Dozens of Dead Children in OK; Here's What the Left Says

Posted in the Columbus Forum

Comments (Page 6)

Showing posts 101 - 120 of130
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102
May 21, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You should bask in your singular ability not to own up to what you write.
I do. But much to your dismay and fury, I'm not wrong.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#103
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
So if my post was about George using "girl" as a pejorative aimed at male posters, what was your purpose in pointing out that he never calls you girl? Think about it. You can do it.
Reader wasn't being an ass, she was trying to decipher your nonsensical post.
Sounds more like you and Reader are so blinded by hate that you can't see straight.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#104
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
So if my post was about George using "girl" as a pejorative aimed at male posters, what was your purpose in pointing out that he never calls you girl? Think about it. You can do it.
Reader wasn't being an ass, she was trying to decipher your nonsensical post.
Nonsensical? You are the very definition of such.

And yes, she was being an ass. She knew damn well what I was inferring. Are you implying she's as dumb as a brick and didn't remember meeting me TWICE?
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#105
May 21, 2013
 
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>I do. But much to your dismay and fury, I'm not wrong.
About what? You have been so wrong about so much lately you have to specify.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#106
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Nonsensical? You are the very definition of such.
And yes, she was being an ass. She knew damn well what I was inferring. Are you implying she's as dumb as a brick and didn't remember meeting me TWICE?
No. Read this out loud, it might help you understand.

I said George calls men girls because he thinks it demeans a man to be referred to that way.

You said, "But George never calls me a girl." In context, that would mean you were a man. See?

So Reader, knowing you were a woman, asked you why you would say such a thing because it made no sense for you to say it.

Ok?
Big Johnson

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#107
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

gokeefe wrote:
Are you implying she's as dumb as a brick and didn't remember meeting me TWICE?
I would not admit it either.

And I would undergo intensive psychotherapy to try to forget.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108
May 21, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Read this out loud, it might help you understand.
I said George calls men girls because he thinks it demeans a man to be referred to that way.
You said, "But George never calls me a girl." In context, that would mean you were a man. See?
So Reader, knowing you were a woman, asked you why you would say such a thing because it made no sense for you to say it.
Ok?
Sad, pathetic little games that you never outgrew.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#109
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
About what? You have been so wrong about so much lately you have to specify.
I'm sure your mind tells you that when you're on the rag, little girl.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#110
May 21, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Read this out loud, it might help you understand.
I said George calls men girls because he thinks it demeans a man to be referred to that way.
You said, "But George never calls me a girl." In context, that would mean you were a man. See?
So Reader, knowing you were a woman, asked you why you would say such a thing because it made no sense for you to say it.
Ok?
You really have a bad Asperger's don't you? No social clues, no reading between the lines, no ability to perceive those nuances in which others relate, do you?

Here's my original response:
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Suggest you review the data. Never called me, Glitter, WW, SL, and a few other women that... there's a reason he does that with specific persons. There's a few "men" I prefer to call boys as well, one is your cheerleader, Johnson.
Your clue: WOMEN. I haven't witnessed George call men "girls". I may have missed somewhere he did--I don't read/post here as obsessively as you and I do tend to be gone sometimes for days or weeks due to other things, but you know, you do carry on like a petulant little GIRL.

And yup. Reader was being an ass. As are you. See how this works?

A good literature course or two may help you, dunno. Or maybe a nice socialization class at Goodwill? I know a few military bases that hire janitors from Goodwill. Do you need a job to get you out of the house? Goodwill often provides the transportation. Might be good to get some socialization. You are as thick as a brick, subtlety isn't your strength is it? Same reason the whole nuclear argument continues.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#111
May 21, 2013
 
^^^^bad case^^^^^

It's hell when the cat wants to climb over the laptop when you're typing.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#112
May 21, 2013
 
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Sad, pathetic little games that you never outgrew.
The truth? Yeah, I never outgrew it.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#113
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Nonsensical? You are the very definition of such.
And yes, she was being an ass. She knew damn well what I was inferring. Are you implying she's as dumb as a brick and didn't remember meeting me TWICE?
Yes, you were inferring that you back George up and he doesn't insult you as a result.

But you were in such a hurry to throw him your support that you overlooked the key point was that George insults MEN he doesn't like by calling them girls.

So your list of women he does not insult was completely irrelevant. In fact, I tried to be nice by offering you the option of just admitting that you hadn't read carefully. Instead you get all huffy and start calling names.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114
May 21, 2013
 
Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
I would not admit it either.
And I would undergo intensive psychotherapy to try to forget.
You need intensive psychotherapy for a lot of issues, I'm not one of them. Denial seems to be your best friend, wee boy.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#115
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
You really have a bad Asperger's don't you? No social clues, no reading between the lines, no ability to perceive those nuances in which others relate, do you?
Here's my original response:
<quoted text>
Your clue: WOMEN. I haven't witnessed George call men "girls". I may have missed somewhere he did--I don't read/post here as obsessively as you and I do tend to be gone sometimes for days or weeks due to other things, but you know, you do carry on like a petulant little GIRL.
And yup. Reader was being an ass. As are you. See how this works?
A good literature course or two may help you, dunno. Or maybe a nice socialization class at Goodwill? I know a few military bases that hire janitors from Goodwill. Do you need a job to get you out of the house? Goodwill often provides the transportation. Might be good to get some socialization. You are as thick as a brick, subtlety isn't your strength is it? Same reason the whole nuclear argument continues.
Let's try it this way. Just one question. If you were trying to prove that George didn't refer to men as "girl," what was the point of offering a list of women posters as evidence?

Instead of "reading between the lines" perhaps you would be better served simply reading the words that were written. You are giving Anne a run for her money.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#116
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
You really have a bad Asperger's don't you? No social clues, no reading between the lines, no ability to perceive those nuances in which others relate, do you?
Nah. Che's just a c#nt.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you were inferring that you back George up and he doesn't insult you as a result.
But you were in such a hurry to throw him your support that you overlooked the key point was that George insults MEN he doesn't like by calling them girls.
So your list of women he does not insult was completely irrelevant. In fact, I tried to be nice by offering you the option of just admitting that you hadn't read carefully. Instead you get all huffy and start calling names.
You got a 4.0 for that bullshit? Was this your English prof?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118
May 21, 2013
 
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
You really have a bad Asperger's don't you? No social clues, no reading between the lines, no ability to perceive those nuances in which others relate, do you?
Here's my original response:7
<quoted text>
Your clue: WOMEN. I haven't witnessed George call men "girls". I may have misse8d somewhere he did--I don't read/post here as obsessively as you and I do tend to be gone sometimes for days or weeks due to other things, but you know, you do carry on like a petulant little GIRL.
And yup. Reader was being an ass. As are you. See how this works?
A good literature course or two may help you, dunno. Or maybe a nice socialization class at Goodwill? I know a few military bases that hire janitors from Goodwill. Do you need a job to get you out of the house? Goodwill often provides the transportation. Might be good to get some socialization. You are as thick as a brick, subtlety isn't your strength is it? Same reason the whole nuclear argument continues.
Oh, I get it now. You are joining George in his little ruse of actually insisting that Che must actually be FEMALE.

So then, I would suppose that you think that George is simply educating Che about his (er,'her') gender.

Is that right?
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#119
May 21, 2013
 
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Nah. Che's just a c#nt.
There you go Anakin. Give into your anger. Give into your hate.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#120
May 21, 2013
 
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Nah. Che's just a c#nt.
Careful, you're gonna arouse WW's ire with language.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#121
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you were inferring that you back George up and he doesn't insult you as a result.
But you were in such a hurry to throw him your support that you overlooked the key point was that George insults MEN he doesn't like by calling them girls.
So your list of women he does not insult was completely irrelevant. In fact, I tried to be nice by offering you the option of just admitting that you hadn't read carefully. Instead you get all huffy and start calling names.
No, you are not interpreting correctly. I've never witnessed George calling another male a "girl." Now, if you want to google obsessively and prove me wrong, go for it. It's an exercise in futility because I haven't seen it or remember it. I don't have the habit of being here 24X7 because I just can't. However, my response and jab was aimed at Che who is acting like a petulant child. You're beginning to act like as ass.

Really, nice? Not really sure about that one, given the history, Reader. You have a grudge about a few pizzas and magazines, false allegations, implying a number of us knew George personally. NOPE. Add to the drama over the Den.

Dead, done, deal. No blind loyalty to anyone. George and I have disagreed before, but I suppose that you can't see it simply because we don't find the need to go on the attack with each other when we do disagree. You happened to jump in on a crew of liberals who I thoroughly disagreed with on a bashing game via your jumping in on the mapping issue--after YOU suggested to drop it, which I obliged.

Seriously? You have a history of meltdowns here. At least be honest for what it is, you want a piece of the pie here and redeem yourself for a few of those meltdowns.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 101 - 120 of130
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

40 Users are viewing the Columbus Forum right now

Search the Columbus Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
What kind of God drowns 300 kids? 13 min Dave stewart 9
google hates GOD 49 min Happy Easter 2
Congress Cost FYI 1 hr They cannot kill a Spook 94
Happy Easter 1 hr They cannot kill a Spook 9
question 1 hr Duke for Mayor 7
Is Nevada rancher a freeloader? 2 hr Duke for Mayor 179
why is chelsea clinton so ugly? 2 hr the real dogman 29
Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13) 13 hr Oops 1,980
•••
•••
•••
•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••