Guns up boys and girls

[TonyD2]

WiseAmerican wrote:

<quoted text> And you guys have Dick Tracy decoder rings and two-way video monitor watches.

We can't tell you that either.

[VADoc]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
I must not remember my "multiple anti gun lines." Why don't you direct me to them so I can remember?

Go read the Obama gun thread. You have plenty in there.

[TonyD2]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
That warrant will say the house, vehicles and all out buildings. When executing a warrant, the police are allowed to look in any closed compartment in which the items listed in the warrant may be found.
But very good. You have chosen to assert and defend your right to possess your assault weapon in spite of the ban and to litigate the scope of the Second Amendment. Much more civilized, reasonable and safe than staging revolution.
I think the difference between you and these other knuckleheads, Tony, is that I suspect you have experienced what war looks like and respect that it isn't like the movies. These other bigmouths have never seen someone bleed out with a hole through their chest and have romantic visions of their "revolution." That's why you can't bring yourself to say who you would kill over this. I'm glad.

As I've said, I'm all about defense. There can be no other valid reason to harm another in my mind. Now having said that, I will also say there is a multitude of things that are mine that I would be willing to defend. Including loved ones, certain property, and rights (and my definition of rights is very broad... "That which does not harm another or violate their superior rights". An example of superior right: One's right to have his property free of trespassers is superior to another's right to travel freely).

[Che Reagan Christ]

VADoc wrote:

<quoted text>
Go read the Obama gun thread. You have plenty in there.

That's a 1000 plus thread. Surely if you said I have posted multiple anti-gun posts you can easily point them out for me so I don't have to read every page.

[hey hey now]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
That's a 1000 plus thread. Surely if you said I have posted multiple anti-gun posts you can easily point them out for me so I don't have to read every page.

A filthy, stinking, lazy progressive who tired himself out by talking out of his AZZ that he wants someone else to do the work! What a sh^tstain like obama.

[now now hey]

hey hey now wrote:

<quoted text>A filthy, stinking, lazy progressive who tired himself out by talking out of his AZZ that he wants someone else to do the work! What a sh^tstain like obama.

You are a very negative person. Try being nice. Smile. Relax by taking a long poop. Get laid. Enjoy a Calgon bath. Not necessarily in that order.

[Rod Croy in Greenfield]

Or try cross dressing
It works for me

[WiseAmerican]

Catman Dave wrote:

<quoted text>Thank you Tony.There is still a thing called the constitution that says you dont have to tell a cop anything at all.

That's exactly what the brow in the urban areas been telling the cops for years. And the response from the cops have been flash light beatings, punches to the head while handcuffed, mace to the face while handcuffed, slammed on hot car hoods while handcuffed, kicked in the ass and groin while handcuffed, shot in the head while reaching for ID.
You don't realize how privileged most of you are! At least in urban areas one can escape through the back yard and over a few gates. In the rural areas your sitting ducks. Good luck!

[Telgin]

WiseAmerican wrote:

<quoted text> That's exactly what the brow in the urban areas been telling the cops for years. And the response from the cops have been flash light beatings, punches to the head while handcuffed, mace to the face while handcuffed, slammed on hot car hoods while handcuffed, kicked in the ass and groin while handcuffed, shot in the head while reaching for ID.
You don't realize how privileged most of you are! At least in urban areas one can escape through the back yard and over a few gates. In the rural areas your sitting ducks. Good luck!

If you act like an effin jerk to the cops, the cops are treat you like an effin jerk. Not a difficult concept.

[Oobie Doobie]

Karl Monday wrote:

<quoted text>
The police do a lot to create a negative impression of themselves, beyond the race baiting. They treat the roads as ATMs. It is arguably one of Ohio's biggest problems, as entire municipalities are nearly sustained by tickets..

Gosh you should do one of your investigative reports about it.

[Telgin]

Karl Monday wrote:

<quoted text>
The police do a lot to create a negative impression of themselves, beyond the race baiting. They treat the roads as ATMs. It is arguably one of Ohio's biggest problems, as entire municipalities are nearly sustained by tickets..

There is no ticket to write if the laws are being followed. Law enforcement is very necessary and the only way to get through to some of the idiots out there is to hit em where it hurts, the pocket book. Have I gotton a ticket before? Of course. Did I like it? Hell no. Do I still speed? I try not to but if I do and get a ticket for it, there is only one person to blame, me.

[Hugh Victor Thompson III]

Telgin wrote:

<quoted text>There is no ticket to write if the laws are being followed. Law enforcement is very necessary and the only way to get through to some of the idiots out there is to hit em where it hurts, the pocket book. Have I gotton a ticket before? Of course. Did I like it? Hell no. Do I still speed? I try not to but if I do and get a ticket for it, there is only one person to blame, me.

Or the Supreme Court of Ohio:

COLUMBUS, Ohio – A simple educated guess that a motorist is speeding is all the evidence a police officer needs to write an ironclad speeding ticket, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday.

In a 5-to-1 ruling, the court said an officer's "unaided visual estimation of a vehicle's speed" is strong enough to support a ticket and conviction. A radar speed detector, commonly used by patrolmen, is not needed, the court concluded.
http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2010/...

[Che Reagan Christ]

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>Or the Supreme Court of Ohio:
COLUMBUS, Ohio – A simple educated guess that a motorist is speeding is all the evidence a police officer needs to write an ironclad speeding ticket, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday.
In a 5-to-1 ruling, the court said an officer's "unaided visual estimation of a vehicle's speed" is strong enough to support a ticket and conviction. A radar speed detector, commonly used by patrolmen, is not needed, the court concluded.
http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2010/...

See what happens when you elect "law and order" Republican judges?

[WiseAmerican]

Telgin wrote:

<quoted text>If you act like an effin jerk to the cops, the cops are treat you like an effin jerk. Not a difficult concept.

Yeah,right! Spoken by a whiteman of your ilk who's never been racially targeted by bigoted cops in an urban area. Speak about things you know and not your perceptions on how you believe cops should act.

There's thousands of complaints about physical abuse by cops on blacks for no reason. You tell me if it's justifiable for a cop to punch you in the head for asking why he pulled you over? The way some here on Topix feel about certain blacks, I can imagine what they'd do to a black person if given a badge and gun!

[hey now hey now]

No reason?
www.topix.com/forum/columbus/TETIIGLSBREKLERR...

[Reality Speaks]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
Time and again in my anti gun rumblings? I don't think I have posted an opinion about guns other than the post that you are responding to. That would be one time.
Hollow points do more damage than regular rounds. I don't care why you claim they were designed, there is no need for them except to do as much damage to humans as possible.
You also don't understand the second amendment.

you are clueless about hollow point bullets

PS: hollow points don't shoot through walls.....much safer.

your claim there is no need for them proves you speak of something you know nothing about.

10,000 clueless icons for you

[Reality Speaks]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
That's a 1000 plus thread. Surely if you said I have posted multiple anti-gun posts you can easily point them out for me so I don't have to read every page.

above where you said there was no use for hollow point bullets is anti gun.

and you don't even know what a hollow point bullet is.

[Che Reagan Christ]

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
above where you said there was no use for hollow point bullets is anti gun.
and you don't even know what a hollow point bullet is.

It is not anti-gun. And of course I know what a hollow point is. We just disagree on its importance.

[Reality Speaks]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
It is not anti-gun. And of course I know what a hollow point is. We just disagree on its importance.

there is no disagreement. you are clueless.

it is same as using a 1/4" in socket on a 1/2" bolt.

it does not fit.

neither does your uninformed useless opinion.

[Reality Speaks]

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
It is not anti-gun. And of course I know what a hollow point is. We just disagree on its importance.

it is anti gun because it absolutely makes no difference either way.

maybe you need to do some studying.