Guns up boys and girls

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#171 Jan 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not anti-gun. And of course I know what a hollow point is. We just disagree on its importance.
It reduces the chance of a "through and through" which reduces the risk of the bullet hitting bystanders or property after passing through the target. Whether used by the police, or a citizen defending himself, it's safer.

Since: Aug 12

McMurdo Station, Antarctica

#173 Feb 24, 2013
No way, tomorrow or today.

Since: Sep 10

wheelersburg

#174 Feb 24, 2013
The provoking of some hate group is what the libs
want to see.
VADoc

Warrenville, SC

#175 Feb 25, 2013
wonka47 wrote:
The provoking of some hate group is what the libs
want to see.
Many liberals are akin to the neighborhood kid who goes to the fence that has the big mean dog behind it and hits the fence with a stick and mocks the dog. Then the little boy is amazed kne day when the dog gets out of the fence as he is teasing it and he gets bit. Then he cries and wonders why it happened.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#176 Feb 25, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Come on, Tony. The cops are at the door with a warrant. They need to get your assault rifle. What are you going to do?
warn and plead with them of the grave mistake first, then prove my point if they refuse to listen.

are your fantasy cops going to have a checkbook to write out checks for confiscation of these firearms, or just steal them?

just wondering how far you played your fantasy out is all.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#178 Feb 25, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
warn and plead with them of the grave mistake first, then prove my point if they refuse to listen.
are your fantasy cops going to have a checkbook to write out checks for confiscation of these firearms, or just steal them?
just wondering how far you played your fantasy out is all.
Prove your point? What's that mean?

(This is your fantasy by the way. I'm just making you lunatics play it out to it's conclusion.)
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#179 Feb 26, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove your point? What's that mean?
(This is your fantasy by the way. I'm just making you lunatics play it out to it's conclusion.)
really?

your President has been videoed this past week outright lying to the American public about money; and demands higher taxes while disarming the citizens.

this same person just a month ago swore to uphold the constitution.

lied again on a bible this time.

anyone who took an oath of office to uphold the constitution; and then blatantly does the opposite is considered treasonous acts.

your lunatic fantasy is that this is untrue.

you along with all the other persons committing treason painted targets upon yourself.

but to a brilliant so called big shot know it all lawyer like yourself.......the words "shall not be infringed" are arguable in court.

what color rock you want on your grave?
you have a will?
are you going to leave tremendous debt to family?
kids?

you should reflect on above questions.

because you were incapable of finding current gun legislation on the books. and incapable of simple math equations, I will spell it out for you.

for every active military member, law enforcement officers from all agencies; and all Un assembled troops at ready, the USA Hunters out number them 2 to 1 at minimum: and have more ammunition in possession.

of above group what % is going to commit treason by violating the constitution?

your progressive party just ended.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#181 Feb 26, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
really?
your President has been videoed this past week outright lying to the American public about money; and demands higher taxes while disarming the citizens.
this same person just a month ago swore to uphold the constitution.
lied again on a bible this time.
anyone who took an oath of office to uphold the constitution; and then blatantly does the opposite is considered treasonous acts.
your lunatic fantasy is that this is untrue.
you along with all the other persons committing treason painted targets upon yourself.
but to a brilliant so called big shot know it all lawyer like yourself.......the words "shall not be infringed" are arguable in court.
what color rock you want on your grave?
you have a will?
are you going to leave tremendous debt to family?
kids?
you should reflect on above questions.
because you were incapable of finding current gun legislation on the books. and incapable of simple math equations, I will spell it out for you.
for every active military member, law enforcement officers from all agencies; and all Un assembled troops at ready, the USA Hunters out number them 2 to 1 at minimum: and have more ammunition in possession.
of above group what % is going to commit treason by violating the constitution?
your progressive party just ended.
I need a translation from "right wing kook manifesto" to English to really be sure what you are trying to say.

I think you are trying to say that any gun regulation is treasonous. If so, that's the kind of crazy one can't argue with. Anyone who will deny 200 years of legal precedent is a nutjob plain and simple.

The interesting thing is, I believe you have written on here before that you would support background checks and restrictions on gun show sales (I might be wrong but I am pretty sure I'm not). If so, I guess you are guilty of treason too Chief. What do you know about that?
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#182 Feb 26, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
because you were incapable of finding current gun legislation on the books. and incapable of simple math equations, I will spell it out for you.
Please keep bringing up these two items, by the way. They do more to demonstrate your foolishness than anything I can write. Thank you.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#183 Feb 26, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I need a translation from "right wing kook manifesto" to English to really be sure what you are trying to say.
I think you are trying to say that any gun regulation is treasonous. If so, that's the kind of crazy one can't argue with. Anyone who will deny 200 years of legal precedent is a nutjob plain and simple.
The interesting thing is, I believe you have written on here before that you would support background checks and restrictions on gun show sales (I might be wrong but I am pretty sure I'm not). If so, I guess you are guilty of treason too Chief. What do you know about that?
I know you are a nut job that has been left behind because of weakness; and think you are brilliant enough to make your path golden if you could only limit someone from stopping you with force.

guess what Nancy......you are wrong again.

you are the nutjob plain and simple, always have been since birth; and now you demand guns be forbidden.

may I be the 1st to show you my middle finger.

you are a crow flying around screeching all day; but eat rotten road kill because you wasted daylight running your mouth and not hunting.

garbage eater Che screams gun control; and in the 60's there was a bounty on Crows.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#184 Feb 26, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Please keep bringing up these two items, by the way. They do more to demonstrate your foolishness than anything I can write. Thank you.
being correct is only foolish to those educated to believe 2 + 2 =7 like you.

you are an idiot....who cares what you think.
Duke for Mayor

United States

#185 Feb 26, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
being correct is only foolish to those educated to believe 2 + 2 =7 like you.
you are an idiot....who cares what you think.
What about for those who honestly, but mistakenly believe that 3/8 is 1/3 greater than 1/4?

What rules apply for those unfortunate souls?

woof
Duke for Mayor

United States

#186 Feb 26, 2013
wonka47 wrote:
The provoking of some hate group is what the libs
want to see.
I sure don't know about that. All I want to see is good lookin women...naked.

woof

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#188 Feb 26, 2013
Hassan al Madji wrote:
<quoted text> i wouldnt mind seeing an ugly one naked
Well, your professed admiration of Hillary indicates you're barking up the right tree.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#190 Feb 26, 2013
Hassan al Madji wrote:
wash you filthy mouth out
Hillary is still a beautiful woman
I'm sorry for your blindness.
Didn't listen to your mama, eh?
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#192 Feb 26, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
What about for those who honestly, but mistakenly believe that 3/8 is 1/3 greater than 1/4?
What rules apply for those unfortunate souls?
woof
the souls who believe 3/8 is 33% larger than 1/4 went on to professional careers earning triple the national average at hire.

Those like you who disagree 3/8 is 33% larger than 1/4, will be stuck in minimum wage positions requiring government assistance so you don't starve and freeze to death.
Spookhere F trolls

Toledo, OH

#193 Feb 26, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
the souls who believe 3/8 is 33% larger than 1/4 went on to professional careers earning triple the national average at hire.
Those like you who disagree 3/8 is 33% larger than 1/4, will be stuck in minimum wage positions requiring government assistance so you don't starve and freeze to death.
Got a post office box I can send something to you.
nobama

Chillicothe, OH

#194 Feb 26, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
the souls who believe 3/8 is 33% larger than 1/4 went on to professional careers earning triple the national average at hire.
Those like you who disagree 3/8 is 33% larger than 1/4, will be stuck in minimum wage positions requiring government assistance so you don't starve and freeze to death.
Better tell the calculator manufacturers, because they all disagree with you. Spreadsheet programs too.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#195 Feb 26, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
the souls who believe 3/8 is 33% larger than 1/4 went on to professional careers earning triple the national average at hire.
Those like you who disagree 3/8 is 33% larger than 1/4, will be stuck in minimum wage positions requiring government assistance so you don't starve and freeze to death.
1 is what percent larger than 1/2?
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#196 Feb 26, 2013
nobama wrote:
<quoted text>
Better tell the calculator manufacturers, because they all disagree with you. Spreadsheet programs too.
so you are a minimum wage government leach too?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Tennessee Wildfires: Trumpland Burning 6 min popular votes matter 5
News Anti-Trump protesters march to Ohio Statehouse 6 min Duke for Mayor 45
144 Companies in 25 Different Countries 7 min Batch 37 Pain Is ... 129
Trump the Crook/Liar 41 min Batch 37 Pain Is ... 179
Poor POS coon-yea 1 hr Reality Speaks 20
News Columbus library eliminating overdue fines in 2017 1 hr Reality Speaks 2
News Hillary Clinton is imperfect but the only choic... 1 hr d pants 1,290

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages