"What difference does it make?"

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#127 May 6, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
Note how Reader's own rush to judgement in the Zimmerman case is perfectly justified in her mind.
Rush?

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#128 May 6, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a small town, reader. They told the truth and the place (a hovel, except for the PP sign) was shut down. May it never return.
So you have been inside and observed procedures?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#129 May 6, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
No, consistently oppose murder of the unborn.
Pro-choice is pro-abortion. There is no gray area.
Are you penpals with Gosnell?
You are only pro-murder in the cases of rape, incest and to save the life of the mother, right?

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#130 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Pro-choice.
And you consistently oppose choice.
Where the choice involves a mother murdering her in-utero child on demand for any reason...I will continue to oppose that choice.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#131 May 6, 2013
They cannot kill a Spook wrote:
<quoted text>
The communist filth of the left claim that the majority of NRA members favored expanded background checks. They say the same of Veterans. I am both a Veteran and a NRA member ( as well as several other gun owner and collector groups), yet not only have I never been polled about any background check legislation or increased gun control, I have never met another Veteran or gun owner, especially NRA member that was polled either.
It is highly unlikely that any member in good standing was ever polled let alone is for any gun control.
My husband and I and quite a few of our friends and family are NRA members. I can find none that have been polled.

There is absolutely no legislaton that will decrease gun violence by even 1%. The criminals don't have registered guns now and they never will.

An average citizen would never modify an AK to fully automatic, a criminal will.

Since this thread is about Benghazi, how many legally attained weapons do you think were used by the terrorists that night?

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#132 May 6, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You are only pro-murder in the cases of rape, incest and to save the life of the mother, right?
Absolutely to save the life of the mother. But I'll come clean about it. I am not afraid or PC about it. I'm not comfortable with any other abortion. The number of legal abortions performed due to rape or incest is so minuscule, I can live with it.

And I do not hold the woman who had a one time abortion in the same distain that I hold the pro-abortion zealots that rant and rave about 'free choice' everyday of their lives.

It is what it is: Murder
They cannot kill a Spook

Toledo, OH

#133 May 6, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
My husband and I and quite a few of our friends and family are NRA members. I can find none that have been polled.
There is absolutely no legislaton that will decrease gun violence by even 1%. The criminals don't have registered guns now and they never will.
An average citizen would never modify an AK to fully automatic, a criminal will.
Since this thread is about Benghazi, how many legally attained weapons do you think were used by the terrorists that night?
Considering it is a over run with various factions of islamic lunatics the answer coukd be 100% or zero. But with either case there are no background checks over there. Cash is King when it comes to weapons purchases.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#134 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
So you have been inside and observed procedures?
Have you? I think you would enjoy that. Go look at a 24 week old fetus, reader. Then come back and tell me late term abortions are fine for any reason, let alone 'economic.'

Since: Apr 13

Columbus, OH

#135 May 6, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
DNA is present at defecation.
I believe it is present prior to and preceeding.

And oddly enough, a certain type fungi that grows from elephant, camel, horse and cow defecation is quite enlightening, or so I've read.

Since: Apr 13

Columbus, OH

#136 May 6, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
No, consistently oppose murder of the unborn.
Pro-choice is pro-abortion. There is no gray area.
Are you penpals with Gosnell?
An English lesson for you.

Pro=for
Choice-option

Pro-life, who favor war and death penalties are oxymorons

Since: Apr 13

Columbus, OH

#137 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Rush?
Have you been hitting the butyl nitrate again?

Since: Apr 13

Columbus, OH

#138 May 6, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Where the choice involves a mother murdering her in-utero child on demand for any reason...I will continue to oppose that choice.
Face it, you're anti-choice. You don't believe anyone should have the choices you don't like.

Not very American, sport.

Since: Apr 13

Columbus, OH

#139 May 6, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
My husband and I and quite a few of our friends and family are NRA members. I can find none that have been polled.
There is absolutely no legislaton that will decrease gun violence by even 1%. The criminals don't have registered guns now and they never will.
An average citizen would never modify an AK to fully automatic, a criminal will.
Since this thread is about Benghazi, how many legally attained weapons do you think were used by the terrorists that night?
In Libya? I think the law is, if you have the funds to purchase, it's legal. My second bet, if you have both the funds to purchase and the funds to bribe, no law will be enforced.

Since: Apr 13

Columbus, OH

#140 May 6, 2013
They cannot kill a Spook wrote:
<quoted text>
Considering it is a over run with various factions of islamic lunatics the answer coukd be 100% or zero. But with either case there are no background checks over there. Cash is King when it comes to weapons purchases.
Wow, you're being reasonable tonight.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#141 May 6, 2013
St of Circumstance wrote:
<quoted text>
Face it, you're anti-choice. You don't believe anyone should have the choices you don't like.
Not very American, sport.
No, we just believe the choice should be made before a woman becomes pregnant. With all of the available birth control, that should not be that much of a chore. I, and I think I can speak for Tip, don't want to take that choice away.

Your remark that it is not 'very American' is true.
And that is very sad. It is not PC to be anti-abortion.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#142 May 6, 2013
St of Circumstance wrote:
<quoted text>
Face it, you're anti-choice. You don't believe anyone should have the choices you don't like.
Not very American, sport.
Again, we are speaking of the choice of a mother to murder her in-utero child on demand for any reason.

Explain how infanticide is "very American."

Since: Apr 13

Columbus, OH

#143 May 6, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
No, we just believe the choice should be made before a woman becomes pregnant. With all of the available birth control, that should not be that much of a chore. I, and I think I can speak for Tip, don't want to take that choice away.
Your remark that it is not 'very American' is true.
And that is very sad. It is not PC to be anti-abortion.
I'm neither pro nor anti abortion. I'm a man and I'll never get pregnant, therefore I will never face the decision. My gal cannot get pregnant so we have a very easy choice (yahoo)

I do, however believe that this is an issue left to the ultimate judge and he's not on earth. If one decides to go that route, they will have to answer for it. It's not up to man or government to decide.

“Hereeeeee'ssss UR Pizza”

Since: May 13

Columbus, OH

#144 May 6, 2013
Pizza anyone? ;-)

Since: Apr 13

Columbus, OH

#145 May 6, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, we are speaking of the choice of a mother to murder her in-utero child on demand for any reason.
Explain how infanticide is "very American."
You say that in one breath and then disregard the 1st amendment. You speak from strictly a misinformed religious view, with a bit of venegance smattered in there.

As far as being 'American' one can't claim a fetus on their tax return, nor can they grant it any form of legal transfer. Our own laws are structured to preserve those outside of the womb. Until they can breathe on their own, our gov't has no business meddling. They've tried over the years, like an expectant mother using drugs, but it's always failed.

Since: Apr 13

Columbus, OH

#146 May 6, 2013
Free Pizza 4 U wrote:
Pizza anyone? ;-)
No anchovies, please

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Man shot near Ferguson protest….. 4 min Reality Speaks 221
AN ODE TO billary! 5 min Seriouslady 20
They're Shooting News Reporters On Live TV 57 min d pants 53
Obama names Mt McKinley, Denali 4 hr Jose 5
News Group raising funds to set up kosher pantry at ... 5 hr d pants 43
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 5 hr d pants 6,438
News Woman caught with 47 heroin balloons in her bod... (May '11) 15 hr Haha 30
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages