George the coward will do what if the...

George the coward will do what if the 2nd amendment is changed?

Created by Kosmik on Jan 10, 2013

13 votes

Click on an option to vote

Pee in his pink frilly panties

Continue to talk tough on Topix only

He has no guns, so nothing.

Will start a thread to get advice from Spook

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#21 Jan 10, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
No, the creator simply predicted you were wrong and your guy would lose. After that prediction came true, you've gone off the rails and any attempts at getting you back on is treated as offensive.
You're even a sorer loser this time and you don't have the tea bagging folk to speak for you.
Countering your incorrectness doesn't necessarily equate to being any of the things you've called me. Your posts indicate that you're each and every one. An angry little man is what you've become.
Hey, if you start acting like a conservative by supporting our troops, for example, you may find my reactions different. We need to get them the hell out of the war zones, pay them more, increase their benefits, quit nickel and dimeing them on equipment, uniforms and healthcare for starters.
So now I don't support our troops? That will come as news to people who know me, including my son in JROTC.
Do you just make things up as you go along?

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#22 Jan 10, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
To have a war on drugs, there also has to be a war on Liberty. It's a whole package, I know you're too obtuse to comprehend that. You like to take a particle of something and project it to be the complete picture.
BS. You confiscate drugs, not cash. It can be done.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#23 Jan 10, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>BS. You confiscate drugs, not cash. It can be done.
Ummmmm, typically the sale of the illegal drugs produces cash, which is then confiscated by the police when they make busts and used to fund the continuing enforcement of drug laws.

woof

Kosmik

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#24 Jan 10, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>So now I don't support our troops? That will come as news to people who know me, including my son in JROTC.
Do you just make things up as you go along?
Which indicates your son has none of your genes.

I've never read one post from you where you've called for true support and reward of our troops.

The door was left open and being the wuss that you are, you're trying to ride your son's tunic tales.

Kosmik

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#25 Jan 10, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>BS. You confiscate drugs, not cash. It can be done.
Than why has it never, ever worked anywhere in the world at any point in history?

You can't have laws against consensual 'crimes' in a free society.

You're one of those whom Ben Franklin spoke of, you're willing to give up some liberty for some security making you deserving of neither.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#26 Jan 10, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummmmm, typically the sale of the illegal drugs produces cash, which is then confiscated by the police when they make busts and used to fund the continuing enforcement of drug laws.
woof
Traffic stop. No drugs. Tons of cash. No seizure.
That's called the way things are supposed to be.
You hit on the the basis of the scam: "funding."

Kosmik

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#27 Jan 10, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummmmm, typically the sale of the illegal drugs produces cash, which is then confiscated by the police when they make busts and used to fund the continuing enforcement of drug laws.
woof
And the busts they make and the money they confiscate is but a drop in the bucket.

George just can't seem to grasp what freedom really is about.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#28 Jan 10, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
Only thing wrong with the poll is the fact that the 2nd Amendment will not change at all.
George is losing his mind.
woof
during this gun control debate

why so one sided?

I would agree to stricter background checks; and 25 round plus magazines sold only to class 3 dealers.

without class 3 license, you are breaking law. That also increases US Treasury immediately is someone wants to keep those magazines.

now to really control guns.....enforce our laws on the books.......labor camps. you play...gonna pay big.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#29 Jan 10, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
Which indicates your son has none of your genes.
I've never read one post from you where you've called for true support and reward of our troops.
The door was left open and being the wuss that you are, you're trying to ride your son's tunic tales.
I don't recall any threads where anyone was talking about support or lack of support for the troops. Show me where I have ever denigrated our troops.
BTW, it's called pride in my son's path. Something you wouldn't understand.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#30 Jan 10, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
Than why has it never, ever worked anywhere in the world at any point in history?
You can't have laws against consensual 'crimes' in a free society.
You're one of those whom Ben Franklin spoke of, you're willing to give up some liberty for some security making you deserving of neither.
Are you drunk? The war on drugs and cash confiscation figure into that...how?

“Hi-Yo Silver! Away!”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#31 Jan 10, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
Which indicates your son has none of your genes.
I've never read one post from you where you've called for true support and reward of our troops.
The door was left open and being the wuss that you are, you're trying to ride your son's tunic tales.
One post on this and one post only.

He's also ridden his father's war record. If he was such a military man, he would have volunteered himself. Which he did not do. The most disgusting type of military "supporter" is one who didn't join himself but thinks he can speak about it.

Also, while his son is doing an admirable thing joining JROTC, that's a LONG way from actually serving.

Kosmik

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#32 Jan 10, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text> I don't recall any threads where anyone was talking about support or lack of support for the troops. Show me where I have ever denigrated our troops.
BTW, it's called pride in my son's path. Something you wouldn't understand.
Until you actually post something, I have nothing to reference. You are more than willing to allow our young men to be sent to war zones and you're mum on the subject. You don't support our troops, you're a fake patriot. You love the fact that you got an education and a cushy, no-work job and that's it.

If bullets ever start to fly, we all know you'll be under your desk begging your wife to check outside.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#33 Jan 10, 2013
Kemosahbe wrote:
<quoted text>
One post on this and one post only.
He's also ridden his father's war record. If he was such a military man, he would have volunteered himself. Which he did not do. The most disgusting type of military "supporter" is one who didn't join himself but thinks he can speak about it.
Also, while his son is doing an admirable thing joining JROTC, that's a LONG way from actually serving.
This isn't "Starship Troopers." Military service is NOT a prerequisite for having opinions about the armed forces. Were that the case, you wouldn't have had the last two Democrat presidents held in any sort of esteem, would you?

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#34 Jan 10, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
Until you actually post something, I have nothing to reference. You are more than willing to allow our young men to be sent to war zones and you're mum on the subject. You don't support our troops, you're a fake patriot. You love the fact that you got an education and a cushy, no-work job and that's it.
If bullets ever start to fly, we all know you'll be under your desk begging your wife to check outside.
Part of my "cushy, no work job" has to do with technology used by the military. That's all I can say about it.
You sound a tad envious, Kosmik. That explains a lot.

Kosmik

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#35 Jan 10, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Are you drunk? The war on drugs and cash confiscation figure into that...how?
Laws against personal choices, as in sex, gambling, drugs etc... run counter to having a free society. The laws against such are nearly impossible to enforce without government violating our rights. They have to conduct entrapment stings and the like, in other words they have to commit a crime to find a crime. Our law enforcement committing crime is blatantly anti-freedom.

So you don't like to gamble, don't. Don't like abortion, don't have one. Don't care for drugs, avoid them. What someone else is doing in the privacy of their home or with their doctor is none of yours or my business.

They discovered that all efforts to one point had failed so they merely keep going to the next step. i.e. taking away liberties or violating freedoms to enforce the unenforceable.

If we did away with the laws, there'd be little to no money issue to even be discussing. And there'd be lot's of room in the jails to keep real criminals.

Kosmik

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#36 Jan 10, 2013
Kemosahbe wrote:
<quoted text>
One post on this and one post only.
He's also ridden his father's war record. If he was such a military man, he would have volunteered himself. Which he did not do. The most disgusting type of military "supporter" is one who didn't join himself but thinks he can speak about it.
Also, while his son is doing an admirable thing joining JROTC, that's a LONG way from actually serving.
He's a chickenhawk who wouldn't even make a positive statement about our forces when given the opportunity. Rather, he chose to ride someone else's coat tails.
John Boehner

Mcdonough, GA

#37 Jan 10, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
Until you actually post something, I have nothing to reference. You are more than willing to allow our young men to be sent to war zones and you're mum on the subject. You don't support our troops, you're a fake patriot. You love the fact that you got an education and a cushy, no-work job and that's it.
If bullets ever start to fly, we all know you'll be under your desk begging your wife to check outside.
GFY. Or Kemosahbe.

Kosmik

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#38 Jan 10, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Part of my "cushy, no work job" has to do with technology used by the military. That's all I can say about it.
You sound a tad envious, Kosmik. That explains a lot.
Envious of what? You're stuck in an office all day with no real work and nothing to do but post on here.

I only work when I choose to, where I choose to and with whom I choose to. Being that I only need to work a few months a year to deal with my expenses (and that's mainly due to the crash) I'm guessing once again you're projecting.

Oh, and in those few months I work, I probably make close to what you do in a year.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#39 Jan 10, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a chickenhawk who wouldn't even make a positive statement about our forces when given the opportunity. Rather, he chose to ride someone else's coat tails.
Let's hear about your illustrious service, Kosmik.
"Given the opportunity"? When? Because you simply demanded it?
You really are full of yourself.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#40 Jan 10, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
From you that's a compliment.
Oh, I forgot the other day when listing some of your lies, the huge whopper you told about your boss having 1 of the only 2 Winston Churchill busts.
Either your boss is the President of this country or the Queen of England if that statement is true.
Just wanted to remind you of your permanent 'pants on fire' statue.
That was no lie. I pass it 20 to 50 times a day. I'll take a photo and post it for you.

I didn't say he had one of two anyway. I said there were several of that bust made that had gone to various contributors to some charity. That was 15 to 20 years ago. Obama had a completely different, unique one that he insultingly returned to the Queen, keeping the one like we have in our office in some far corner of the WH.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Tiffeny Marie Brown 35 min Posting as myself 7
News Donald Trump to visit eastern Ohio on Tuesday 37 min Posting as myself 12
Hillary's speech - thread is missing 2 hr d pants 101
Topix Closes Human Sexuality Forums 3 hr d pants 7
Topix- Stop Removing Threads 3 hr d pants 11
News Volkswagen to pay state $13M and compensate nea... 4 hr They cannot kill ... 2
RIP William Shatner 9 hr They cannot kill ... 13
America is doomed. 10 hr Duke for Mayor 22
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages