Family of drunken man killed by car s...

Family of drunken man killed by car sues Ohio cops about 1 hour

There are 141 comments on the The Review story from Jan 19, 2014, titled Family of drunken man killed by car sues Ohio cops about 1 hour. In it, The Review reports that:

The family of a drunken man picked up by Ohio police officers and dropped off at a Taco Bell before he was fatally struck by a car has sued over his death, accusing authorities of racial discrimination and putting their loved in danger as part of a "perverse joke" about his Mexican heritage.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Review.

Trayvonius Martinez

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#111 Jan 23, 2014
Pardon me while I rub your face in it, Douchie:

"First, let's be clear what parcels we're talking about. The Win Win Agreement contains exhibits that spell out with precision the boundaries of the area that Columbus City Schools agrees will be left in the suburban districts. In the case of Hilliard City Schools, this represents roughly the large swath of land between I-270 and the Scioto River, and another couple of large hunks on the southern border of the district.

These areas include neighborhoods such as Golfview Woods, Highpoint, Westbrooke Park, Crosscreek Village, Thornapple Grove, Saddlebrook, Hilliard Green, Western Lakes, Scioto Trace, The Glen, River Place, and Bayside Commons Apartments."
http://www.savehilliardschools.org/2010/03/wi...

Your friend the convict is going to Crosscreek Village.

Trayvonius Martinez

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#112 Jan 23, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I just posted the address Paco.
woof
And it blew up in your face. imagine that.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#113 Jan 23, 2014
d pantz wrote:
<quoted text> well, they must be electing truck drivers as judges then huh?? Because you seem to be confused as to the law. You and the other "lawyer" who posts here.... http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28...
It doesn't take rocket appliances to figure out that these professionals ruled differently than what you think the law is.
Did the cop run him over??? No! Do the cops really protect anybody ever??? Not usually.
First, find a post where I ever stated that the police have a constitutional duty to protect anyone. I never wrote that.

Second, there is a difference between a constitutional duty to protect and a duty to act reasonably once a police officer chooses to insinuate himself into a situation and take custody of someone. But of course, you knew that.

So, was I right about the truck driver thing?
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#114 Jan 23, 2014
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
<quoted text>And it blew up in your face. imagine that.
Oh Paco, you know I enjoy stirring you up. So nice to have you back.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#115 Jan 23, 2014
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
Pardon me while I rub your face in it, Douchie:
"First, let's be clear what parcels we're talking about. The Win Win Agreement contains exhibits that spell out with precision the boundaries of the area that Columbus City Schools agrees will be left in the suburban districts. In the case of Hilliard City Schools, this represents roughly the large swath of land between I-270 and the Scioto River, and another couple of large hunks on the southern border of the district.
These areas include neighborhoods such as Golfview Woods, Highpoint, Westbrooke Park, Crosscreek Village, Thornapple Grove, Saddlebrook, Hilliard Green, Western Lakes, Scioto Trace, The Glen, River Place, and Bayside Commons Apartments."
http://www.savehilliardschools.org/2010/03/wi...
Your friend the convict is going to Crosscreek Village.
He's a lot closer to being your friend than mine Paco. I doubt I'll ever run into him in my travels around town.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#116 Jan 23, 2014
d pantz wrote:
<quoted text> well, they must be electing truck drivers as judges then huh?? Because you seem to be confused as to the law. You and the other "lawyer" who posts here.... http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28...
It doesn't take rocket appliances to figure out that these professionals ruled differently than what you think the law is.
Did the cop run him over??? No! Do the cops really protect anybody ever??? Not usually.
One question.

Just minutes before they died, were those kids that were murdered by their father in the custody of the police ?

woof

Trayvonius Martinez

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#117 Jan 23, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Paco, you know I enjoy stirring you up. So nice to have you back.
woof
You stirred yourself into utter embarrassment by posting the address, Douchie.
One would think a "lawyer" would know when not to volunteer information.

Trayvonius Martinez

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#118 Jan 23, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a lot closer to being your friend than mine Paco. I doubt I'll ever run into him in my travels around town.
woof
Nor I, Douchie...all his needs lie to his south...even further from the Hilliard city line.
They cannot kill a Spook

Taylor, MI

#119 Jan 23, 2014
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
Pardon me while I rub your face in it, Douchie:
"First, let's be clear what parcels we're talking about. The Win Win Agreement contains exhibits that spell out with precision the boundaries of the area that Columbus City Schools agrees will be left in the suburban districts. In the case of Hilliard City Schools, this represents roughly the large swath of land between I-270 and the Scioto River, and another couple of large hunks on the southern border of the district.
These areas include neighborhoods such as Golfview Woods, Highpoint, Westbrooke Park, Crosscreek Village, Thornapple Grove, Saddlebrook, Hilliard Green, Western Lakes, Scioto Trace, The Glen, River Place, and Bayside Commons Apartments."
http://www.savehilliardschools.org/2010/03/wi...
Your friend the convict is going to Crosscreek Village.
The zip codes may have Hilliard as the mail route origination but those places are pure Colemanistan.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#120 Jan 23, 2014
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
<quoted text>You stirred yourself into utter embarrassment by posting the address, Douchie.
One would think a "lawyer" would know when not to volunteer information.
Beyond getting a rise out of you, what makes you think I care Paco?

woof

Trayvonius Martinez

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#121 Jan 23, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Beyond getting a rise out of you, what makes you think I care Paco?
woof
Too stupid to be embarrassed? That's certainly in keeping with the scum with whom you identify.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#122 Jan 23, 2014
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
<quoted text>Too stupid to be embarrassed? That's certainly in keeping with the scum with whom you identify.
No Paco, I enjoy chuckling at how such simple things cause you to claim "victory", as if they matter.

woof

Trayvonius Martinez

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#123 Jan 23, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
No Paco, I enjoy chuckling at how such simple things cause you to claim "victory", as if they matter.
woof
Exposing your arrogant stupidity and proving yet again that you have no business here...I'm loving it.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#128 Jan 24, 2014
d pantz wrote:
<quoted text> 1st. what were you implying when you said we need to look up "vicarious liability"?
2and the difference would be that no, there isn't usually a difference, many people are beaten by police while in custody. Unarmed innocent people and usually the judge makes their decision based on the "constitution". http://www.google.com/search...
Let me guess, you're a divorce lawyer?
If you would have looked up "vicarious liability" you might know. The concept of vicarious liability has absolutely nothing to do with whether a police officer has a duty to protect. The fact that you can't see a difference in duty between protecting a person from a potential threat and when the police officer has taken custody of someone is one reason why you drive that truck.

I don't do divorce work. I can't stand dealing with people like Nate.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#129 Jan 24, 2014
d pantz wrote:
So do you see the obligation of the "employees" (the pigs) to their employer is that their not obligated to protect you... and the only "vicarious liability" cops seem to have is to lie to "criminal suspects"? They do approach every person, whether they saw them commit a crime or not, as a criminal suspect!
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/never-tal...
Vicarious liability doesn't have anything to do with an employees duty to his employer. You are very confused.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#130 Jan 24, 2014
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
<quoted text> Exposing your arrogant stupidity and proving yet again that you have no business here...I'm loving it.
Actually it seems rather stupidly arrogant for one to wiggle a victory dance because another poster provided an address to you from a public record, and then claim that poster "has no business" in an open internet forum.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#131 Jan 24, 2014
d pantz wrote:
<quoted text> how about this.... can you prove without a doubt that this man died because he was let go by the cops????????!! No you can't. Can you prove he was struck by a car because he was drunk?????!!!! NO! Why? We weren't there... does any of these stipulations matter when it comes to how courts let cops get away with everything... even murder of unarmed innocent people??? NO! But ask all the stupid questions you want, duke.
I can prove that police in that case were negligent, and that but for their negligence, that man would not have been killed by a car on that highway.

Your rambling is becoming almost as exciting as Bubba's.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#134 Jan 24, 2014
d pantz wrote:
<quoted text> nor does it have anything to do with the employer having an obligation to an employee when it comes to a "police officers duty to protect". And they aren't obligated to protect anybody from potential threats... there is no difference. Plain and simple "vicarious liability" doest apply to this situation at all because nobody, sargents, captains, even tax payers have obligation to make sure they let him walk or detain him. They aren't obligated either way. They do whatever the f**k they want and are trained that way... they can arrest you and beat you half to death and 9 times out of ten their superiors don't get in any trouble and neither do they. You seem to be confused as to how these guys are trained or carry out orders...
You can read, can't you?

Try reading this:

http://www.aele.org/losciv2000.html

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#136 Jan 24, 2014
They cannot kill a Spook

United States

#137 Jan 24, 2014
The driver that hit and killed the invading trash should be compensated. Wonder how they would fare filing a suite in Mexico for damages to the car?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Pentagon to house 20,000 migrant children on mi... 2 hr They cannot kill ... 2
Democrat Ted Lieu plays audio of migrant kids c... 2 hr They cannot kill ... 2
The separation of migrant children from their p... 2 hr They cannot kill ... 107
Republicans, Trump DON'T CARE. Do You? VOTE 3 hr They cannot kill ... 3
DON'T MISS OUT on A PIECE OF HISTORY ! 5 hr Capt Pepe 4
News Timeline of Patricia Adkins' murder | The Colum... (Dec '10) 7 hr Pontificating 110
Disgraced President Trump 8 hr Enter Username 36
Trump Cult 13 hr Duke for Mayor 150

Columbus Jobs

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages