“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#21 Mar 15, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
1) You aren't a member of the GOP, so you don't count.
2) Look at the results of primaries when <slur>are running. For the most part, the <slur>beats the GOP incumbent, and then loses the general. Don't kid yourself who is driving that party.
It generally only applies to Senate seats, House seats have been more successful.

Alaska 2010-RINO won write in vote
PA 2010-Ds remove former RINO in primary, conservative wins
Utah 2010-Tea Party defeats RINO, wins general

Indiana 2012-RINO loses renomination, Tea Party loses general, but DINO is elected

You asked for incumbents.

It's worth noticing that RINOs lost elections for Gov in California, Oregon (2010), Washington (2012), for Senate in Massachusetts (2012), Connecticut (2010,2012).

In leftist thought, it's because they were dragged down by the "extremists", but I never recall the media saying that a D lost re-election because of Grayson, Waters, and Rangel.

In Ohio, only elected officials with (R) and precinct committeemen are GOP members. We don't have actual registration, only primary ballots.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#22 Mar 15, 2013
Listen4truth wrote:
...Just curious but, how solid are one's morals when one's moral compass -one's long-embraced position on an issue of this magnitude- can be flipped just because a member of that person's family embraces such a controversial lifestyle?...
We can only assume adultery would become acceptable to Sen. Portman, if his wife suddenly practiced it.

Since: Jan 12

Columbus, OH

#24 Mar 15, 2013
CMH Rick wrote:
He won't be getting any support from the GOP after this. He is toast.
He'll get GOP support but not Teabaggers endorsements. You are aware of the group called 'Log Cabin' Republicans, right? They're Republican conservatives who chase each other around a room wearing G-strings and holding feather dusters.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#25 Mar 15, 2013
WISE AMERICAN wrote:
<quoted text> He'll get GOP support but not Teabaggers endorsements. You are aware of the group called 'Log Cabin' Republicans, right? They're Republican conservatives who chase each other around a room wearing G-strings and holding feather dusters.
They're about as "conservative" as Karl Rove and George Voinovich.
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#26 Mar 15, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>They're about as "conservative" as Karl Rove and George Voinovich.
Tough call on this one.

Of course I'm with you guys in that gay "marriage" is just plain stupid, among other things.

On the other hand, not everybody is Christian and it's a government license we're talking about. So I think each state can set whatever criteria it wants as a prerequisite for issuing licenses.

This is a very important distinction: Government license versus marriage in the church.

I heard how Portman consulted with his "pastor" for this one to get the okay.... I didn't know he went to Reader's black liberation church.

What a goofy country this is.

Why do we need to know anything about his son "Will" and that he has a leaky an|_| us? Keep this crap to yourselves.
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#27 Mar 15, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
You support a Democrat President who has reversed his position on this three times.
Not to mention frequenting Man's Country.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#28 Mar 15, 2013
You cannot kill a Spook wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. Well I won't be sending out any checks for his campaign. Portman, Kasich, if this keeps going I will be saving lots of money.
His subservience to the leadership has been an issue beforehand, back in December he was talking up a "compromise" on gun bans, not to mention his failure to rein in the deficit despite his "fiscal hawk" reputation.

He will be overwhemingly re-elected, bigger than Voinovich's 2004 margin.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#29 Mar 15, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Tough call on this one.
Of course I'm with you guys in that gay "marriage" is just plain stupid, among other things.
On the other hand, not everybody is Christian and it's a government license we're talking about. So I think each state can set whatever criteria it wants as a prerequisite for issuing licenses.
This is a very important distinction: Government license versus marriage in the church.
I heard how Portman consulted with his "pastor" for this one to get the okay.... I didn't know he went to Reader's black liberation church.
What a goofy country this is.
Why do we need to know anything about his son "Will" and that he has a leaky an|_| us? Keep this crap to yourselves.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_an...

Surprisingly his denomination isn't a PC sellout on this one.

Rand Paul said the government should no longer issue licenses.

Based on Anthony Kennedy's ruling in Lawrence v Texas, this is largely already decided.

Since: Jan 12

Columbus, OH

#30 Mar 15, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>They're about as "conservative" as Karl Rove and George Voinovich.
Conservatives still! Red ties and all!
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#31 Mar 15, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
His subservience to the leadership has been an issue beforehand, back in December he was talking up a "compromise" on gun bans, not to mention his failure to rein in the deficit despite his "fiscal hawk" reputation.
He will be overwhemingly re-elected, bigger than Voinovich's 2004 margin.
There's a fine line between selling out and getting things done. Portman's okay.

“Where did I put my tiara?”

Since: Dec 11

Columbus, OH

#32 Mar 15, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Tough call on this one.
Of course I'm with you guys in that gay "marriage" is just plain stupid, among other things.
On the other hand, not everybody is Christian and it's a government license we're talking about. So I think each state can set whatever criteria it wants as a prerequisite for issuing licenses.
This is a very important distinction: Government license versus marriage in the church.
I heard how Portman consulted with his "pastor" for this one to get the okay.... I didn't know he went to Reader's black liberation church.
What a goofy country this is.
Why do we need to know anything about his son "Will" and that he has a leaky an|_| us? Keep this crap to yourselves.
Not a tough call Bobby. He wanted to legislate morality and pass judgement on others until it hit close to home. Thus the turn around. Not saying I agree or disagree with gay marriage, just find it ironic that those so steadfast in their convictions can turn on a dime when it's kin that is affected.
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#33 Mar 15, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>

Rand Paul said the government should no longer issue licenses.
That would also be a disaster. The main purpose of a government-issued marriage license is for record-keeping and record integrity purposes. Otherwise, you go back to a medieval system where churches keep records ... and what about people who don't belong to a church?

Who can qualify for a government license is best done the way we do things now. IF the government decides that sodomites qualify for one, then so be it.
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#34 Mar 15, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
Based on Anthony Kennedy's ruling in Lawrence v Texas, this is largely already decided.
I'm guessing if and when this gets up to the Supreme Court, Scalia will say that it's up to the states, which is the correct answer.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#35 Mar 15, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
There's a fine line between selling out and getting things done. Portman's okay.
When the ink drips on AWB II and amnesty, his name will probably be on it.
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#36 Mar 15, 2013
GlitterSucks wrote:
<quoted text>Not a tough call Bobby. He wanted to legislate morality and pass judgement on others until it hit close to home. Thus the turn around. Not saying I agree or disagree with gay marriage, just find it ironic that those so steadfast in their convictions can turn on a dime when it's kin that is affected.
If it were my kid, I would never broadcast the fact that he's a poof all over the world.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#37 Mar 15, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
That would also be a disaster. The main purpose of a government-issued marriage license is for record-keeping and record integrity purposes. Otherwise, you go back to a medieval system where churches keep records ... and what about people who don't belong to a church?
Who can qualify for a government license is best done the way we do things now. IF the government decides that sodomites qualify for one, then so be it.
Whatever probate agreement people choose is filed in the probate court.

If the courts are intellectually honest, they have to allow polygamy as well.

That will be entertaining

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#38 Mar 15, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm guessing if and when this gets up to the Supreme Court, Scalia will say that it's up to the states, which is the correct answer.
4 liberal justices, 1 Anthony Kennedy

Read his opinion from Lawrence v Texas

It's a done deal

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#39 Mar 15, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Tough call on this one.
Of course I'm with you guys in that gay "marriage" is just plain stupid, among other things.
On the other hand, not everybody is Christian and it's a government license we're talking about. So I think each state can set whatever criteria it wants as a prerequisite for issuing licenses.
This is a very important distinction: Government license versus marriage in the church.
I heard how Portman consulted with his "pastor" for this one to get the okay.... I didn't know he went to Reader's black liberation church.
What a goofy country this is.
Why do we need to know anything about his son "Will" and that he has a leaky an|_| us? Keep this crap to yourselves.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#40 Mar 15, 2013
GlitterSucks wrote:
<quoted text> He wanted to legislate morality and pass judgement on others
Are you aware of how laws work???

All laws are based on some form of right/wrong

Since: Jan 12

Columbus, OH

#41 Mar 15, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Tough call on this one.
Of course I'm with you guys in that gay "marriage" is just plain stupid, among other things.
On the other hand, not everybody is Christian and it's a government license we're talking about. So I think each state can set whatever criteria it wants as a prerequisite for issuing licenses.
This is a very important distinction: Government license versus marriage in the church.
I heard how Portman consulted with his "pastor" for this one to get the okay.... I didn't know he went to Reader's black liberation church.
What a goofy country this is.
Why do we need to know anything about his son "Will" and that he has a leaky an|_| us? Keep this crap to yourselves.
I attend a 85% Black church and homosexual behavior is put down from my Bishop! That's a no,no. If you're gay you get prayed for and hands layed on, but your ass had better straighten up, because Bishop is gonna hammer the message repeatedly if he even suspects. And a man had better not give the strong brothas a limp, half assed hand shake, oh noooo, we'll squeeze that hand so tight, that the knuckles between the forefinger and small finger will pop, and hurt for days. Homies don't play that sh!t. Homosexuality is a choice of sexual perversion. It's an spiritual attack by the Devil to counter God's original design. It's rebellion against God, but most gays aren't aware of that!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
OH Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 20 min NRA_RWNJ 31,531
Can the White House really be protected? 43 min Pope Che Reagan C... 22
Connecticut: Democrat arrested Voter Fraud 46 min Pope Che Reagan C... 19
Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13) 50 min truth 2,460
Marion Woman Sentenced To 5 Years For Taking Sh... 1 hr notoriousOSUfinkCREW 2
Armed Contractor on Elevator with President 2 hr Reality Speaks 66
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 3 hr Reality Speaks 3,588
Xenos Christian Fellowship is a CULT! (Jul '12) 12 hr Praying for Change 964
Catman Dave 14 hr They cannot kill ... 30
Columbus Dating
Find my Match

Columbus Jobs

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]