Comments
241 - 260 of 320 Comments Last updated Feb 3, 2013
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#243
Jan 29, 2013
 
VADoc wrote:
<quoted text>
So is healthcare but it never stops you or know it alls like reader from giving your two cents.
I doubt you'll find a single post that I have written on that subject.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#244
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
The court made up judicial review, there is nothing in the Constitution that says the courts can do this, the courts powers were not defined.
Well, its been that way for well over two centuries, and the entirety of the institutions our nation relies on seem to depend upon judicial review continuing on in perpetuity.

I suppose you could try to reverse Marbury. Let me know how that goes.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#245
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

GlitterSucks wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, you are wrong. If you want to spin, go chase your tail.
So that's not what you meant when you wrote this about prisoners?
GlitterSucks wrote:
<quoted text>Oh goodie, then they just get to live on my dime.
woof

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#246
Jan 29, 2013
 
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
So, essentially, you are an anarchist.
woof
No, he's a "less-archist"

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#247
Jan 29, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
So to you, there can be absolutely no gun laws at all. Fair enough.
Sure there can be. "Don't use a gun to commit a crime."

But I'm pretty sure criminals will ignore that one too.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#248
Jan 29, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

1

FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you insist on the right to arms, citing Constitutionality.
No. The right is already mine, existing before the constitution was ever dreamed of. What I insist on is that government honor and protect it, as they promised. The Constitution does not create the right. It only affirms it and says the government will not infringe upon it.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#249
Jan 29, 2013
 
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, he's a "less-archist"
"minarchist"

(not a minarchist)

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#250
Jan 30, 2013
 
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
No. The right is already mine, existing before the constitution was ever dreamed of. What I insist on is that government honor and protect it, as they promised. The Constitution does not create the right. It only affirms it and says the government will not infringe upon it.
So, you are a natural law advocate?

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#251
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you are a natural law advocate?
I think anyone should be able to do as he pleases (and is within his capabilities) as long as he does not harm another. Within those boundaries, yes, I believe that the strong and smart should thrive and the weak and stupid should not.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#252
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
I think anyone should be able to do as he pleases (and is within his capabilities) as long as he does not harm another. Within those boundaries, yes, I believe that the strong and smart should thrive and the weak and stupid should not.
And who determines what is within the capabilities of another?

Can harm prevention be legislated?

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#253
Jan 30, 2013
 
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
And who determines what is within the capabilities of another?
Can harm prevention be legislated?
The courts, mainly

The criminal justice system is meant to exist to control those who are too dangerous to be allowed to exist in society.

Now we have decided to make it into a social work agency as well, which is in effect the legislation of harm prevention.

Is it a good idea?

I don't think so.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
The courts, mainly
The criminal justice system is meant to exist to control those who are too dangerous to be allowed to exist in society.
Now we have decided to make it into a social work agency as well, which is in effect the legislation of harm prevention.
Is it a good idea?
I don't think so.
Well, K, jumping into the middle of a conversation, as you typically do, you are making a confusing mess.

Are you also a natural law advocate, like Tony?

However, the criminal justice system cannot function without a system of laws, which means that someone needs to spell out those things which are too dangerous in society.

But, in addition, we have the protections of the Constitution, so that, for instance, the government cannot just go on a hunt for meth labs by checking out every house on a block by block basis.

And because the application of those protections to multiple instances--not to mention the balancing of protections when they appear to be in conflict--is neither simple, nor do all citizens agree, we have the ultimate role of the Supreme Court.

Now--if Tony is truly a natural law adherent, he rejects all of that in favor of an every man for himself determination of what is acceptable, not dangerous and not likely to have an impact on others.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255
Jan 30, 2013
 
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, K, jumping into the middle of a conversation, as you typically do, you are making a confusing mess.
Are you also a natural law advocate, like Tony?
However, the criminal justice system cannot function without a system of laws, which means that someone needs to spell out those things which are too dangerous in society.
But, in addition, we have the protections of the Constitution, so that, for instance, the government cannot just go on a hunt for meth labs by checking out every house on a block by block basis.
And because the application of those protections to multiple instances--not to mention the balancing of protections when they appear to be in conflict--is neither simple, nor do all citizens agree, we have the ultimate role of the Supreme Court.
Now--if Tony is truly a natural law adherent, he rejects all of that in favor of an every man for himself determination of what is acceptable, not dangerous and not likely to have an impact on others.
A. This isn't a PM, why are you whining that I am contributing to discussion?

B. You seem to be confusing "Natural Law" with "Law of the Jungle"

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#256
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, K, jumping into the middle of a conversation, as you typically do, you are making a confusing mess.
Are you also a natural law advocate, like Tony?
However, the criminal justice system cannot function without a system of laws, which means that someone needs to spell out those things which are too dangerous in society.
But, in addition, we have the protections of the Constitution, so that, for instance, the government cannot just go on a hunt for meth labs by checking out every house on a block by block basis.
And because the application of those protections to multiple instances--not to mention the balancing of protections when they appear to be in conflict--is neither simple, nor do all citizens agree, we have the ultimate role of the Supreme Court.
Now--if Tony is truly a natural law adherent, he rejects all of that in favor of an every man for himself determination of what is acceptable, not dangerous and not likely to have an impact on others.
You mean meth lab operators don't have to register?
But...criminal gunowners will?

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#257
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean meth lab operators don't have to register?
But...criminal gunowners will?
Drugs will make you dependent on the state, guns will free you from it.
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#258
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
I think anyone should be able to do as he pleases (and is within his capabilities) as long as he does not harm another. Within those boundaries, yes, I believe that the strong and smart should thrive and the weak and stupid should not.
Sounds like anarchy to me. By your logic the street thugs and organized gangsters would be the strongest and smartest. But for the police and military, squares like you wouldn't make it in a 'natural law' real life day to day experience.

The survival of the fittest, right? You don't really want to live in a society like that, trust me! The ONLY reason white like yourself were able to make it this far is the laws against the arming of freed slaves, and the police and court system that protect you and your community.

So when I hear about you white men crying about some 2nd amendment BS, I know it's bunk, because most of you would've defend urban blacks gun rights if they had felonies or not. You and your ilk are only concerned with your individual rights as white males in the world. None of you would agree with 150 million black men and women having AR-15's and AK-47's, like the BBP, Malcolm X, US Slaves, The BLA, and other groups (American Indians) wanted for self defense.

All of you who cry about your rights being taken is full of it. You have no ideal as a white male, what it means to have rights restricted or not given by a system by design. No one cares to hear your bull.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259
Jan 30, 2013
 
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
A. This isn't a PM, why are you whining that I am contributing to discussion?
B. You seem to be confusing "Natural Law" with "Law of the Jungle"
Well, most intelligent posters pay attention to what someone is responding to before jumping in to disagree with them. Not saying that you can't do it--just makes you look dimwitted.

The confusion may be Tony's.

However, there are a number of people who post here claiming themselves to be strict Constitutionalists, or Natural Law proponents who are really just picking and choosing bits and pieces of one or the other to justify something that they want.

So--are you also claiming to be an adherent of Natural Law?

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#260
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean meth lab operators don't have to register?
But...criminal gunowners will?
Ummmm, define "criminal gunowner."
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
The courts, mainly
The criminal justice system is meant to exist to control those who are too dangerous to be allowed to exist in society.
Now we have decided to make it into a social work agency as well, which is in effect the legislation of harm prevention.
Is it a good idea?
I don't think so.
Wrong! The criminal Justice system was created in it's largess, to control and enforce statues and laws that were primarily enacted by state and county government for the sole purpose to keep freed blacks in their place. In other words, stay subservient to whites ,eventhough you're free to walk without chains, or we will by force with guns, lock you up or shoot you.

There's no mistaking why so many black males are prohibited by statue, contrary to the 2nd amendment, to carry, own, or even handle a firearm without being sent to prison for doing so. Not committing a crime, just having a firearm, even for home protection, is a 'violation' punishable with up to ten years in prison.

No where in the Constitution does it state that a convicted person is barred FOR LIFE, from owning a firearm! Yet, you sorry lame ass phoney patriots won't fight those statues that are clearly against the "right too bear arms", but you cry and bellyache about certain rifle restrictions! STFU, or stand for solid rights for everyone, as the constitution states!

And don't give me no BS about a Presidential or Governors pardon to get what's rightfully every free citizens right.
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#262
Jan 30, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummmm, define "criminal gunowner."
Everyone knows that's a code word for black male with gun (BMG). Even the term 'criminal' is used to take people's rights away. For example, if a person owns a business, pays state, city, and federal taxes, has a mortgage, kids in college, owns a vehicle, is married, attends church weekly, served in jury duty,ect. but did something stupid in his youth. He has a record of violating some law. He cannot own a firearm, and in the eye's of the stupid and brainwashed, he is still labeled a 'criminal' for a crime he paid for 30 years ago!

This kind of thinking is what many blacks are faced with, millions of blacks and whites, across this country. They are still considered Criminals. And their 2nd amendment right is denied for life. None of these cowards on here will rally against that.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

57 Users are viewing the Columbus Forum right now

Search the Columbus Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 10 min Pope Che Reagan Christ I 29,355
The Sarah Salin Channel 18 min Pope Che Reagan Christ I 4
22 People Indicted As Part Of Columbus To Ports... 27 min Collins 3
Do we need to impeach Obama to save America? 40 min They cannot kill a Spook 63
Do you agree with Eric Holder that criticism of... 46 min They cannot kill a Spook 53
Michael Feldman from - Whad'ya Know?' talks abo... 49 min Big Johnson 1
Trump Says Obama "Biggest Liar I Know" 50 min They cannot kill a Spook 5
Xenos Christian Fellowship is a CULT! (Jul '12) 51 min Concerned Brother 840
•••
•••
•••
Columbus Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••