Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#125 Feb 16, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I hate to burst yer bubble Paco, but when you swallow that wafer there's no argument about where its goin, or what yer doin...biologically speakin.
woof
Maybe he doesn't receive it where you are assuming he does.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#126 Feb 16, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I find it hard to believe you say such things with a straight face, as if its important.
woof
When one is a shut in, this becomes one's community.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#127 Feb 16, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Holy Christ, George is a taker. Sucking at the government tit. It's always the ones who cry the loudest.
My company employs over 10,000 people and has government contracts in the eight figures.
How much am I "taking" little girl? A can of pop?

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#128 Feb 16, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe he doesn't receive it where you are assuming he does.
That, above all other posts of yours, exemplifies the vile leftist mindset.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#129 Feb 16, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
When one is a shut in, this becomes one's community.
I'm sorry for your situation. Do you receive Meals on Wheels?
Whoreallycares

Columbus, OH

#130 Feb 16, 2013
I'd bet a crisp twenty that this "eberly" is either hugh or the artist wearing their "anonymous" mask for ethos purposes.

I want my points to stand on their own, compare me to whoever you want, but you're only repressing your own understanding.

What is unethical about eating meat on fridays? Do any "christians" still maintain the belief that doing so is somehow less sacred than eating fish or obstaining from red meat? My whole point was to note how the original intent in the creation of that religious prescription was anything but religious ideals... it was politically and economically motivated at the time of its conception. I dont care if its 500AD or 1500AD... its still arbitrary.

Ethics is "relative" but i'd trust my grasp on it over any racist or bigot anyday. I don't care if you're "protecting the white wealth from greedy immigrants" or are "federally insured an income because of some crony-cause" you're not someone i'd want preaching to me on any sunday.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#131 Feb 16, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>My company employs over 10,000 people and has government contracts in the eight figures.
How much am I "taking" little girl? A can of pop?
Sounds like you are "taking" every single penny you claim to earn. But I really don't know how much janitors at your company make.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#132 Feb 16, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like you are "taking" every single penny you claim to earn. But I really don't know how much janitors at your company make.
Likely more than a "lawyer" of your caliber does. I'll ask them Monday and let you know.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#133 Feb 16, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>That, above all other posts of yours, exemplifies the vile leftist mindset.
Oh come on. How many priests used that very same argument to explain why the altar boy shouldn't be upset?

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#134 Feb 16, 2013
Whoreallycares wrote:
I'd bet a crisp twenty that this "eberly" is either hugh or the artist wearing their "anonymous" mask for ethos purposes.
I want my points to stand on their own, compare me to whoever you want, but you're only repressing your own understanding.
What is unethical about eating meat on fridays? Do any "christians" still maintain the belief that doing so is somehow less sacred than eating fish or obstaining from red meat? My whole point was to note how the original intent in the creation of that religious prescription was anything but religious ideals... it was politically and economically motivated at the time of its conception. I dont care if its 500AD or 1500AD... its still arbitrary.
Ethics is "relative" but i'd trust my grasp on it over any racist or bigot anyday. I don't care if you're "protecting the white wealth from greedy immigrants" or are "federally insured an income because of some crony-cause" you're not someone i'd want preaching to me on any sunday.
Kid, you're batting .000 right from the start of that post. Eberly has been around forever and only recently migrated from the state board to the Columbus board.
The rest of your post wouldn't earn you a "D" in a public high school. You're just embarrassing yourself.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#135 Feb 16, 2013
Whoreallycares wrote:
I'd bet a crisp twenty that this "eberly" is either hugh or the artist wearing their "anonymous" mask for ethos purposes.
I want my points to stand on their own, compare me to whoever you want, but you're only repressing your own understanding.
What is unethical about eating meat on fridays? Do any "christians" still maintain the belief that doing so is somehow less sacred than eating fish or obstaining from red meat? My whole point was to note how the original intent in the creation of that religious prescription was anything but religious ideals... it was politically and economically motivated at the time of its conception. I dont care if its 500AD or 1500AD... its still arbitrary.
Ethics is "relative" but i'd trust my grasp on it over any racist or bigot anyday. I don't care if you're "protecting the white wealth from greedy immigrants" or are "federally insured an income because of some crony-cause" you're not someone i'd want preaching to me on any sunday.
Eberly repeats the same thing over and over, his views tend toward LaRouche.

Enjoy simmering in your oikophobia...
Whoreallycares

Columbus, OH

#136 Feb 16, 2013
I don't care how long they've been around, where they came from, or if they are REALLY them, because they're fucking anonymous. I got high marks in high school, and am not a "kid" by traditional defintion. Would hate for my childlike demeanor and internal fire to die out though, then i'd be hollow and cynical like the rest of you. I am however a younger adult, but I'm not entirely sure that matters, it won't change your judgemental attitude, thats for sure. Calling me a kid was a tell-tale sign of e-peen inflation. You're old mr.gruffykins huh :(. Have to call other people kids because you can't chip away at their arguements.

My ethos, or "who I am" or the character I assume for the purpose of this conversation is irrelevant. My content, however, is. I haven't read anything meaningful from you all day. All day.

What points were you making again? Why even bother to defend yourself about the whole federally supported thing? You'd know where you stand, why bother selling/defending yourself to anonymous internet people? Why did you attack me (weakly, I get you weren't being particularly agressive) rather than my points? If you want to defend yourself, defend it against accusations of racism/bigotry/anything else obviously observable in your forum posts. The Artist already chalked himself up to racist, hes proud of it, defending his white-nation brothers from the imminent immigrant threat!... a regular white-collar skin-head. Won't cop to the same? Don't want him one-upping you.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#137 Feb 16, 2013
In closing for the evening, I'd like to ask why he, "Whoreallycares" a "Libertarian," was so offended by the title of this post. He has said he was. But why?

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#138 Feb 16, 2013
Whoreallycares wrote:
I don't care how long they've been around, where they came from, or if they are REALLY them, because they're fucking anonymous. I got high marks in high school, and am not a "kid" by traditional defintion. Would hate for my childlike demeanor and internal fire to die out though, then i'd be hollow and cynical like the rest of you. I am however a younger adult, but I'm not entirely sure that matters, it won't change your judgemental attitude, thats for sure. Calling me a kid was a tell-tale sign of e-peen inflation. You're old mr.gruffykins huh :(. Have to call other people kids because you can't chip away at their arguements.
My ethos, or "who I am" or the character I assume for the purpose of this conversation is irrelevant. My content, however, is. I haven't read anything meaningful from you all day. All day.
What points were you making again? Why even bother to defend yourself about the whole federally supported thing? You'd know where you stand, why bother selling/defending yourself to anonymous internet people? Why did you attack me (weakly, I get you weren't being particularly agressive) rather than my points? If you want to defend yourself, defend it against accusations of racism/bigotry/anything else obviously observable in your forum posts. The Artist already chalked himself up to racist, hes proud of it, defending his white-nation brothers from the imminent immigrant threat!... a regular white-collar skin-head. Won't cop to the same? Don't want him one-upping you.
I'm 49, a college graduate with a 23 year career for a large company. I have a son who is most likely going to attend one of the three service academies.
You are a kid. If not, you are not only uneducated, but possibly developmentally disabled.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#139 Feb 16, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Likely more than a "lawyer" of your caliber does. I'll ask them Monday and let you know.
Ask them Monday. That's a good one.
Whoreallycares

Columbus, OH

#140 Feb 16, 2013
Because I don't hate, demean, or degrade any other political affiliations because of my personal beliefs on the matter.

I accept that there are two solid sides to every arguement, with valid points on both. I understand the beliefs of moderates, democrats, and the like and why they believe the way they do. Just because I believe differently doesn't make them wrong, thats why this same stale point has been debated for so fucking long. I told you, it was DESIGNED into our governmental structure, there isn't ALWAYS one "SINGLE" correct answer.

You can be fair by process, or fair by result, you can't always be fair by both.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#141 Feb 16, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask them Monday. That's a good one.
That's when I'm going to work. It's not like I have their phone numbers.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#142 Feb 16, 2013
Whoreallycares wrote:
I don't care how long they've been around, where they came from, or if they are REALLY them, because they're fucking anonymous. I got high marks in high school, and am not a "kid" by traditional defintion. Would hate for my childlike demeanor and internal fire to die out though, then i'd be hollow and cynical like the rest of you. I am however a younger adult, but I'm not entirely sure that matters, it won't change your judgemental attitude, thats for sure. Calling me a kid was a tell-tale sign of e-peen inflation. You're old mr.gruffykins huh :(. Have to call other people kids because you can't chip away at their arguements.
My ethos, or "who I am" or the character I assume for the purpose of this conversation is irrelevant. My content, however, is. I haven't read anything meaningful from you all day. All day.
What points were you making again? Why even bother to defend yourself about the whole federally supported thing? You'd know where you stand, why bother selling/defending yourself to anonymous internet people? Why did you attack me (weakly, I get you weren't being particularly agressive) rather than my points? If you want to defend yourself, defend it against accusations of racism/bigotry/anything else obviously observable in your forum posts. The Artist already chalked himself up to racist, hes proud of it, defending his white-nation brothers from the imminent immigrant threat!... a regular white-collar skin-head. Won't cop to the same? Don't want him one-upping you.
I didn't say that I was a racist, I said that I didn't care if I was called a racist.

I'm not bald, so I can't be a skinhead, and I never liked punk rock.
Whoreallycares

Columbus, OH

#143 Feb 16, 2013
I honestly don't care how old you are, the position you hold, or anything else related to it.

You are either the person making the posts on this board (whose personality I can grasp from my 2 month observation) or you are posing as a person with those beliefs for whatever reason, in which case i'll use your skeleton to pose my points. Because whether you are or aren't a conservative douche-bag, there are hundreds... nay THOUSANDS of conservative douche-bags with the same agenda... and they fucking besmirch the conservative idealology and THROW AWAY ELECTION POTENTIAL. I want to see a solid Republican president as much as the next conservative, but if you keep with the same approach you've had for six years, you'll get shit on the same way you have been for six years.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result. Insulting the president and glueing yourself to an ancient broad platform economically or to a misguided neo-con platform that stands currently will only spell more defeat. You'll end up looking like Palin, then Dems and Cons alike can bash you.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#144 Feb 16, 2013
Whoreallycares wrote:
I got high marks in high school, and am not a "kid" by traditional defintion.
"Marks"

You aren't from this country are you?

That's a British term, like "maths"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Lawyer booked on charges he stole from guardian... 1 hr Silna 17
President Ebola 1 hr Duke for Mayor 658
Good morning BizzyBee and friends 1 hr They cannot kill ... 18
Autopsy, toxicology report on Michael Brown 1 hr Duke for Mayor 35
destiny Gilliam/benbrook 2 hr justagirl 15
Breaking: Second Nurse w/ Ebola flies with 99.5... 3 hr Male 116
Woman Behind Columbus Ebola Hoax Faces $2,800 Bill 3 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 3
Xenos Christian Fellowship is a CULT! (Jul '12) Tue J-Corn 981
Columbus Dating
Find my Match

Columbus Jobs

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]