Where's the National Outrage?
First Prev
of 8
Next Last
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#149 Mar 8, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
The last figure I heard in the news cycle Che was 85 billion, but the first number that Bernanke announced with the policy back in September or October of last year was 40 billion a month until the Fed changes it's mind. You don't even care what the Fed does anyway, so why do you ask?
I had mentioned that the 40 billion a month number was way low; and had heard 80 billion every month for far into the future.

point being....the USA is the poorest nation in the world.

nobody even close to being as poor as we are as a Nation; and our Democratic run Government wants to spend us to prosperity.

The US dollar is losing value faster than citizens can earn a dollar.

When the quantitive easing ends, the Stock Market will crash.

Question..........
how many months of $80,000,000,000 of new printed money does it take to devalue the dollar to worthlessness?
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#150 Mar 9, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
I had mentioned that the 40 billion a month number was way low; and had heard 80 billion every month for far into the future.
point being....the USA is the poorest nation in the world.
nobody even close to being as poor as we are as a Nation; and our Democratic run Government wants to spend us to prosperity.
The US dollar is losing value faster than citizens can earn a dollar.
When the quantitive easing ends, the Stock Market will crash.
Question..........
how many months of $80,000,000,000 of new printed money does it take to devalue the dollar to worthlessness?
As long as we have citizens like Che that don't know and don't care. Our government is nothing more then a reflection of us, the people, who a majority no longer cares about constitutional government or morality. We just want to be entertained.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#151 Mar 9, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
As long as we have citizens like Che that don't know and don't care. Our government is nothing more then a reflection of us, the people, who a majority no longer cares about constitutional government or morality. We just want to be entertained.
The problem is your definition of constitutional government. You want a government based on an ignorant and uneducated interpretation of the constitution.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#152 Mar 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is your definition of constitutional government. You want a government based on an ignorant and uneducated interpretation of the constitution.
how do you interpret.....thou shall not be infringed?

there is only one interpretation. Simple plain English.

it can not be spun.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#153 Mar 9, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
how do you interpret.....thou shall not be infringed?
there is only one interpretation. Simple plain English.
it can not be spun.
Do you support background checks?
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#154 Mar 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is your definition of constitutional government. You want a government based on an ignorant and uneducated interpretation of the constitution.
It's not my side Che that thinks it's a "living document". If you have read the Federalist Papers, and even casually studied Jefferson and Madison, the constitution does a fine job defining itself. It's very to the point Che, if you have ever taken the time to read it. Unlike the Affordable Healthcare Act (aka Obamacare) which is over 2000 pages long and even the lawyers struggle to understand, the constitution is only six pages long with the Bill of Rights. The only body that gets to "define" or interpret the document is the Supreme Court. So I take it that you are a product of the public schools?
Big Johnson

Columbus, OH

#155 Mar 9, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
If you have read the Federalist Papers, and even casually studied Jefferson and Madison, the constitution does a fine job defining itself.
Why would one need to read The Federalist Papers and study Jefferson and Madison to understand a document that does a fine job of defining itself?
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#156 Mar 9, 2013
Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would one need to read The Federalist Papers and study Jefferson and Madison to understand a document that does a fine job of defining itself?
The fact you had to ask tells me the bulk of your thinking in life has been with your "Big Johnson". Public schools, right?
Big Johnson

Columbus, OH

#157 Mar 9, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact you had to ask tells me the bulk of your thinking in life has been with your "Big Johnson". Public schools, right?
The fact that you are unable to answer tells me you don't think.

Of course you would not know this but it's good to be "Big".
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#158 Mar 9, 2013
I don't think you want me to teach you a history lesson here "BJ", but we did not even adopt the constitution until 1788, although we declared our independence twelve years prior to that during the second continental congress. The politics back then was just as brutal, and centralized government authority represented not much more then tyranny to most of the free states. That is why the articles of confederation failed, and ultimately the continental congress. The hard work of the founding fathers is remarkable in what they accomplished, and today we have pissed it all away to a centralized government authority that has selfishly mortgaged our children's future with their irresponsible spending to satisfy the lust so many have for redistributing what other people make.
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#159 Mar 9, 2013
Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that you are unable to answer tells me you don't think.
Of course you would not know this but it's good to be "Big".
Just let me know if there is anything else "Beej".
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#160 Mar 11, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you support background checks?
already doing it for over 10 years.

do you support jock itch?
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#161 Mar 11, 2013
Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would one need to read The Federalist Papers and study Jefferson and Madison to understand a document that does a fine job of defining itself?
public school moron post above.

above is a perfect demonstration of the dumbing down of america.

above person ever earning more than minimum wage is a fantasy.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#162 Mar 11, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
already doing it for over 10 years.
do you support jock itch?
That wasn't my question. Do you support them or do you think they should be eliminated?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#163 Mar 11, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
public school moron post above.
above is a perfect demonstration of the dumbing down of america.
above person ever earning more than minimum wage is a fantasy.
I think you totally missed his point.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#164 Mar 11, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
public school moron post above.
above is a perfect demonstration of the dumbing down of america.
above person ever earning more than minimum wage is a fantasy.
Seemed like a pretty reasonable question to me.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#165 Mar 11, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Seemed like a pretty reasonable question to me.
so that makes 2 of you then.

splains a lot

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#167 Mar 11, 2013
You cannot kill a Spook wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why does the leftist scum have such a problem understand "shall not be infringed"
Spook, I think we would all just love it if you could offer us a close reading of the second amendment. It would clarify just so much.
Jill

Huntington, WV

#168 Mar 11, 2013
lol

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 8
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll Who Do You Support For President 4 min Doc 412
Absolutely Worthless RINO Republicans 17 min Linda 5
News Rachel Cushard 34 min Big Johnson 1
Obama rated 5th best POTUS in history! 2 hr Neutral Party 99
updated list of firsts for forty-fore 8 hr server wiper downer 3
Arby's ground zero in war on cops 11 hr Spit on a cops bu... 14
Extra. Extra. Read all about it! 11 hr Spot for Guvnah 4
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages