Like it or not, Romney lost by just over 2% of the popular vote. What third party candidate came that close? Now I know attention to detail or even reality is not your strong point, but would you say he was more likely to win then the libertard candidate?<quoted text>
Explain just how likely was Romney to get elected, against a mountain of polls that showed otherwise and how he was less evil.
You're just proof that all a majority means sometimes, is that more people are wrong. When you support a candidate who fits your belief, you speak freely. Now you're just exposing yourself for the fascim promoting broke wienie that you are.
You have nothing, yet you'll vote for one who'll take that away in a heartbeat. Wonderful.
When you support a candidate with no chance at winning, you purposely allow the candidates you do not like the most to win and rule over you. Hell, Garry Johnson could manage to only get 3.5% of the vote in his home state where he had been governor. Romney was a hell of a lot more electable and likely to win than all the alternatives in the race.
But you keep tilting at windmills and crying that all the politicians do everything you do not like if that's what you have to do.