GOP L00SERS: Rand not Christie

Posted in the Columbus Forum

Enzyte Bob

Reynoldsburg, OH

#1 Jun 8, 2013
Enzyte Bob

Reynoldsburg, OH

#2 Jun 8, 2013
GOP Losers Ought to Try Rand, Not Christie

Posted on June 8, 2013 5:30 pm by Bill Quick

Christie, Paul offer models for how GOP can compete in blue states – The Washington Post: The depth of the Republican deficit in the Electoral College was laid out in stark detail by independent analyst Rhodes Cook in his recent newsletter. Cook charts two eras in the modern history of presidential politics, one Republican and the other Democratic. Republicans dominated the period from 1968 until 1992. Democrats have been the dominant presidential party since then.

The reason the GOP started losing the White House after 1992 was the party’s move toward nominating mushy RINOs rather than actual conservatives.

George H. W. Bush’s betrayal of his “Read my lips, no new taxes” pledge did more to destroy the GOP at the Presidential level than any support of guns, anti-abortion stance, or lack of support for environmental (read: global warming) issues. That the losing nominees that followed Bush were, in order, Bob Dole, John McCain, and Mitt Romney (all squishes of the first order) is no accident.

It is further no accident that supposedly disinterested “observers” call for more of the same. In other words, double down on stupid.

Rand Paul would be a winner. Chris Christie would be just another RINO loser.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#3 Jun 8, 2013
Rand favors amnesty. No.
the beloved yeah baby

Columbus, OH

#4 Jun 8, 2013
Rand is watered down Ron who said eliminate the Fed before watering that down to audit the Fed.
Enzyte Bob

United States

#5 Jun 8, 2013
the beloved yeah baby wrote:
Rand is watered down Ron who said eliminate the Fed before watering that down to audit the Fed.
-I like Christie, but so many people have tagged him as a rino he doesn't have a chance. it's a shame because he's done a lot more word counts than the average so-called conservative.

-Rubio I just don't like for some reason. First of all I don't like a guy who can't pay a measly $8,000 dat. Second of all he's in the pocket of the bushes. That's enough to disqualify him.

-Ted Cruz sounds great, everybody says he's brilliant, but the downside is that he's also in the pocket of the Bushes and he's also a rhino or so they say. given that he's also owned by the Bushes, I wouldn't doubt that either. looks like the Bush family own themselves a couple of Cuban house khniggh hers.

-I don't know a lot about Rand Paul other than the fact that Rand Paul makes a lot of sense.when he talks and he's not owned by the Bush family.Sounds good to me.

“Where did I put my tiara?”

Since: Dec 11

Columbus, OH

#6 Jun 9, 2013
I disagree that Christie doesn't have a chance. GOP's best option to "lure" indies, like myself, to vote Repub. Although staunch repubs disagree with his praise of Obama after super storm Sandy, he has shown he can reach across the aisle; Obama, epic failure when it comes to that.
They cannot kill a Spook

Toledo, OH

#7 Jun 9, 2013
Christies anti gun and continuous sucking of Obama a-nus means I not only won't vote for him in the primary I wouldn't piss on him to put him out if he were on fire.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#8 Jun 9, 2013
GlitterSucks wrote:
I disagree that Christie doesn't have a chance. GOP's best option to "lure" indies, like myself, to vote Repub. Although staunch repubs disagree with his praise of Obama after super storm Sandy, he has shown he can reach across the aisle; Obama, epic failure when it comes to that.
I won't vote for Christie, at all. Even if his opponent was Michelle.

“Where did I put my tiara?”

Since: Dec 11

Columbus, OH

#9 Jun 10, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
I won't vote for Christie, at all. Even if his opponent was Michelle.
You're potentially missing my point. GOP needs someone that is not identified with the tea party, appears as an elitist, in order to take back the White House. GOP may have to tick off staunch repubs in the short term in order to "fix" long term strategies. Reminds me of the old adage, sometimes who have to spend money in order to make money.
They cannot kill a Spook

Toledo, OH

#10 Jun 10, 2013
GlitterSucks wrote:
<quoted text>You're potentially missing my point. GOP needs someone that is not identified with the tea party, appears as an elitist, in order to take back the White House. GOP may have to tick off staunch repubs in the short term in order to "fix" long term strategies. Reminds me of the old adage, sometimes who have to spend money in order to make money.
But electing a R.I.N.O. has not worked in the general election. Dole lost, McCain lost Romney lost. In Ohio we had 8the years of Voinivich then Dick Celeste and both were scumbags nearly identical. Then Taft same thing. Putting in a liberal crook does mean next election will get a constitutionalist in next time.
Now we have a clown that can't comprehend basic math and wants to hide records and activities from the public ala a turd world dictator, just like Obama but with lighter skin.

“Where did I put my tiara?”

Since: Dec 11

Columbus, OH

#11 Jun 10, 2013
They cannot kill a Spook wrote:
<quoted text>
But electing a R.I.N.O. has not worked in the general election. Dole lost, McCain lost Romney lost. In Ohio we had 8the years of Voinivich then Dick Celeste and both were scumbags nearly identical. Then Taft same thing. Putting in a liberal crook does mean next election will get a constitutionalist in next time.
Now we have a clown that can't comprehend basic math and wants to hide records and activities from the public ala a turd world dictator, just like Obama but with lighter skin.
GOP needs to go middle of the road if they want a chance...that's all I'm saying.
They cannot kill a Spook

Toledo, OH

#12 Jun 10, 2013
GlitterSucks wrote:
<quoted text>GOP needs to go middle of the road if they want a chance...that's all I'm saying.
Christie is a leftist not a centrist.

Since: Sep 08

Neon City Oh.

#13 Jun 10, 2013
GlitterSucks wrote:
<quoted text>You're potentially missing my point. GOP needs someone that is not identified with the tea party, appears as an elitist, in order to take back the White House. GOP may have to tick off staunch repubs in the short term in order to "fix" long term strategies. Reminds me of the old adage, sometimes who have to spend money in order to make money.
Well, you are right, and I sure hope the GOP doesn't pay any attention to you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
England Outlaws Vulva Piercings 14 min Beth 10
Chick-Fil-A Heckler CFO Unemployed, on Food Sta... 29 min Pope Che Antichri... 9
Poll Do Black Lives Matter? 44 min Pam 39
Poll Do you support Affirmative Action? (Oct '12) 46 min Pam 27
News Bakken oil trains roll across Columbus 51 min They cannot kill ... 5
Obama legacy and a nuclear Iran 57 min REAL American 24
Bibi the Hypocrite 1 hr REAL American 60
Poll Which topix troll are you willing to ignore com... (Apr '13) 3 hr Duke for Mayor 97
Columbus Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]