Media bias, yes it's real

Media bias, yes it's real

Posted in the Columbus Forum

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#1 Feb 21, 2013
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens...

Stats don't lie

The media will not go after the Ds
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#2 Feb 21, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/g eoffrey-dickens/2013/02/21/big -three-network-double-standard -labeling-scandalous-politicia ns
Stats don't lie
The media will not go after the Ds
You must be the most paranoid person in Medina.
Oliver Canterberry

Chillicothe, OH

#3 Feb 21, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/g eoffrey-dickens/2013/02/21/big -three-network-double-standard -labeling-scandalous-politicia ns
Stats don't lie
The media will not go after the Ds
The media loves evil and hates goodness.
Telgin

Valley City, OH

#4 Feb 21, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You must be the most paranoid person in Medina.
So you consider factual-ism to be the same as paranoia?
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#5 Feb 21, 2013
Telgin wrote:
<quoted text>So you consider factual-ism to be the same as paranoia?
No.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#6 Feb 21, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
They counted up the data, and the results show a bias.

We call that facts.
off the rails

Dayton, OH

#7 Feb 21, 2013
The media, "main stream", has been libby for 50 years. They have attained thier goal and cannot help themselves now. The cancer has metastasized and is busy trying to uphold gains but thier ass is rotting off.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#8 Feb 21, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
They counted up the data, and the results show a bias.
We call that facts.
That assumes the accuracy of the data and the integrity of the analyst. Both of which are highly suspect in your "study."

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#9 Feb 21, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
That assumes the accuracy of the data and the integrity of the analyst. Both of which are highly suspect in your "study."
By your standards, MMFA is delegitimized...

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#10 Feb 21, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You must be the most paranoid person in Medina.
You people had low information paranoids convinced that the GOP presidential candidate was somehow going to "abolish contraception." Says a lot about those you consider allies, huh?
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#11 Feb 21, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
By your standards, MMFA is delegitimized...
MMFA. Is that a mixed martial arts league?

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#12 Feb 21, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
MMFA. Is that a mixed martial arts league?
Hello???

Bueller

Bueller

Bueller

Media Matters for America

And I was told that it was the conservatives who were backward...
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#13 Feb 21, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello???
Bueller
Bueller
Bueller
Media Matters for America
And I was told that it was the conservatives who were backward...
You like to talk in anagrams. I don't know why. Maybe you think it makes you look cool. It limits your ability to communicate.

So what does MMFA have to do with what you posted?

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#14 Feb 21, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You like to talk in anagrams. I don't know why. Maybe you think it makes you look cool. It limits your ability to communicate.
So what does MMFA have to do with what you posted?
Acronyms, not anagrams

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anagram

That J.D. does not make you into a superior class of being.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#15 Feb 21, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Acronyms, not anagrams
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anagram
That J.D. does not make you into a superior class of being.
Yep. I made a mistake. Doesn't change that the acronym you cited isn't mentioned anywhere in your link.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#16 Feb 21, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. I made a mistake. Doesn't change that the acronym you cited isn't mentioned anywhere in your link.
Post 8- you said that Newsbusters (MRC) was not reliable

Post 9- I said that Soros funded MMFA (Media Matters) can't be reliable by your standards either.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#17 Feb 21, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Post 8- you said that Newsbusters (MRC) was not reliable
Post 9- I said that Soros funded MMFA (Media Matters) can't be reliable by your standards either.
I never vouched for any of those organizations. But your logic is faulty. I never stated what standard I was applying, did I? You are prone to making pretty big assumptions. Perhaps you don't have a problem with the MSM. Perhaps you have a problem with any media outlet that publishes ideas you don't agree with.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#18 Feb 21, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I never vouched for any of those organizations. But your logic is faulty. I never stated what standard I was applying, did I? You are prone to making pretty big assumptions. Perhaps you don't have a problem with the MSM. Perhaps you have a problem with any media outlet that publishes ideas you don't agree with.
I don't like Fox News, but that is said to be a conservative channel.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#19 Feb 21, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't like Fox News, but that is said to be a conservative channel.
The sources of information you post here have as much, if not more, of a political agenda as the media outlets you rail against. Be honest. You don't care that they have an agenda, you just disagree with the agenda you perceive them as having.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#20 Feb 21, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
The sources of information you post here have as much, if not more, of a political agenda as the media outlets you rail against. Be honest. You don't care that they have an agenda, you just disagree with the agenda you perceive them as having.
MSNBC at least admits that it has an agenda. CNN doesn't and neither does the rest of the MSM.

If they claim objectivity, then they need to get rid of the bias. If they want to be openly partisan, then they should admit to being openly partisan, so that the idiots that don't realize the bias get a "red pill" moment.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Trump Golf Balls Hillary, Absolutely Hillaryious 7 min Big Johnson 40
I Don't Shop Online. Takes away neighborhood jobs 24 min bricey 2
Do you miss Channel 10? 59 min shadow_hunter 2
Does anyone still believe Obama is not a US cit... 1 hr Sledgehammer Man 7
The Idealism of the U.S. Flag Deserves American... 1 hr Sledgehammer Man 9
Rocket Man 1 hr Sledgehammer Man 8
Why do Republicans love Russian lovers more tha... 1 hr d pants 80

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages