"What difference does it make?"

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#24 May 6, 2013
GlitterSucks wrote:
<quoted text>Haven't been chased recently. My pet groundhog is done hibernating and I am feeding him well. Still waiting on seeing my deer. How's the retard...not asking about Reader.
LMAO....Lord you're a woman after my own heart. Glit, don't let the groundhog anywhere near your dog. Groundhogs can kill even big, vicious dogs. The other thing I know is groundhogs will NOT cross a patch of stink bug carcasses. "He" will probably be bringing 'kits' to see you soon.
Put some sweet potatoes....any sweet veggie or fruit out to attract the deer.

So, whistle blowers at State Dept and one at the CIA have lawyered up and are going to testify about what went down on 9-11-12. There may even be a special op or two testify. They all say they have been threatened by the administration if they told the truth.

Hillary apparently ordered the group just for anti-terrorism to "stand down" during the attack.

At CBS, there is a journalist covering it,(See George's thread from yesterday) and, of course, FNC. Other than that the media is mum on it.
Yesterday a dem on Chris Wallace's show stated that Susan Rice's 'talking points' absolutely had been 'scrubbed' and altered NOT to mention terrorism.

It's bad. It's a cover up that far surpasses Watergate, but we all know the relationship between this administration and the media, so we have to see if it gains attention, or in Hillary's words, "What difference does it make?"

Then again, with the 2014 midterms coming up, maybe some dems will grow a pair.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#25 May 6, 2013
FKAdukechereader wrote:
<quoted text>
You bet.
I would guess that Hill and Bill know a lot of fun stuff.
I think Bill has taken the last 'one for the team.' And I don't think he likes Obama.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#26 May 6, 2013
-tip- wrote:
Hillary's about to burn.
Obama will remain unscathed.
Bill must be mad as hell.
Let's get this straight, tip.

You are predicting something yet to happen, based on a report associated with the lying name of Breitbart?

In the 'hood we call that selling wolf tickets.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#27 May 6, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Hillary was responsible for security at the embassy.
She failed to secure it and then failed to reinforce it during a known terror attack.
The whistleblower testimony will leave no doubt about her culpability in the deaths of U.S. citizens serving under her.
There is no logical response to such utter negligence.
Hillary is finished.
And the DNC and all the feminists can send their thank-you cards to Obama.
The divisive effect of the Obama Machine on the Democrat party as a whole -- particularly, moving toward 2016 -- will be most interesting to observe.
Face it folks, Hillary is a target, and not from Obama.

The Repubs are gunning for her because she appears to be electable.

And they are still stuck in the rut of being the "party of stupid" (per Bobby Jindal).

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#28 May 6, 2013
GlitterSucks wrote:
<quoted text>Concur. Regardless, all scenarios show the "integrity" of the job they were appointed/elected to. Understand, I am not equating loss of life to a pic of a wee wee or an extramarital affair, all make me shake my head.
An extramarital affair on the public dime, don't forget.

And while the the office was abandoned and nobody knew where Sanford was.

The term "loose cannon" comes to mind.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#29 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's get this straight, tip.
You are predicting something yet to happen, based on a report associated with the lying name of Breitbart?
In the 'hood we call that selling wolf tickets.
You are woefully underinformed, as usual.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#31 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Face it folks, Hillary is a target, and not from Obama.
The Repubs are gunning for her because she appears to be electable.
And they are still stuck in the rut of being the "party of stupid" (per Bobby Jindal).
The GOP didn't leave Benghazi twisting in the wind.
Your weak counterattack will never fly.
Truths are being revealed.
And the Obama Machine chose the perfect sacrificial lamb.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#32 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
An extramarital affair on the public dime, don't forget.
And while the the office was abandoned and nobody knew where Sanford was.
The term "loose cannon" comes to mind.
Sanford is a prick.
But he did not knowingly allow Americans to die at the hands of Muslim terrorists.
Hillary did.
And the Obama Machine will see to that.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#33 May 6, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
You are woefully underinformed, as usual.
The hearings are not until Wednesday, correct?

Based on info published in the notoriously (and possibly willfully) inaccurate Breitbart website, you are predicting the downfall of Hillary--and further claiming that this has been engineered by the President, correct?

Now beyond that Darrell (or Daniel--per SL) Issa said a few things yesterday on Face the Nation, quibbling over the terminology "attack" vs "attack by terrorists."

I would say that much remains to be seen.

BTW--I really had to giggle at Issa claiming to want to crawl in a hole of embarrassment when Susan Rice failed to endorse al-Magariaf's immediate assessment of "attack by terrorists" on the basis that one does not disagree with a foreign head of state in public. Really? I wonder if he felt that way when Mexican President Felipe Calderone called for re-instatement of the US assault weapons ban, due to the negative impact the deregulation was having on crime in his country.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#34 May 6, 2013
FKAdukechereader wrote:
<quoted text>
There must be some sort of state rule about posting all day on the internet instead of doing the work you are paid for.
I guess that ripping off your employer is OK in the "hood" huh queenie.
You don't get a lunch hour or breaks where you work?

Or, you do work, don't you?

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#35 May 6, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
The GOP didn't leave Benghazi twisting in the wind.
Your weak counterattack will never fly.
Truths are being revealed.
And the Obama Machine chose the perfect sacrificial lamb.
The GOP certainly had a hand in the budget cuts that had an impact.

Truths may well be revealed--but you appear to have already decided what they are.

And Obama has little to gain at this point by "sacrificing" Hillary--and far more to gain by supporting her.

But that wouldn't fit with what you have aleady decided must be the "truth."

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#37 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
The hearings are not until Wednesday, correct?
Based on info published in the notoriously (and possibly willfully) inaccurate Breitbart website, you are predicting the downfall of Hillary--and further claiming that this has been engineered by the President, correct?
Now beyond that Darrell (or Daniel--per SL) Issa said a few things yesterday on Face the Nation, quibbling over the terminology "attack" vs "attack by terrorists."
I would say that much remains to be seen.
BTW--I really had to giggle at Issa claiming to want to crawl in a hole of embarrassment when Susan Rice failed to endorse al-Magariaf's immediate assessment of "attack by terrorists" on the basis that one does not disagree with a foreign head of state in public. Really? I wonder if he felt that way when Mexican President Felipe Calderone called for re-instatement of the US assault weapons ban, due to the negative impact the deregulation was having on crime in his country.
Emerge from your HuffPo rabbit hole every once in a while, will ya?
You might find that the Breitbart you love to hate is not the only media outlet reporting on the whistleblower testimony; in fact, George linked to a CBS [gasp!] report yesterday.

Further, Congressional Dems are waking up to the potential fallout from these events.
After all, 2014 is around the corner -- and politicians who want to remain in office cannot be seen as defending a policy of ignoring Muslim terrorism and allowing Americans to die as a result.

Benghazi.
Boston.

I am not claiming that Obama engineered these events; however, a sacrificial lamb at the helm of the State Dept.-- should Islamic relations go south -- is good planning on his part. That it happens to be his own Dem archnemesis is icing on the cake.

That he has extra melanin...is his ultimate insurance.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#38 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
...And Obama has little to gain at this point by "sacrificing" Hillary....
Are you stupid or somethin'?
He is saving his own arse from the fire.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#39 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Face it folks, Hillary is a target, and not from Obama.
The Repubs are gunning for her because she appears to be electable.
And they are still stuck in the rut of being the "party of stupid" (per Bobby Jindal).
Why, in your opinion as a leftist giving us advice, is it wrong to go after Hillary on the Benghazi incident, when the State Department knowingly misled the public?

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#40 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
The GOP certainly had a hand in the budget cuts that had an impact.
As I said many times, note the European embassies that got the Chevy Volts and charging stations.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#41 May 6, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Sanford is a prick.
But he did not knowingly allow Americans to die at the hands of Muslim terrorists.
Hillary did.
And the Obama Machine will see to that.
Talk is that since the D candidate Colburt's sister is actually running as a full dope liberal, instead of a half dope moderate, that Sanford the crook might win.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#42 May 6, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
An extramarital affair on the public dime, don't forget.
And while the the office was abandoned and nobody knew where Sanford was.
The term "loose cannon" comes to mind.
I'll get flak for this, but you are right on this.
They cannot kill a Spook

Taylor, MI

#43 May 6, 2013
GlitterSucks wrote:
<quoted text>Haven't been chased recently. My pet groundhog is done hibernating and I am feeding him well. Still waiting on seeing my deer. How's the retard...not asking about Reader.
He is doing great. He has decide Alley Cat cat food is his favorite besides the buttered sweet corn. The new kittens follow him around.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#44 May 6, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Emerge from your HuffPo rabbit hole every once in a while, will ya?
You might find that the Breitbart you love to hate is not the only media outlet reporting on the whistleblower testimony; in fact, George linked to a CBS [gasp!] report yesterday.
Further, Congressional Dems are waking up to the potential fallout from these events.
After all, 2014 is around the corner -- and politicians who want to remain in office cannot be seen as defending a policy of ignoring Muslim terrorism and allowing Americans to die as a result.
Benghazi.
Boston.
I am not claiming that Obama engineered these events; however, a sacrificial lamb at the helm of the State Dept.-- should Islamic relations go south -- is good planning on his part. That it happens to be his own Dem archnemesis is icing on the cake.
That he has extra melanin...is his ultimate insurance.
Yes, I read the CBS article. "Whistle-blowers" will be testifying, although exactly what they will testify to is yet to be revealed. And in some cases even their identity is yet to be revealed.

This is far from "sign, sealed and delivered," particularly with the conclusions that you reach.

And the fantasy that poor Hillary will go down at Obama's hand is just a tad too convenient for a lot of Republicans who really wish she would simply go away. The 2014 elections are looming on both sides. The Repubs are looking for an issue they can blame on the Dems. They can't quite get together on anything they are FOR. Much easier to find something that they are against.

Hard to govern that way.

Just ask Congress.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#45 May 6, 2013
FKAdukechereader wrote:
<quoted text>
Damnnnnn FKA Reader
The state must be great to work for.
Since you post ALL DAY LONG here 5 of the working days in a week, you must get an eight hour lunch break.
Do you take a couple of hours off on Sunday to pray to the earth mother?
WOLF
It sounds like you are fishing for me to tell you my work schedule.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Trump BALD HEAD 1 hr White Fangs 67
AEP silences #MeToo complaint 1 hr 404 not found 20
The Empty Head of Donald J. Trump 2 hr White Fangs 7
John Lewis Heckled on Airplane Flight 2 hr They cannot kill ... 2
PRESIDENT TRUMP says 'DACA is probably dead' bl... 2 hr They cannot kill ... 8
STILL WAITING for someone to explain how the wo... 3 hr They cannot kill ... 13
Is Trump Healthy or they LYING? 3 hr Republicans Shill... 7

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages