... at least on paper.

Where to you leftists get this notion that when somebody makes a lot of money, they have to get that money from lower wage people? You've been brainwashed, do you even realize that?

Our economy is not a bubble. We are not encapsulated. Tell me, if we increased taxes 20% on rich people, how does that change your life? Does it buy you one more loaf of bread? Do you think that you'll make more money because the wealthy are taxed at a higher rate? Explain how that all works in your mind. OBummer got his tax on the wealthy. How much better have you done since then?

When I go to my employer asking for a raise, and he tells me he'd love to give me one, but he doesn't have the money because the rich have it all, then your theory would make sense. But in my entire life, I've never had an employer tell me that.

This is what I call financial envy. People are not given money. They work hard for it just like anybody else. They take risks opening up their own business, investing in education, or they invest their money in stocks, real estate or the commodities market. Have you ever done any of these things?

Of course you haven't. The other week you were on here bragging about sitting in front of your 70" television. That's not sacrificing much now is it? Well people who are trying to become wealthy don't buy 70" televisions. They make a lot of sacrifices and do without. They would take that television money and save or invest it.

"Liberals believe that if you earn money, you are not entitled to it, but if you want money, you are."
Ken Blackwell
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#22121 Nov 16, 2013
Canton wrote:
Now when those same "Patriots" were voting in Bush Sr., who was a big boy in the CIA, was THAT your definition of smaller government?
Who was running for a smaller government than Bush?
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#22122 Nov 16, 2013
Canton wrote:
Dominionism. Theocracy. That's what the Tea Party is really about. Let me guess. The reason they are teaching creationism in the science classes of the rightwing conservative run K12 online learning program is because they just want lower taxes. The reason why they push anti-climate change propaganda in the same rightwing owned online public school, even though it goes directly against what 97% of the scientific world believes, is because they just want to uphold the constitution...right?
Why? Is there something about global warming in the Constitution? Is there anything in the Constitution that forbids the teaching of religion?

I went to a religious school as a child, what's wrong with that? Know what they taught us? RELIGION! In fact it was mandatory that you start the day off in Church, and you better not be late.

Of course, that was back in the day when children were raised by different people than today. They were called parents. Yes, you see, way back then, we actually had this insane idea that parents be responsible for their children including what they were taught. Today we know how crazy that was. Now we know that government is better at raising children than parents. After all, government does everything better, don't they?

It Takes A Village, doesn't it Canton? The funny thing is you liberals got your way. You forced religion out of schools, put kids in classrooms where the teacher shows them how to put rubbers on bananas, teaches them about a science without evidence, enter schools with metal detectors, and then wonder why certain people want their children to be no part of it. So they teach them at home.

I know you're a liberal so you are against choice. Liberals don't like choice--they never have. Choice means freedom. You know, like if you want to purchase health insurance or not? So it's understandable that you wouldn't want children to learn something outside of government propaganda, but there are still real Americans in this country that believe in choice and that government is not the highest power in the universe.
Canton

Canton, OH

#22123 Nov 16, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Why? Is there something about global warming in the Constitution? Is there anything in the Constitution that forbids the teaching of religion?
I went to a religious school as a child, what's wrong with that? Know what they taught us? RELIGION! In fact it was mandatory that you start the day off in Church, and you better not be late.
Of course, that was back in the day when children were raised by different people than today. They were called parents. Yes, you see, way back then, we actually had this insane idea that parents be responsible for their children including what they were taught. Today we know how crazy that was. Now we know that government is better at raising children than parents. After all, government does everything better, don't they?
It Takes A Village, doesn't it Canton? The funny thing is you liberals got your way. You forced religion out of schools, put kids in classrooms where the teacher shows them how to put rubbers on bananas, teaches them about a science without evidence, enter schools with metal detectors, and then wonder why certain people want their children to be no part of it. So they teach them at home.
I know you're a liberal so you are against choice. Liberals don't like choice--they never have. Choice means freedom. You know, like if you want to purchase health insurance or not? So it's understandable that you wouldn't want children to learn something outside of government propaganda, but there are still real Americans in this country that believe in choice and that government is not the highest power in the universe.
Sure and since our tax dollars funs that public school and I'm not dumb enough to be a Christian, I think it's only fair that we teach the Hindu creation story in public school science classes. You have been buying into the bullsh1t that Christians are the only real Americans. Let's make children pray to the moon god at the start of every public tax funded school and see how quick you guys reach for the Constitution. Guess the freedom of religion thing is fine and dandy just as long as that religion is Christianity. Funny how the founders of this nation weren't Christians, they were Deists. Now lets have a long look at Jefferson cutting every "miracle" Jesus performed out of the Bible. It's almost as if our country was hijacked by a bunch of old rich white Christians who are trying to rewrite history to fit their agenda. I'm sure it has nothing to do with the old southern Baptists who own the tobacco industry (also see hoop your personally jump through) and the old conservative Christian oil men from Texas.(Also see anti-climate change hoop you jump through)
Canton

Canton, OH

#22124 Nov 16, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Who was running for a smaller government than Bush?
Sure, ex head of the CIA seems like smaller government...right?
Canton

Canton, OH

#22125 Nov 16, 2013
Hey Canton wrote:
Is that your head i see popping up and down from the presidents desk? Awww... it is... just another one drinking his cool-aide...
You must be thinking of the sloppy Koch wh@re you call mom. Tell her to wipe that crude oil from around her mouth. Also tell her she's not kneeling in front of Jesus.
Canton

Canton, OH

#22126 Nov 16, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>To Canton. You are such a $hit stirrer. You 'judged' this post as, incendiary, racy & clueless & simply provide even more evidence of lower life forms & lower levels of intelligence. Congratulations on that success!
Shut up you haggard, hypocritical clown. Nobody was even talking to your stupid @ss, let alone cares what your posts get judged. You cry about people calling others names as you call people names. Since you need the most basic things explained to you on a daily basis, I'm thinking it's time some one put your feeble ass in a nice home somewhere and let the big boys dig us out of your past political disasters.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
SeriousLady, BizzyBee, Catman Rowdy , everybody... 24 min d pantz 23
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 28 min d pantz 4,543
impeachment 2 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 30
President Ebola 7 hr Reality Speaks 952
Ronald Reagan gave blanket amnesty to 3 million... 10 hr Glitter Gipper 4
Xenos Christian Fellowship is a CULT! (Jul '12) 14 hr Anonymous 996
Man Shot Multiple Times In North Columbus Alley 19 hr hey now 2
Columbus Dating
Find my Match

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 4:00AM
Complete Bengals Week 12 Preview vs. Texans
NBC Sports 4:07 AM
Ben Tate has no expectations for role with Vikings
NFL 6:04 AM
Marvin Lewis: Bengals hit 'rock bottom' in Week 10
NBC Sports 7:25 AM
Marvin Lewis: Sometimes you have to hit rock bottom before you go to the top
NBC Sports 8:23 AM
PFT Live: Browns talk with Mary Kay Cabot, PFT Planet calls and tweets