Global Warmin??? We Don't Need No St...

Global Warmin??? We Don't Need No Stinkin Global Warmin

Posted in the Columbus Forum

Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#1 Aug 5, 2014
d pantz

Taylor, MI

#2 Feb 10, 2015
They cannot kill a Spook

Taylor, MI

#3 Feb 10, 2015
Duke for Mayor wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ news/morning-mix/wp/2014/08/05 /scientists-may-have-cracked-t he-giant-siberian-crater-myste ry-and-the-news-isnt-good/?hpi d=z1
woof
Stop eating beans, causing all that flatulence. They say cow farts are causing globL warming just think of all the damage cause by mexicans and thos people.who eat.that red beans and rice in the south

“Baby, it's cold outside! ”

Since: Apr 10

BLOCKHEADS!

#4 Feb 10, 2015
Global warming means the earth's surface,waters and streams are warmer than usual. The rivers and streams which flow underneath, and around each of the glaciers are recorded at warmer temps, therefore the glaciers are melting at an alarming rate.
HOWEVER....
These types of conditions occurr in cycles. A cycle usually last 10-20 years.
Colder cycles, warmer cycles.

Does anyone know about the BIG BANG MACHINE? The new discovery?
Look it up. It's facinating!
They cannot kill a Spook

Taylor, MI

#5 Feb 10, 2015
BizzyBee wrote:
Global warming means the earth's surface,waters and streams are warmer than usual. The rivers and streams which flow underneath, and around each of the glaciers are recorded at warmer temps, therefore the glaciers are melting at an alarming rate.
HOWEVER....
These types of conditions occurr in cycles. A cycle usually last 10-20 years.
Colder cycles, warmer cycles.
Does anyone know about the BIG BANG MACHINE? The new discovery?
Look it up. It's facinating!
Hi BizzyBee

Keep the beans and cabbage to a minimum. Don't want all those Russian peasants to fall into a crater
Chicken Little

Mountain View, CA

#6 Feb 10, 2015
http://manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2015/2/9/...

The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time -- Part III
February 09, 2015/ Francis Menton

A few weeks ago, in mid-January, you would have had a hard time missing the big shouting and celebration in the global warming alarmist camp of 2014 being the "hottest year ever." As just a few examples, there was Scientific American on January 5 ("2014 Officially Hottest Year On Record"); the BBC on January 16 ("2014 warmest year on record, say US researchers"); or the New York Times on January 16 ("2014 Breaks Heat Record, Challenging Global Warming Skeptics"). There were plenty of others like those.

If you read all of those articles, without doubt you will come away asking yourself one glaring question, namely: So what did the satellites show? Not one of these articles, or for that matter any of many others from the alarmist camp that I have looked at, so much as mentions the satellite data. But anybody who follows this issue even a little knows that beginning in 1979 the U.S. government at great taxpayer expense has put up satellites with sophisticated instruments to get much more accurate measurements of world temperatures than previously available. The alternative networks of ground based thermometers still exist, but have widely scattered coverage and are subject to large inaccuracies (like from having cities grow up around them, or having their sites moved over the years). So SA, BBC, NYT: How could you insult our intelligence with articles trumpeting "hottest year ever" without telling us what the satellites say?

Luckily it's not too hard to figure out what the satellites say -- their data is published monthly by two sources, UAH and RSS. Here's an article summarizing the results from both. Of course it's exactly what you knew it would be as soon as you saw that the likes of the liars at SA, BBC and NYT wouldn't tell you what the satellites say: 2014 was not the hottest year, nor close, but rather tied for 6th/7th place in the 36 year record from RSS, 0.3 degrees C cooler than the warmest year, which was 1998 -- 16 years ago. Now 0.3 degrees C may not be a lot, but it's also not a little in a record that only varies by about 1.2 degrees C from coolest to warmest year.

But it gets worse. Regular readers of this blog know that there is a gigantic issue out there of the extent to which the ground thermometer records can be trusted because the guardians of the data (who are the same people putting out the press releases about 2014 being the "hottest year ever") have been systematically tampering with the data to make the earlier years cooler and therefore make the present appear warmer by comparison. I previously wrote about this issue on July 3, 2014 ("What Is The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time -- Part II") and on July 19, 2013 ("What Is The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time?") Those articles name names, both of the crooked U.S. government paid fake scientists who "adjust" the raw thermometer data without explanation to fit the desired narrative of "hottest year ever," and also of the independent researchers who laboriously track down old archived temperature records to uncover the tampering.

Just today this issue is starting to explode. It was at the top of Drudge earlier today, although now gradually falling back. Drudge linked to an article by Christopher Booker in the UK Telegraph from Saturday titled "The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever." (Wait, are they stealing their headlines from me? OK, not quite.) Booker discusses the work of Paul Homewood, reported on his blog notalotofpeopleknowthat.....

“Baby, it's cold outside! ”

Since: Apr 10

BLOCKHEADS!

#7 Feb 10, 2015
Chicken Little wrote:
http://manhattancontrarian.com /blog/2015/2/9/the-greatest-sc ientific-fraud-of-all-time-par t-iii
The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time -- Part III
February 09, 2015/ Francis Menton
If you read all of those articles, without doubt you will come away asking yourself one glaring question, namely: So what did the satellites show? Not one of these articles, or for that matter any of many others from the alarmist camp that I have looked at, so much as mentions the satellite data. But anybody who follows this issue even a little knows that beginning in 1979 the U.S. government at great taxpayer expense has put up satellites with sophisticated instruments to get much more accurate measurements of world temperatures than previously available. The alternative networks of ground based thermometers still exist, but have widely scattered coverage and are subject to large inaccuracies (like from having cities grow up around them, or having their sites moved over the years). So SA, BBC, NYT: How could you insult our intelligence with articles trumpeting "hottest year ever" without telling us what the satellites say?
Luckily it's not too hard to figure out what the satellites say -- their data is published monthly by two sources, UAH and RSS. Here's an article summarizing the results from both. Of course it's exactly what you knew it would be as soon as you saw that the likes of the liars at SA, BBC and NYT wouldn't tell you what the satellites say: 2014 was not the hottest year, nor close, but rather tied for 6th/7th place in the 36 year record from RSS, 0.3 degrees C cooler than the warmest year, which was 1998 -- 16 years ago. Now 0.3 degrees C may not be a lot, but it's also not a little in a record that only varies by about 1.2 degrees C from coolest to warmest year.
But it gets worse. Regular readers of this blog know that there is a gigantic issue out there of the extent to which the ground thermometer records can be trusted because the guardians of the data (who are the same people putting out the press releases about 2014 being the "hottest year ever") have been systematically tampering with the data to make the earlier years cooler and therefore make the present appear warmer by comparison. I previously wrote about this issue on July 3, 2014 ("What Is The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time -- Part II") and on July 19, 2013 ("What Is The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time?") Those articles name names, both of the crooked U.S. government paid fake scientists who "adjust" the raw thermometer data without explanation to fit the desired narrative of "hottest year ever," and also of the independent researchers who laboriously track down old archived temperature records to uncover the tampering.
Just today this issue is starting to explode. It was at the top of Drudge earlier today, although now gradually falling back. Drudge linked to an article by Christopher Booker in the UK Telegraph from Saturday titled "The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever." (Wait, are they stealing their headlines from me? OK, not quite.) Booker discusses the work of Paul Homewood, reported on his blog notalotofpeopleknowthat.....
When the previous president had his administration "adjust" the report from notiable scientists, on global warming, it was an outrage wasn't it?
No matter what the scientists report, it is adjusted to suit the agenda of a party's views.
SOOO, you ask when will the truth come out? It's been out, only to be revised and changed.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#8 Feb 10, 2015
BizzyBee wrote:
<quoted text>
When the previous president had his administration "adjust" the report from notiable scientists, on global warming, it was an outrage wasn't it?
No matter what the scientists report, it is adjusted to suit the agenda of a party's views.
SOOO, you ask when will the truth come out? It's been out, only to be revised and changed.
Mans science experiment recording the weather is less than 150 years worth of data. FACT.

Earth is over a billion years old.

the weather can not be predicted accurately for Monday, and with a mere blip of recorded experiments it will be 5 million more years before anything definitive could be proclaimed even relevant regarding climate anything.

Wonder why they are not predicting volcano eruptions and earthquakes accurately?

They can't, and fail over 50% of the time with the weather.

Only man is arrogant enough to think he can control nature.

ever hear them predict the carbon footprint of California forest fires?
They don't because it is more than all the california cars collectively?

because the liberals invaded the West creating more forest fires they are to blame for global warming.
Banning liberals from America is good for ecology and Earth health.
d pantz

Toledo, OH

#9 Feb 14, 2015
They cannot kill a Spook wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop eating beans, causing all that flatulence. They say cow farts are causing globL warming just think of all the damage cause by mexicans and thos people.who eat.that red beans and rice in the south
Thats his breath from all the BS he talks.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ziggy Stardust & The Spiders From Mars 3 hr Big Johnson 16
T Minus 4 3 2 1 ,,,, | Mueller Gone! 4 hr Duke for Mayor 1,383
President's Day news: James Buchanan moves up 4 hr Duke for Mayor 11
News Eastland Mall, at 50, remains popular among nei... 5 hr Michael B Coleman 2
Russian Involvement 5 hr Duke for Mayor 7
Where Next Mass Shooting? 5 hr They cannot kill ... 2
Peter Kurto Columbus Industries 6 hr STFU 14

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages