Chavez Dead, Finally

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#22 Mar 5, 2013
Yet again, another leftist chimes in

http://twitchy.com/2013/03/05/michael-moore-r...

You think that Sherrod isn't buddies with him...

I've been told by many a leftist that when ever Rush Limbaugh says something they don't like, that prominent Rs must condemn him.

Time to hold the leftists to the same standard.

I want Sherrod and the Ohio House Ds to condemn Moore, Serrano and Carter. Otherwise they are dictator-enablers

Waiting...
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#23 Mar 5, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Eat it Marxist, your hero will face judgement for his crimes
http://dailycaller.com/2013/03/05/jimmy-carte...
And yet again, why Jimmah was bad, and why you cannot elect Democrats.
Wow I didn't know I was a marxist. Ya learn somethin new everyday, I guess.

woof

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#24 Mar 5, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a Venezualan. I'm fairly certain the CIA tried to kill him.
Of course, being a strict Constitutionalist, I'm sure you approve of that sort of intervention in the internal political affairs of sovereign nations.
woof
The Constitution is silent as to whether or not assassinations are illegal.

Oh, and BTW, you have now met Che's standard of "paranoid conspiracy theorist"

Enjoy defending a dirty, Jew hating, Iran loving dictator who dramatically increased inflation, ran huge budget deficits even with 100/bbl oil, rampantly increased military spending, and needlessly increased regional tensions. Not to mention a far higher crime rate.

Or that Chavez was interfering in the internal affairs of Colombia...

You gotta realize, dog, that I know Communism, I know why it fails, and "Los Gringos Imperialisimo" is not the answer.

Senor Chavez was a brutal tyrant, a second rate thug.

That progressives would defend him, speaks volumes, considering their historical grief over Pinochet, a leader who actually achieved progress at the cost of his tyranny.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#25 Mar 5, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow I didn't know I was a marxist. Ya learn somethin new everyday, I guess.
woof
You are easily the forum's most far-left poster, you express rapid anti-capitalist views and favor nationalizations, you also express visible self hatred of your own people, a component of Marxist internationalism. Not to mention that you support many points of the Communist Manifesto.

I've never seen you reject dialectical materialism, anyone who accepts that idea, is a marxist.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#26 Mar 5, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a Venezualan. I'm fairly certain the CIA tried to kill him.
Of course, being a strict Constitutionalist, I'm sure you approve of that sort of intervention in the internal political affairs of sovereign nations.
woof
I approve of what's in the best interest of OUR nation. A pity you lefties never think like that.
The CIA had its balls cut off by Frank Church 40 years ago. That's how we got stuck having to send an Army into Iraq instead of Mitch Rapp.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#29 Mar 6, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
You are easily the forum's most far-left poster, you express rapid anti-capitalist views and favor nationalizations, you also express visible self hatred of your own people, a component of Marxist internationalism. Not to mention that you support many points of the Communist Manifesto.
I've never seen you reject dialectical materialism, anyone who accepts that idea, is a marxist.
You don't have a clue about me. You think you do, because apparently you believe that anyone who sees things differently than you do must be either a marxist, communist, or socialist.

Sorry Karl. That's not the way it works.

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#30 Mar 6, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>

Oh, and BTW, you have now met Che's standard of "paranoid conspiracy theorist"
No, he hasn't.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#31 Mar 6, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
You are easily the forum's most far-left poster, you express rapid anti-capitalist views and favor nationalizations, you also express visible self hatred of your own people, a component of Marxist internationalism. Not to mention that you support many points of the Communist Manifesto.
I've never seen you reject dialectical materialism, anyone who accepts that idea, is a marxist.
I've never seen you reject dialectical materialism either. Uh oh.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#32 Mar 6, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never seen you reject dialectical materialism either. Uh oh.
My personal favorite was Karl's allegation that calling for nationalization (of the oil research and extraction industry) somehow makes one a marxist, socialist, or communist.

So the story I suppose is told like this: Nationalized interstate system, social security, space program, good. Nationalized Oil extraction bad.

Now I'm told I harbor "rapid anti-capitalist" views.

I just want the oil companies to stop making absurdly obscene profits off of a commodity that is essential to the economic security of the Nation and throw a little bit of that cash our way instead.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#33 Mar 6, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>I approve of what's in the best interest of OUR nation. A pity you lefties never think like that.
The CIA had its balls cut off by Frank Church 40 years ago. That's how we got stuck having to send an Army into Iraq instead of Mitch Rapp.
Ok Paco, I'll bite.

How was deposing Hugo Chavez in 2002 in America's best interests?

woof

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#34 Mar 6, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
My personal favorite was Karl's allegation that calling for nationalization (of the oil research and extraction industry) somehow makes one a marxist, socialist, or communist.
So the story I suppose is told like this: Nationalized interstate system, social security, space program, good. Nationalized Oil extraction bad.
Now I'm told I harbor "rapid anti-capitalist" views.
I just want the oil companies to stop making absurdly obscene profits off of a commodity that is essential to the economic security of the Nation and throw a little bit of that cash our way instead.
woof
"So the story I suppose is told like this: Nationalized interstate system, social security, space program, good. Nationalized Oil extraction bad."

---Interstate Highway System: Build originally for defense. And road building by the federal government is covered in the Constitution.

---Social Security: Unconstitutional.

---Space Program: Originally developed and still partially used for military purposes. Constitutional. The civilian angle is political, created to create a contrast to the Soviet efforts of 50 years ago.(You realize Armstrong instead of Aldrin was the first to step on the moon's surface because he was a "civilian," right?)

Now, who discovered oil, developed the technology, constructed the refineries and grew the business into the industry as we know it today? Certainly not the government. No Dukie, the PRIVATE SECTOR did that, not your precious deity. Nationalization would be theft and nationalization is the hallmark of a socialist or Communist government. You can dress it up all you want (in Canada, such ventures are called "Crown Corporations") but it goes against everything this nation is supposed to stand for.

"I just want the oil companies to stop making absurdly obscene profits off of a commodity that is essential to the economic security of the Nation and throw a little bit of that cash our way instead."

You don't give a damn about this nation and its economic security. If you did you'd oppose this "president" and his party with every fiber of your being. The rest of your paragraph says it all...you're an envious mooch at heart. "Profit" (unless it's in your pocket) is a dirty word. You WANT...yet what have you done to deserve it? Not a bloody thing.

You're a disgrace as a citizen.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#35 Mar 6, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok Paco, I'll bite.
How was deposing Hugo Chavez in 2002 in America's best interests?
woof
Obviously you approved of him allying with our enemies and having their influences spread even more in our backyard. And his takeover of US oil company assets no doubt warmed your heart.
Like I said, you're not much of an American.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#37 Mar 9, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't have a clue about me. You think you do, because apparently you believe that anyone who sees things differently than you do must be either a marxist, communist, or socialist.
Sorry Karl. That's not the way it works.
woof
it does when it is true; and in this case it is

go back to your fantasy, today is the day you take the bar exam.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#38 Mar 9, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
My personal favorite was Karl's allegation that calling for nationalization (of the oil research and extraction industry) somehow makes one a marxist, socialist, or communist.
So the story I suppose is told like this: Nationalized interstate system, social security, space program, good. Nationalized Oil extraction bad.
Now I'm told I harbor "rapid anti-capitalist" views.
I just want the oil companies to stop making absurdly obscene profits off of a commodity that is essential to the economic security of the Nation and throw a little bit of that cash our way instead.
woof
pure fantasy
6was9

Columbus, OH

#39 Mar 9, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
pure fantasy
Pure idiocy.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#40 Mar 9, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>
"So the story I suppose is told like this: Nationalized interstate system, social security, space program, good. Nationalized Oil extraction bad."
---Interstate Highway System: Build originally for defense. And road building by the federal government is covered in the Constitution.
---Social Security: Unconstitutional.
---Space Program: Originally developed and still partially used for military purposes. Constitutional. The civilian angle is political, created to create a contrast to the Soviet efforts of 50 years ago.(You realize Armstrong instead of Aldrin was the first to step on the moon's surface because he was a "civilian," right?)
Now, who discovered oil, developed the technology, constructed the refineries and grew the business into the industry as we know it today? Certainly not the government. No Dukie, the PRIVATE SECTOR did that, not your precious deity. Nationalization would be theft and nationalization is the hallmark of a socialist or Communist government. You can dress it up all you want (in Canada, such ventures are called "Crown Corporations") but it goes against everything this nation is supposed to stand for.
"I just want the oil companies to stop making absurdly obscene profits off of a commodity that is essential to the economic security of the Nation and throw a little bit of that cash our way instead."
You don't give a damn about this nation and its economic security. If you did you'd oppose this "president" and his party with every fiber of your being. The rest of your paragraph says it all...you're an envious mooch at heart. "Profit" (unless it's in your pocket) is a dirty word. You WANT...yet what have you done to deserve it? Not a bloody thing.
You're a disgrace as a citizen.
I am a "disgrace as a citizen" huh? Why? Because I hold position which you disagree with? Chew on that for a while Paco, while you ponder what it means to be an "American".

Let me ask you these two simple questions:

Would the US government be able to defend itself without the exploration of, research on, extraction of, or refining of oil?

Would the US economy continue whirling without those things?

You and I see things differently. I'm just as "American as you Paco...maybe more so. I don't view those that I disagree with as enemies of the state. You do.

Maybe someday you'll actually grow into and fully understand the rights of citizenship you've been granted as a result of your parents' copulation.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#41 Mar 9, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Obviously you approved of him allying with our enemies and having their influences spread even more in our backyard. And his takeover of US oil company assets no doubt warmed your heart.
Like I said, you're not much of an American.
Why do you so oppose the principle of national sovereignty?

woof

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#42 Mar 9, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I am a "disgrace as a citizen" huh? Why? Because I hold position which you disagree with? Chew on that for a while Paco, while you ponder what it means to be an "American".
Let me ask you these two simple questions:
Would the US government be able to defend itself without the exploration of, research on, extraction of, or refining of oil?
Would the US economy continue whirling without those things?
You and I see things differently. I'm just as "American as you Paco...maybe more so. I don't view those that I disagree with as enemies of the state. You do.
Maybe someday you'll actually grow into and fully understand the rights of citizenship you've been granted as a result of your parents' copulation.
woof
A disgrace of a citizen because you advocate the unconstitutional. Nationalization is theft.
Private industry is responsible for oil production and no matter the circumstances, the US government has to PAY for its oil like any other consumer. Standard Oil didn't hand it over for free in World War II.
Communists are enemies of the state. They always have been and always will be. Socialism is merely Communism "sold by the drink."
You're a sad little man, Dukie. You hate your own country.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#43 Mar 9, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>A disgrace of a citizen because you advocate the unconstitutional. Nationalization is theft.
Private industry is responsible for oil production and no matter the circumstances, the US government has to PAY for its oil like any other consumer. Standard Oil didn't hand it over for free in World War II.
Communists are enemies of the state. They always have been and always will be. Socialism is merely Communism "sold by the drink."
You're a sad little man, Dukie. You hate your own country.
You haven't read the Fifth Amendment, have you Paco?

woof

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#44 Mar 9, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>A disgrace of a citizen because you advocate the unconstitutional. Nationalization is theft.
Private industry is responsible for oil production and no matter the circumstances, the US government has to PAY for its oil like any other consumer. Standard Oil didn't hand it over for free in World War II.
Communists are enemies of the state. They always have been and always will be. Socialism is merely Communism "sold by the drink."
You're a sad little man, Dukie. You hate your own country.
What he advocates, is Argentinian

Anyone who knows the recent history of Argentina would oppose it.

Nationalization is not unconstitutional, Conrail and Amtrak were not defeated in the courts, though it is stupid.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Body Camera For Police 21 min Annie 7
Planned parenthood videos appall even pro choic... 24 min d pants 242
News Police: Man Repeatedly Exposing Himself At Nort... (Feb '10) 26 min Bon 69
Police are cowards 31 min d pants 23
UC area citizen 1 hr Duke for Mayor 2
Public Schools are Becoming Sanctuary Cities in... 1 hr Duke for Mayor 2
'Dead' woman wakes up screaming at funeral home 1 hr Duke for Mayor 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages