Hillary to be crucified over Benghazi

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#124 May 9, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Getting just a bit into woohoo territory there, aren't you, George?
Ask the families; it's their accusation.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#125 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Ask the families; it's their accusation.
They speak Arabic?
Big Johnson

Columbus, OH

#126 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>If you say so...
But speaking of that:
Families of slain SEAL Team 6 to blame government for deaths of servicemen
According to a press release put out by the families, retired military experts will also appear to explain "how and why the government is as much responsible for the deaths of their sons as is the Taliban."
The press release says that areas of inquiry include, but are not limited to:
How President Obama and Vice President Biden, having disclosed on May 4, 2011, that Navy SEAL Team VI carried out the successful raid on Bin Laden’s compound resulting in the master terrorist’s death, put a retaliatory target on the backs of the fallen heroes.
How and why high-level military officials sent these Navy SEAL Team VI heroes into battle without special operations aviation and proper air support.
How and why middle-level military brass carries out too many ill-prepared missions to boost their standing with top-level military brass and the Commander-in-Chief in order that they can be promoted.
How the military restricts special operations servicemen and others from engaging in timely return fire when fired upon by the Taliban and other terrorist groups and interests, thus jeopardizing the servicemen’s lives.
How and why the denial of requested pre-assault fire may have contributed to the shoot down of the Navy SEAL Team VI helicopter and the death of these special operations servicemen.
How Afghani forces accompanying the Navy SEAL Team VI servicemen on the helicopter were not properly vetted and how they possibly disclosed classified information to the Taliban about the mission, resulting in the shoot down of the helicopter.
How military brass, while prohibiting any mention of a Judeo-Christian God, invited a Muslim cleric to the funeral for the fallen Navy SEAL Team VI heroes who disparaged in Arabic the memory of these servicemen by damning them as infidels to Allah. A video of the Muslim cleric’s “prayer” will be shown with a certified translation.
http://www.examiner.com/article/families-of-s...
Better yet, compare total military casualties under Presidents Obama and Bush. You are spitting in the faces of the brave American heroes killed and maimed in Iraq settling Bush's family feud. Why do you hate them?
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#128 May 9, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
OK, note the moral equivalence
If you see those two things as equal, than you make Georgie's 3.1 look like a Phd.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#129 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>If you think morons like Johnson and control freaks like "Bob" are engaged in anything but disruption, you're a fool.
I'm no fool Paco, but what I see more often is someone sarcastically pointing out your frequent displays of hypocrisy with a quick, one line comment, and you responding as if there has been an Act of Treason committed by their doing so.

So sorry you can't recognize that perhaps what you claim is "trolling", may really not be.

Further, regardless whether one's commentary qualifies as "trolling", who really cares, beyond you and your little circle of confidants who possess such weak stomachs, thin skin, and courageous brave hearts?

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#130 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Stop lying, paralegal:
In one of the most stunning portions of the hearing, Hicks confirmed the chilling refusal of the Obama administration to send in readily available U.S. assets to stop the consulate slaughter. This order to “stand down” was given not once, but at least twice. Hicks also revealed that an explicit order from the chain of command prevented a four-man special forces rescue team in Tripoli from getting to the Americans trapped at the annex. He noted the order came from ”either AFRICOM or SOCAFRICA” and that the team was “furious” when they were told to stand down.“I will quote Lieutenant Colonel Gibson,” said Hicks, referring to the officer on the receiving end of that command.“He said,‘This is the first time in my career that a diplomat has more balls than somebody in the military.’” Hicks’ testimony on this point directly contradicts recent statements from the Obama-run Pentagon.“There was never any kind of stand-down order to anybody,” said Maj. Robert Furman, Pentagon spokesman, on Monday.
Yet Mark Thompson also testified that he tried to get a Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST) comprised of special ops and intelligence personnel deployed, and he, too, was told to stand down. According to a source interviewed by Breitbart.com , only President Obama, or someone acting on his authority, could have given the stand down order.
http://frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/bl...
First, the allegations and innuendos in that post are a long way from being established as fact. Second, even if true, it doesn't support your wild assertion that President Obama ordered that Americans be left to die under fire.

You are a hack.

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#131 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
First, the allegations and innuendos in that post are a long way from being established as fact. Second, even if true, it doesn't support your wild assertion that President Obama ordered that Americans be left to die under fire.
You are a hack.
"Yet Mark Thompson also testified that he tried to get a Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST) comprised of special ops and intelligence personnel deployed, and he, too, was told to stand down. According to a source interviewed by Breitbart.com , only President Obama, or someone acting on his authority, could have given the stand down order."
Get off your knees for that homosexual in the White House, little girl.

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#132 May 9, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm no fool Paco, but what I see more often is someone sarcastically pointing out your frequent displays of hypocrisy with a quick, one line comment, and you responding as if there has been an Act of Treason committed by their doing so.
So sorry you can't recognize that perhaps what you claim is "trolling", may really not be.
Further, regardless whether one's commentary qualifies as "trolling", who really cares, beyond you and your little circle of confidants who possess such weak stomachs, thin skin, and courageous brave hearts?
woof
Trolls present nothing of substance...ever. That defines Johnson and "Bob." Are you too dense to see that?

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#133 May 9, 2013
Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
Better yet, compare total military casualties under Presidents Obama and Bush. You are spitting in the faces of the brave American heroes killed and maimed in Iraq settling Bush's family feud. Why do you hate them?
Your people said this:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#134 May 9, 2013
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#135 May 9, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
They speak Arabic?
Nobody at the service spoke Arabic or taped it? Really?
Have some pizza, Reader.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#136 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Bush lied, people died

George is nothing but a right wing kook

/sarc/Che
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#137 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>
"Yet Mark Thompson also testified that he tried to get a Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST) comprised of special ops and intelligence personnel deployed, and he, too, was told to stand down. According to a source interviewed by Breitbart.com , only President Obama, or someone acting on his authority, could have given the stand down order."
Get off your knees for that homosexual in the White House, little girl.
Oh, Breitbart has a source. Well that settles it I guess.

"As to whether more could have done during the attack, Pickering said the board looked closely at the military air assets, and other assets, reviewing the attack with the military in extensive detail."

"Despite the fact that we have the world's best military, they were neither postured nor placed in a way that could have made a significant difference," Pickering said. "It's regrettable, but it is truth and it is honesty."

http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/08/state...

You guys are trying to gin up a controversy. It's obvious and it's pathetic.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#138 May 9, 2013
Just in case someone is interested in a rational, apolitical, analytical look at Benghazi.

http://www.whatthefolly.com/2012/12/19/transc...

Of course, why listen to an Admiral and Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when Breitbart has a source?

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#139 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, Breitbart has a source. Well that settles it I guess.
"As to whether more could have done during the attack, Pickering said the board looked closely at the military air assets, and other assets, reviewing the attack with the military in extensive detail."
"Despite the fact that we have the world's best military, they were neither postured nor placed in a way that could have made a significant difference," Pickering said. "It's regrettable, but it is truth and it is honesty."
http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/08/state...
You guys are trying to gin up a controversy. It's obvious and it's pathetic.
No, "ginning up a controversy" is lying about people paying no income taxes, "binders full of women," the "47%" and "rich people."

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#140 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, Breitbart has a source. Well that settles it I guess.
"As to whether more could have done during the attack, Pickering said the board looked closely at the military air assets, and other assets, reviewing the attack with the military in extensive detail."
"Despite the fact that we have the world's best military, they were neither postured nor placed in a way that could have made a significant difference," Pickering said. "It's regrettable, but it is truth and it is honesty."
http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/08/state...
You guys are trying to gin up a controversy. It's obvious and it's pathetic.
I guess they figured that digging up Vince Foster wasn't going to do it for them, eh?

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#141 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>

You guys are trying to gin up a controversy. It's obvious and it's pathetic.
Gonzales fired 12 attorneys and the Ds were musing about impeachment
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#142 May 9, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush lied, people died
George is nothing but a right wing kook
/sarc/Che
Those people learned a hard lesson about listening to people like W. and Cheney. The Cleveland Plain Dealer published an analysis days after Colin Powell's BS presentation to the U.N. that showed how unreliable all of that intelligence was.

That is what happens when people like Georgie try to paint anyone who disagrees with their rhetoric as un-American. If people don't have the cajones to stand up to it, a bunch of people needlessly die.

I don't care who voted for it, it was a pointless, ridiculous folly that cost us endless blood and treasure.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#143 May 9, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>No, "ginning up a controversy" is lying about people paying no income taxes, "binders full of women," the "47%" and "rich people."
But, wait. I thought Romney was your guy?

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#144 May 9, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
Just in case someone is interested in a rational, apolitical, analytical look at Benghazi.
http://www.whatthefolly.com/2012/12/19/transc...
Of course, why listen to an Admiral and Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when Breitbart has a source?
90% of flag rank officers are politicians. I'm betting you don't know that every single guy wearing a star has to go through the president and Congress, do you?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Out of the mouth of babes! 12 min UTrashy 4
Keeps pushing and pushing.... 14 min Male 151
Donald Trump didn't win because he's Donald Trump 41 min jonjedi 241
Who is the Biggest Liar? 42 min UTrashy 70
High Crimes and Misdemeanors 45 min jonjedi 89
News Columbus sets record for 60-degree days in Janu... 1 hr Pam 4
Dems Progress To A New Low 3 hr Batch 37 Pain Is ... 252
President Trump Rally 2017 Florida 7 hr Batch 37 Pain Is ... 104
What is happening in Sweden? 12 hr Duke for Mayor 85

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages