Why 'Equality' Must Die

Posted in the Columbus Forum

First Prev
of 10
Next Last

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#1 Oct 3, 2013
Take a look at the following list and tell me if anything strikes you:

Prudence
Justice
Temperance
Courage
Faith
Hope
Charity

Viewing these, the Seven Cardinal Virtues, anything make an impression? Okay, now try the Seven Heavenly Virtues of:

Chastity
Temperance
Charity
Diligence
Patience
Kindness
Humility

Anything? What strikes me is that equality is not among them.

Scour great works, such as the Bible, and you won't find talk of equality. Not one bit -- that is, unless you consider The Communist Manifesto a great work.

One thing about virtues -- which are defined as "good moral habits" -- is that their exercise doesn't require the cooperation, or compulsion, of another person. I can cultivate prudence, temperance, courage and the other virtues in myself, and I can do it all by myself. So while a virtuous society is desirable, virtue can also be a purely personal goal. And this is one time when focusing on the self needn't be selfish, for we should take the log out of our own eyes before worrying about the speck in our brother's.

But equality is far different. Just as there can be no numerical equality without at least two numbers, there can be no human equality on an island with a population of one. And while you could increase patience through personal change, increasing equality necessitates societal change; it involves raising people up as much as they're able -- which requires their cooperation -- and insofar as they're unable, it involves bringing others down. This is where compulsion enters the equation. The point is that, unlike with virtues, increasing equality is always an endeavor of the collective.

Another quality of virtues is that, as Aristotle noted, their cultivation is necessary for a happy life. And lack of virtue in the collective can make life harder, such as when the government stifles just economic freedom (excessive regulation), suppresses truth (hate-speech laws) or imposes some other aspect of tyranny. We also want our survival needs fulfilled: enough food and water and a roof over our heads. And we'd like the opportunity to pursue proper pleasures and dreams and exercise our creative capacity. But is actual "equality" necessary for happiness?

A long time ago, in a "previous life," I was an aspiring tennis player. I wanted to be the best. Alas, though, it just wasn't in the cards -- I didn't have the talent of a Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal. Yet the cards also taught me something: being a famous athlete just isn't that important, and it certainly isn't necessary for happiness. And what would it say about me if my happiness (or what I fancy such) were dependent upon those more talented fellows being brought down to my level?

Using a more common example, consider income inequality. If Bill Gates had never made his billions, it not only wouldn't have put one more cent in your pocket, society would be poorer because we wouldn't have the jobs and productivity-enhancing products he created. Moreover, when the rich invest their money in stocks, companies are provided working capital. The rich may put it in banks, too, and banks aren't just money warehouses; they provide loans to businesses. So both these activities facilitate economic growth and more job creation. Given this, what does it say about a person when he nonetheless wants the rich cut down to size? Well, it reminds me of Friedrich Nietzsche's line in Thus Spake Zarathustra: "If there were Gods, how could I bear not to be a God? Consequently there are no Gods."

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#2 Oct 3, 2013
The class-warfare warrior may claim fellowship with the poor, but often something else lies deep in his heart: "If there are rich people, how can I bear to not be a rich person? Consequently, there must be no rich people." Like Nietzsche, he is what he is; that his ire's targets are greater or have more doesn't make him less. Regardless, he's only satisfied to be what he is if those who would have or be more don't exist. This is because of one or both of two deadly sins: pride and envy. The cures for these, by the way, are the corresponding virtues of humility and kindness -- not "equality." Equality is the voodoo medicine of the vice-ridden man blind to virtue.

Be thankful equality isn't necessary for happiness, too, because it is completely contrary to nature. Some species are more dominant than others; some unsuited to survival become extinct; and within species some members are bigger, stronger or faster than others. And animals have their dominance hierarchies; a silverback leads a gorilla troop, a wolf pack has an alpha male and female and chickens actually do have a pecking order.

People are no different. There are natural-born leaders and followers, alpha and beta personalities, and individuals have different gifts and capacities. The world had always recognized this, too. In fact, when young Therese of Lisieux was bothered by the idea that people would have different places even in Heaven, she was instructed to get her thimble and her father's tumbler and fill them with water. She then was asked, "Which is more full?" Of course, secular modernists will criticize this as a Christian justification for prejudice and discrimination, but what does their world view imply?

The reality is that there's a huge contradiction between belief in cosmic-accident evolution and belief in human equality. First, when even just one couple has a child, there are a whopping 3.1 billion possible combinations. Then there's group variation. Do you really believe groups could have "evolved" isolated from one another for hundreds of thousands or even millions of years -- subject to different environments, stresses and adaptive requirements -- and wound up being the same in every respect? This is a mathematical impossibility and a brazenly unscientific notion. As G.K. Chesterton put it, if people "were not created equal, they were certainly evolved unequal."

Whatever your belief about creation, group variation in physical being and capacities is apparent. A gynecologist once told me that black women didn't suffer as frequently from descended uteruses because they have stronger abdominal walls. And Dr. Walter Williams tells us here and here:

Prostate cancer is nearly twice as common among black men as white men. Cervical cancer rates are five times higher among Vietnamese women in the U.S. than among white women....Male geniuses outnumber female geniuses 7-to-1....[D]uring the 1960s, the Chinese minority in Malaysia received more university degrees than the Malay majority -- including 400 engineering degrees compared with four for the Malays, even though Malays dominate the country politically....[Jews are] only two-tenths of 1 percent of the world's population. Yet between 1901 and 2010, Jews were...22 percent of the world's [Nobel Laureate winners].

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#3 Oct 3, 2013
And is the last statistic any surprise? Ashkenazi Jews have the highest I.Q. of any group.

Because this is an inherently unequal world, the actions of equality dogmatists such as today's liberals can be understood as rebellion against nature. This also helps explain why they -- from the French Revolutionaries to the communists to today's liberals -- practice tyranny. When your agenda is so contrary to nature and, more to the point, man's nature, people will quite naturally act contrary to it. In fact, they will quite naturally be contrary to it. And since people can only be what they are, the agents of unnatural agendas will often say they are not to be. For no one likes having his plans spoiled, and these social engineers, enraged, will lash out at those not "good enough" to conform to the program. This of course is everyone, and killing fields are the ultimate result.

We're not there yet, but the cultural killing field is all around us. We have government decrees stating that if groups perform differently on a test (e.g., a police exam), it is by definition "discriminatory"; and that students must be punished in racially proportional ways. We see quotas and affirmative action and lawsuits and destructive discrimination, as we tear ourselves apart fighting nature. And why? Among other things, if you believe all groups are equal in all ways, it follows that you'll attribute different performance outcomes among them to discrimination.

One might now wonder why liberals don't apply their diversity tenet "Embrace differences" to what really matters. After all, if you watch golf on TV, do you want to see "equality," where everyone would have to be a duffer, or the best? Do you want "equality" in an art museum or ethereal beauty? Gifts displayed by others are to be relished, reveled in and revered. And the only thing preventing this is, again, those twin demons of envy and pride.

And what of equality dogma? It gave us the drab, cookie-cutter projects of communist Eastern Europe. It breeds ugliness and mediocrity.

Equality is not a virtue.

It is not a laudable goal.

It can never be a reality, as some will always be "more equal than others."

And if anything deserving of the name civilization is to live, equality, as an aspiration, must die.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/10/why_eq...
Follow us:@AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
De Las Casas

Louisville, KY

#4 Oct 3, 2013
We all should have political equality. Why should some get freedoms and rights, and others don't? That's unjust. I want justice.

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#5 Oct 3, 2013
De Las Casas wrote:
We all should have political equality. Why should some get freedoms and rights, and others don't? That's unjust. I want justice.
You poor, deprived creature...just what have you been denied?

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#6 Oct 3, 2013
De Las Casas wrote:
We all should have political equality. Why should some get freedoms and rights, and others don't? That's unjust. I want justice.
No, we should not.

Currently in Ohio, you can work and be taxed in a city, and yet not get to vote on said taxation.

The same with owning property where you do not have your primary residence.

Suffrage should be graduated and qualified, not equal.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#7 Oct 3, 2013
Wow, Paco has really outdone himself with his cut and paste bigotry this time.

Great Job, Paco!!!

woof
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#8 Oct 3, 2013
Ooops....forgot to include kudos for Karl.

Good Job Karl!!!

woof
De Las Casas

Louisville, KY

#9 Oct 3, 2013
NSA tapping our phones and emails... you poor baby... how come you love fascists up in ur azz? u fkkked up in the head
De Las Casas

Louisville, KY

#10 Oct 3, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
No, we should not.
Currently in Ohio, you can work and be taxed in a city, and yet not get to vote on said taxation.
The same with owning property where you do not have your primary residence.
Suffrage should be graduated and qualified, not equal.
So a neonazi fascist is against democracy... hum? Big f'n surprise there. I bet you hate food stamps too... but guess wat... it's u wytes whose overwhelming weighing down these welfare rolls... u wytes thought about stop'n ur uppity attitudes, start taking care of ur kids instead of hitting up meth, and columbine, Jeffrey Dahmer, always shooters in US, gotta be some right wing Tim McVeigh wannabe... who, btw, is WHITE.
Big Johnson

Columbus, OH

#11 Oct 3, 2013
Just cut to the chase and tell us what Ralph McGreevy has to say about it.

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#12 Oct 3, 2013
De Las Casas wrote:
<quoted text>
So a neonazi fascist is against democracy... hum? Big f'n surprise there. I bet you hate food stamps too... but guess wat... it's u wytes whose overwhelming weighing down these welfare rolls... u wytes thought about stop'n ur uppity attitudes, start taking care of ur kids instead of hitting up meth, and columbine, Jeffrey Dahmer, always shooters in US, gotta be some right wing Tim McVeigh wannabe... who, btw, is WHITE.
What color was Aaron Alexis, boy? How about John Muhammed? Lee Malvo?

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#13 Oct 3, 2013
Big Johnson wrote:
Just cut to the chase and tell us what Ralph McGreevy has to say about it.
Your ass is still stinging, isn't it?

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#14 Oct 3, 2013
De Las Casas wrote:
<quoted text>
So a neonazi fascist is against democracy... hum? Big f'n surprise there. I bet you hate food stamps too... but guess wat... it's u wytes whose overwhelming weighing down these welfare rolls... u wytes thought about stop'n ur uppity attitudes, start taking care of ur kids instead of hitting up meth, and columbine, Jeffrey Dahmer, always shooters in US, gotta be some right wing Tim McVeigh wannabe... who, btw, is WHITE.
Welfare is not majority white. It's disproportionately non-white compared to the population at large.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#15 Oct 3, 2013
Big Johnson wrote:
Just cut to the chase and tell us what Ralph McGreevy has to say about it.
He says that his members are making no money whatsoever on capital gains, so that in a flat housing market, they cannot pass on any property tax increases to their tenants.

That's what he says.

But its a lie.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#16 Oct 3, 2013
Diamond Eugene wrote:
<quoted text>What color was Aaron Alexis, boy? How about John Muhammed? Lee Malvo?
what color is your black neighbor?

woof
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#17 Oct 3, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
No, we should not.
Currently in Ohio, you can work and be taxed in a city, and yet not get to vote on said taxation.
The same with owning property where you do not have your primary residence.
Suffrage should be graduated and qualified, not equal.
What if the poor black 19 year old girl is actually more intelligent than you?

Shouldn't she get to vote, and not you?

woof

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#18 Oct 3, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
what color is your black neighbor?
woof
he's a mass shooter? Who knew?

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#19 Oct 3, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
He says that his members are making no money whatsoever on capital gains, so that in a flat housing market, they cannot pass on any property tax increases to their tenants.
That's what he says.
But its a lie.
woof
Amazing how you have the gift that allows you to call the explanation of other people's divorces and business experience, "lies."
makes one wonder about projection on your part, douche.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#20 Oct 3, 2013
Diamond Eugene wrote:
<quoted text>he's a mass shooter? Who knew?
Imagine that!!!

A black person who is civil.

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 10
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Where has Rowdy been? 1 hr They cannot kill ... 2
A one-horse open carriage 1 hr They cannot kill ... 2
Black on black and scarcely a peep. 1 hr They cannot kill ... 4
Spears from South Side 4 hr now hey 5
Dead boy's mom urges Columbus marchers on 4 hr now hey 12
4 cheetah cubs from 2 moms share first playtime... 4 hr Duke for Mayor 6
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 4 hr They cannot kill ... 4,935
COPS lives MATTER 8 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 199
Columbus Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:57 am PST

ESPN11:57AM
Bengals TE Eifert will not return this season
NFL12:07 PM
Browns' Gilbert on ugly rookie season: 'I messed up'
ESPN12:37 PM
Shaw gets start for Browns; Hoyer ruled out
ESPN 1:15 PM
Browns' Gilbert: 'I brought it upon myself'
NBC Sports 4:00 PM
Justin Gilbert vows to be great after work ethic is questioned