CNN and Reader Agree: Steubenville Ra...

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#516 Mar 24, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you read the part that said "I wanted to choke him..."?
Did you read the part that said I choked him?
You really aren't very bright.
woof
Yeah...you broke Rule Number One. And not all 1950s racists assaulted anyone. But they still hated.
You are dumber than a box of rocks.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#517 Mar 24, 2013
Wait what wrote:
<quoted text>
If there wasn't that kind of passion, a lot of folks would have gotten away with things they should never have gotten away with. I'm glad someone cares.
There's a fine line, and when it's crossed to indict the 98% of the group that had nothing to do with the problem, that's an issue.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#518 Mar 24, 2013
Paco, I don't think you really want to travel down the road you're trying to lead me down.

I guarantee that I will make you look even more foolish than I've made you look in the past 24 hours.

Enjoy the rest of your Sunday instead.

woof

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#519 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's not forget how this whole discussion started.
I insulted George on his claimed knowledge of the hearsay rules. He replied,
<quoted text>
I pointed out that it wasn't the same, since I actually possessed knowledge about priests who molest.
<quoted text>
Gokeefe decided to chime in, with her usual grace and class, by asking if I was a defrocked gay priest,
<quoted text>
Not content to let it go, Gokeefe continued,
<quoted text>
SL added her two cents as well. Since you were all so desperate to know what my knowledge was about the corruption and organized crime in the Catholic Church, I shared it. You asked, I told you. Now you cry about what you heard. Whether you believe it or not means nothing to me.
Wow. You don't cry?

In response to Catman:
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Get to the liquor store before you get snowed in.
And how many times have you called others who have disagreed with you a moron or stupid? Or challenged them on their statements regarding their background or education and have minimized it?

Che, you really are a piece of work. My responses were obviously sarcastic. You can dish it but can't take it?

You claim to have knowledge of priests who molest. I do as well, I am more than familiar with the Toledo case. I also have had discussions with one of the investigators with the Toledo case, as well as know some of the victims--PERSONALLY--that I attended school with years ago. The document you presented was one you stated showed "proof" of "hush money" paid between the diocese of Cleveland and a victim. It turns out to be an appeal. Not proof, and you know it. I simply claimed there was no proof of hush money as these kinds of deals aren't well documented and are hard to prove. Simple as that. But your ego got in the way.

And you had the audacity to claim that a LEGAL settlement, a civil lawsuit claim settled in a court of LAW that is legally and publicly documented -- monies awarded to victims -- were "hush money?"

You and Duke have so contributed to this insanity of this discussion it is down right nauseous. And then you play victim by whining that sarcastic posts get made because you're mad or upset that you're called on the rug?

Get over it. Grow up.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#520 Mar 24, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
Paco, I don't think you really want to travel down the road you're trying to lead me down.
I guarantee that I will make you look even more foolish than I've made you look in the past 24 hours.
Enjoy the rest of your Sunday instead.
woof
You social work do-gooders do far more damage than any Church. That's a fact.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#521 Mar 24, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
Paco, I don't think you really want to travel down the road you're trying to lead me down.
I guarantee that I will make you look even more foolish than I've made you look in the past 24 hours.
Enjoy the rest of your Sunday instead.
woof
You've only made yourself look petty and arrogant. Leftist social engineering is a crime against this country and its society. You a-holes are right down there at the bottom of the barrel with the molesters.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#522 Mar 24, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
I will tell a brief story to indicate why this issue riles me so, just for you Paco.
I think I told you before what I do for a living. My work occasionally brings me in direct contact with people who have molested children and have either been convicted of it, or charged with it, or been alleged to have done it, and have not yet been criminally charged.
I had the pleasure of sitting in the home of one of these individuals and speaking with he and his wife for over an hour last week. All of the children who were previously living in their home were removed over a year ago, and they want their two biological kids returned to their custody. I had the pleasure of looking this gentleman in the eye, staring him down like the vermin he is, and telling him exactly why I will NEVER recommend to the court that that occur. He had his adult niece recording our entire conversation with her cell phone, although he probably doesn't know that I knew it within the first ten minutes.
I wanted to choke his throat and watch him take his last breath of air right there in front of his wife, who still doesn't believe he did it, because she doesn't have the cognitive ability to understand the overwhelming evidence that exists.
So when I hear people like you, and keefe, and SL talk as if what the Church did to thousands of victims did not really occur, despite mountains of evidence that it indeed did, I get a little angry.
Ok...I now return this thread to its original subject matter.
Carry on.
woof
So in over 500 posts, this is the first time we've heard this 'story.' Did you pull it out of thin air or out of your a$$? Really, Duke, get real.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#523 Mar 24, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow. You don't cry?
In response to Catman:
<quoted text>
And how many times have you called others who have disagreed with you a moron or stupid? Or challenged them on their statements regarding their background or education and have minimized it?
Che, you really are a piece of work. My responses were obviously sarcastic. You can dish it but can't take it?
You claim to have knowledge of priests who molest. I do as well, I am more than familiar with the Toledo case. I also have had discussions with one of the investigators with the Toledo case, as well as know some of the victims--PERSONALLY--that I attended school with years ago. The document you presented was one you stated showed "proof" of "hush money" paid between the diocese of Cleveland and a victim. It turns out to be an appeal. Not proof, and you know it. I simply claimed there was no proof of hush money as these kinds of deals aren't well documented and are hard to prove. Simple as that. But your ego got in the way.
And you had the audacity to claim that a LEGAL settlement, a civil lawsuit claim settled in a court of LAW that is legally and publicly documented -- monies awarded to victims -- were "hush money?"
You and Duke have so contributed to this insanity of this discussion it is down right nauseous. And then you play victim by whining that sarcastic posts get made because you're mad or upset that you're called on the rug?
Get over it. Grow up.
What? That is a rambling post. Take a breath and listen. Georgie and you keep suggesting I brought this topic up. The post you just replied to was simply intended to show that you two created this discussion that you seem to want to blame me for. That simple.

I didn't post the link to that Court of Appeals case. Someone else did.

I posted a link days ago to a series of news accounts of the payments made to the family by the church designed to keep them quiet. You, of course, chose to ignore it because it didn't fit your narrative. Those payments were not part of a lawsuit. The minute the family contacted the church about the rape the church was at the family's door with lawyers, their checkbook and release papers (and if it was anything like my contact with the church, a few guys that looked a lot like Luca Brasi).

You don't know what you are talking about. You will be a better person the day you realize that you don't know everything and your limited experiences don't define the universe.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#524 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>You've only made yourself look petty and arrogant. Leftist social engineering is a crime against this country and its society. You a-holes are right down there at the bottom of the barrel with the molesters.
Why do you hate people who protect children from molesters?

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#525 Mar 24, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
A good six or eight months ago Che addressed his gender. You all ignored it hopped on the wrong train anyway.
woof
So he's a he? Could have sworn a couple monhts ago Che told Karl she was a she.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#526 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't know what you are talking about. You will be a better person the day you realize that you don't know everything and your limited experiences don't define the universe.
Pot, meet kettle.

I've admitted quite a while ago I didn't know "everything." And I've publicly admitted here many times when I've been downright wrong.

This post is revealing. And to that end, it's the end of any discussion with you on this topic--you are one of the most arrogant and obnoxiously vile posters I have ever encountered here. Telling someone who's admitted having problems with alcohol to go buy booze? Wow. There's little wonder few have respect for you here.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#527 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you hate people who protect children from molesters?
Keep twisting. It's ALL you do.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#528 Mar 24, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Pot, meet kettle.
I've admitted quite a while ago I didn't know "everything." And I've publicly admitted here many times when I've been downright wrong.
This post is revealing. And to that end, it's the end of any discussion with you on this topic--you are one of the most arrogant and obnoxiously vile posters I have ever encountered here. Telling someone who's admitted having problems with alcohol to go buy booze? Wow. There's little wonder few have respect for you here.
You are right. I should have offered to buy it for him.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#529 Mar 24, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep twisting. It's ALL you do.
Keep being incapable of understanding the plain language of posts. It's ALL you do.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#530 Mar 24, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
So in over 500 posts, this is the first time we've heard this 'story.' Did you pull it out of thin air or out of your a$$? Really, Duke, get real.
Very simple answers for you.

Paco started this thread last Monday. The events I described took place on Wednesday afternoon, between 4 and 5:30. I offered that description of those events to explain my reason for being very very direct about how I feel about people like you who deny the truth.

Setting that aside, do you think its reasonable to expect me to tell you everything I do?

If that's what you think, no one can help you.

woof

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#531 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you hate people who protect children from molesters?
I'm not convinced they do. I've read just as many horror stories about foster homes as I have about priests.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#532 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not convinced they do. I've read just as many horror stories about foster homes as I have about priests.
Foster homes? What do foster homes have to do with this discussion? Oh, I know. You are trying to divert attention away from another of your stupid comments.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#533 Mar 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not convinced they do. I've read just as many horror stories about foster homes as I have about priests.
Tell me how many stories you have read about County Departments of Children's Services entering into private agreements with the parents of children who were sexually abused in foster care wher the terms of those agreements purportedly bound the parents to silence as a means of maintaining the perpetrating foster parents' certification to foster?

Provide the documentation, asshole.

woof

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#534 Mar 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Foster homes? What do foster homes have to do with this discussion? Oh, I know. You are trying to divert attention away from another of your stupid comments.
Really? Here's what your daddy douche posted:

"I had the pleasure of sitting in the home of one of these individuals and speaking with he and his wife for over an hour last week. All of the children who were previously living in their home were removed over a year ago, and they want their two biological kids returned to their custody. I had the pleasure of looking this gentleman in the eye, staring him down like the vermin he is, and telling him exactly why I will NEVER recommend to the court that that occur."

Your a liar, little girl.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#535 Mar 24, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell me how many stories you have read about County Departments of Children's Services entering into private agreements with the parents of children who were sexually abused in foster care wher the terms of those agreements purportedly bound the parents to silence as a means of maintaining the perpetrating foster parents' certification to foster?
Provide the documentation, asshole.
woof
Abuse is abuse, scum bag. The circumstances don't matter, but in your desperation to spit on the Church you'll try to sweep all the corrupt Children's Service and foster home abuse under the rug.
You're like Mel Brooks in Blazing Saddles: "We have to protect our phoney baloney jobs here!"

You're lower than sewage, douche.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
A taste of their own 13 min Male 143
GOP Blind to their own bill ? 35 min Batch 37 Pain Is ... 2
Robert Mueller Investigating Donald Trump 39 min Batch 37 Pain Is ... 124
Health Care/The Wall 46 min Reality Speaks 73
News Former Dublin teacher charged with child pornog... 1 hr Faux news 4
Ramadan, Does Anyone Understand It? 2 hr Oliver Canterberr... 9
Obama Tapping Melania 7 hr Barack Boner 1

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages