hannity and limbaugh to be dropped on...

Diamond Eugene

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#67 Jul 31, 2013
Nat Turner wrote:
<quoted text>
Wingnut racists. That's what you are. It is applicable.
You call people apes and the like. Big difference.
You will not be able to out think me, sir.
There's no difference. And you've been out thought by every poster who has responded to your lies and racist tripe.
Nat Turner

United States

#68 Jul 31, 2013
d pantz wrote:
<quoted text>before cumulus was cumulus it was susquehana radio. It was bought by three backers, bain capital being one of them. Believe it or not , bain capital gave more money to the democrats in the last presidential election than to mitthead and the republicans. All of these big corporate media outlets get money from lobbyists ( mostly big corporations) and are all in a group that has meetings about how the news ( "left" or "right" wing) will shape public opinion on foreign policy to their advantage. Just look at the 180 all the liberals did on the middle east. Or obamas campaign speech in 07-08 about forign policy. It went from limiting our involvment to ( after he got elected) attacking countries without a vote from congress. WTF? The group btw is called the CFR and they publicly admit everything Ihave posted.
You've got a lot of misinformation in here. Cumulus went public and bought out Bain Capital. Bain Capital backs Clear Channel which is under monstrous debt. The FCC banned cross ownership by a single entity of a daily tv, newspaper, or radio station.. Obama didn't attack anyone...All of the countries we are in, we were there since Bush was president.

You may want to re-examine your post.
Nat Turner

United States

#69 Jul 31, 2013
Diamond Eugene wrote:
<quoted text>Nothing sensational about NBC doctoring 911 calls and using rocket motors to blow up GMC pickup gas tanks, is there?
I said credible news sources. Did I mention NBC or did you?
You're getting lost, sir. You are exposing yourself as a racist fraud with every post. Not unless your actually this mis informed.
Nat Turner

United States

#70 Jul 31, 2013
Diamond Eugene wrote:
<quoted text>There's no difference. And you've been out thought by every poster who has responded to your lies and racist tripe.
Big difference. Not one of you has had one shred of viable retorts that stood on its own, not one.
You fool yourself into believing what is not there. I have a feeling you pat yourself on the back with every racist nonsense post. Then call it a victory. That's just sad.

Diamond Eugene

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#71 Jul 31, 2013
Nat Turner wrote:
<quoted text>
I said credible news sources. Did I mention NBC or did you?
You're getting lost, sir. You are exposing yourself as a racist fraud with every post. Not unless your actually this mis informed.
You're engaging in projection simply because you have nothing else.
Why don't you enlighten us by listing your idea of credible news sources.

Diamond Eugene

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#72 Jul 31, 2013
Nat Turner wrote:
<quoted text>
Big difference. Not one of you has had one shred of viable retorts that stood on its own, not one.
You fool yourself into believing what is not there. I have a feeling you pat yourself on the back with every racist nonsense post. Then call it a victory. That's just sad.
You've been buried here, just as you were the last time you appeared. Soon you'll be running away again. Your posts are devolving into mere random words with no meaning.
Nat Turner

United States

#73 Jul 31, 2013
Diamond Eugene wrote:
<quoted text>You're engaging in projection simply because you have nothing else.
Why don't you enlighten us by listing your idea of credible news sources.
Not Fox News, that's for damn sure. What projection? I don't think you used that word in the correct tense, but that's not surprising. Guardian UK is a pretty good news source..Depends on what the subject matter is on any other news source. They all have an agenda. You the viewer have to learn to decipher the information. You can't be just sheep. Fox News is one of the only sources I can think of that just twists the plain truth with no regard for integrity. Everyone knows it. I don't call them a news source, they are entertainment, not to be taken seriously.

Diamond Eugene

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#74 Jul 31, 2013
Nat Turner wrote:
<quoted text>
Not Fox News, that's for damn sure. What projection? I don't think you used that word in the correct tense, but that's not surprising. Guardian UK is a pretty good news source..Depends on what the subject matter is on any other news source. They all have an agenda. You the viewer have to learn to decipher the information. You can't be just sheep. Fox News is one of the only sources I can think of that just twists the plain truth with no regard for integrity. Everyone knows it. I don't call them a news source, they are entertainment, not to be taken seriously.
It stands to reason that a fan of The Guardian wouldn't know what "projection" is:

pro·jec·tion (pr-jkshn)
n.

8. Psychology
a. The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or suppositions to others.
b. The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or desires to someone or something as a naive or unconscious defense against anxiety or guilt.
Nat Turner

United States

#75 Jul 31, 2013
Diamond Eugene wrote:
<quoted text>You've been buried here, just as you were the last time you appeared. Soon you'll be running away again. Your posts are devolving into mere random words with no meaning.
LOL! If that were true, your minion would not have tooted her horn for you and waved her ignorance so blatantly.

I see you are running out of ammunition and realizing you are not going to out think me. This attempt at damage control is transparent. I've thwarted each of your pawns in no uncertain terms. If you are the best they've got...You might as well pack it up and go home...Weak racist opinions and name calling is the foundation of your posts. I bet you use different names and been kicked off this site numerous times. LOL!!!

Diamond Eugene

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#76 Jul 31, 2013
Nat Turner wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! If that were true, your minion would not have tooted her horn for you and waved her ignorance so blatantly.
I see you are running out of ammunition and realizing you are not going to out think me. This attempt at damage control is transparent. I've thwarted each of your pawns in no uncertain terms. If you are the best they've got...You might as well pack it up and go home...Weak racist opinions and name calling is the foundation of your posts. I bet you use different names and been kicked off this site numerous times. LOL!!!
Did you finally learn the meaning of projection? You're engaging in it again.
Nat Turner

United States

#77 Jul 31, 2013
Diamond Eugene wrote:
<quoted text>It stands to reason that a fan of The Guardian wouldn't know what "projection" is:

pro·jec·tion (pr-jkshn)
n.

8. Psychology
a. The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or suppositions to others.
b. The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or desires to someone or something as a naive or unconscious defense against anxiety or guilt.
No dice. You didn't give a rebuttal this is an attempt to divert attention to your agenda. A cut and paste definition is not an answer or defense.
You are becoming more and more transparent. I am stirring you in the direction I want you to go. Contemptible confutations will not save you. In fact, you better call in a relief pitcher. You are throwing grapefruits out here.
Nat Turner

United States

#78 Jul 31, 2013
Diamond Eugene wrote:
<quoted text>Did you finally learn the meaning of projection? You're engaging in it again.
And I see you've learned nothing.
Which I'm sure is a life characteristic.

Diamond Eugene

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#79 Jul 31, 2013
Nat Turner wrote:
<quoted text>
No dice. You didn't give a rebuttal this is an attempt to divert attention to your agenda. A cut and paste definition is not an answer or defense.
You are becoming more and more transparent. I am stirring you in the direction I want you to go. Contemptible confutations will not save you. In fact, you better call in a relief pitcher. You are throwing grapefruits out here.
You're STILL doing it...
Have you ever read Einstein's definition of insanity?
The Retorter

Lancaster, OH

#80 Jul 31, 2013
Nat Turner wrote:
<quoted text>
Big difference. Not one of you has had one shred of viable retorts that stood on its own, not one.
Here's a retort that stands on its own:

Foxtrot Uniform Charlie Kilo Oscar Foxtrot Foxtrot Alpha Sierra Sierra Hotel Oscar Lima Echo
Nat Turner

United States

#82 Jul 31, 2013
The Retorter wrote:
<quoted text>Here's a retort that stands on its own:

Foxtrot Uniform Charlie Kilo Oscar Foxtrot Foxtrot Alpha Sierra Sierra Hotel Oscar Lima Echo
Let's see...One is a racist wingnut and this one uses the phonetic alphabet to tell me to screw off.
LOL!!!
This is the A team I'm dealing with.

Diamond Eugene

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#83 Jul 31, 2013
Nat Turner wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's see...One is a racist wingnut and this one uses the phonetic alphabet to tell me to screw off.
LOL!!!
This is the A team I'm dealing with.
And you're failing in spectacular fashion.
zoe

Brinkhaven, OH

#84 Jul 31, 2013
As long as I don't have to listen to a democrat, I really don't care.
d pantz

United States

#85 Jul 31, 2013
Nat Turner wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got a lot of misinformation in here. Cumulus went public and bought out Bain Capital. Bain Capital backs Clear Channel which is under monstrous debt. The FCC banned cross ownership by a single entity of a daily tv, newspaper, or radio station.. Obama didn't attack anyone...All of the countries we are in, we were there since Bush was president.
You may want to re-examine your post.
no we are both wrong about cumulus. They merged with clear channel and other media grous in 2006 and bain was a backer.
Did bush attack syria and libya? Un forces includes u.s. boots ya know. They commit our millitary without a vote from congress which should be illegal.
d pantz

United States

#86 Jul 31, 2013
I know bush included syria and libya in the "axis of evil". But the un seemed to hate everything he did.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#87 Jul 31, 2013
d pantz wrote:
I know bush included syria and libya in the "axis of evil". But the un seemed to hate everything he did.
The Axis of Evil was Iraq, Iran and North Korea

Libya and Syria were part of what John Bolton called "Beyond the Axis of Evil" and Rice called "Outposts of Tyranny"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil#Ric...

In retrospect, the use of that term was one of the dumbest things Bush did, along with "Mission Accomplished"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
People of Topix 11 min 1 and 1 and 1 is 3 12
Tired of trump's lies yet? 20 min Duke for Mayor 39
Drumpf's Latest Cabinet Picks: Mayor McCheese, ... 55 min BizzyBee 11
Make America Great Again 59 min Batch 37 Pain Is ... 400
Trump dumps "Hail to the Chief" for new anthem 1 hr Seriouslesbian 2
OMG! Trump scores $50 Billion for Americans! 1 hr Reality Speaks 74
Trump- a ONE Term President 1 hr Reality Speaks 204
Religion in our schools..... 1 hr Reality Speaks 250

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages