US discussing giving Russia missile d...

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#127 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You are doing it again George. You are hiding. It's a simple question.
Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?
Not thermonuclear weapons.
We can do this all day, little girl.

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#128 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
George is getting angry.
Are you kidding? I'm just stating facts.
You're illiterate when it comes to reading people.
Duke for Mayor

United States

#129 May 10, 2013
George gets mad when his hypocrisy is so easily exposed. He should. He's not doing a very good job of hiding it.

woof
Duke for Mayor

United States

#130 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Not thermonuclear weapons.
We can do this all day, little girl.
But that's not the word Karl used when he brought the subject up. And you never said a peep about it.

Poor George.

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#131 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Not thermonuclear weapons.
We can do this all day, little girl.
We all know that they weren't thermonuclear weapons, Georgie. That would be relevant if that were the question. Answering the question, "Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?" with "they were not thermonuclear weapons" is the same as answering it with "they were not chicken sandwiches."

So let's give it another shot.

Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#132 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Not thermonuclear weapons.
We can do this all day, little girl.
Their lawyers, they earn their living off of finding one word out of place.

If they find anything wrong, its another "George is wrong, we banned him so much" line similar to the troll that started the WOIO threats.

Nothing but leeches they are. Parasites.

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#133 May 10, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
But that's not the word Karl used when he brought the subject up. And you never said a peep about it.
Poor George.
woof
Are you able to read? Because I only go after my enemies. You should appreciate that as a "lawyer."

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#134 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
We all know that they weren't thermonuclear weapons, Georgie. That would be relevant if that were the question. Answering the question, "Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?" with "they were not thermonuclear weapons" is the same as answering it with "they were not chicken sandwiches."
So let's give it another shot.
Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?
Is a chicken fried steak sandwich a chicken sandwich?
Duke for Mayor

United States

#135 May 10, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Their lawyers, they earn their living off of finding one word out of place.
If they find anything wrong, its another "George is wrong, we banned him so much" line similar to the troll that started the WOIO threats.
Nothing but leeches they are. Parasites.
Words have meaning Karl, sometimes very specific meaning.

Why do some people get upset when someone else points that out?

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#136 May 10, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Their lawyers, they earn their living off of finding one word out of place.
If they find anything wrong, its another "George is wrong, we banned him so much" line similar to the troll that started the WOIO threats.
Nothing but leeches they are. Parasites.
Come on now, Karl. You already admitted that Georgie was wrong. Don't lose that little bit of backbone you discovered. Georgie is the one who is playing games with the words. He is the one who keeps wanting to substitute "thermonuclear" for "nuclear."

This really isn't that difficult. Do you have the integrity to answer the question?

Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#137 May 10, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Words have meaning Karl, sometimes very specific meaning.
The left is the side that likes to pretend words mean something else, redefine the words, or pretend they have no meaning.

You hung yourself there.

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#138 May 10, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Words have meaning Karl, sometimes very specific meaning.
Why do some people get upset when someone else points that out?
woof
This isn't a courtroom or a legal document. But your daughter was exposed as an idiot and then frantically ransacked Google to try and save her sorry ass by playing lawyer.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#139 May 10, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Is a chicken fried steak sandwich a chicken sandwich?
What?
Duke for Mayor

United States

#140 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text> Are you able to read? Because I only go after my enemies. You should appreciate that as a "lawyer."
Yes I'm able to read. That's why I've honed in on posts 15 and 16 in this thread to get at the heart of this ridiculous argument you've started.

In post 15, Karl used "nuclear", referring to pre-thermonuclear weapons in a general sense.

In post 16, you switched it to "atomic".

Now you're dug in, refusing to admit that the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were indeed "nuclear" weapons.

You're an idiot.

woof

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#141 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>

Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?
In 1945, that wasn't the popular term.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#142 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>This isn't a courtroom or a legal document. But your daughter was exposed as an idiot and then frantically ransacked Google to try and save her sorry ass by playing lawyer.
Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?
Zero point Zero

Sharon Center, OH

#143 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
CLICK!
What?
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#144 May 10, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I'm able to read. That's why I've honed in on posts 15 and 16 in this thread to get at the heart of this ridiculous argument you've started.
In post 15, Karl used "nuclear", referring to pre-thermonuclear weapons in a general sense.
In post 16, you switched it to "atomic".
Now you're dug in, refusing to admit that the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were indeed "nuclear" weapons.
You're an idiot.
woof
Read posts 27 and 28. It gets even better.

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#145 May 10, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I'm able to read. That's why I've honed in on posts 15 and 16 in this thread to get at the heart of this ridiculous argument you've started.
In post 15, Karl used "nuclear", referring to pre-thermonuclear weapons in a general sense.
In post 16, you switched it to "atomic".
Now you're dug in, refusing to admit that the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were indeed "nuclear" weapons.
You're an idiot.
woof
You wouldn't know the difference between those weapons to save your life, douche. Go look up the word 'colloquial' and grow up.
Duke for Mayor

United States

#146 May 10, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
MacArthur was responsible for the organizational collapse of the Army forces in Korea before Incheon. He failed to maintain standards in Japan.
He overextended his supply lines nearing the Yalu.
A general without his ego would not have made the same mistake.
Though at the time we would have been able to beat the Chinese in nuclear combat, it would have lowered the threshold.
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>We were the only nation on the planet with deployable and deliverable atomic weapons at the time. We should have used them on military targets and laid down the law.
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. The world would be a better place if only we would have dropped more nuclear bombs. You are a troglodyte.
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>You just keep making my case. There were no "nuclear" bombs until late 1952 and even then it was undeliverable. You're so poorly educated that you don't even know the difference between fission and fusion weapons.
And yes, if we had destroyed the Chinese army in 1950 and told the Soviets to forget about their weapons projects, the world sure would have been a better and freer place.
And they let people like you vote...
Aaaah the sweet smell of hypocrisy.

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Please help me find the love of my life 5 min Trenton 1
Should the GOP cut its loses? 14 min MarkJ- 899
Trump the Liar 29 min Pale Rider 927
33% women would swap IQ for larger breasts (Mar '12) 31 min Pam 29
I wish our cat would die. 1 hr They cannot kill ... 89
did RS write this on his super sized boat 2 hr Catman Dave 5
Black Voters should Remove Clinton CHAINS 2 hr Blacks-LOOSEfromC... 1
News Hillary Clinton tops Donald Trump in battlegrou... 3 hr Vote for Jill Stein 256

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages