Did Obama Lie Again? This Time Global...

Did Obama Lie Again? This Time Global Warming!

Created by Zoe Regen on Jan 3, 2014

104 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

dunadd

Greensboro, NC

#85 Jan 10, 2014
socialists, scientists, scientists socialists.
I mention one, you mention the other.
Leaving that aside, do you honestly think a majority of scientists don't have an agenda? an agenda firstly of being right?
Does anyone have a suggestion why the ignorant unlearned Vikings named an icecap Greenland? Green ice? Really!
Can anyone explain the summer snow storm in New England in the nineteenth century?
Has anyone heard of the word cyclical?
Climate of mother is cyclical.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#86 Jan 10, 2014
Duke for Mayor

United States

#87 Jan 10, 2014
dunadd wrote:
socialists, scientists, scientists socialists.
I mention one, you mention the other.
Leaving that aside, do you honestly think a majority of scientists don't have an agenda? an agenda firstly of being right?
Does anyone have a suggestion why the ignorant unlearned Vikings named an icecap Greenland? Green ice? Really!
Can anyone explain the summer snow storm in New England in the nineteenth century?
Has anyone heard of the word cyclical?
Climate of mother is cyclical.
No pops, true scientists don't care whether they are "right" or "wrong".

Yes, Pops, weather patterns are cyclical, but when one can observe statistical anomalies in those cycles that have never taken place before, and also observe trends over periods of decades that correspond to those anomalies, one can attempt to draw conclusions from them, and often, be correct.

woof

Trayvonius Martinez

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#88 Jan 10, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
No pops, true scientists don't care whether they are "right" or "wrong".
Yes, Pops, weather patterns are cyclical, but when one can observe statistical anomalies in those cycles that have never taken place before, and also observe trends over periods of decades that correspond to those anomalies, one can attempt to draw conclusions from them, and often, be correct.
woof
The sheer arrogance of claiming that on a 4 billion year old planet a mere 140 years of meteorological records come to the conclusion that AGW exists is astounding.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#90 Jan 10, 2014
Cold used to be caused by cold; now it's caused by heat.
Ice cream melting? Turn up the freezer temp.
dunadd

Greensboro, NC

#91 Jan 10, 2014
Yeah, young'un, it isn't these things and events haven't taken place before, it is on the human side. Our technology has become so advanced in the last few decades that we're observing events we didn't know take place without our help and in spite of us.
Mama is perfectly able to take care of herself without any help from the brats.
You believe what you believe and that's fine. And discuss what you believe but it ain't gonna change the facts.
You have your global warming day and I'll have my Mama takes of herself day and you wait for the day when NYC is underwater and the beaches are at Richmond and Raleigh. Just imagine, your descendants will only have to drive to Harrisburg PA to swim in the ocean. Ain't that quaint. Thanks for the laughs.
Later, child!
Duke for Mayor

United States

#92 Jan 10, 2014
RU_Kiddingme wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't get too close to the edge of the Earth. You don't want to fall off.
Its ok. A good bleeding will fix him up once we catch him.

woof

Trayvonius Martinez

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#93 Jan 10, 2014
Hmmm...4 billion years of planetary development with 140 years of records, including those showing no warming since 1998...now that's what lefties call solid evidence on which to base the biggest scam ever perpetrated on the civilized world by those who seek:
A) To destroy the Western economy
And/Or
B) To punish their political opponents
While
C) Getting rich beyond the dreams of avarice.

We're not playing, lemmings.

“Zuzu's Petals”

Since: Sep 10

Bedford Falls

#94 Jan 10, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Its ok. A good bleeding will fix him up once we catch him.
woof
Doubt a normal person would want you to touch them. Creepy liberal!

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#96 Jan 10, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you claiming that the ice core record that now goes back 800,000 years is flawed?
woof
No, the data is not flawed... but some of conclusions drawn from it certainly deserve skepticism.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#97 Jan 10, 2014
dunadd wrote:
socialists, scientists, scientists socialists.
I mention one, you mention the other.
Leaving that aside, do you honestly think a majority of scientists don't have an agenda? an agenda firstly of being right?
The vast majority of scientists are chosen BY those with the agenda, and if you don't "think right", you aren't invited to play.
dunadd

Greensboro, NC

#98 Jan 10, 2014
For enough money, I have no doubt some scientists would report what the payer wants and needs to hear. I believe it's called government grants. In actuality, they are playing the game with our money.
I have to pay a scientist through government grants for said scientist to report things I know are not true.
This government business is the world's greatest flim flam artistry man has ever known.
d pants

United States

#99 Jan 10, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
No pops, true scientists don't care whether they are "right" or "wrong".
Yes, Pops, weather patterns are cyclical, but when one can observe statistical anomalies in those cycles that have never taken place before, and also observe trends over periods of decades that correspond to those anomalies, one can attempt to draw conclusions from them, and often, be correct.
woof
but god forbid anybody check their math. Plus a lot of them seem to be up their own ass about their theories. Darwinism comes to mind. They've dug up artifacts that date intelligent humans way before the Darwinian theory claims we evolved. Yet there all a bunch of "scientists" who seem to totally ignore that.
d pants

United States

#100 Jan 10, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Its ok. A good bleeding will fix him up once we catch him.
woof
or a "polar vortex". 
d pants

United States

#101 Jan 10, 2014
RU_Kiddingme wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't get too close to the edge of the Earth. You don't want to fall off.
sure! Just like the ice caps are supposed to be melted away, right?

“MAGA”

Since: May 13

Columbus, OH

#102 Jan 10, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
All bullshit links dukie dog and no comment from you. TYPICAL

The global temperature average has NOT risen in 15 years

That is an IRREFUTABLE FN FACT!!!!!!!!!!

Here is a link from the HARD CORE LEFTIST news paper The LA Times.
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/sep/22/scien...

From the article

" It's a climate puzzle that has vexed scientists for more than a decade and added fuel to the arguments of those who insist man-made global warming is a myth.

Since just before the START of the 21st century, the Earth's average global surface temperature has FAILED to rise DESPITE soaring levels of heat-trapping greenhouse gases and years of dire warnings from environmental advocates.

Now, as scientists with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change gather in Sweden this week to approve portions of the IPCC's fifth assessment report, they are finding themselves pressured to explain this GLARING discrepancy.

The panel, a United Nations creation that shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore, hopes to brief world leaders on the current state of climate science in a clear, unified voice. However, experts inside and outside the process say members probably will engage in heated debate over the causes and significance of the so-called global warming hiatus."

THEORIES, THEORIES,THEORIES but no facts.

FACT is the world is NOT getting warmer despite the globull warming EXPERTS (LMAO)
OPINIONS.

You can post all the bullshit links you want dukie boy, the inconvenient truth is for the last 15 years the Earth has not experienced a rise in AVERAGE TEMPERATURE.

If you post a link that says otherwise it's bullshit.

The coming conservative majority in congress WILL stop the lying globull warming socialists from destroying the economy and redistributing wealth under the guise of saving the planet..........

Stop your whining, get back in your gas guzzling old beater car and run along.

Hope your heater works cause, as you know we a breaking all kinds of records for cold temperatures.

https://www.google.com/search...

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#103 Jan 12, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Your statement that "There have been times when the CO2 in the atmosphere was greater than it is now, yet the temperature wasn't" is patently false.
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/co2/vostok.html
woof
Came across this.

http://phys.org/news174234562.html
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#104 Jan 13, 2014
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
No pops, true scientists don't care whether they are "right" or "wrong".
Yes, Pops, weather patterns are cyclical, but when one can observe statistical anomalies in those cycles that have never taken place before, and also observe trends over periods of decades that correspond to those anomalies, one can attempt to draw conclusions from them, and often, be correct.
woof
science failure is reviewing data as FACT, when less than 1% of data is recorded.

can you hear me laughing?
wiseAfricanAmeri can

Columbus, OH

#106 Jan 13, 2014
Time to edumacate the Neanderthals who're wooo to sleep by Fox and cigar smoking closet fairy Slimball on AM radio. You pigs are too easy!
Weather Warfare: Beware the US Military’s Experiments with Climatic Warfare
‘Climatic warfare’ has been excluded from the agenda on climate change.
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, November 09, 2013
The Ecologist, December 2007, Global Research 7 December 2007
Theme: Environment, Militarization and WMD
In-depth Report: Climate Change
5229 325 289 23.9K

Weather Warfare: Beware the US military’s experiments with climatic warfare
“HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction, capable of destabilising agricultural and ecological systems globally.”

“‘Climatic warfare’ potentially threatens the future of humanity, but has casually been excluded from the reports for which the IPCC received the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.”

Pdf version of article on Weather Warfare by Michel Chossudovsky, The Ecologist, December 2007 (pdf)

Rarely acknowledged in the debate on global climate change, the world’s weather can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated electromagnetic weapons. Both the US and Russia have developed capabilities to manipulate the climate for military use.

Environmental modification techniques have been applied by the US military for more than half a century. US mathematician John von Neumann, in liaison with the US Department of Defense, started his research on weather modification in the late 1940s at the height of the Cold War and foresaw ‘forms of climatic warfare as yet unimagined’. During the Vietnam war, cloud-seeding techniques were used, starting in 1967 under Project Popeye, the objective of which was to prolong the monsoon season and block enemy supply routes along the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

The US military has developed advanced capabilities that enable it selectively to alter weather patterns. The technology, which is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), is an appendage of the Strategic Defense Initiative –‘Star Wars’. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction, operating from the outer atmosphere and capable of destabilising agricultural and ecological systems around the world.
wiseAfricanAmeri can

Columbus, OH

#107 Jan 13, 2014
So DID Obama actually lie, or is he withholding military secrets and using that info to get his clean air and tax the Corporations agenda passed? You be the judge of that after you understand what's been going on with are "strange" weather patterns!

Weather-modification, according to the US Air Force document AF 2025 Final Report,‘offers the war fighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary’, capabilities, it says, extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts and earthquakes:‘Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog and storms on earth or to modify space weather… and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of [military] technologies.’

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Robert Mueller Investigating Donald Trump 17 min 404 has been found 503
Why are Trump's Kids so ugly? 42 min Mud, James Mud 40
News Whitehall teens just 'headed to club' (Jun '09) 1 hr Marquan is worm f... 75
Are Jobs More Important Than Our Environment? 3 hr Duke for Mayor 182
OJ & Barack High Struttin Togetha, Score 1 Blac... 3 hr Duke for Mayor 2
Burn in Hell White Pigs, Go Fight Real Crime, N... 4 hr Alternative Facts... 83
Dems in disarray- Well, yeah! 7 hr Duke for Mayor 934
News Scandal forces appraisal of gay issues | The Co... (Oct '10) 19 hr A Brutha Gotta Know 258

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages