Comments
21 - 40 of 177 Comments Last updated May 16, 2013

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
May 9, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
What a bunch of paper tiger loons.
Excuse me, Tovarisch?
just saying

Reynoldsburg, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
May 9, 2013
 
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps its one of those Purgatory cases.
woof
Then it has still been answered and decided - delayed entry but entry none the less.

Or perhaps he's just pushing daisies.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
May 9, 2013
 
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Excuse me, Tovarisch?
Funny how you knew I was talking about you.
Zero point Zero

Litchfield, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
CLICK!
tee hee

“Hereeeeee'ssss UR Pizza”

Since: May 13

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

Zero point Zero wrote:
<quoted text>
tee hee
excellent!!!!

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how you knew I was talking about you.
You were talking to all of us, little girl. You hate the fact that not only are we right, but you're so ignorant of history that the entire thread has you bewildered. Naturally you know only to try and cope by lashing out.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>You were talking to all of us, little girl. You hate the fact that not only are we right, but you're so ignorant of history that the entire thread has you bewildered. Naturally you know only to try and cope by lashing out.
Right. The world would be a better place if only we would have dropped more nuclear bombs. You are a troglodyte.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
May 9, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. The world would be a better place if only we would have dropped more nuclear bombs. You are a troglodyte.
You just keep making my case. There were no "nuclear" bombs until late 1952 and even then it was undeliverable. You're so poorly educated that you don't even know the difference between fission and fusion weapons.
And yes, if we had destroyed the Chinese army in 1950 and told the Soviets to forget about their weapons projects, the world sure would have been a better and freer place.
And they let people like you vote...
Zero point Zero

Litchfield, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
CLICK!
nuked

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>You just keep making my case. There were no "nuclear" bombs until late 1952 and even then it was undeliverable. You're so poorly educated that you don't even know the difference between fission and fusion weapons.
And yes, if we had destroyed the Chinese army in 1950 and told the Soviets to forget about their weapons projects, the world sure would have been a better and freer place.
And they let people like you vote...
If it was up to them, they'd be the only ones voting.

In Europe, they're called "Commissioners"
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>You just keep making my case. There were no "nuclear" bombs until late 1952 and even then it was undeliverable. You're so poorly educated that you don't even know the difference between fission and fusion weapons.
And yes, if we had destroyed the Chinese army in 1950 and told the Soviets to forget about their weapons projects, the world sure would have been a better and freer place.
And they let people like you vote...
Yeah. The people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki gave a rat's ass about the difference between fission and fusion, 3.1.

And of course fission has nothing to do with creating explosions at a nuclear level, does it? Not only are you a paper tiger, you are a paper scholar. The more you type, the more apparent it is that even your claimed GPA is a gross exaggeration (the sheer amusement of a grown man bragging about his GPA aside).
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
If it was up to them, they'd be the only ones voting.
In Europe, they're called "Commissioners"
Karl. Work your wiki magic for Georgie and teach him what types of weapons are included in the term "nuclear."
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

There is about to be a massive change of subject on this thread. Wait for it...

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Karl. Work your wiki magic for Georgie and teach him what types of weapons are included in the term "nuclear."
He was referring to the USSR nuclear arsenal, they didn't have a weaponized form in 1952.

Bring it amateur physicist

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

The other reference is towards "atomic" vs "nuclear"

Fission bombs were labled "atomic" bombs

"fusion" bombs are labled "thermonuclear" which then became "nuclear" bombs

Now, wiki labels "atomic" as a misnomer, but that's the historical term.

George didn't get it wrong.
Big Johnson

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>You just keep making my case. There were no "nuclear" bombs until late 1952 and even then it was undeliverable. You're so poorly educated that you don't even know the difference between fission and fusion weapons.
And yes, if we had destroyed the Chinese army in 1950 and told the Soviets to forget about their weapons projects, the world sure would have been a better and freer place.
And they let people like you vote...
Why do you spit in the faces of the survivors of nuclear warfare?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
May 9, 2013
 
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
He was referring to the USSR nuclear arsenal, they didn't have a weaponized form in 1952.
Bring it amateur physicist
He was? That's a pretty weird interpretation of what he wrote considering it was in response to my post that said,
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. The world would be a better place if only we would have dropped more nuclear bombs. You are a troglodyte.
Now why would a guy who graduated with a 3.1 in international relations lecture about the USSR's nuclear arsenal when I mused about if "we would have dropped more nuclear bombs?"

You know damn well what he was talking about, and it wasn't the USSR.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
May 9, 2013
 
Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you spit in the faces of the survivors of nuclear warfare?
Because an invasion would have killed millions more.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
May 9, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah. The people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki gave a rat's ass about the difference between fission and fusion, 3.1.
And of course fission has nothing to do with creating explosions at a nuclear level, does it? Not only are you a paper tiger, you are a paper scholar. The more you type, the more apparent it is that even your claimed GPA is a gross exaggeration (the sheer amusement of a grown man bragging about his GPA aside).
And if I had mentioned the connection between fission and fusion, you still would have cried, Johnson. So spare me and remember not only what I majored in but in what era I studied.
Where did you go to school, little man?

BTW, ask the people of Tokyo, Hamburg and Dresden if they were better off than the denizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
May 9, 2013
 
Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you spit in the faces of the survivors of nuclear warfare?
There you go with your stupidity again. They were the enemy, for one thing. Bad things happen in wars, little girl. No doubt you wish an invasion had occurred instead, resulting in at least one million American casualties.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

41 Users are viewing the Columbus Forum right now

Search the Columbus Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
ISIS beheads James Foley 8 min sidekick 31
Debate: Ferguson - Columbus, OH 24 min Duke for Mayor 63
Do you agree with Obama's plan to fundamentally... 32 min They cannot kill ... 176
angela james 33 min Duke for Mayor 2
OH Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 40 min Reality Speaks 30,164
-Are There Big Secrets Within the Obama -Family-? 1 hr Alex Trivek 8
Talking Of Electric Handpieces 5 hr medorder 1
Xenos Christian Fellowship is a CULT! (Jul '12) 13 hr Anon 912
•••
•••
•••
Columbus Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••