CNN and Reader Agree: Steubenville Ra...
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#269 Mar 22, 2013
Roland wrote:
SWEET !!! Its Friday, I can go get all liquored up and take no responsibility for myself or anything that happens. AWESOME !!!!
At least until Monday when the Courts re-open.

woof
Roland

Valley City, OH

#270 Mar 22, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
At least until Monday when the Courts re-open.
woof
Oh you are right. Apparently it only works that way if you have a vag at least from what I have read in this case.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#271 Mar 22, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I was asked a specific question you dumbass. Late in the thread. Ye gods. Your crusade to try to "get me" is really making you look foolish. The last person you want to be relying on is SL. She's dumb as a skunk and has the personality of a pit viper.
Yet, she's been at her present job 26 years, has an MBA, makes a good salary and larger decisions, and gets 'funny' comments on several posts, while you collect 'clueless','disagree' and 'nuts', as you spend 24 X 7 on topix.

George doesn't have to rely on anyone and Spookerini will, and I do, take exception to your reference 'dumb as a skunk.' Skunks are not dumb.

There's no campaign to get you. You keep challenging everyone and set yourself up. Mostly, we were ignoring you.

Going to Tran's nuptials this weekend? Or participating?

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#272 Mar 22, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
If that's an insult, you fail, as usual. I am far from anyone's 'toady'(I think that should be Toadie.) But I'd FAR rather be in line with George, Spook, gokeefe, WW, Bob, Tony, Glitter, Rowdy and others than with you, Tran and the Twister.
You back eachother up (and who knows what else to eachother) on any ridiculous idea.
At least George has, class, substance and a life outside of Topix 24 X 7.
You want to attack an entire religion over a few rouge priests, that's unfair and unwise. You'll find rouges in every group. That's a given. That does not take away from all of the good work the Catholic Church and other clergy connected to it have done.
You claim to have personally seen a highly confidential document in the 80's, that late in the thread, doesn't ring true.
Forgot Wise American, who has is lengths in front of Che or Tran. Sorry WA.
Back to work. TGIF!
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#273 Mar 22, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet, she's been at her present job 26 years, has an MBA, makes a good salary and larger decisions, and gets 'funny' comments on several posts, while you collect 'clueless','disagree' and 'nuts', as you spend 24 X 7 on topix.
George doesn't have to rely on anyone and Spookerini will, and I do, take exception to your reference 'dumb as a skunk.' Skunks are not dumb.
There's no campaign to get you. You keep challenging everyone and set yourself up. Mostly, we were ignoring you.
Going to Tran's nuptials this weekend? Or participating?
Wow. You get funny "judge its." Are you keeping count?
From Steubenville

Columbus, OH

#274 Mar 22, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
At least until Monday when the Courts re-open.
woof
Really?

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#275 Mar 22, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow. You get funny "judge its." Are you keeping count?
No. One of my minions does that for me.
Wait what

Dublin, OH

#276 Mar 22, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
You should stick to what you're doing, whatever it is.
If you believe, despite the mountains of evidence that the Catholic Church didn't pay off its victims to keep them quiet, I'd say you're a bit naive.
woof
Two semesters of law.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#277 Mar 22, 2013
Wait what wrote:
<quoted text>
Start here, and work your way backward. Che is right.
http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/8/...
I'm I read, admittedly from my iPhone. I read again. Admittedly not a lawyer, but this document mentions nothing about monies paid by the diocese if Cleveland to abuse victims. It appears to be a summary of whether the medical records were admissible. I will read again, when I get back to a full screen -- but still looks like no go for Che.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#278 Mar 22, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow. You get funny "judge its." Are you keeping count?
No, buy apparently you are and I struck a nerve. My post 271 got three each of your signature marks,'clueless''nuts' and 'disagree'. First time since I've been on here.

Been busy haven't you?

So what's up with you and Tran's wedding. You giving the bridge/groom away or catering?

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#279 Mar 22, 2013
^^ No, buT apparently you are^^

Which brings me to ponder, where has the Grammer Nazi been?

“Cats rule.”

Since: Dec 09

Chardon Ohio.

#280 Mar 22, 2013
Roland wrote:
SWEET !!! Its Friday, I can go get all liquored up and take no responsibility for myself or anything that happens. AWESOME !!!!
Just don't do it on an empty stomach.I sure know how bad that that turns out.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#281 Mar 22, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
^^ No, buT apparently you are^^
Which brings me to ponder, where has the Grammer Nazi been?
I'm assuming you've done this on purpose, but to what end?
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#282 Mar 22, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm I read, admittedly from my iPhone. I read again. Admittedly not a lawyer, but this document mentions nothing about monies paid by the diocese if Cleveland to abuse victims. It appears to be a summary of whether the medical records were admissible. I will read again, when I get back to a full screen -- but still looks like no go for Che.
The original case against the diocese was settled in 2006. Terms of the settlement were not disclosed. The opinion you're looking at is a second claim against the diocese' law firm claiming unauthorized disclosure of privileged and confidential medical records during the litigation of the first suit.

Like I said...stick to whatever it is you do.

Trying to prove that the Catholic Church didn't try to buy the silence of its victims won't go well for you.

The proof is on online court dockets and private websites operated by attorneys and others with access to the documents all over the world.

woof

woof

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#283 Mar 22, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm assuming you've done this on purpose, but to what end?
The rouge priests made her do it. Their faces were very red.

woof

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#284 Mar 22, 2013
Catman Dave wrote:
<quoted text>Just don't do it on an empty stomach.I sure know how bad that that turns out.
Dave! Miss you, Bud.! About another week of freedom, huh? I have to PM you about the purple martins.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#285 Mar 22, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm assuming you've done this on purpose, but to what end?
Done what on purpose? Shouldn't you be getting your mani/pedi/waxing in preparation of your wedding ceremony?

Or have you already had the ceremony? If so, good thinking. If it hasn't worked out for your fiancee by tomorrow morning, they won't have wasted the whole weekend.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#286 Mar 22, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
The rouge priests made her do it. Their faces were very red.
woof
Oh yes, they are roaming free here in the country, Duke.
And I'm such a vulnerable woman.

woof ( I think I'll start doing that to irritate you. woof)

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#287 Mar 22, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
The original case against the diocese was settled in 2006. Terms of the settlement were not disclosed. The opinion you're looking at is a second claim against the diocese' law firm claiming unauthorized disclosure of privileged and confidential medical records during the litigation of the first suit.
Like I said...stick to whatever it is you do.
Trying to prove that the Catholic Church didn't try to buy the silence of its victims won't go well for you.
The proof is on online court dockets and private websites operated by attorneys and others with access to the documents all over the world.
woof
woof
woof
Stick to it yourself. I haven't stated anywhere that the Catholic Church didn't attempt to buy silence in many instances. But that is NOT proof it occurred in Cleveland, nor is it proof that Che "read" and had "access" to such documents.

All this document is is an uphold of an appeal that was argued for unauthorized use of medical documents, looks like it happened via a divorce. It cannot talk to any other issues surrounding the case. Or alleged facts, in Che's and your case.

Just how ignorant are you and Che that you can't be willing to admit you're shamming here? You're simply assuming someone won't read and analyze your links, dummy. I did. I took the time.

Go bark up another tree and quit p!!$$ing on the lawn, will ya?
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#288 Mar 22, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Stick to it yourself. I haven't stated anywhere that the Catholic Church didn't attempt to buy silence in many instances. But that is NOT proof it occurred in Cleveland, nor is it proof that Che "read" and had "access" to such documents.
All this document is is an uphold of an appeal that was argued for unauthorized use of medical documents, looks like it happened via a divorce. It cannot talk to any other issues surrounding the case. Or alleged facts, in Che's and your case.
Just how ignorant are you and Che that you can't be willing to admit you're shamming here? You're simply assuming someone won't read and analyze your links, dummy. I did. I took the time.
Go bark up another tree and quit p!!$$ing on the lawn, will ya?
You don't understand what you're reading.

Not at all.

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Daily Bucket: Scioto Audubon Park in Columbus OH 4 min Big Johnson 1
For Cat Lovers Only! 6 min Reality Speaks 175
News Clintonville: Man says graffiti aimed at me 7 min Big Johnson 1
News Johnson's Real Ice Cream Family marks 65 years ... 9 min Big Johnson 1
Man shot near Ferguson protest….. 30 min Reality Speaks 254
They're Shooting News Reporters On Live TV 36 min Reality Speaks 72
HEY "reality freak" you FAT TURD! 37 min Reality Speaks 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages