US discussing giving Russia missile d...
First Prev
of 9
Next Last
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#170 May 16, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Now we know just how old you are, little girl.
You just can't win, so you play these games only to lose again.
You're going to be a battered wife someday if some blind, desperate SOB actually takes you in.
Lose? I made you mad enough to roll out one of your silly little insult posts. And, you are the one who insists the US didn't use nuclear weapons on Japan. I win both of those.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#171 May 16, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Lose? I made you mad enough to roll out one of your silly little insult posts. And, you are the one who insists the US didn't use nuclear weapons on Japan. I win both of those.
The Us did not use nuclear weapons against Japan.

We burt the crap out them with napalm, then dropped 2 atomic bombs on them. Not sure which was worse. Dropping napalm on society to force surrender is fighting with extreme prejudice.

We have never fought for surrender ever again.

Paul Tibbets whose mother was Enola Gay, used to shoot trap with me frequently. I have sat hours in his car driving to shoots on many occasions. I was early 20's and he 60's. Paul lived in Columbus and formed Net Jets.

Paul hit the button Harry Truman ordered him to push. He dove plane hoping explosion did not rip wings off plane. It didn't. His words.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#172 May 16, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
The Us did not use nuclear weapons against Japan.
We burt the crap out them with napalm, then dropped 2 atomic bombs on them.
http://lmgtfy.com/...

Yappari, ne?

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#173 May 16, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
http://lmgtfy.com/...
Yappari, ne?
Try "thermonuclear weapon." That's what your sister Che is referring to.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#174 May 16, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Try "thermonuclear weapon." That's what your sister Che is referring to.
We've been over this numerous times Paco. You inserted that prefix after the discussion about nuclear weapons had already been started.

That's just the way you roll.

woof
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#175 May 16, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
http://lmgtfy.com/...
Yappari, ne?
you libs continue to re-define things.

want to compare a 1946 car to a 2013 model as the same also. Both have engines and wheels.

notice the experiment with different materials. notice the 1945 version is called fission. The 2013 is nuclear, and just 100 times more powerful at minimum?.

in 1945 a rotary phone was all there was. Want to tell me how it is the same as a cell phone.

your childish dictionary written by paid trolls like you is not reality.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#176 May 16, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Try "thermonuclear weapon." That's what your sister Che is referring to.
No, I am most certainly not. I am referring to this:
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>You just keep making my case. There were no "nuclear" bombs until late 1952 and even then it was undeliverable. You're so poorly educated that you don't even know the difference between fission and fusion weapons.
And yes, if we had destroyed the Chinese army in 1950 and told the Soviets to forget about their weapons projects, the world sure would have been a better and freer place.
And they let people like you vote...
This is the post were you insisted that nuclear bombs were developed until 1952. No thermo in that nuclear, 3.1

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#177 May 16, 2013
Ah, reading back it looked like you said something pretty stupid and then tried to back pedal into a different position.
Which seems a lot less intellectually honest than saying "Heh, sorry, flubbed that up".
So far as RS, bless his dear little face, anything we can do to get him learning basic world history is great so I thank you for presenting a teachable moment.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#178 May 16, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
you libs continue to re-define things.
want to compare a 1946 car to a 2013 model as the same also. Both have engines and wheels.
notice the experiment with different materials. notice the 1945 version is called fission. The 2013 is nuclear, and just 100 times more powerful at minimum?.
in 1945 a rotary phone was all there was. Want to tell me how it is the same as a cell phone.
your childish dictionary written by paid trolls like you is not reality.
Both cars and both phones, Walter.

I love it when you guys deny reality. Tell us about how we don't breathe oxygen next.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#179 May 16, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
you libs continue to re-define things.
want to compare a 1946 car to a 2013 model as the same also. Both have engines and wheels.
notice the experiment with different materials. notice the 1945 version is called fission. The 2013 is nuclear, and just 100 times more powerful at minimum?.
in 1945 a rotary phone was all there was. Want to tell me how it is the same as a cell phone.
your childish dictionary written by paid trolls like you is not reality.
I'm not sure the issue you have is with liberals redefining terms, so much as an issue with science.

We've not just redefined the A-bomb as a nuclear bomb to win an internet argument. It *is* a nuclear weapon.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#180 May 16, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not sure the issue you have is with liberals redefining terms, so much as an issue with science.
We've not just redefined the A-bomb as a nuclear bomb to win an internet argument. It *is* a nuclear weapon.
I've never really given it much thought until now but I think thermonuclear families came along shortly after the development of thermonuclear weapons.

I wonder what Paco has to say about that.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#181 May 16, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Both cars and both phones, Walter.
I love it when you guys deny reality. Tell us about how we don't breathe oxygen next.
My 59 Studebaker is much better constructed than some of the crap coming out of assembly lines today.

woof

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#182 May 16, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
We've been over this numerous times Paco. You inserted that prefix after the discussion about nuclear weapons had already been started.
That's just the way you roll.
woof
Get a dictionary and find, "colloquial." Surely a "lawyer" is capable of such a task.

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#183 May 16, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not sure the issue you have is with liberals redefining terms, so much as an issue with science.
We've not just redefined the A-bomb as a nuclear bomb to win an internet argument. It *is* a nuclear weapon.
Except Che was referring to thermonuclear weapons or if it makes it easier for you, fission weapons vs fusion weapons.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#184 May 16, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Get a dictionary and find, "colloquial." Surely a "lawyer" is capable of such a task.
And I've already told you before that your attempt to write this off as a merely colloquial use of the term "nuclear" doesn't get you where you're trying to go.

Just give it up, Fred. You were wrong days ago, and you still are.

woof

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#185 May 16, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
And I've already told you before that your attempt to write this off as a merely colloquial use of the term "nuclear" doesn't get you where you're trying to go.
Just give it up, Fred. You were wrong days ago, and you still are.
woof
Odd that only you and you daughter think so while at least eight other posters disagree with you...
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#186 May 16, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Except Che was referring to thermonuclear weapons or if it makes it easier for you, fission weapons vs fusion weapons.
Bbbbbuttt...Che wasn't. You were.

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 9
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Burn in Hell White Pigs, Go Fight Real Crime, N... 2 hr Alternative Facts... 73
Dems in disarray- Well, yeah! 2 hr OJ Simpson 926
Robert Mueller Investigating Donald Trump 2 hr Pale Rider 479
Why are Trump's Kids so ugly? 3 hr Duke for Mayor 19
News Scandal forces appraisal of gay issues | The Co... (Oct '10) 3 hr A Brutha Gotta Know 258
O J is free on parole, Goldmans still bitter 3 hr Duke for Mayor 4
older women needing spanked? 9 hr o_o-Ho0t-o_o 62

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages