Why Do Republicans Lie?
Duke for Mayor

United States

#214 Dec 30, 2012
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Once again, for the visually impaired:
In an appearance at the Center for American Progress on Tuesday, former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland argued that he could openly speculate as to whether Romney "is a tax avoider" or "cheat" because "his behavior invites such speculation."
There's no speculation about it whatsoever.

Mittens has been protecting his revenue streams overseas for decades.

You don't really want me to provide you a link, do you?

woof
Mrs Cleaver

Galion, OH

#215 Dec 30, 2012
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Romney could have chosen to provide documentation to dispute the charge. He did not. Either there is truth to it, or something embarrassingly close to it.
Even with years to prep for a pre-Presidential release he could only manage a 14% rate. And that required some shifting easily undone as soon as the need for transparency was gone.
And again--the charge has never been that Romney as a cheat, but rather that he is the poster boy or the kind of tax structure advocated by his party.
What an inane comment, to think that rich Democrats don't benefit from the same tax structure! "His" party? Tell me, Ms. Reader, when did Nancy Pelosi, with all her riches that benefit from the current tax structure, advocate changing said tax structure when she had so much power? I must have missed that. Provide a link so that I can get educated, please?
Mrs Cleaver

Galion, OH

#216 Dec 30, 2012
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not quite sure what you are trying to say. Koch pumped millions into the election via Karl Rove, who weeped like a baby on election night when the results from Cuyahoga County came in.
Now poor Karl is persona non grata at the Koch mansion.
woof
The Democrats led (Soros, mostly) in pumping millions more than the Republicans and the Cuyahoga County results - considering Cleveland's downhill spiral - is a sad commentary.

Meow.
Duke for Mayor

United States

#217 Dec 30, 2012
Mrs Cleaver

Galion, OH

#218 Dec 30, 2012
Bob Lewis wrote:
CNN reports that Obama is WINNING now and America WILL plummet off the fiscal cliff in support of his Orwellian Nightmare agenda. Exciting times ahead for the freaks and morons who preferred Obama to any hope for future success.
Obama is hoping that forcing this Recession on the American people will leave even more Americans hopeless enough to elect even more far left of reason progressive freaks in two years.
Bad things are ALWAYS good for what pass for Democrats these days.
Of course. It will be the Republicans' fault for not cooperating, helping the Democrats to a presidential victory in 2016. I'm certain they're preparing the sound bites and videos as we speak.
Duke for Mayor

United States

#219 Dec 30, 2012
Mrs Cleaver wrote:
<quoted text>
The Democrats led (Soros, mostly) in pumping millions more than the Republicans and the Cuyahoga County results - considering Cleveland's downhill spiral - is a sad commentary.
Meow.
Good God you're a bore.

woof
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

#220 Dec 30, 2012
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Was Richard Nixon a "better man"? He got 60%.
BTW, Obama is also 37.5% Arab. He's less black than Paula Abdul.
Go back to your Warren Buffett centerfold, kid.
Oh, I see how you righties think! You're quick to point out some stupid "bloodline theory" when dissecting Obama's heritage. What about Mitt's heritage or your bloodline? Are there any percentages of "other" that you'd like to post to see if you're accepted or worthy to be an American? I know you understand that no one here is "pure" anything. Americans whites can have any number of genetic DNA from the myriad ethnic groups of Europe, Asia, and north Africa. The "percentage bloodline" comments is NEVER bought up when a caucasian politician is discussed. Your racism is clearly on display.
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

#221 Dec 30, 2012
Bob Lewis wrote:
Obama was right about us again this morning on Meet the Press. He lashed out at us and reminded us that we are only Obamites now and must surrender, submit, and obey his anti unity, anti prosperity agenda driven madness.
Oooh, we get it now. When the GOP continue cutting millionaires taxes, as it has been for 12 long years now, we will be a more prosperous, united, full employment nation because of it.

Is that what you goons on the right is selling to the electorate?
News Flash, Buck! The American people called the shots November 6th. We're not falling for the banana in the tailpipe trick, sorry. Your team has had tax cuts for years and lied about the millions of jobs that were supposed to be created. They lied, we're tired of the same old Republican mantra, "The job creators need more money". Other than the third world slums, no concrete job creation has come to America due to tax cuts!

They had 12 years to bring our unemployment rate down below 5% and they failed. They invested in China, moved money to offshore banks ( foreign) and lay-off millions of people. It was a lie!
Mrs Cleaver

Galion, OH

#222 Dec 30, 2012
WiseAmerican wrote:
<quoted text> Oooh, we get it now. When the GOP continue cutting millionaires taxes, as it has been for 12 long years now, we will be a more prosperous, united, full employment nation because of it.
Is that what you goons on the right is selling to the electorate?
News Flash, Buck! The American people called the shots November 6th. We're not falling for the banana in the tailpipe trick, sorry. Your team has had tax cuts for years and lied about the millions of jobs that were supposed to be created. They lied, we're tired of the same old Republican mantra, "The job creators need more money". Other than the third world slums, no concrete job creation has come to America due to tax cuts!
They had 12 years to bring our unemployment rate down below 5% and they failed. They invested in China, moved money to offshore banks ( foreign) and lay-off millions of people. It was a lie!
12 long years? Have you forgotten when the Democrats held the majority of Congress under Obama and could have changed the tax structure then? It's your rhetoric which gives me pause as to the future of this country.
WiseAmerican

Columbus, OH

#223 Dec 30, 2012
Mrs Cleaver wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course. It will be the Republicans' fault for not cooperating, helping the Democrats to a presidential victory in 2016. I'm certain they're preparing the sound bites and videos as we speak.
And so the game is played! Dirty Karl Rove has worn out his stay in the Teabagger party. The Kochs are searching for a new weasel with twice the deception and trickery that Rove has. It'll only push the right so far out of touch, that only suburban white males over 55 and CEO's will make up the base.
Mrs Cleaver

Galion, OH

#224 Dec 30, 2012
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Good God you're a bore.
woof
No problem, I have cheerfully removed your place setting.

meow
Mrs Cleaver

Galion, OH

#225 Dec 30, 2012
WiseAmerican wrote:
<quoted text> And so the game is played! Dirty Karl Rove has worn out his stay in the Teabagger party. The Kochs are searching for a new weasel with twice the deception and trickery that Rove has. It'll only push the right so far out of touch, that only suburban white males over 55 and CEO's will make up the base.
Do people like you who constantly feel the need to point fingers by name calling do it so that you don't have to look at your own dirt? You've plenty.
VADoc

Warrenville, SC

#226 Dec 30, 2012
Any plan or change to the tax code Obama and company will come up with will be a simple bait and switch. They will say they raise taxes on the rich, but then another loophole will be given and you can bet the richies on the left will know it.

Obama panders to the dollar just as much as the right does.

If Obama really cared about making the rich pay their fair share he would have done it long ago, but he was afraid to bite the hands that feeds him and knew he'd need those deep pockets to get re-elected.

Anyone who believes either the right or the left cares about the working middle class is an idiot or blind.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#231 Dec 30, 2012
WiseAmerican wrote:
<quoted text> Oooh, we get it now. When the GOP continue cutting millionaires taxes, as it has been for 12 long years now, we will be a more prosperous, united, full employment nation because of it.
Is that what you goons on the right is selling to the electorate?
News Flash, Buck! The American people called the shots November 6th. We're not falling for the banana in the tailpipe trick, sorry. Your team has had tax cuts for years and lied about the millions of jobs that were supposed to be created. They lied, we're tired of the same old Republican mantra, "The job creators need more money". Other than the third world slums, no concrete job creation has come to America due to tax cuts!
They had 12 years to bring our unemployment rate down below 5% and they failed. They invested in China, moved money to offshore banks ( foreign) and lay-off millions of people. It was a lie!
Are you ever capable of telling the truth?
October, 2006 US unemployment rate: 4.4%
http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2006/nov/wk1/art0...
George Jefferson Little

Delaware, OH

#233 Dec 30, 2012
Mrs Cleaver wrote:
<quoted text>
Do people like you who constantly feel the need to point fingers by name calling do it so that you don't have to look at your own dirt? You've plenty.
That sounds just like Hugh Victor Thompson III, always pointing his finger & name calling. Hey look Hugh (George) Victor your can be YOUR if you's that lucky. LOL

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#234 Dec 30, 2012
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>
According to the Columbus Dispatch, one out of every five registered voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio's Wood County, there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote. An additional 31 of Ohio's 88 counties have voter registration rates over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious. Obama miraculously won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland, and received over 99% of the vote where GOP inspectors were illegally removed.
The inflated numbers can't just reflect voters who have moved, because the average voting registration level nationwide is only 70%. The vast majority of voters over the 70% level are not voting because they want to, they are voting because someone is getting them to cast a vote, one way or another. Those 31 counties are most likely the largest counties in Ohio, representing a majority of Ohio voters. This means the number of votes cast above the 70% typical voter registration level easily tops 100,000, the margin Obama won Ohio by.
http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexande...
Since 1985 Chicago has pioneered new ways to promote illegal immigration. After 1990 the illegal immigrant population in Chicago and the nation skyrocketed. As illegal immigrants flocked to Chicago, a method was needed to get them on the registered voter list. Although 80,000 illegal aliens voted in 1982, the old-fashioned way, through vote fraud; by 2005 both Cook County and the state of Illinois had moved to allow photo I.D. to be given to illegal immigrants by passing matricula consular laws.
By allowing the matricula consular to function as an official photo I.D., Illinois and Chicago can say they are conforming to any Voter ID requirement. But the Cook County law (most Illinois illegal immigrants live in Cook County) also allows the consulates of Mexico and "any other Latin American country" to issue the consular I.D.s at their discretion. In effect, Illinois has enabled foreign countries to decide who votes in U.S. elections.
In 1983 an alien born in Belize stated to the Chicago Tribune that he and his two sisters were never required to show any identification when they registered to vote. The matricula consular enables people to reside in Illinois, and once they reside there, they need no ID to register to vote. This "globalization" of voting rights is clearly a violation of the U.S. Constitution, yet has never been challenged in any court during its ten year history. This supports the idea that Chicago's goal is to attract large numbers of undocumented residents from all countries.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/how_ch...
Whole lotta maybe coulda's in there.

However, you made a specific charge regarding the Obama campaign bussing voters from place to place so that they could vote more than one time.

I don't see the evidence that this happened. Only some rather lengthy bloviated in the general direction of how this might have been pulled off. Of course, both sides would have the same opportunity to do so.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#235 Dec 30, 2012
Karl Monday wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, can you provide evidence that says the unborn aren't human?
Like say? DNA samples showing they are a different species?
No. Now you are shifting the argument.

Where is the science that equates a fetus with a living human in terms of rights? This is not a scientific question and you will not find a scientific answer.

BTW--corpses also have DNA.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#236 Dec 30, 2012
VADoc wrote:
Anyone who believes either the right or the left cares about the working middle class is an idiot or blind.
Well, at any rate, we know that you don't.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#237 Dec 30, 2012
Karl Monday wrote:
<quoted text>
A significant number of people, have largely meaningless degrees, and are "overqualified" for jobs they held. No one forced them to get what they got, and take out the loans.
Every single one of them is Argentina in miniature.
Balderdash. Take a look at international comparisons and how the US stacks up economically.
Duke for Mayor

United States

#240 Dec 31, 2012
Karl Monday wrote:
<quoted text>
"rights" is what the five justices say they are. A corpse is inanimate.
The unborn are animate. They are "living"
Of course they're animate. And of course they possess human dna.

But whatever "rights" they may possess are typically subordinate to those of their mother, until they're physically viable outside of the mother's womb.

That's the law, I think.

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Trump Doctor Drunk 5 min lol 7
Sean Hannity 41 min Male 166
Hi im Holly Hylton Your Local Racist Starbucks ... 1 hr Leftist handjob 104
The Comey Interview 2 hr d pants 187
Comrade Donald Trump 2 hr Escondito 92
Syracuse University Whitey Racists Gone Wild 3 hr Escondito 15
Racist white van mows pedestrians down in Toronto 3 hr Escondito 6

Columbus Jobs

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages