You don't even bother to dispute my main point, which is that the US constitution is the final authority, not case law.<quoted text>
No, go read Marbury v. Madison (1803). It's not quite that simple.
The rest of your argument would get your laughed out of any ConLaw I class in any accredited law school, which I am now quite certain you have never attented, nor could if you tried.
Your arguments are ideological, not legal, and are therefore irrelevant.
The rest of your post is simply unworthy of response.
You instead resort to the same appeal to authority (SCOTUS and case law) logical fallacy, because you have no logical basis. SCOTUS has authority only regarding constitutionally delegated powers, not all powers as for which you lust. You deny this fact because you are not intelligent and you are corrupt.
Your ideology is a big lie and totalitarian, which you are too cowardly and dishonest to admit.
My ideology is in accordance with the letter and spirit of the true authority, whereas your ideology is based on feelings, word games, and a lust for power, which your kind has spectacularly achieved in Washington DC, but is too cowardly and dishonest to take responsibility.
In short, you are full of crap as are most ABA-style money grubbers. There is no mystery understanding why ABA lawyers are seen as pathological liars by ordinary people.
The control of public schools is very relevant to the headline topix discussion, because it is fedgov intervention in public schools, formerly controlled by the people, that has caused the issue of religion in public schools to be controversial. Queers and other diversity people are pushing queer education in public because fruitcakes have gained the upper hand using likeminded political appointments in the fedgov judicial system. You deny this corruption because you are full of crap and your diversity ideology (victim cult) is psychotic crap.