Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#771 Feb 7, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct. Marriage is between a man (male) and a woman (female). Homosexuals have chosen to reject the concept of marriage --- as a same-sex partnership does not meet the basic requirements. And they have no right to redefine society's definition simply because they have personally rejected it. Further, society is not responsible to them to reorder our naturally-defined world so that their deviant world seems more acceptable to them.
Your Bible bears no legal authority Tippy.

woof

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#772 Feb 7, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not true at all.
Try claiming spousal privilege to exclude from a trial statements made to your partner when you're not married.
Or try to assert a claim of inheritance absent a will when you're not married.
Good luck with that.
woof
When one rejects marriage, one does not receive its privileges.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#773 Feb 7, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Your Bible bears no legal authority Tippy.
woof
I suppose the Court doesn't take oaths seriously then.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#774 Feb 7, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
ummmmm skippy....that is not the constitution
Ummmmm, Walter. Yes it is.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#775 Feb 7, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Mr. Loving was male. Mrs. Loving was female.
So?
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#776 Feb 7, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose the Court doesn't take oaths seriously then.
One could swear upon a copy of Huck Finn if they wished, and it would have the same effect.

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#777 Feb 7, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Not in this state. Good luck trying to amend the Ohio constitution.
It will be done within the next 10 years. Ohio's constitution is pretty easy to amend as constitutions go.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#778 Feb 7, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
When one rejects marriage, one does not receive its privileges.
You have no clue, do you?

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#779 Feb 7, 2013
Adif understanding wrote:
<quoted text>No, not at all. In fact, I never even thought about sexuality until I reached puberty where I wanted to get my rocks off whenever I could. When I started having sex, I chose a girl and proceeded to get my rocks off quite a bit. Of course then came a short dry spell where I ended it quite nicely with another girl I chose to sleep with.
You don't take that sex in wedlock only stuff too seriously, eh?

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#780 Feb 7, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
It will be done within the next 10 years. Ohio's constitution is pretty easy to amend as constitutions go.
But finding a majority for your sickness is not.
Here's a clue: The GOP won 72 counties in 2012. And blacks in the urban counties will not vote for "gay marriage."
How do you think Bush won Ohio in 2004? He got a record vote from blacks, who not only disliked Kerry, but voted against gay marriage.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#781 Feb 7, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
But to everyone around him, he seemed absolutely normal and a 'good guy.' There was another teacher in Philly last night. Molesting young boys.
My point is, pedophiles are often the person you would least expect. And it is MOST OFTEN older men committing it upon young boys.
If it keeps one child from being molested, keep gays the heck out of the BSA.
All this political correctness is BS, and you know it.
So to save one child, you are willing to infringe on the rights of other law abiding citizens? Hmmmm.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#782 Feb 7, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
So?
So...the nature of marriage was not at issue.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#783 Feb 7, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
You have no clue, do you?
woof
Here's a clue:

The Ohio Marriage Amendment appeared on the November 2, 2004 ballot in Ohio as an initiated constitutional amendment where it was approved ---

Yes: 3,329,335 ---(61.7%)
No: 2,065,462 ---(38.3%)

Ballot wording:

"Be it Resolved by the People of the State of Ohio:

That the Constitution of the State of Ohio be amended by adopting a section to be designated as Section 11 of Article XV thereof, to read as follows:

Article XV Section 11. Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state and its political subdivisions. This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage.

A majority yes vote is necessary for passage."

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#784 Feb 7, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
So to save one child, you are willing to infringe on the rights of other law abiding citizens? Hmmmm.
As a private organization, the BSA may set its own membership standards.
Your preference would be to infringe on THEIR rights.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#785 Feb 7, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
So to save one child, you are willing to infringe on the rights of other law abiding citizens? Hmmmm.
That's what you morons are advocating with your unconstitutional gun control emotional arguments.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#786 Feb 7, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>But finding a majority for your sickness is not.
Here's a clue: The GOP won 72 counties in 2012. And blacks in the urban counties will not vote for "gay marriage."
How do you think Bush won Ohio in 2004? He got a record vote from blacks, who not only disliked Kerry, but voted against gay marriage.
Just like the rest of your prehistoric, superstitious, ignorant opinions, this one too will go extinct. More and more, people are thinking and understanding. I'm not too worried about it.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#787 Feb 7, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
So...the nature of marriage was not at issue.
Right. But whether or not it was a fundamental right sure was.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#788 Feb 7, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's a clue:
The Ohio Marriage Amendment appeared on the November 2, 2004 ballot in Ohio as an initiated constitutional amendment where it was approved ---
Yes: 3,329,335 ---(61.7%)
No: 2,065,462 ---(38.3%)
Ballot wording:
"Be it Resolved by the People of the State of Ohio:
That the Constitution of the State of Ohio be amended by adopting a section to be designated as Section 11 of Article XV thereof, to read as follows:
Article XV Section 11. Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state and its political subdivisions. This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage.
A majority yes vote is necessary for passage."
And a mere 8 years later, check this out.

http://urbanchristiannews.com/ucn/2012/10/pol...

The times, they are a changing.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#789 Feb 7, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
As a private organization, the BSA may set its own membership standards.
Your preference would be to infringe on THEIR rights.
Really? I will wait for you to quote where I wrote anything of the sort.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#790 Feb 7, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>That's what you morons are advocating with your unconstitutional gun control emotional arguments.
I wonder why your girlfriend would be making such a "moronic" argument about the Boy Scouts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 54 min Pale Rider 4,843
I found Mr Tea 1 hr Reality Speaks 13
convert to islam online and become a muslim 2 hr PEGIDA will stand 4
Transportation Insider: Outgoing COTA trustee p... 2 hr Latrina Waters 7
Where will Glitter be spending the holidays? 2 hr They cannot kill ... 2
Merry Christmas! What's your favorite memory? 4 hr Big Papa Tea 321
Scammer 4 hr GlitterSucks 9
COPS lives MATTER 19 hr They cannot kill ... 48
Columbus Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 1:25 pm PST

ESPN 1:25PM
Manziel ruled out; Browns add rookie Shaw
NBC Sports 1:35 PM
Manziel's season over for Browns, Hoyer hurt - NBC Sports
Yahoo! Sports 1:52 PM
Johnny Manziel's bumpy rookie season is officially over
Bleacher Report 3:26 PM
Denver Broncos vs. Cincinnati Bengals: Live Score and Analysis for Denver
Bleacher Report 3:56 PM
Denver Broncos vs. Cincinnati Bengals: Live Score, Highlights and Analysis