Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#41 May 9, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
The other reference is towards "atomic" vs "nuclear"
Fission bombs were labled "atomic" bombs
"fusion" bombs are labled "thermonuclear" which then became "nuclear" bombs
Now, wiki labels "atomic" as a misnomer, but that's the historical term.
George didn't get it wrong.
You are really going to let ol' Georgie drag you down with him, eh? I thought you were smarter than that. I never used the term "atomic."
Professor Bigsby stepped on his Johnson and now you are stomping on yours too. You are even going to abandon your most trusted source of information.

"A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#42 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>And if I had mentioned the connection between fission and fusion, you still would have cried, Johnson. So spare me and remember not only what I majored in but in what era I studied.
Where did you go to school, little man?
BTW, ask the people of Tokyo, Hamburg and Dresden if they were better off than the denizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
I can almost hear you stammering and stuttering from here. Tells us more about how the atomic bombs dropped on Japan didn't derive their power from a nuclear level, professor. Exactly what type of fission created those really big explosions?

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#43 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You are really going to let ol' Georgie drag you down with him, eh? I thought you were smarter than that. I never used the term "atomic."
Professor Bigsby stepped on his Johnson and now you are stomping on yours too. You are even going to abandon your most trusted source of information.
"A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons
Ok, he was wrong, nothing I said regarding atomic was, as I said that wiki called it a misnomer.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#45 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You are really going to let ol' Georgie drag you down with him, eh? I thought you were smarter than that. I never used the term "atomic."
Professor Bigsby stepped on his Johnson and now you are stomping on yours too. You are even going to abandon your most trusted source of information.
"A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons
I stepped on nothing but your neck...as usual:

There are two types of atomic explosions that can be facilitated by Uranium-235: fission and fusion. Fission, simply put, is a nuclear reaction in which an atomic nucleus splits into fragments, usually two fragments of comparable mass, emitting 100 million to several hundred million volts of energy. This energy is expelled explosively and violently in the atomic bomb. A fusion reaction is usually started with a fission reaction, but unlike the fission (atomic) bomb, the fusion (hydrogen) bomb derives its power from the fusing of nuclei of various hydrogen isotopes into helium nuclei.
http://inventors.about.com/od/nstartinvention...

“Hereeeeee'ssss UR Pizza”

Since: May 13

Columbus, OH

#46 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah. The people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki gave a rat's ass about the difference between fission and fusion, 3.1.
And of course fission has nothing to do with creating explosions at a nuclear level, does it? Not only are you a paper tiger, you are a paper scholar. The more you type, the more apparent it is that even your claimed GPA is a gross exaggeration (the sheer amusement of a grown man bragging about his GPA aside).
Folks are catching on to you 0.0

Being a vapid troll is no way to go through life eh.

Duke is on the other line, he says come on home, he wants your help with table tennis

WOLF

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#47 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I can almost hear you stammering and stuttering from here. Tells us more about how the atomic bombs dropped on Japan didn't derive their power from a nuclear level, professor. Exactly what type of fission created those really big explosions?
See post #45, little girl.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#48 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>I stepped on nothing but your neck...as usual:
There are two types of atomic explosions that can be facilitated by Uranium-235: fission and fusion. Fission, simply put, is a nuclear reaction in which an atomic nucleus splits into fragments, usually two fragments of comparable mass, emitting 100 million to several hundred million volts of energy. This energy is expelled explosively and violently in the atomic bomb. A fusion reaction is usually started with a fission reaction, but unlike the fission (atomic) bomb, the fusion (hydrogen) bomb derives its power from the fusing of nuclei of various hydrogen isotopes into helium nuclei.
http://inventors.about.com/od/nstartinvention...
But, Georgie. First you said there were no nuclear bombs before 1952. Now you are saying that fission is a nuclear reaction that causes energy to be expelled explosively and violently in an atomic bomb which clearly existed in 1945. Which is it?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#49 May 9, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, he was wrong, nothing I said regarding atomic was, as I said that wiki called it a misnomer.
That's better Karl. No use letting Georgie's pigheadedness drag you down too.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#50 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
But, Georgie. First you said there were no nuclear bombs before 1952. Now you are saying that fission is a nuclear reaction that causes energy to be expelled explosively and violently in an atomic bomb which clearly existed in 1945. Which is it?
Quibbling over a single word, but ignoring the massive lies of Kosmik.

Typical fraud Che.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#51 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>See post #45, little girl.
Come on Georgie. You used to brag about how you could always admit when you were wrong. Karl's already admitted it. Are you going to lose that last shred of integrity too?

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#52 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
That's better Karl. No use letting Georgie's pigheadedness drag you down too.
No worries, the revolution will take all of you parasites down.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#53 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
But, Georgie. First you said there were no nuclear bombs before 1952. Now you are saying that fission is a nuclear reaction that causes energy to be expelled explosively and violently in an atomic bomb which clearly existed in 1945. Which is it?
And you refuse to admit that you're using the terms "atomic" and "nuclear" interchangeably when referring to yields. Higher yields are produced by fusion weapons, colloquially called "nuclear weapons." They were not in existence until 1952 and not deployable until 1954.
You know damn well the discussion was about low kiloton yield weapons known as "atomic bombs." Spin your way all over this forum, kid...your stupid "gotcha" nonsense doesn't work.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#54 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Come on Georgie. You used to brag about how you could always admit when you were wrong. Karl's already admitted it. Are you going to lose that last shred of integrity too?
I'm not wrong. Try harder, little girl.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#55 May 9, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Quibbling over a single word, but ignoring the massive lies of Kosmik.
Typical fraud Che.
Quibbling? Your boy insisted there were no nuclear bombs until 1952 and insisted that anyone who thought otherwise was too stupid to be allowed to vote. He threw down the gauntlet on this one, Karl. I just picked it up.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#56 May 9, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
No worries, the revolution will take all of you parasites down.
You have repeatedly proven yourself to be a gracious loser.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#57 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Quibbling? Your boy insisted there were no nuclear bombs until 1952 and insisted that anyone who thought otherwise was too stupid to be allowed to vote. He threw down the gauntlet on this one, Karl. I just picked it up.
Hey dummy:

A thermonuclear weapon is a nuclear weapon design that uses the heat generated by a fission bomb to compress and ignite a nuclear fusion stage. This indirectly results in a greatly increased energy yield—explosive "power". It is colloquially referred to as a hydrogen bomb or H-bomb because it employs hydrogen fusion, though in most applications the majority of its destructive energy comes from uranium fission, not hydrogen fusion alone. The fusion stage in such weapons is required to efficiently cause the large quantities of fission characteristic of most thermonuclear weapons.[1]

The concept of the thermonuclear weapon was first developed and used in 1952 and has since been used in most of the world's nuclear weapons.[2] The modern design of all thermonuclear weapons in the United States is known as the Teller-Ulam design for its two chief contributors, Edward Teller and Stanislaw Ulam, who developed it in 1951 for the U.S., with certain concepts developed with the contribution of John von Neumann. The first test of this principle was the "Ivy Mike" nuclear test in 1952, conducted by the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_we...

THAT is what is colloquially referred to as a "nuclear bomb" and that is exactly what you were referring to.
What a moron you are...caught and you lie and never stop.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#58 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You have repeatedly proven yourself to be a gracious loser.
He hasn't lost. You've spun yourself into a tizzy trying to convince everyone otherwise.

“Hereeeeee'ssss UR Pizza”

Since: May 13

Columbus, OH

#59 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
But, Georgie. First you said there were no nuclear bombs before 1952. Now you are saying that fission is a nuclear reaction that causes energy to be expelled explosively and violently in an atomic bomb which clearly existed in 1945. Which is it?
Hey 0.0

It is one thing to be a moron, it is a total different thing to post and prove it.
Please stop embarrassing yourself.

Duke says come on home babe, I got a great table tennis game for ya.

I guess only you know what he means huh 0.0

“Hereeeeee'ssss UR Pizza”

Since: May 13

Columbus, OH

#60 May 9, 2013
WOLF

“I made PRISM by myself”

Since: May 13

USS Iowa 1983 Mediterranean

#61 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Hey dummy:
A thermonuclear weapon is a nuclear weapon design that uses the heat generated by a fission bomb to compress and ignite a nuclear fusion stage. This indirectly results in a greatly increased energy yield—explosive "power". It is colloquially referred to as a hydrogen bomb or H-bomb because it employs hydrogen fusion, though in most applications the majority of its destructive energy comes from uranium fission, not hydrogen fusion alone. The fusion stage in such weapons is required to efficiently cause the large quantities of fission characteristic of most thermonuclear weapons.[1]
The concept of the thermonuclear weapon was first developed and used in 1952 and has since been used in most of the world's nuclear weapons.[2] The modern design of all thermonuclear weapons in the United States is known as the Teller-Ulam design for its two chief contributors, Edward Teller and Stanislaw Ulam, who developed it in 1951 for the U.S., with certain concepts developed with the contribution of John von Neumann. The first test of this principle was the "Ivy Mike" nuclear test in 1952, conducted by the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_we...
THAT is what is colloquially referred to as a "nuclear bomb" and that is exactly what you were referring to.
What a moron you are...caught and you lie and never stop.
liar liar, your pants would be on fire if not for Ronnie the coward

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BizzyBee baking secrets 15 min They cannot kill ... 29
Taxes----- who pays taxes? 18 min Pope Che Reagan C... 24
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 20 min Pope Che Reagan C... 5,523
Update: dangerous Muslim travels 29 min Reality Speaks 8
homosexuality is a "lifestyle choice" 33 min Reality Speaks 157
Xenos Christian Fellowship is a CULT! (Jul '12) 1 hr Xeniod 1,036
Mayor Coleman on Ikea: Voters' 'No. 1 retail wish' 1 hr Reality Speaks 5
More Christian Murderers 1 hr Reality Speaks 22
Columbus Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:43 am PST

NFL 8:43AM
Jimmy Haslam: Browns have to get a QB in 2015
Bleacher Report 9:17 AM
Jimmy Haslam Speaks on Browns' 2015 QB Situation
Bleacher Report12:23 PM
Manziel's Teammates Discuss QB's Rookie Season
Yahoo! Sports12:24 PM
Report: Cleveland Browns 'wrecked' by Johnny Manziel's rookie season
NBC Sports12:46 PM
Teammate: Manziel was a "100 percent joke" as a rookie