Is 2014 the year for gay marriage in Ohio?

-tip- wrote:

<quoted text>
Analogy FAIL.
The term "human" was not redefined.

Of course it was. "Man" used to mean "white man". Blacks were 3/5ths of one.

-tip- wrote:

<quoted text>
Analogy FAIL.
The term "human" was not redefined.

And where exactly in the constitution is "marriage" defined?

TonyD2 wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course it was. "Man" used to mean "white man". Blacks were 3/5ths of one.

U.S. History FAIL.

At our nation's founding, the framers purposely stipulated that blacks would count only as 3/5 so as to prevent the South from holding the reins of the House of Representatives into perpetuity. They had their eyes on the elimination of slavery from day one.

But please, illumine me as to how immutable race relates to selective sexual behaviors.

-tip- wrote:

<quoted text>
U.S. History FAIL.
At our nation's founding, the framers purposely stipulated that blacks would count only as 3/5 so as to prevent the South from holding the reins of the House of Representatives into perpetuity. They had their eyes on the elimination of slavery from day one.
But please, illumine me as to how immutable race relates to selective sexual behaviors.

There's no genetic basis for "race." You always were ignorant, but on this point you're about four decades behind.

Religious choice is not genetic, at any rate, even in the unreal world of fundie ignoramuses, yet we protect on that basis.

So the whole bit about "immutable traits" has nothing to do with anything, anyway, you stupid, regressive, reprobate pos.

TonyD2 wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course it was. "Man" used to mean "white man". Blacks were 3/5ths of one.

Nothing you can do about your race. Homosexuality is a choice, twit....

woof

Fundies R Mentally ill wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, well then by your own stupid syntax you don't think variations in sexual orientation are a mental illness. You dumb rube.
But it's telling that neither lesbians nor females never enter the content of your posts, whether you're posting with a male name or a female name.

You are mentally ill.....

woof

Hanna wrote:

If you go through life playing in another man’s fecal matter, you’re likely to end up sick and/or dead. You’d think the sodomites would get a clue, but I guess they just can’t help themselves. If the American Psychiatric Association didn’t tell me different, I might end up thinking homosexuality is a mental illness.

Still spending lots of time thinking about gay men having sex, eh?

Interesting...

Fundies R Mentally ill wrote:

<quoted text>
There's no genetic basis for "race." You always were ignorant, but on this point you're about four decades behind.
Religious choice is not genetic, at any rate, even in the unreal world of fundie ignoramuses, yet we protect on that basis.
So the whole bit about "immutable traits" has nothing to do with anything, anyway, you stupid, regressive, reprobate pos.

No genetic basis for race?
You're almost as embarrassingly ignorant as Barack Obama.

-tip- wrote:

<quoted text>
U.S. History FAIL.
At our nation's founding, the framers purposely stipulated that blacks would count only as 3/5 so as to prevent the South from holding the reins of the House of Representatives into perpetuity. They had their eyes on the elimination of slavery from day one.

Oh puh-leez. They owned slaves themselves, you moron. Slavery wasn't abolished until way after they we all long dead.

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
Nothing you can do about your race. Homosexuality is a choice, twit....
woof

Really? It's a choice? So how many guys did you sleep with before you CHOSE to be straight?

-tip- wrote:

<quoted text>
No genetic basis for race?
You're almost as embarrassingly ignorant as Barack Obama.

President Obama has more intellect in his toenail clippings than you have in your entire family tree.

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh puh-leez. They owned slaves themselves, you moron. Slavery wasn't abolished until way after they we all long dead.

Slavery has been around since the first tribe conquered its neighbor.

It was an entrenched institution at the founding of this nation...and, unsurprisingly, continues in various parts of our globe even today.

Still, our framers recognized it as contradictory to our moral principles, and in need of gradual abolition. By example, many freed their slaves upon their deaths. In fact, our nation continued in this vein up until abolition in 1864.

There is no doubt the timeline would have stretched somewhat longer had the South controlled the House from inception.

But, knowledge is wasted on you.
You failed freshman Biology.

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
Nothing you can do about your race. Homosexuality is a choice.

Cletus, fact is you have that exactly backwards.

Race is a matter of how someone wants to identify.

Of course you above all others know that sexual orientation can stuffed - in that sense there's a choice involved - but where someone falls on the spectrum of sexual orientation is definitely not a choice.

You stupid, closet case pos.

-tip- wrote:

<quoted text>
You failed freshman Biology.

You did not get that far. Because you are a racist to go along with your other bigotries you won't do it, but you need to visit the current thinking about race.

It has been known since at least the late 60s that there is likely to be more genetic difference between a given individual and a cousin of that individual than between a random "white" person and a random "black" person. And of course these "white" and "black" people really come in many different shades, and identify themselves in many different ways of their choosing.

The chair of the NAACP identifies as African American and has a far whiter complexion than Congr. Orangina Boner, for example.

But ignorance like yours cannot be fixed because it functions as the very basis of your bigoted world view, which is impervious. You will just increasingly be shunned by the educated; that's as close to a cure as we well find.

Rural OH sounds like the one of the leading armpits of the nation. As ignorant and racist as about anyplace you can find in the buybull belt.

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you ever tire of being wrong?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/...
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/2...
http://www.yalescientific.org/2012/03/do-anim...
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/magazine/04...
Simply stating one's opinion forcefully does not make it factual.

They didn't have aids prior to the seventies! Thats when all the push for "gay" acceptance started,the television was full of shows that promoted this lifestyle as being normal ,then the aids epidemic hit, the left had to scramble to hide the truth.Everything from it came from monkies,to an African was spreading the disease etc etc.The Left created this big push for "Gay" acceptance,and it was a voting group ,and another nail in the coffin of America's moral decay,and DECLINE!!.....Animals exhibit homosexuality only for dominace,but NOT for life!!.....Besides !,like to think of myself above the ANIMAL"s and how they behave!!...We are at the TOP of the food chain I believe!!...Did you sleep during Biology,do you believe that the moon is made of cheese too?.That's about what the Left want's us to believe these days........Not buyin it,just like I don't buy into global warming either......Leftist propaganda,and LIES.....

lides wrote:

<quoted text>
Over 50% nationally, as well as in Ohio.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/w...
http://www.pollingreport.com/civil.htm

Why do you think it wasn't allowed to go to a vote in Massachusetts Lides? Because it would never have passed. Not even today.

Scheherazade wrote:

<quoted text>
The 1970's called...they want their homophobic analogy back....

Sin is just plain old sin.

Adultery is still sin.

Homosexuality is still sin.

Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God. Be not deceived, neither fornicators, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor drunkards shall inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Corinthians Chapter 6 verse 9 and 10.

Fundies R Mentally ill wrote:

Rural OH sounds like the one of the leading armpits of the nation. As ignorant and racist as about anyplace you can find in the buybull belt.

In nearly every one of your posts you assert someone as being racist. Are you saying those who do funny things with the same sex could never be a racist? That makes no sense at all. This is another serious problem you have that needs addressing.

Oliver Canterberry wrote:

<quoted text>
Sin is just plain old sin.
Adultery is still sin.
Homosexuality is still sin.
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God. Be not deceived, neither fornicators, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor drunkards shall inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Corinthians Chapter 6 verse 9 and 10.

I see incest and those sleeping with the same sex not much different than the other. This is a serious problem and is now running rampant across America. There are many reasons virtually all nations are sick of with America and they don't want to see their country turn into a slutfest that America has become. This is awful.