gosnell guilty !!!!!!!

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#344 May 23, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Your deductive reasoning skills are deficient.
RS stated that abortion is murder -- in fact, the murder of babies.
The Bible consistently holds that murder violates God's Law.
Therefore, it would be inconsistent for a Christian to condone it.
However, it is also inconsistent for a Christian to lie, steal, covet, et al...yet, Christians do commit these sins. Committing sin does not negate a believer's faith; it drives him or her to repentance...again and again. It is the sinner who refuses to repent and who takes pride in his sin whose faith true believers must sincerely doubt.
Has nothing to do with deductive reasoning.

RS said flat out that a person who condones abortion cannot be a Christian. Impossible, he said. Look it up.

You're need to argue with me just to fill your time isn't working. You obviously don't know what you're talking about and have decided to jump in on the conversation, but you're proving yourself quite ignorant of the facts.

RS claimed a person who condoned abortion could not be a Christian and/or a Catholic. EB claims he is both. An observant Catholic, according to his words. So either RS regards EB as a non-Christian or he's going to eat his words, back pedal and claim that's not what he meant in order to save face. I've already seen that he's choosing the latter.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#345 May 23, 2013
*Your need

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#346 May 23, 2013
Just for your own edification:

Reality Speaks

#274
Friday May 17

impossible.....complete fiction from you yet again.

it is impossible to be a Christian and condone baby murder or commit it.

impossible.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#347 May 23, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
Has nothing to do with deductive reasoning.
RS said flat out that a person who condones abortion cannot be a Christian. Impossible, he said. Look it up.
You're need to argue with me just to fill your time isn't working. You obviously don't know what you're talking about and have decided to jump in on the conversation, but you're proving yourself quite ignorant of the facts.
RS claimed a person who condoned abortion could not be a Christian and/or a Catholic. EB claims he is both. An observant Catholic, according to his words. So either RS regards EB as a non-Christian or he's going to eat his words, back pedal and claim that's not what he meant in order to save face. I've already seen that he's choosing the latter.
Again...since:

1) RS holds that abortion is murder, and
2) murder is unlawful according to God's law, and
3) RS cannot excuse anyone's condoning of it, and
4) RS believes one who condones abortion cannot be a true believer, then...
5) RS does not believe Bob to be a true believer.

But, then...neither do I.

No one who [like Bob] consistently rejects the Virgin birth, mocks Jesus' paternity, and encourages abortion for his own material gain can be considered representative of the Christian faith.

Now, what is your point?
Are you concerned about Bob's eternal soul?

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#348 May 23, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Your deductive reasoning skills are deficient.
RS stated that abortion is murder -- in fact, the murder of babies.
The Bible consistently holds that murder violates God's Law.
Therefore, it would be inconsistent for a Christian to condone it.
However, it is also inconsistent for a Christian to lie, steal, covet, et al...yet, Christians do commit these sins. Committing sin does not negate a believer's faith; it drives him or her to repentance...again and again. It is the sinner who refuses to repent and who takes pride in his sin whose faith true believers must sincerely doubt.
Abortion is only "murder" if man's law defines "murder" as such.

I will state that abortion is "homicide".

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#349 May 23, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Abortion is only "murder" if man's law defines "murder" as such.
I will state that abortion is "homicide".
A pregnant womans enter an abortion clinic with the intent to end her child's life.
Semantic gymnastics do not alter reality.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#350 May 23, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Again...since:
1) RS holds that abortion is murder, and
2) murder is unlawful according to God's law, and
3) RS cannot excuse anyone's condoning of it, and
4) RS believes one who condones abortion cannot be a true believer, then...
5) RS does not believe Bob to be a true believer.
But, then...neither do I.
No one who [like Bob] consistently rejects the Virgin birth, mocks Jesus' paternity, and encourages abortion for his own material gain can be considered representative of the Christian faith.
Now, what is your point?
Are you concerned about Bob's eternal soul?
You've stated outright your thoughts. RS skirted the issue by saying he's not in a position to judge when his feet were held to the fire.

I honestly don't care if you think EB is a Christian or not. I never asked you your opinion on the subject. I want a straight answer from RS, and I will keep asking him until I get a straight answer. The only half-answer he gave was backtracking and saying "
talking about it, and actually doing it are 2 separate things." But that's not what he originally said. Originally he said anyone who condones abortion cannot be a Christian, thus EB (in RS' opinion) cannot be a Christian.

Now that we have your unsolicited opinion on the subject, feel free to carry on. I'm going to wait for RS' clear statement of EB is a Christian or EB is not a Christian (in his opinion).

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#351 May 23, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
A pregnant womans enter an abortion clinic with the intent to end her child's life.
Semantic gymnastics do not alter reality.
No, but the text of the law does.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#352 May 23, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
You've stated outright your thoughts. RS skirted the issue by saying he's not in a position to judge when his feet were held to the fire.
I honestly don't care if you think EB is a Christian or not. I never asked you your opinion on the subject. I want a straight answer from RS, and I will keep asking him until I get a straight answer. The only half-answer he gave was backtracking and saying "
talking about it, and actually doing it are 2 separate things." But that's not what he originally said. Originally he said anyone who condones abortion cannot be a Christian, thus EB (in RS' opinion) cannot be a Christian.
Now that we have your unsolicited opinion on the subject, feel free to carry on. I'm going to wait for RS' clear statement of EB is a Christian or EB is not a Christian (in his opinion).
Back in the day, they would've kept you upstairs.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#353 May 23, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, but the text of the law does.
No, it pretends to.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Hightstown, NJ

#354 May 23, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Back in the day, they would've kept you upstairs.
Back in the day, I still wouldn't have cared about your opinion. And I'm guessing I won't tomorrow either.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#355 May 23, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
The comma goes inside the quotation marks.
Not so fast, oh wise one.

http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2011/08/pun...

You're welcome. It depends on whether one is using British English or American. Now, we don't know whether Karl was educated in something other than American English, do we?

Go ahead, you know you want the last word...
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#356 May 23, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Not so fast, oh wise one.
http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2011/08/pun...
You're welcome. It depends on whether one is using British English or American. Now, we don't know whether Karl was educated in something other than American English, do we?
Go ahead, you know you want the last word...
Go back and read that chart again and get back to us.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#357 May 23, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it pretends to.
with "pretend" prison sentences for breaking it, no doubt.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Canal Winchester, OH

#358 May 23, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Not so fast, oh wise one.
http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2011/08/pun...
You're welcome. It depends on whether one is using British English or American. Now, we don't know whether Karl was educated in something other than American English, do we?
Go ahead, you know you want the last word...
lol...when I see him put a "u" in something that ends with "or" (i.e. labour) or spell theater as "theatre" then you may have a case. You're desperate and reaching.

“Ignorance is bliss.”

Since: May 11

Canal Winchester, OH

#359 May 23, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Go back and read that chart again and get back to us.
This one really made me laugh. Just so desperate for an argument...lol.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#360 May 23, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Go back and read that chart again and get back to us.
Place periods and commas… Inside quotation marks (American) Outside quotation mark (British)

Go back to the hellhole you crawled out of and don't get back to us, eh?

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#361 May 23, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Go back and read that chart again and get back to us.
oops!

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#362 May 23, 2013
Mpnf1979 wrote:
<quoted text>
lol...when I see him put a "u" in something that ends with "or" (i.e. labour) or spell theater as "theatre" then you may have a case. You're desperate and reaching.
'

Ah, but then why even mention the quotation marks?

Ooops. Thought that would call you out, knew you'd have to have the last word!

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#363 May 23, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
with "pretend" prison sentences for breaking it, no doubt.
Muslim law holds rape victims guilty for their rapes.
Doesn't make it so.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
935000 signatures to boycott Target 11 min Male 110
is caitlin jenner still a man? 15 min Duke for Mayor 64
News Residents on alert with mass shooting suspect a... 18 min insiting race wars 178
California rejects John Wayne Day due to commen... 22 min Duke for Mayor 126
hang out? 37 min Laughing Out Loud 4
Obama "out". 2 hr Liberte 19
News COTA begins bus line between Downtown, Port Col... 3 hr UTrashy 10
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages