Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#54 Jan 16, 2013
Karl Monday wrote:
<quoted text>
Hagel along with Lincoln Chafee, are the archtypeal RINOs
Wrong.

Hagel won the Purple Heart and is a fiscal conservative. He's just not fixated on the Jews like you conservatards are. He doesn't believe we should bankrupt this country to help a bunch of squatters ... i.e. the Somalians of Palestine.

What do you conservatards have to show for the last 50 years? Trillions spent on the military and the only war you've ever won was in Grenada.

If we listened to the Chuck Hagels and the Pat Buchanans of the world, this nation would still be wealthy and the World Trade Center would still be standing.

You're nothing but puppets. You're every bit the Uncle Toms that the blacks are ... except the Jew squatters are pulling your strings.
Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#55 Jan 16, 2013
Neocons Should Heed Hagel's Eisenhower Model - Evan Thomas

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-15/u-s-...
Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#57 Jan 16, 2013
Karl Monday wrote:
<quoted text>
Oliver North has a Silver Star and two purple hearts.
http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2013/01/oliv...
Hagel, grunt
North, officer
Oliver North is one of the idiots responsible for our cycle of endless war ... and endless defeats.

Of course, we can always take pride that the most expensive military in human history can beat up on Grenada. Now that's a real victory for "freedom". Afghanistan and Iraq are obviously too much of a challenge for you Jew lovers.

LMAO!
Gail

Cincinnati, OH

#58 Jan 17, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
Pat Buchanan:
Catholic conservative who questions the bible thumpers' fixation with Isreal. Tarred as an anti-semetic because he dares question endless war and trillions in debt defending squatters on someone else's land.
Hagel:
Catholic conservative who questions the bible thumpers' fixation with Isreal. Tarred as an anti-semetic because he dares question endless war and trillions in debt defending squatters on someone else's land.
Any questions?
The problems of the US are not that Israeli's are a bunch of squatters. Squatters don't make a whole nation a pariah. Israel is a pariah state because it regularly flouts international law and basic human rights, and that it subverts the US to do its violent bully-boy dirty work through its Diversity (victim cult) scheming.

The problems of the US are caused by the leaders of the immoral Diversity scheme.

In Israel, the leaders of Diversity are 100% jewish.

In the US, the leaders of Diversity are mostly jewish, but there are a few other Diversity types that lead too, including especially LGBTQ, feminists, and disabled.

Obama is one example of a American Diversity leader that is not jewish. Obama is definitely a Diversity ideologue, being both black and a bisexual.

George W Bush is another example of a American Diversity leader that is not jewish. George W is a bi-sexual, as evidenced by some of his earlier homosexual escapades.

A lot of neo-conservative pundits are queers still hiding in the closet. The most ostentatious and well known neconservative pundit still hiding deep in the closet is Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh is a flamer, and pays many women to act as a beard to fool his neocon audience full of rubes.
Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#59 Jan 17, 2013
Gail wrote:
<quoted text>
The most ostentatious and well known neconservative pundit still hiding deep in the closet is Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh is a flamer, and pays many women to act as a beard to fool his neocon audience full of rubes.
I've read before that Dubya was known to be ADD, shy and insecure so I don't buy that he was a poof. A Protestant Jew puppet, maybe. But most definitely not a poof.

As to Rush, I like him but I do wonder about him. His "wives" live in separate quarters on his estate. He's either pathologically shy or is indeed in the closet.
Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#60 Jan 17, 2013
Gail wrote:
<quoted text>

In the US, the leaders of Diversity are mostly jewish,
All of these themes are all intertwined. Communism, socialism, the sexual revolution, pornography, atheism, diversity and blending families are all aimed at weakening individuals and making them subservient to the state.

That said, I have to admit I stole the line about endless military FAILURES ...

I stole it from none other than Mark Steyn.

The most expensive military in the history of mankind ... can anybody point to any significant victories since 1960? Iraq under Bush 41 doesn't count. That was a march through the desert not unlike our overrun of Grenada.
Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#61 Jan 17, 2013
... But beyond the politics is a real question. He’s not wrong to raise the question of Pentagon “bloat.” The United States has the most lavishly funded military on the planet, and what does it buy you? In the Hindu Kush, we’re taking twelve years to lose to goatherds with fertilizer.

Something is wrong with this picture. Indeed, something is badly wrong with the American way of war. And no one could seriously argue that, in the latest in the grim two-thirds-of-a-century roll call of America’s un-won wars, the problem is a lack of money or resources. Given its track record, why shouldn’t the Pentagon get a top-to-toe overhaul — or at least a cost-benefit analysis?

Just to be clear: I disagree with Hagel on Israel, on Iran, and on most everything else. But my colleagues on the right are in denial if they don’t think there are some very basic questions that need to be asked about the too-big-to-fail Department of Defense. Obama would like the U.S. military to do less. Some of us would like it to do more with less — more nimbly, more artfully. But, if the national-security establishment won’t acknowledge there’s even a problem, they’re unlikely to like the solutions imposed by others.

-Mark Steyn

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/337490...

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#62 Jan 17, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
REPEAT ONE MORE TIME:
REPEAT:
It is remarkable that the party continues to consult with the same people (neocon Jews) who championed the wars that have so tarnished the GOP’s once stellar brand.
Hey, buttocks scrubber, you do realize that you used the Cato Institute for your source, don't you? They are a Libertarian think tank. You know, the group you said I can't be associated with because I oppose neoconservatives in general?

God, your stupidity knows no bounds.
Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#63 Jan 17, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, buttocks scrubber, you do realize that you used the Cato Institute for your source, don't you? They are a Libertarian think tank. You know, the group you said I can't be associated with because I oppose neoconservatives in general?
God, your stupidity knows no bounds.
Reality check: You are no libertarian. You only want to think you are. Just another renaming scheme like liberal ==> progressive.

Take the test and report the results like I did. Be honest.

http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz
WiseAmerican

Westerville, OH

#64 Jan 17, 2013
Gail wrote:
<quoted text>
The problems of the US are not that Israeli's are a bunch of squatters. Squatters don't make a whole nation a pariah. Israel is a pariah state because it regularly flouts international law and basic human rights, and that it subverts the US to do its violent bully-boy dirty work through bits Diversity (victim cult) scheming.
The problems of the US are caused by the leaders of the immoral Diversity scheme.
In Israel, the leaders of Diversity are 100% jewish.
In the US, the leaders of Diversity are mostly jewish, but there are a few other Diversity types that lead too, including especially LGBTQ, feminists, and disabled.
Obama is one example of a American Diversity leader that is not jewish. Obama is definitely a Diversity ideologue, being both black and a bisexual.
George W Bush is another example of a American Diversity leader that is not jewish. George W is a bi-sexual, as evidenced by some of his earlier homosexual escapades.
A lot of neo-conservative pundits are queers still hiding in the closet. The most ostentatious and well known neconservative pundit still hiding deep in the closet is Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh is a flamer, and pays many women to act as a beard to fool his neocon audience full of rubes.
True indeed! Rush is a closet "fairy Pinkie " who has a "fake wife " living a few mile from him in a guest house he owns in Florida. Question, what heterosexual man would invite Elton John to entertain guest and have a pink room decorated in 18th century French decor??? You Republicans are stupid and being lemmings for the Zionist!
WiseAmerican

Westerville, OH

#65 Jan 17, 2013
Rush is into young "foreign men " who can't cause him any harm because of language and citizenship issues!
Big Johnson

Columbus, OH

#66 Jan 17, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
Take the test and report the results like I did. Be honest.
http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz
Libertarian.
Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#67 Jan 17, 2013
Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
Libertarian.
I scored libertarian 80% in both categories.

Based on the answers I gave, there is no way Kosmik is anywhere near what could be considered libertarian. Likewise for these right wing warmongers like Tim who also like to think they are.

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#68 Jan 17, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Reality check: You are no libertarian. You only want to think you are. Just another renaming scheme like liberal ==> progressive.
Take the test and report the results like I did. Be honest.
http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz
Don't know if the results will be in this link:

http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz_result...

But I, as always in these types of tests, land squarely as Libertarian. There is a circular type test and I fell right between Libertarian and 'left' Libertarian.

Ahhh, none of you know what you're talking about when the subject of Libertarians arise. The right has tried hard since Reagan to co-opt some Libertarian principles in word only. They cry small government but they grow it. They wail for tax cuts, effect a few but cause greater deficits requiring taxes to be raised to cover their holes.

A clue is one thing Vanna can't sell you.
Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#69 Jan 17, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't know if the results will be in this link:
http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz_result...
But I, as always in these types of tests, land squarely as Libertarian. There is a circular type test and I fell right between Libertarian and 'left' Libertarian.
Ahhh, none of you know what you're talking about when the subject of Libertarians arise. The right has tried hard since Reagan to co-opt some Libertarian principles in word only. They cry small government but they grow it. They wail for tax cuts, effect a few but cause greater deficits requiring taxes to be raised to cover their holes.
A clue is one thing Vanna can't sell you.
Cut and paste the results here liar. Just like I did.

For you to be a libertarian, then you must either be bipolar or you must have multiple personality disorder. Your drivel here is squarely leftist and liberal. You are no libertarian.

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#70 Jan 17, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Cut and paste the results here liar. Just like I did.
For you to be a libertarian, then you must either be bipolar or you must have multiple personality disorder. Your drivel here is squarely leftist and liberal. You are no libertarian.
Your PERSONAL issues Score is 90%
Your ECONOMIC issues Score is 90%

Bob, cite one thing that I've taken a 'leftist' or 'liberal' side on with the exception of social issues, which the Libertarians take no position on.
Gail

Cincinnati, OH

#71 Jan 18, 2013
WiseAmerican wrote:
<quoted text> True indeed! Rush is a closet "fairy Pinkie " who has a "fake wife " living a few mile from him in a guest house he owns in Florida. Question, what heterosexual man would invite Elton John to entertain guest and have a pink room decorated in 18th century French decor??? You Republicans are stupid and being lemmings for the Zionist!
Wise up, cheddar head.

Both democrats and republicans are Diversity freaks.

Democrats promote Diversity as a domestic policy and republicans promote Diversity as a foreign policy.

Diversity people are the organized majority of voters, so no one can get elected without the voting support of Diversity people.

Diversity freaks are responsible for both democrat and republican policies, because they are the organized majority, over 80 percent of the voting populace in the US and Israel.

Take a Diversity head count...

women
blacks
LGBTQ
jewish
disabled
hispanic
asian
native american

Because typical LGBTQ monkeyshines offend normal people, many queer neo-conservatives and libertarians stay in the closet to keep normal people supporting their Diversity agenda. The Diversity agenda intrinsically includes crony capitalism. Limbaugh is one such Diversity freak of many who stay in the closet for that reason, to hoodwink the normal people.

If you scratch the surface of any libertarian, you'll find a Diversity freak.
Gail

Cincinnati, OH

#72 Jan 18, 2013
WiseAmerican wrote:
<quoted text> True indeed! Rush is a closet "fairy Pinkie " who has a "fake wife " living a few mile from him in a guest house he owns in Florida. Question, what heterosexual man would invite Elton John to entertain guest and have a pink room decorated in 18th century French decor??? You Republicans are stupid and being lemmings for the Zionist!
Much fuss is made of the idea that the republican party is the party of white men and white male privilege.

However, the fuss is just another typical Diversity deception. In fact, white males are the leaders of Diversity.

White males of Diversity include Jewish white male, disabled white male, queer white male, and Hispanic white male.

White males who are Diversity people get privilege.

Diversity white males include Jewish white male, disabled white male, queer white male, and Hispanic white male.

The only true white male privilege that exist today are the legal privileges granted by big government to Diversity (victim cult) white males.

Here are only some of their legal privileges:

Jewish White Male - slavish govt support for Israel, Wall Street TARP bailouts, hate speech prosecutions, taxpayer-paid holocaust museums, selective tax breaks and credits, neoconservative war-mongering, anti-discrimination laws, govt set-aside contracts, mass media dominance, Hollywood subsidies, nepotism and cronyism.

Disabled White Male - generous disability pensions, premium health care, preferential parking and public access, Affirmative Action, National Health Care

Queer White Male - sodomy civil rights, abortion civil rights, govt sponsored AIDS hysteria and remediation, pornography civil rights, obnoxious NEA art grants, hate speech prosecution, Wall Street TARP bailouts, anti-discrimination law, National Health Care, mass media dominance, govt Hollywood subsidies.

Hispanic White Male - anti-discrimination law, illegal alien amnesty, Affirmative Action, govt set-aside contracts

In the case of Adam Lanza, his white male privilege was based on the fact he was a closet queer. The privilege he received is a complete news blackout of his homosexual orientation, and media pundits ignoring how his gayness led him to a gay-rage rampage attack on children in Newtown.

Attacking children is a well known typical behavior of queer males. If anyone should be forcibly disarmed, it ahould be queer males anywhere near children.
Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#73 Jan 18, 2013
Kosmik wrote:
<quoted text>
Your PERSONAL issues Score is 90%
Your ECONOMIC issues Score is 90%
Bob, cite one thing that I've taken a 'leftist' or 'liberal' side on with the exception of social issues, which the Libertarians take no position on.
List the answers to each individual question. They certainly do not square with what you post here.

Since: Sep 10

Columbus, OH

#74 Jan 18, 2013
Enzyte Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
List the answers to each individual question. They certainly do not square with what you post here.
What doesn't square, Bob?

I think that what baffles you the most is that I speak strictly from a Libertarian mindset on all or most matters.

There is one slight difference economically that I address that the Libertarian platform doesn't and that's fulfilling the obligations of our current debt. Cutting spending will work towards filling that as long as revenue remains constant for the period it takes to get back to even. Until our debt is paid down, reducing revenue will only exacerbate the problem.

Towards that goal I favor the least restrictive form of taxation imaginable.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 9 min PASStyme2retireUR... 31,125
Trees nut fruit shade and timber 26 min They cannot kill ... 1
Hey pale rider 28 min They cannot kill ... 34
Pet and animal reports 30 min They cannot kill ... 37
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 1 hr They cannot kill ... 3,344
Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13) 1 hr JBS 2,435
The Michael Brown Case 1 hr They cannot kill ... 65
Spook, Dave, Bizzy.... 8 hr They cannot kill ... 142
•••
•••
•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••