Only thing wrong with the poll is the fact that the 2nd Amendment will not change at all.

George is losing his mind.

woof

Duke for Mayor wrote:

Only thing wrong with the poll is the fact that the 2nd Amendment will not change at all.
George is losing his mind.
woof

Is that the case with the Fourth Amendment after 40 years of the war on drugs?

Duke for Mayor wrote:

Only thing wrong with the poll is the fact that the 2nd Amendment will not change at all.
George is losing his mind.
woof

What's really wrong with this poll is that it shows how its creator went from a seemingly reasonable person several months ago to a bitter, angry lunatic leftist with a tendency toward the infantile in his most recent posts.

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>Is that the case with the Fourth Amendment after 40 years of the war on drugs?

There you go again George. Just yesterday you were standing behind the war on drugs. Your little wee wee just flaps whichever way the hot air from your masters blows.

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>Is that the case with the Fourth Amendment after 40 years of the war on drugs?

I just read it again. It's the same.

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>Is that the case with the Fourth Amendment after 40 years of the war on drugs?

Pretty much.

What has eroded 4th Amendment rights is the reaction to 911.

Anyway, you folks are really getting worked up over nothing. Go read the remand of Heller.

woof

This is the most juvenile thread I've seen on any Topix locale ever.

Kosmik wrote:

<quoted text>
There you go again George. Just yesterday you were standing behind the war on drugs. Your little wee wee just flaps whichever way the hot air from your masters blows.

Did I mention anything about search and seizure yesterday? Bank transactions? Large cash purchases?
Wake up.

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
Pretty much.
What has eroded 4th Amendment rights is the reaction to 911.
Anyway, you folks are really getting worked up over nothing. Go read the remand of Heller.
woof

You'll get no argument from me about what the reaction to 9/11 has done to civil liberties.

Seriouslady wrote:

This is the most juvenile thread I've seen on any Topix locale ever.

It's funny which threads you chose to state an objection to.

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
I just read it again. It's the same.

Is it executed the same way as 40 years ago? Seems to me that you could carry enough cash to purchase a new car in the good old days without having to worry about some redneck sheriff pulling you over and confiscating your money on suspicion of drug dealing.

Seriouslady wrote:

This is the most juvenile thread I've seen on any Topix locale ever.

Kosmik has either developed a brain tumor or he's sleeping with Nancy Pelosi.

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>What's really wrong with this poll is that it shows how its creator went from a seemingly reasonable person several months ago to a bitter, angry lunatic leftist with a tendency toward the infantile in his most recent posts.

No, the creator simply predicted you were wrong and your guy would lose. After that prediction came true, you've gone off the rails and any attempts at getting you back on is treated as offensive.

You're even a sorer loser this time and you don't have the tea bagging folk to speak for you.

Countering your incorrectness doesn't necessarily equate to being any of the things you've called me. Your posts indicate that you're each and every one. An angry little man is what you've become.

Hey, if you start acting like a conservative by supporting our troops, for example, you may find my reactions different. We need to get them the hell out of the war zones, pay them more, increase their benefits, quit nickel and dimeing them on equipment, uniforms and healthcare for starters.

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
It's funny which threads you chose to state an objection to.

Et tu, Brute?

Seriouslady wrote:

This is the most juvenile thread I've seen on any Topix locale ever.

From you that's a compliment.

Oh, I forgot the other day when listing some of your lies, the huge whopper you told about your boss having 1 of the only 2 Winston Churchill busts.

Either your boss is the President of this country or the Queen of England if that statement is true.

Just wanted to remind you of your permanent 'pants on fire' statue.

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>Did I mention anything about search and seizure yesterday? Bank transactions? Large cash purchases?
Wake up.

To have a war on drugs, there also has to be a war on Liberty. It's a whole package, I know you're too obtuse to comprehend that. You like to take a particle of something and project it to be the complete picture.

Seriouslady wrote:

This is the most juvenile thread I've seen on any Topix locale ever.

Wait until you see the one I'm working on.

woof

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>Is it executed the same way as 40 years ago? Seems to me that you could carry enough cash to purchase a new car in the good old days without having to worry about some redneck sheriff pulling you over and confiscating your money on suspicion of drug dealing.

Forfeiture of money isn't a 4th amendment issue. The seizure may be, but not the forfeiture. And for the most part, 4th amendment jurisprudence hasn't changed a helluva lot in the last 40 years.

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
It's funny which threads you chose to state an objection to.

It really is quite amusing isn't it? Juvenile uses of racist language raises no objection, but this apparently crosses the line.

woof

Seriouslady wrote:

This is the most juvenile thread I've seen on any Topix locale ever.

Coming from you that means...nothing!