“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#193 Nov 24, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true worrier.
woof
How's that not true? Hate is a thought.

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#194 Nov 25, 2013
DayStar_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Those 11 states also have the largest number of guns, gun carriers, & the most lenient gun laws. Having a large number of guns & lenient gun laws doesn't seem to have worked too well. It sure hasn't reduced crime there. It's higher.
The race thing again. Bet you support the Tea Party.
The next county up from mine has a large polulation of kkk & militia. Those fools brag about how great the tea party is, so I take that to mean they're bonafided tea partiers.
In Texas one of the Tea Party’s primary leaders (& the leader of the Wood County Tea Party) use to be listed as a member of Pastor Thomas Robb's kkk.
The media spokesman & advisor for the 2010 Tax Day Tea Party is on the national board of directors of the Council of Conservative Citizens. It's a white nationalist group, one of the largest in the nation. It's a direct descendant of the White Citizens Council.
A Tea Party leader in Florida ~~ the ResistNet Tea Party ~~ is also head of design, marketing, & advertising of the white nationalist group I mentioned above.
Another Tea Partier uses a Tea Party website to advertise his radio show. One broadcast he did was titled "Are the Jews Behind the Destruction of America?". At 1 meeting he blamed Jews for the 9-11 terrorist attacks.
In Arizona a leader spoke at a meeting of aryan nation's leaders & which also has ties to the Christian Identity movement ~~ you know, the group that planted all those bombs at gay night clubs & abortion clinics.
A tea party leader which at one time was a write-in for governor of Arkansas is founder of the White Revolution movement.
I think I read last year that a tea party leader in one of the western states use to be a state leader in a state communist party group.
Now the biggie. The founder of the whole tea party movement, Dale Robertson, was photographed at a tea party rally holding a sign with the 'N' word on it. The original tea party website you guys were so high on was registered in his name.
Drat, she's onto us. Yes, it turns out that George, WMW, Tony, Hey now, Bob and I are part of an evil underground movement led by Sarah Palin dedicated to reviving Hitler from the dead and driving you deviants into the ovens.

/sarc

On later thought, Bill Ayers actually bombed things.
Oliver Canterberry

Columbus, OH

#195 Nov 25, 2013
One of the areas with the largest number of "knock out" victims is the Crown Heights area of Brooklyn, New York. Seven Jews have been attacked in that area alone. There is a regular poster, Black Rhino, who lives close to Crown Heights in near by Bedford Stuyvercent, 70.1% Black. Based on that fact, people who live in predominantly White areas are going to be safe, whereas Whites, Asians or White Hispanics who wander into Black neighborhoods will be at risk.

All the and Obama and Eric Holder and the Marxist posters like Duke and Che refuse to oppose this ugly racism.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#196 Nov 25, 2013
when you possibly are playing in the knockout game, a 9MM handgun and aluminum baseball bat are recommended safety equipment.

If you shoot the puncher in the azz, you win the game. If you whack the puncher with a bat upside the chest breaking ribs, you receive a trophy.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#197 Nov 25, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU certainly don't think so... when the victim is white.
Now you're getting as bad as Paco, pretending to "know" what other people think.

An interesting concept, considering the issue that we are now discussing.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#198 Nov 25, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
How's that not true? Hate is a thought.
It is not true because the terms "hate crime" or "bias crime" refer to specific criminal statutes which operate to impose more severe sentences and consequences upon those who harass or commit physical acts of violence upon others when that conduct is motivated by an animus related to some inherent human characteristic of the victim which cannot or need not be changed, ie race, religion, or gender.

Those statutes do indeed exist, and have for decades in many state criminal codes.

The fine gentleman in New York that you have been reading about recently was just charged under one of those statutes.

And contrary to what your previous asserted, if it turns out to be true that his alleged victim was singled out specifically or partially because of his race or religion, I agree with imposing a more sever sentence upon the attacker(s) if they are convicted.

woof
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#199 Nov 25, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you're getting as bad as Paco, pretending to "know" what other people think.
An interesting concept, considering the issue that we are now discussing.
woof
I know what ever you think, the opposite thought is most likely correct for success.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#200 Nov 25, 2013
what_me_worry_ wrote:
<quoted text>
As opposed to bopping someone on the nose because you disagree with their political views?
The difference there worrier is that in one scenario, an assault motivated by racial animus actually occurs, and in the other, there is merely a sarcastic remark made about a politician by an actor who is thousands of miles away who has no intention of leaving his seat before his computer screen.

See the difference?

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#201 Nov 25, 2013
what_me_worry_ wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe Dukie doggie is implying that we are the same poster.
Either that or the Mad Dog 20-20 has kicked in..........
No "implication" whatsoever. It is called making a mistake from the eyes to the brain.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#202 Nov 25, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
How's that not true? Hate is a thought.
When racial or religious animus motivates criminal action, the criminal action SHOULD be punished more severely. Such criminal acts are performed by the actors to purposefully deprive the victims of their Constitutional rights to pursue happiness regardless of their race, religion, gender, or creed.

Do you think groups of thugs like the KKK selected their victims merely because they were carrying a bit of cash?

woof
Oliver Canterberry

Columbus, OH

#203 Nov 25, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
when you possibly are playing in the knockout game, a 9MM handgun and aluminum baseball bat are recommended safety equipment.
If you shoot the puncher in the azz, you win the game. If you whack the puncher with a bat upside the chest breaking ribs, you receive a trophy.
Ghetto Blacks and Ghetto Browns may win battles, but always lose the war.

They have no job skills.
They speak in ghetto gibberish.
They take no individual responsibility for their actions.
They remain on the economic bottom because they do not value education or anything other than gratification of brute impulse.
Tessie

Dayton, OH

#204 Nov 25, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not true because the terms "hate crime" or "bias crime" refer to specific criminal statutes which operate to impose more severe sentences and consequences upon those who harass or commit physical acts of violence upon others when that conduct is motivated by an animus related to some inherent human characteristic of the victim which cannot or need not be changed, ie race, religion, or gender.
Those statutes do indeed exist, and have for decades in many state criminal codes.
The fine gentleman in New York that you have been reading about recently was just charged under one of those statutes.
And contrary to what your previous asserted, if it turns out to be true that his alleged victim was singled out specifically or partially because of his race or religion, I agree with imposing a more sever sentence upon the attacker(s) if they are convicted.
woof
Federal hate crime prosecution is practically always based on the coincident speech of a perp, thus making it a speech crime.

The 1st amendment specifically says the fedgov cannot make any law that infringe speech, but they do it anyway because 2-party system scum and the judiciary have been operating outside the constitution for decades. 2-party system scum and the judiciary are a reflection of the ambitions of the leaders of diversity, the organized majority in the US and Israel.

Beside the fact that hate speech prosecution is unconstitutional, fedgov always selectively prosecute bias crime, and their selectivity is always in the favor of victim cult people.

The afro-american teens perpetrating the knockout game refer to their felonius game as polar bear hunting, a veiled reference to white people or non-blacks. US mass media queers have sanitized the black teen reference to polar bears hunting, and have substituted the generic term of knockout game. Media queers generally show no pictures of the black teens involved or the victims, unless the victim is a diversity victim cult person. These media manipulations are yet another case of media queers hiding the base criminality of victim cult people.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#205 Nov 25, 2013
Tessie wrote:
<quoted text>
Federal hate crime prosecution is practically always based on the coincident speech of a perp, thus making it a speech crime.
The 1st amendment specifically says the fedgov cannot make any law that infringe speech, but they do it anyway because 2-party system scum and the judiciary have been operating outside the constitution for decades. 2-party system scum and the judiciary are a reflection of the ambitions of the leaders of diversity, the organized majority in the US and Israel.
Beside the fact that hate speech prosecution is unconstitutional, fedgov always selectively prosecute bias crime, and their selectivity is always in the favor of victim cult people.
The afro-american teens perpetrating the knockout game refer to their felonius game as polar bear hunting, a veiled reference to white people or non-blacks. US mass media queers have sanitized the black teen reference to polar bears hunting, and have substituted the generic term of knockout game. Media queers generally show no pictures of the black teens involved or the victims, unless the victim is a diversity victim cult person. These media manipulations are yet another case of media queers hiding the base criminality of victim cult people.
polar bears can smell prey from 30 miles away, and swim to eat it.

When polar bears are threatened, they brutally defend to the death.

Mother polar bears have been videoed keeping at bay 3 male teenage types polar bears. She broke 1 of the punks jaw, and tore a 8 inch strip of hide off another prior to them scattering and fleeing the scene they created. A bloody trail followed them on the ice they quickly were covering to flee the momma polar bear protecting her cubs.

Let this be a lesson to those playing the knockout game, because the opposing team is shooting back with intent to kill.

Since 2009 all firearms sales have reached a fevered pitch, and ammunition is purchased as soon as hitting the shelves.

I just wonder who has the MONEY to purchase guns and ammo in bulk..........knockout gangster wannabe types, or people with jobs and families depending on them for safety?

When polar bears get sick of all the society ruination by the hunters, the hunters become prey and extinct within a few weeks.

the media will be reporting this incident as hate crimes and racism.

polar bears extend media as next of prey, and devour them as well.

“Keep your policy period. LMAO”

Since: Sep 13

The 57th state

#206 Nov 25, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
The difference there worrier is that in one scenario, an assault motivated by racial animus actually occurs, and in the other, there is merely a sarcastic remark made about a politician by an actor who is thousands of miles away who has no intention of leaving his seat before his computer screen.
See the difference?
woof
Hmmmmmmm

I see now.

Advocating for a violent assault against someone you hate is perfectly fine as long as you have no intention of carrying out the assault personally.

Thanks for clearing that up counselor...

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#207 Nov 25, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
When racial or religious animus motivates criminal action, the criminal action SHOULD be punished more severely. Such criminal acts are performed by the actors to purposefully deprive the victims of their Constitutional rights to pursue happiness regardless of their race, religion, gender, or creed.
Do you think groups of thugs like the KKK selected their victims merely because they were carrying a bit of cash?
woof
Ask the liberal dems. They founded the KKK and carry it on today.

Lincoln and the Republican party pushed and passed abolition with NO democratic votes. You like to forget that .
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#208 Nov 25, 2013
what_me_worry_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmmmmmmm
I see now.
Advocating for a violent assault against someone you hate is perfectly fine as long as you have no intention of carrying out the assault personally.
Thanks for clearing that up counselor...
Yes worrier, there is a salient difference between sarcastic political speech and violent assaultive conduct motivated by racial animus, whether you wish to acknowledge it or not.

Wouldn't you enjoy seeing Sarah Palin get a bop on the nose, say from Katie Couric or Morley Safer maybe?

I would.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#209 Nov 25, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask the liberal dems. They founded the KKK and carry it on today.
Lincoln and the Republican party pushed and passed abolition with NO democratic votes. You like to forget that .
Blah blah blah blah blah.

Are you trying to imply that the Democratic party of today is the equivalent of the Dixiecrats of days of yore?

If so, you are an idiot.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#210 Nov 25, 2013
Tessie wrote:
<quoted text>
Federal hate crime prosecution is practically always based on the coincident speech of a perp, thus making it a speech crime.
The 1st amendment specifically says the fedgov cannot make any law that infringe speech, but they do it anyway because 2-party system scum and the judiciary have been operating outside the constitution for decades. 2-party system scum and the judiciary are a reflection of the ambitions of the leaders of diversity, the organized majority in the US and Israel.
Beside the fact that hate speech prosecution is unconstitutional, fedgov always selectively prosecute bias crime, and their selectivity is always in the favor of victim cult people.
The afro-american teens perpetrating the knockout game refer to their felonius game as polar bear hunting, a veiled reference to white people or non-blacks. US mass media queers have sanitized the black teen reference to polar bears hunting, and have substituted the generic term of knockout game. Media queers generally show no pictures of the black teens involved or the victims, unless the victim is a diversity victim cult person. These media manipulations are yet another case of media queers hiding the base criminality of victim cult people.
You have not a clue what you are talking about. Ask Billy Rehnqiust. Despite numerous attempts, his opinion has never been overturned:

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992...

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-515....

woof

“Zuzu's Petals”

Since: Sep 10

Bedford Falls

#211 Nov 25, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Blah blah blah blah blah.
Are you trying to imply that the Democratic party of today is the equivalent of the Dixiecrats of days of yore?
If so, you are an idiot.
woof
Worse, they are basically stupid and lazy!

Woof!
Tessie

Dayton, OH

#212 Nov 25, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
You have not a clue what you are talking about. Ask Billy Rehnqiust. Despite numerous attempts, his opinion has never been overturned:
http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992...
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-515....
woof
Nonsense.

You lie like a typical lawyer when you imply that hate speech prosecution is not based on the speech of a perp.

Federal court people are appointed by politicians, who are elected by the organized majority that refers to itself as diversity.

The federal court system is loaded with Diversity ideologues, as is the US congress and presidency.

All federal jurists must be diversity ideologues to be considered for the bench, including Rehnquist. Rehnquist is not only a diversity ideologue he is a lawyer, which makes him a professional BS artist as are all 2-party system approved lawyers.

All you got to offer as argument is an argument from authority, a garbage form of illogic.

Please go away.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Pet and animal reports 1 hr sidekick 18
Columbus wins top spot on list of 'Opportunity ... 1 hr dpx55 1
Spook, Dave, Bizzy.... 1 hr Pale Rider 125
OH Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 2 hr 18WheelsNoBrainCells 31,059
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 2 hr Free Pizza 4 U 3,337
strike a pose 4 hr Free Pizza 4 U 8
New Columbus Reading Program Aims To Get Books ... 4 hr yeah baby yeah 4
Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13) 20 hr Sue 2,434
•••
•••
•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••