CNN and Reader Agree: Steubenville Ra...

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#556 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I can think of at least two places where the kids could have been in Duke's scenario, both of which are more likely than a foster home or Duke's basement. Can you?
I doubt you can, but you'll google real fast and come up with something. Probably unrelated.

They could have been kids of relatives living there. They could have been adopted kids, not biological. They could have been children of either gender the kind host was pimping out.

Wow, two scenearios and I didn't even have to 'search.'

My big questions are: Why did he meet with them in their home? Why did he say 'I had pleasure'? And why did he even interview them as potential clients if he knew the type of defending they needed and the alledged crimes they had committed?

And why is he bringing up this ancedote after 500+ posts when it's been the subject for at least 200 of them? It's BS.

This thread is dead. Now Pale Rider is jumping on board and he's a mirror image of you, Duke and Tran.

You should organize a circle and jerk off to eachother's lies and twists.

Later, George
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#557 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Naturally, no abuse ever occurs at Children's Service facilities.../sarc
Again, what does that have to do with Duke's scenario?

In the large majority of abuse cases, the children never end up in foster care. Most times, the accused abuser leaves the home, voluntarily or otherwise. In the circumstances when the children are removed, they usually end up with an extended family member. You are blathering about something you don't know about. Again.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#558 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Douche drove the thread in that direction himself as part of his unhinged rant.
No, Cleavon. You brought up the foster care thing. Your outrage at people whose job it is to protect children is really frightening. In my experience there are two categories of folks so rabidly antagonistic to those people; people who have been accused of child abuse and people who have something to hide.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#560 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
No, Cleavon. You brought up the foster care thing. Your outrage at people whose job it is to protect children is really frightening. In my experience there are two categories of folks so rabidly antagonistic to those people; people who have been accused of child abuse and people who have something to hide.
How about people who are sick of intrusive government hiding its own abuses...on our dime, no less? No, you'd never see common sense like that if it kicked you in the teeth.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#561 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Those people weren't his clients, retard. They were obviously parents of children that Duke was appointed to be the Guardian ad litem for. A GAL is tasked with representing the best interest of the children. GALs routinely make home visits. Your desperation to suck Georgie's ass is making you more ridiculous that you usually are.
GALs are generally losers...and that assessment comes from my own lawyer.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#562 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>How about people who are sick of intrusive government hiding its own abuses...on our dime, no less? No, you'd never see common sense like that if it kicked you in the teeth.
First, that is not what Duke was writing about. It is what you insist on changing the subject to.

Second, as Duke has pointed out, you have yet to show any evidence to support your assertion that there is an institutional effort by "intrusive government" to protect child abuser by paying their victims to be quiet and transfering the abusers to another area to avoid prosecution and find new victims.

You are creating an entire straw universe and your motivation is either very suspicious or very odd.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#563 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>GALs are generally losers...and that assessment comes from my own lawyer.
Attorneys who represent people accused of abusing children often times aren't fans of GALs. Those lawyers often lose cases as a result of the findings of the GALs. There is a certain "kill the messenger" dynamic.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#564 Mar 24, 2013
I don't believe I have ever read such ignorant speculation and simply nasty assertions coming from two supposedly intelligent people than has been posted here in the past two hours.

woof

Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#565 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
First, that is not what Duke was writing about. It is what you insist on changing the subject to.
Second, as Duke has pointed out, you have yet to show any evidence to support your assertion that there is an institutional effort by "intrusive government" to protect child abuser by paying their victims to be quiet and transfering the abusers to another area to avoid prosecution and find new victims.
You are creating an entire straw universe and your motivation is either very suspicious or very odd.
This is simply fascinating, isn't it???

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#566 Mar 24, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
My big questions are: Why did he meet with them in their home? Why did he say 'I had pleasure'? And why did he even interview them as potential clients if he knew the type of defending they needed and the alledged crimes they had committed?
And why is he bringing up this ancedote after 500+ posts when it's been the subject for at least 200 of them? It's BS.
1) I was doing the job I am paid to do.
2) Because I was being sarcastic.
3) I wasn't.
4) I already answered that question before.

woof

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#567 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
First, that is not what Duke was writing about. It is what you insist on changing the subject to.
Second, as Duke has pointed out, you have yet to show any evidence to support your assertion that there is an institutional effort by "intrusive government" to protect child abuser by paying their victims to be quiet and transfering the abusers to another area to avoid prosecution and find new victims.
You are creating an entire straw universe and your motivation is either very suspicious or very odd.
CPS Covers Up Abuse of Children in Foster Homes, Group Homes


From the newscast in the video: "CPS allowed treatment center employees with complaints of child abuse against them to get new jobs in group homes where they have committed even more abuse."

You were saying, little girl?
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#568 Mar 24, 2013
I predicted this in post #385. It took a day, but I was, as Paco likes to say..."spot on".

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#569 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>
CPS Covers Up Abuse of Children in Foster Homes, Group Homes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =ZiD7p1irHCYXX
From the newscast in the video: "CPS allowed treatment center employees with complaints of child abuse against them to get new jobs in group homes where they have committed even more abuse."
You were saying, little girl?
I don't watch videos. If your interpretation is true (and based on your history that is a huge if) then it is wrong and people should lose their jobs and be prosecuted.

That doesn't change the fact that it has absolutely nothing to do with what Duke was talking about. Are you done trying to change the subject now?

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#570 Mar 24, 2013
Look at the icons of pure denial and fury for post #567. Douche got what he asked for and He Is mad, rite?
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#571 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>
CPS Covers Up Abuse of Children in Foster Homes, Group Homes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =ZiD7p1irHCYXX
From the newscast in the video: "CPS allowed treatment center employees with complaints of child abuse against them to get new jobs in group homes where they have committed even more abuse."
You were saying, little girl?
Settlement agreements and hush money???

woof

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#572 Mar 24, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Settlement agreements and hush money???
woof
Watch the video. You afraid it'll steal your soul?

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#573 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Those people weren't his clients, retard. They were obviously parents of children that Duke was appointed to be the Guardian ad litem for. A GAL is tasked with representing the best interest of the children. GALs routinely make home visits. Your desperation to suck Georgie's ass is making you more ridiculous that you usually are.
Oh, now he was a court appointed guardian. Just never mentioned that in any of his many posts.

You and Duke are real looney tunes.

And clean up your mouth when you address me.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#574 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't watch videos. If your interpretation is true (and based on your history that is a huge if) then it is wrong and people should lose their jobs and be prosecuted.
That doesn't change the fact that it has absolutely nothing to do with what Duke was talking about. Are you done trying to change the subject now?
Stop lying.

Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
"Like I said asshole.
Provide the documentation that supports what you are asserting...that any children's services agency...just one in the entire country...acted in a manner to protect a foster parent perpetrator by trying to buy someone's silence as the Catholic Church did thousands of times?
Back it up.
woof"
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#575 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
Look at the icons of pure denial and fury for post #567. Douche got what he asked for and He Is mad, rite?
And the icons on 568 are pure denial and fury too, right? You have really gone off the rails.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#576 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Watch the video. You afraid it'll steal your soul?
I watched it.

Settlement agreements and hush money???

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Satan / Trump: Father of All Lies 24 min John844 1
Erase ObamaCare, It Doesn't Work, Its Unaffordable 33 min Axe ObamaCare 6
Dems in disarray- Well, yeah! 36 min d pants 247
Red, White and Boom Dining Event 2 hr pbeasley 1
Columbus Biggest bold face Liar? 5 hr brice mutiple zip 7
News Robin Hamlin and Steven Fleming to tie the knot... 5 hr Brice N Livingston 1
Military Coup Has Seized Control of America's M... 5 hr Dangerous Dan 3
A taste of their own 6 hr Dangerous Dan 267

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages