You're speculating (and hoping) on that matter. I can tell you this: there was no mention of homosexuality in curriculum when my son was in elementary school (ending in 2007). There was no mention of HIV. That is age-inappropriate.<quoted text>
And, btw--most the objections posted here about Chicago have less to do with the actual description of what will be taught than with what that might lead to.
Hilliard plainly includes the concept of "family" with some notion of diversity of structure. It's pretty hard to believe that the educated professionals of Hilliard are demanding that the schools pretend that there is no such thing as adoption, single parent families, or gay couples.
Posted in the Columbus Forum
Hugh Victor Thompson III
“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”
Since: Dec 12
#42 Mar 12, 2013
“Don't trust the internet!”
Since: Jan 12
#43 Mar 12, 2013
Probably also the case in Chicago in 2007.
“Ludibrium est onus genio”
Since: Dec 11
#44 Mar 12, 2013
Some interpretations of these two are interesting.
#45 Mar 17, 2013
Typical PC liberalism
Add your comments below
|Creamer Confirms Hillary Clinton Was PERSONALLY...||48 min||Blind||14|
|404's Trump Victory Thread||56 min||404 not found||84|
|Hillary Clinton is imperfect but the only choic...||1 hr||Synque||287|
|Overzealous donut munchers break car window to ...||2 hr||Bloomp||9|
|Theodore Decker commentary: Family suffering lo...||2 hr||Bloomp||2|
|Malik Obama Slams Obama, Tells Hillary Supporte...||2 hr||Bloomp||5|
|Why do black people smell like amonia?||2 hr||Bloomp||28|
Find what you want!
Search Columbus Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC