71% of Obama Voters Regret His Reelec...
Latch

United States

#61 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>Unlike Obama, numbers don't lie.
I beg to differ. YOUR numbers are a lie.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#62 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Yougov's inconsistent sample size skewed the reading of the stats.
Doesn't change the fact that Obama is hugely unpopular among voters, including those who voted for his reelection...and those who now regret it.
His year-end approval ratings were in the toilet...and he hasn't done anything since to elevate them.
In fact:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/18/fo...
And:
http://www.14news.com/story/24746933/this-pre...
Further, with news out today about the closing of four (4) GA hospitals due to Obamacare, we can expect to see his numbers slide further.
Obama.Is.A.Loser.
America.Knows.It.
You aren't going to tell us why you lied, are you? I guess we will all just have to come to our own conclusions.
Latch

United States

#63 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>Yougov's inconsistent sample size skewed the reading of the stats.
Doesn't change the fact that Obama is hugely unpopular among voters, including those who voted for his reelection...and those who now regret it.

His year-end approval ratings were in the toilet...and he hasn't done anything since to elevate them.

In fact:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/18/fo...

And:

http://www.14news.com/story/24746933/this-pre...

Further, with news out today about the closing of four (4) GA hospitals due to Obamacare, we can expect to see his numbers slide further.

Obama.Is.A.Loser.

America.Knows.It.
Fox News? Ok. They are usually fair and balanced.(End sarcasm)

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#64 Feb 19, 2014
Latch wrote:
<quoted text>
Fox News? Ok. They are usually fair and balanced.(End sarcasm)
Again, all you ever do is attack the messenger.
Funny thing is the second link -- from CNN -- corroborates the findings.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#65 Feb 19, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
You aren't going to tell us why you lied, are you? I guess we will all just have to come to our own conclusions.
I don't write for the Washington Examiner.
Other sites have explained why the numbers were easily misread.

By your standard, I could accuse you of lying nearly every time you quote Obama.
Duke for Mayor

Canton, OH

#66 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, all you ever do is attack the messenger.
Funny thing is the second link -- from CNN -- corroborates the findings.
Come back here and post the results of Question #3.

woof

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#67 Feb 19, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Come back here and post the results of Question #3.
woof
What? You can't find them on your own?
Will they prove that Obama is wildly popular?
Duke for Mayor

Canton, OH

#68 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
What? You can't find them on your own?
Will they prove that Obama is wildly popular?
I know exactly where to find it.

And if you would look at them, you would realize that the entire premise of this thread is utter bullchit.

woof

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#69 Feb 19, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I know exactly where to find it.
And if you would look at them, you would realize that the entire premise of this thread is utter bullchit.
woof
Obama admires your tireless efforts on his behalf, I'm sure.
Keep it up 'cause things are only gettin' worse for him.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Akron, OH

#70 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't write for the Washington Examiner.
Other sites have explained why the numbers were easily misread.
By your standard, I could accuse you of lying nearly every time you quote Obama.
You wrote the headline of the thread, didn't you?
Latch

United States

#71 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>Again, all you ever do is attack the messenger.
Funny thing is the second link -- from CNN -- corroborates the findings.
Crap. You now try to reduce the damage of being caught using false numbers.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#72 Feb 19, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote the headline of the thread, didn't you?
Based on the article headline, as always.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#73 Feb 19, 2014
Latch wrote:
<quoted text>
Crap. You now try to reduce the damage of being caught using false numbers.
I am not Paul Bedard, though I find his commentary engaging.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#74 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Based on the article headline, as always.
So you made no effort to actually look at the poll and see that its results were not what the article claimed them to be? Maybe you should not be so trusting of things you find on the internet. While killing the messenger may not be appropriate, questioning the messenger is.
Duke for Mayor

Canton, OH

#75 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Based on the article headline, as always.
Therein lies your problem, as always.

You need to learn to read beyond a headline.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Canton, OH

#76 Feb 19, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
So you made no effort to actually look at the poll and see that its results were not what the article claimed them to be? Maybe you should not be so trusting of things you find on the internet. While killing the messenger may not be appropriate, questioning the messenger is.
No wonder the Bible is so believable, and evolution is not.

woof

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#77 Feb 19, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
No wonder the Bible is so believable, and evolution is not.
woof
Both are equally believable.
I await your irrefutable proof...as you await mine.
Duke for Mayor

Canton, OH

#78 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Both are equally believable.
I await your irrefutable proof...as you await mine.
This is fantastic.

You wallow in the hope of proving a negative, while I mellow in the assurance that the scientific method has been proven to show that the Earth is not flat.

Carry on.

woof

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#79 Feb 19, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
This is fantastic.
You wallow in the hope of proving a negative, while I mellow in the assurance that the scientific method has been proven to show that the Earth is not flat.
Carry on.
woof
Again, you resort to changing the subject.
When you can create matter ex nihilo, call the networks.
Duke for Mayor

Canton, OH

#80 Feb 19, 2014
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, you resort to changing the subject.
When you can create matter ex nihilo, call the networks.
No Tippy.

Evolution is supported by science.

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News PNC Bank robber pleads guilty in federal court 21 min Wedidthat 9
Men in the Girls Bathroom 1 hr UTrashy 338
States to sue WH over Bathrooms debacle 1 hr Rob 7
SCOTUS ruling in AHCA 2 hr Big Johnson 67
News Cleveland craft brewer Platform to open brewpub... 3 hr They cannot kill ... 14
Federal lands in America 3 hr JohnKerry 48
State Department Hillary Email Smokescreen-CYA. 3 hr Beentheredonethat 14
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages