Comments
21 - 40 of 320 Comments Last updated Feb 3, 2013

“Cats rule.”

Since: Dec 09

Chardon Ohio.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

1

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>You don't even know what an "assault weapon" is. Hint: With very few exceptions, they've been illegal for civilians to own since 1968. And you also don't know the difference between a clip and a magazine. Magazine capacity over 30 has been illegal in Ohio for decades.
Until you stop with your ignorance and emotion, nobody will take you seriously.
Thanks buddy.These people just dont get it.If the government gets away with one thing,all they will want is more.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Catman Dave wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks buddy.These people just dont get it.If the government gets away with one thing,all they will want is more.
Female Democrat trolls are the worst.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Catman Dave wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks buddy.These people just dont get it.If the government gets away with one thing,all they will want is more.
Some upstate counties are essentially nullifying the law, this may force Cuomo to remove some offending parts, but I doubt it.

What I really want to see happen is for the state to be flooded with bogus registrations. An "Anon DDoS" kinda thing.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Female is the worst.
fify

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
fify
I think she and Kosmik eloped.
Sneezles

Cleveland, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

3

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>You don't even know what an "assault weapon" is. Hint: With very few exceptions, they've been illegal for civilians to own since 1968. And you also don't know the difference between a clip and a magazine. Magazine capacity over 30 has been illegal in Ohio for decades.
Until you stop with your ignorance and emotion, nobody will take you seriously.
Why do you always assume everyone is a dumbass and you reign as supreme scholar?
I know all about the guns, bans, etc.
Dumbass.
What kills me is that all you GOP worshipers can't accept the truth in all matters. You believe the paranoid FOX, Rush, and who ever else is spewing the hatred. You thrive on hate.
Methinks you would follow your leader off a cliff if he so commanded.
LMAO

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>I think she and Kosmik eloped.
Three way with Jenny???
Sneezles

Cleveland, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Jan 27, 2013
 
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Go away Cleveland troll, your C-Bus cousin had it handed to him already today.
Just because it says Cleveland doesn't mean I live there,dumb$hit.

LMAO

“Cats rule.”

Since: Dec 09

Chardon Ohio.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Sneezles wrote:
<quoted text>
Just because it says Cleveland doesn't mean I live there,dumb$hit.
LMAO
But if you dont,you aren't far away from there.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Jan 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Sneezles wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you always assume everyone is a dumbass and you reign as supreme scholar?
I know all about the guns, bans, etc.
Dumbass.
What kills me is that all you GOP worshipers can't accept the truth in all matters. You believe the paranoid FOX, Rush, and who ever else is spewing the hatred. You thrive on hate.
Methinks you would follow your leader off a cliff if he so commanded.
LMAO
Typical leftist troll

See my Image?

It says to boycott FNC. I despise all of the MSM.

I might listen to Rush or Beck about 1-3 times a month.

Meanwhile you are doped up on the PD, ABCNBCBSCNNMSNBC, NPR, and the Hollywood filth.

Use your head, Andrew Cuomo really did say he was considering to confiscate guns, and the D leaders of the Assembly agreed with him, but could not get enough Ds in the Senate to agree.

But come next year, the traitorous 12 will be booted out, and the socialist supermajority will confiscate, just as they did in California and New Orleans after Katrina.
Sneezles

Cleveland, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Jan 27, 2013
 
Catman Dave wrote:
<quoted text>But if you dont,you aren't far away from there.
You will never know that, will you?
Lmao
VADoc

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
the socialist supermajority will confiscate, just as they did in California and New Orleans after Katrina.
Exactly. I brought this up a few weeks ago to Che when he said the government isn't and never has tried to take our guns away. I brought up the seizing of thousands of guns from law abiding citizens after Katrina. Amazingly the little fella didn't have a response. That's all it will take and l this current administration is waiting for is an opportune time to confiscate under the guise of safety for the people.

When the shooting in Connecticut happened and they said an AR15 was used I immediately shook my head because I knew just one attack by some whack job with a rifle is all the ammo these morons would need to push their banning agenda. Statistics be damned they don't care they just want their ban because they don't like the citizens having weapons that can be used to stop tyranny from the government. Most people got sad on that day in Connecticut. I guarantee Obama, Feinstein, Reid, and several other high ranking anti-gunners were smiling.

Turns my stomach.
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

VADoc, the left is not alone for wanting strick gun laws. As I've stated before, the main reason to enforce guns by politicians was an effort to keep blacks from getting them. No one white was upset about that though!

Obama cited Reagan's opposition to military-style weapons.

“And by the way, so did Ronald Reagan, one of the staunchest defenders of the Second Amendment, who wrote to Congress in 1994 urging them — this is Ronald Reagan speaking — urging them to listen to the American public and to the law enforcement community and support a ban on the further manufacture of military-style assault weapons."

Reagan, who was shot while president in March, 1981, backed a ban on assault weapons and the Brady Bill, proposed by an anti-gun group formed by the family of Reagan's press secretary, Jim Brady, who was also shot.(See video here.)

Obama Wednesday signed executive orders to strengthen background checks on gun sales, research the causes of gun violence, encourage mental health providers to report patients who own guns and may be prone to violence. Complete list here.

He also encouraged Congress to ban assault weapons, step-up background checks on secondary sellers and purchasers and hire a director of the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms department, which has gone vacant for six years.(see full text of his speech here.)
VADoc

Aiken, SC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

WiseAmerican wrote:
VADoc, the left is not alone for wanting strick gun laws. As I've stated before, the main reason to enforce guns by politicians was an effort to keep blacks from getting them. No one white was upset about that though!
Obama cited Reagan's opposition to military-style weapons.
“And by the way, so did Ronald Reagan, one of the staunchest defenders of the Second Amendment, who wrote to Congress in 1994 urging them — this is Ronald Reagan speaking — urging them to listen to the American public and to the law enforcement community and support a ban on the further manufacture of military-style assault weapons."
Reagan, who was shot while president in March, 1981, backed a ban on assault weapons and the Brady Bill, proposed by an anti-gun group formed by the family of Reagan's press secretary, Jim Brady, who was also shot.(See video here.)
Obama Wednesday signed executive orders to strengthen background checks on gun sales, research the causes of gun violence, encourage mental health providers to report patients who own guns and may be prone to violence. Complete list here.
He also encouraged Congress to ban assault weapons, step-up background checks on secondary sellers and purchasers and hire a director of the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms department, which has gone vacant for six years.(see full text of his speech here.)
It's always about race with you isn't it? Is that all you got?

Jim Crow laws are still in effect. In North Carolina you still have to purchase a license to buy a firearm. This is a holdover from Jim Crow laws.

And sorry I am neither right nor left. I'm against anyone wishing to ban semi auto rifles. Reagan was wrong, bush senior was wrong, and Obama is wrong.

Why should I think differently about Obama? Why do you? I'm guessing because he happens to have a little more melanin in his skin than I do?

Criminals don't buy their guns at the gun store. They buy them on the street and usually at a cheaper price than I pay for mine at the gun shop. Nothing the president is shoveling will do a damn thing to stop anything. It's about a personal agenda and nothing more. He doesn't care about anyone or the deaths of the children in Connecticut. It's just political capital to him.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Sneezles wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you always assume everyone is a dumbass and you reign as supreme scholar?
I know all about the guns, bans, etc.
Dumbass.
What kills me is that all you GOP worshipers can't accept the truth in all matters. You believe the paranoid FOX, Rush, and who ever else is spewing the hatred. You thrive on hate.
Methinks you would follow your leader off a cliff if he so commanded.
LMAO
You're a liar. Your initial post on this thread proves you know nothing about firearms and existing laws. Your immaturity and emotionalism leads you to lash out at the messenger while reinforcing your reputation as an ignorant, low information emotional woman. There's no need to assume that you're a dumbass, you revel in that status with every post.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>You're a liar. Your initial post on this thread proves you know nothing about firearms and existing laws. Your immaturity and emotionalism leads you to lash out at the messenger while reinforcing your reputation as an ignorant, low information emotional woman. There's no need to assume that you're a dumbass, you revel in that status with every post.
http://www.cga.ct.gov/asaferconnecticut/testi...

Read most of the canned testimony of the vast majority of female names. The same stupid is out here as well.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

hey now now wrote:
C'mon Ohio sheriffs
http://cspoa.org/sheriffs-gun-rights/
The following is a list of sheriffs and state sheriff’s associations from who have vowed to uphold and defend the Constitution against Obama’s unlawful gun control measures.
Well, now, isn't that interesting?

I am guessing that Sheriffs in general are already bound to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, and of the state in which they serve.

So, this particular vow means what? specifies what? Is this an expansion or a contraction to what they have already sworn to?

Will they no longer uphold the laws of the US and their state? Only uphold those that they individually believe to be Constitutional?

I suppose we can be somewhat reaassured that 86 out of 88 have NOT seen fit to sign onto this garbage.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, now, isn't that interesting?
I am guessing that Sheriffs in general are already bound to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, and of the state in which they serve.
So, this particular vow means what? specifies what? Is this an expansion or a contraction to what they have already sworn to?
Will they no longer uphold the laws of the US and their state? Only uphold those that they individually believe to be Constitutional?
I suppose we can be somewhat reaassured that 86 out of 88 have NOT seen fit to sign onto this garbage.
Most of the sheriffs in Utah and Idaho have said they will not enforce any new gun laws.

Some constitutionalist upstate NY sheriffs are refusing to enforce Il Duce Cuomo's diktats. One county has outright nullified the law.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Jan 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Catman Dave wrote:
<quoted text>No,but what do you think will happen when the government tries to take peoples guns away?.It's not going to happen.The cops on that list are the smart ones that will live to see many more days.
Catman--calm down.

Only in NRA Fantasy Land is the government planning to storm in and demand all your weapons.

Even Feinstein's bill grandfathers currently owned weapons (unless sold or transferred), although it does allow local entities to use federal dollars for buy-back programs.

And the ban is limited specifically to military-style assault weapons (as defined in the bill).
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Jan 28, 2013
 
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical leftist troll
See my Image?
It says to boycott FNC. I despise all of the MSM.
I might listen to Rush or Beck about 1-3 times a month.
Meanwhile you are doped up on the PD, ABCNBCBSCNNMSNBC, NPR, and the Hollywood filth.
Use your head, Andrew Cuomo really did say he was considering to confiscate guns, and the D leaders of the Assembly agreed with him, but could not get enough Ds in the Senate to agree.
But come next year, the traitorous 12 will be booted out, and the socialist supermajority will confiscate, just as they did in California and New Orleans after Katrina.
If you boycott all media, where do you get your information?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

41 Users are viewing the Columbus Forum right now

Search the Columbus Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 26 min xxxrayted 29,147
Chevrolet Malibu Owners: Problems & Solutions (Jun '06) 26 min kip 2,696
Lois Lerner linked to another erased hard drive 28 min d pantz 83
Do you agree with Texas protecting its own border? 49 min Buckeye at Birth 8
Family Says Murder-Suicide Victim Was Trying To... 2 hr Prince Harming 2
Little Boy Blue's Got a Job in Town 2 hr Flacid Phallis 9
Are PEDOphiles Born That Way 2 hr sidekick 18
•••
•••
•••
•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••