“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#85 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>I ask myself that from time to time. Then I realize that it melts her down a little at a time. She's soon to be at Kosmik levels. She'll be talking about her behind the scenes work on the OJ trial and her sharing the inner-most backdoor fantasies of Jodi Arias.
Seville Ohio 2,296

97% White

0.7% Black (16)
0.2% Native American (4)
0.5% Asian (12)
1.5% Latin (34)

Considering that non-whites are a statistical margin of error in Seville, I doubt that Che really understands much about race at all.

There are more blacks at my place of work than live there.

Not to forget that those 4 Native Americans are dollars to donuts just like Elizabeth Warren.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#86 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>No, little girl, YOU changed the subject by trying to say that the colloquial terms for the weapons don't apply and that their destructive power isn't vastly different.
Fission bombs = "Atomic."
Fusion bombs = "Nuclear."
Nomenclature as it applies to the SUBJECT and TIME actually count, kid. You made yourself look like a moron and then you doubled down. As always, you lost.
No, that isn't what happened at all. What happened was this. I wrote,
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. The world would be a better place if only we would have dropped more nuclear bombs.
to which you responded in the very next post,
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text> There were no "nuclear" bombs until late 1952 and even then it was undeliverable.
Very simple. Nothing about nomenclature of the times. Nothing about the destructive power of Fat Boy versus a warhead of today. Just your simple declaration that the bombs used in WWII on Japan were not nuclear weapons.

Now, you can't even answer a simple yes or no question. Sad.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#87 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>FISSION weapons colloquially known as "Atomic."
Not surprised you would try to dodge the question. That's ok, I will ask it again. It doesn't require a complicated answer, just a "yes" or a "no."

Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#88 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Karl. Work your wiki magic for Georgie and teach him what types of weapons are included in the term "nuclear."
why does it matter, and liberals re-define words to suit their agenda anyway.

have some baby feet for a decoration on your xbox stand. you have no desk like your God Kermit the butcher.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#89 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Not surprised you would try to dodge the question. That's ok, I will ask it again. It doesn't require a complicated answer, just a "yes" or a "no."
Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?
fat man was your daddy, and you are the little boy
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#90 May 10, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
why does it matter, and liberals re-define words to suit their agenda anyway.
have some baby feet for a decoration on your xbox stand. you have no desk like your God Kermit the butcher.
Ask your boy Georgie why it matters. He is the one who made this an issue and now is running away from it like a child.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#91 May 10, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
fat man was your daddy, and you are the little boy
Wow. Brilliant.
They cannot kill a Spook

Toledo, OH

#92 May 10, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
fat man was your daddy, and you are the little boy
What is the ratio of your axles in that truck? 17 plus isn't bad
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#93 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Not surprised you would try to dodge the question. That's ok, I will ask it again. It doesn't require a complicated answer, just a "yes" or a "no."
Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?
why does it matter?

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#94 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Not surprised you would try to dodge the question. That's ok, I will ask it again. It doesn't require a complicated answer, just a "yes" or a "no."
Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?
This isn't a courtroom little girl. I answered your questions even as you already knew the answers. Those weapons were not thermonuclear.
You're embarrassing yourself.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#95 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask your boy Georgie why it matters. He is the one who made this an issue and now is running away from it like a child.
Running away? I'm exposing you, again, for the kind of loser who gets caught being a moron and then desperately tries to get out by parsing definitions. You ain't Bill Clinton, and the word isn't, "is."
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#96 May 10, 2013
They cannot kill a Spook wrote:
<quoted text>
What is the ratio of your axles in that truck? 17 plus isn't bad
Factory...I honestly don't know.

I have been playing to find fuel mileage. Stock at 70MPH it averaged 16.5. 6 speed allison tranny.

added new air intake, MBRP 5" turbo back exhaust with new up pipe as well last night. No ideas if that does anything till I check. Today is not a good day to check, as I am towing close to 15,000 pounds. I should be able to feel difference so I am told. Exhaust was only $285 shipped to my door, and took a little over an hour to install. Intake took another hour.

turbo pipe sucked putting on because of no room. had to remove front tire to get to it. Tires on this truck weigh as much as a Prius. Good gravy they are heavy.

17.5 at 70mph with air on. Tailgate removed it will receive 18.7 at 75mph over 380 miles. Did it yesterday. How it has better mileage at 75 or 80 over 65 still baffles me.

Getting the programmer EFI live with layered tunes, and am told I will see over 20 as a highway average.

My Jeep Grand Cherokee never saw 20mpg ever. You could almost put the grand cherokee in the bed of this truck. I just wish I could made it ride better when no load is on it. With boat behind or a bed full, it is smooth as any luxury car. Empty it jolts you fairly rough.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#97 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>This isn't a courtroom little girl. I answered your questions even as you already knew the answers. Those weapons were not thermonuclear.
You're embarrassing yourself.
The question wasn't if they were thermonuclear. The question was if they were nuclear. You won't answer a simple question and you say that someone else is embarrassing themselves.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#98 May 10, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
why does it matter?
Because Georgie made a fool of himself and it is fun watching him trying to squirm his way out of it. That's why.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#99 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Running away? I'm exposing you, again, for the kind of loser who gets caught being a moron and then desperately tries to get out by parsing definitions. You ain't Bill Clinton, and the word isn't, "is."
This whole comedy could end if you had the balls to answer a simple question.

Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#100 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Running away? I'm exposing you, again, for the kind of loser who gets caught being a moron and then desperately tries to get out by parsing definitions. You ain't Bill Clinton, and the word isn't, "is."
Parsing definitions. That's a good one coming from the guy who when asked if Fat Man and Little Boy were nuclear weapons says "they were not thermonuclear weapons." This is a hoot.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#101 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
This whole comedy could end if you had the balls to answer a simple question.
Were Fat Man and Little Boy nuclear weapons or not?
This isn't court, little girl. I answered your question ten times and you act like a little spoiled girl after being caught admitting to not using the terms as defined by the scientific community.
I'll tell you what...tell us where you went to college and law school and you'll get your childish wish.
They cannot kill a Spook

Toledo, OH

#102 May 10, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
Factory...I honestly don't know.
I have been playing to find fuel mileage. Stock at 70MPH it averaged 16.5. 6 speed allison tranny.
added new air intake, MBRP 5" turbo back exhaust with new up pipe as well last night. No ideas if that does anything till I check. Today is not a good day to check, as I am towing close to 15,000 pounds. I should be able to feel difference so I am told. Exhaust was only $285 shipped to my door, and took a little over an hour to install. Intake took another hour.
turbo pipe sucked putting on because of no room. had to remove front tire to get to it. Tires on this truck weigh as much as a Prius. Good gravy they are heavy.
17.5 at 70mph with air on. Tailgate removed it will receive 18.7 at 75mph over 380 miles. Did it yesterday. How it has better mileage at 75 or 80 over 65 still baffles me.
Getting the programmer EFI live with layered tunes, and am told I will see over 20 as a highway average.
My Jeep Grand Cherokee never saw 20mpg ever. You could almost put the grand cherokee in the bed of this truck. I just wish I could made it ride better when no load is on it. With boat behind or a bed full, it is smooth as any luxury car. Empty it jolts you fairly rough.
The intake probably won't gain you much more. You are getting to the asymptote of improvements external gaining mileage.

The higher speed is possibility do to the tranny going into over drive and less fuel being pushed to maintain that speed.

As for the ride you could put in air ride seat for the driver..... let the passengers bounce.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#103 May 10, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Parsing definitions. That's a good one coming from the guy who when asked if Fat Man and Little Boy were nuclear weapons says "they were not thermonuclear weapons." This is a hoot.
You're saying they were? You're just digging that hole deeper and deeper.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#104 May 10, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Running away? I'm exposing you, again, for the kind of loser who gets caught being a moron and then desperately tries to get out by parsing definitions. You ain't Bill Clinton, and the word isn't, "is."
Hi Paco.

Remember the day I showed you the text of the Federal Terrorism statute that defines the crime of "domestic terrorism"? Remember how I showed you that Adam Lanza and TJ Lane were domestic terrorists, despite your stubborn refusal to acknowledge those facts?

Or how about the time I showed you that William Rehnquist wrote the initial SC opinion finding that hate crimes legislation does not infringe free speech rights?

Remember how you ran away like a frightened turtle, never to speak upon those subjects ever again?

Those were fun times, eh Paco?

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 11 min Pope Che Reagan C... 4,059
President Ebola 13 min Black Rhino 731
Kaci Hickox : Maine nurse who vows to break Ebo... 2 hr Law abiding citizen 7
Fall SPOOKTACULAR 3 hr They cannot kill ... 5
Autopsy, toxicology report on Michael Brown 4 hr Reality Speaks 287
Second person arrested for South Side homicide ... (Jul '10) 7 hr TRU OR DUNN DUNN 28
Breaking: Second Nurse w/ Ebola flies with 99.5... 15 hr Male 149
Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13) 16 hr Id rather not 2,483

Freeze Watch for Franklin County was issued at October 31 at 11:12AM EDT

Columbus Dating
Find my Match

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]