Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#26 Jun 11, 2013
Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
Georgie is jealous!
Seven years of college down the drain.
I wouldn't want that job...I still believe in the Fourth Amendment. And I wouldn't want to live in Hawaii for any amount of money.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#27 Jun 11, 2013
Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
Georgie is jealous!
Seven years of college down the drain.
That's Community College, Johnson.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#28 Jun 11, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
That's Community College, Johnson.
You went...where?

“The One! The Only! RUKiddingme”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey, Baby!

#29 Jun 11, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>I wouldn't want that job...I still believe in the Fourth Amendment. And I wouldn't want to live in Hawaii for any amount of money.
And Hawaii breathes a collective sigh of relief...
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#30 Jun 11, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>I wouldn't want that job...I still believe in the Fourth Amendment. And I wouldn't want to live in Hawaii for any amount of money.
And by "still" you mean "since last week."

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#31 Jun 11, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
And by "still" you mean "since last week."
Try that with this guy:

http://www.topix.com/forum/columbus/TGGIBEAD9...
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#32 Jun 11, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Try that with this guy:
http://www.topix.com/forum/columbus/TGGIBEAD9...
I was talking about you, Georgie. But I guess your link cuts off at the ankles your assertion that this only started in 2008.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#33 Jun 11, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I was talking about you, Georgie. But I guess your link cuts off at the ankles your assertion that this only started in 2008.
Are you illiterate?
From the article:
"The second, called PRISM, taps into major U.S. technology companies and monitors emails in the search for foreign terrorists. That program was authorized by 2007 and 2008 laws that allow the government to monitor, without specific warrants, emails believed to belong to foreigners."

You are one stupid c#nt.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#34 Jun 12, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Are you illiterate?
From the article:
"The second, called PRISM, taps into major U.S. technology companies and monitors emails in the search for foreign terrorists. That program was authorized by 2007 and 2008 laws that allow the government to monitor, without specific warrants, emails believed to belong to foreigners."
You are one stupid c#nt.
Georgie, being wrong all the time is making you quite angry. You said the spying program wasn't enacted until 2008 and that Dubya's administration wasn't involved in it. The quote you just cited makes clear that the authorization you were talking about was in 2007 not 2008 and Biden's quote was in 2006. Now which administration could he have been talking about, 3.1?

If you are going to increase the rate you step on your dick to twice a day, I may have to start putting a little effort into this.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#35 Jun 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Georgie, being wrong all the time is making you quite angry. You said the spying program wasn't enacted until 2008 and that Dubya's administration wasn't involved in it. The quote you just cited makes clear that the authorization you were talking about was in 2007 not 2008 and Biden's quote was in 2006. Now which administration could he have been talking about, 3.1?
If you are going to increase the rate you step on your dick to twice a day, I may have to start putting a little effort into this.
There was no funding until the 2008 FISA Amendment. Therefore, there was no PRISM until then. I already posted that before. Your lies won't save you in your attempt to dig your way out of being the troll you are.

"Its creation was enabled by the Protect America Act of 2007 under President Bush and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which legally immunized private companies that cooperated voluntarily with US intelligence collection and was renewed by Congress under President Obama in 2012 for five years until December 2017.[3][20] According to The Register, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 "specifically authorizes intelligence agencies to monitor the phone, email, and other communications of U.S. citizens for up to a week without obtaining a warrant" when one of the parties is outside the U.S.[20]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_%28surveil...

2008-07-10: President George W. Bush signed the bill into law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intellig...

And without Boundless Informant, PRISM is useless in the sense we know it today:

"Boundless Informant collects and analyzes data captured by intelligence-gathering technology like PRISM, which replaced the Terrorist Surveillance Program. Intelligence gathered by the United States government inside the United States or specifically targeting US citizens is legally required to be gathered in compliance with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) and under the authority of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA court).[5][6][7].

Legality and FISA Amendments Act of 2008

The FISA Amendments Act (FAA) Section 702 is referenced in PRISM documents detailing the electronic interception, capture and analysis of metadata. Many reports and letters of concern written by members of Congress suggest that this section of FAA in particular is legally and constitutionally problematic, such as by targeting U.S. persons, insofar as "Collections occur in U.S." as published documents indicate.[12][13][14][15] "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundless_Inform...

Get it, moron? That's TWICE I've shown you this. And twice you've been schooled in the word, "enabled," which means "made possible."
The funding and the use of private companies came six months before Bush left office. So did Boundless Informant.

You just keep on shooting yourself in the foot, little girl. Next time, try a head shot.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#37 Jun 12, 2013
RU_Kiddingme wrote:
Liar
Then prove it. All you have is your childish 'Nuts' icon...no intellect, no balls and no sense. You're just another subhuman draining resources while impeding decency and sowing destruction.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#38 Jun 12, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>There was no funding until the 2008 FISA Amendment. Therefore, there was no PRISM until then. I already posted that before. Your lies won't save you in your attempt to dig your way out of being the troll you are.
"Its creation was enabled by the Protect America Act of 2007 under President Bush and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which legally immunized private companies that cooperated voluntarily with US intelligence collection and was renewed by Congress under President Obama in 2012 for five years until December 2017.[3][20] According to The Register, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 "specifically authorizes intelligence agencies to monitor the phone, email, and other communications of U.S. citizens for up to a week without obtaining a warrant" when one of the parties is outside the U.S.[20]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_%28surveil...
2008-07-10: President George W. Bush signed the bill into law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intellig...
And without Boundless Informant, PRISM is useless in the sense we know it today:
"Boundless Informant collects and analyzes data captured by intelligence-gathering technology like PRISM, which replaced the Terrorist Surveillance Program. Intelligence gathered by the United States government inside the United States or specifically targeting US citizens is legally required to be gathered in compliance with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) and under the authority of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA court).[5][6][7].
Legality and FISA Amendments Act of 2008
The FISA Amendments Act (FAA) Section 702 is referenced in PRISM documents detailing the electronic interception, capture and analysis of metadata. Many reports and letters of concern written by members of Congress suggest that this section of FAA in particular is legally and constitutionally problematic, such as by targeting U.S. persons, insofar as "Collections occur in U.S." as published documents indicate.[12][13][14][15] "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundless_Inform...
Get it, moron? That's TWICE I've shown you this. And twice you've been schooled in the word, "enabled," which means "made possible."
The funding and the use of private companies came six months before Bush left office. So did Boundless Informant.
You just keep on shooting yourself in the foot, little girl. Next time, try a head shot.
You are assuming a lot of facts not in evidence, 3.1. But even assuming you are correct, why do you absolve Dubya who signed the legislation into law? My point all along has been you never had any problem with any of the Patriot Act until a Democrat administration was in the White House.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#39 Jun 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You are assuming a lot of facts not in evidence, 3.1. But even assuming you are correct, why do you absolve Dubya who signed the legislation into law? My point all along has been you never had any problem with any of the Patriot Act until a Democrat administration was in the White House.
I never commented on the Patriot Act before and I was never on Topix when Bush was president. Nobody is absolving anyone...except you, with Obama. That would be the Obama who promised to undo Bush's policies and have "the most transparent administration in history." Instead, he enhanced those policies. But you know what's funny? PRISM didn't stop the Tsarnaev brothers, even after the Russians warned us about them. Makes you wonder...
Now, how many times must you be told that Carter got the whole mess started in 1978, after Ted Kennedy wrote the legislation?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#40 Jun 12, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>I never commented on the Patriot Act before and I was never on Topix when Bush was president. Nobody is absolving anyone...except you, with Obama. That would be the Obama who promised to undo Bush's policies and have "the most transparent administration in history." Instead, he enhanced those policies. But you know what's funny? PRISM didn't stop the Tsarnaev brothers, even after the Russians warned us about them. Makes you wonder...
Now, how many times must you be told that Carter got the whole mess started in 1978, after Ted Kennedy wrote the legislation?
It is not surprising that you claim not to have had a thought or opinion prior to when you began posting on Topix. And don't lie, Georgie, I have never absolved the Obama administration for this. I don't agree with the policy. Never have. I put up with wingnuts like you calling me Un-American for being against the Patriot Act. But I am in the vast minority of people in this country in that regard. This policy has, and still maintains, wide bipartisan support.

Now, you have blamed Carter. You have blamed Obama. And you have still been unable to include your boy Bush in your outrage. Why is that?

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#41 Jun 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not surprising that you claim not to have had a thought or opinion prior to when you began posting on Topix. And don't lie, Georgie, I have never absolved the Obama administration for this. I don't agree with the policy. Never have. I put up with wingnuts like you calling me Un-American for being against the Patriot Act. But I am in the vast minority of people in this country in that regard. This policy has, and still maintains, wide bipartisan support.
Now, you have blamed Carter. You have blamed Obama. And you have still been unable to include your boy Bush in your outrage. Why is that?
Carter started it. Obama said he would end it. You don't see me blaming Clinton, do you?
Show me where I ever called anyone un-American for opposing the Patriot Act.
You really need to grow up and accept facts. YOUR boy is in the center seat now, and has been for four and a half years. He is also implicated in several other scandals that involve the privacy and free speech of US citizens. And you wonder why he's taking the heat?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#42 Jun 12, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Carter started it. Obama said he would end it. You don't see me blaming Clinton, do you?
Show me where I ever called anyone un-American for opposing the Patriot Act.
You really need to grow up and accept facts. YOUR boy is in the center seat now, and has been for four and a half years. He is also implicated in several other scandals that involve the privacy and free speech of US citizens. And you wonder why he's taking the heat?
You are completely incapable of admitting that the attacks on privacy and free speech in this country aren't limited to one party or one president. That's why you have no credibility. You are a right wing shill, plain and simple.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#43 Jun 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You are completely incapable of admitting that the attacks on privacy and free speech in this country aren't limited to one party or one president. That's why you have no credibility. You are a right wing shill, plain and simple.
Did you not see where I said I don't blame Clinton?
Carter started it. Obama said he would end it. That's all that matters.
And spare me the faux ideological bipartisanship on your part. Never, ever, on this forum have you either praised Bush for anything or condemned Obama for anything.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#44 Jun 12, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Did you not see where I said I don't blame Clinton?
Carter started it. Obama said he would end it. That's all that matters.
And spare me the faux ideological bipartisanship on your part. Never, ever, on this forum have you either praised Bush for anything or condemned Obama for anything.
That's all that matters to you because you are a GOP shill.

Never, ever huh? Do you have a short term memory problem? You forgot what I posted just an hour ago?

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#45 Jun 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
That's all that matters to you because you are a GOP shill.
Never, ever huh? Do you have a short term memory problem? You forgot what I posted just an hour ago?
Oh, boy! A whole HOUR ago, for the first time, and now you're in the clear, right?
And I shill for conservatives, not the GOP. I left that bunch right after McCain threw the election.

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#47 Jun 12, 2013
RU_Kiddingme wrote:
<quoted text>
Liar
Like I said before...prove it. You can't and you know it, Porchy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Pro Islamic indocrination at American schools 11 min Reality Speaks 30
News Have You Seen Jovan Dennis? 14 min Words Have Conseq... 3
Ohio High School cancels Muslim Day celebration... 16 min Reality Speaks 32
American Sniper cancelled again because of Musl... 17 min BizzyBee 18
BizzyBee HAS LEFT THIS FORUMů..FOR GOOD! 18 min Catman Dave 52
News Narcotics missing from fire stations 18 min No Love Lost 1
When Obama gets to Heaven will he be a Muslim o... 22 min Reality Speaks 92
Columbus man on a deadly mission, caught 39 min Reality Speaks 128
Hooters Columbus locations closing due to defla... 4 hr Pam 185
More from around the web

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]