Another Shoe Drops in Benghazi: Stinger Missiles

Posted in the Columbus Forum

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1 Jun 8, 2014
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2014/06/anot...

ANOTHER SHOE DROPS IN THE BENGHAZI SCANDAL:
Taliban Now Targeting U.S. Troops With Stinger Missiles

via Doug Ross

Kenneth Timmerman, writing in The New York Post, breaks open another shocking chapter in the Benghazi scandal.

"The Obama administration isnít only giving the Taliban back its commanders ó itís giving them weapons... Military records and sources reveal that on July 25, 2012, Taliban fighters in Kunar province successfully targeted a US Army CH-47 helicopter with a new generation Stinger missile."

The helicopter and all aboard survived the attack as it was able to crash land. But what had hit the Chinook?

"The next day, an explosive ordnance disposal team arrived to pick through the wreckage and found unexploded pieces of a missile casing that could only belong to a Stinger missile.

Lodged in the right nacelle, they found one fragment that contained an entire serial number.

The investigation took time ... But when the results came back, they were stunning: The Stinger tracked back to a lot that had been signed out by the CIA recently, not during the anti-Soviet ≠jihad."

Can you guess where the Taliban got Stinger missiles with which to target U.S. troops?

If you guessed the smartest President ever and the smartest Secretary of State in history, you're in luck!

"The US Special Operations community believe the Stinger fired against the Chinook was part of the same lot the CIA turned over to the ≠Qataris in early 2011, weapons Hillary Rodham Clintonís State Department intended for anti-Khadafy forces in Libya.

They believe the Qataris delivered between 50 and 60 of those same Stingers to the Taliban in early 2012, and an additional 200 SA-24 Igla-S surface-to-air missiles."

That's right: Hillary's State Department tried to turn over advanced anti-aircraft weapons to anti-Khadafy forces -- this is what appears to have been happening in Benghazi -- and they ended up with the Taliban.

Care to guess where the five bloodthirsty barbarians loosed in Qatar will turn up?

That's a rhetorical question, which means only drones, sycophants, progressives, liberals, and other miscreants will try to answer it (e.g., by yelling "Bush!" at the top of their lungs).

And when a passenger jet is downed thanks to this deranged, evil plot, what will they say then?
The cannot kill a Spook

Detroit, MI

#2 Jun 8, 2014
[QUOTE who="-tip-"

And when a passenger jet is downed thanks to this deranged, evil plot, what will they say then?
[/QUOTE]

The will say that white males must be strip searched and there will be no carry ons allowed any longer.

And the american public will sa " Baaa Baaaa Baaaa"

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#3 Jun 8, 2014
The cannot kill a Spook wrote:
<quoted text>
The will say that white males must be strip searched and there will be no carry ons allowed any longer.
And the american public will sa " Baaa Baaaa Baaaa"
So true.
Still, I can't see how Shrillary can overcome this expanding scandal.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#4 Jun 8, 2014
Speaking of Shrillary...

http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2014/06/hillary-cl...

Hillary Clinton: I May Not Testify, If Subpoenaed By Benghazi Committee, If I Donít Like How They Conduct Themselves

via IBA

From ABC News:

"In the interview, Sawyer also asked about the new congressional committee that will examine the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. Clinton did not say definitively whether or not she will testify before the new committee if called to do so.

'Thatís going to be up to the people running the hearing,' she said.'We'll see what they decide to do, how they conduct themselves, whether or not this is, you know, one more travesty about the loss of four Americans, or whether this is, in the best tradition of the Congress, an effort to figure out how Ė what we can do better.' "

It's not up to her. If the House subpoenas her, she must testify. Can you imagine if John Dean just decided he did not like how the House conducted themselves, so he won't testify?

Fucking absurd.

Hilary, like Obama, thinks she can get away with anything.

This woman must go now.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#5 Jun 9, 2014
-tip- wrote:
Speaking of Shrillary...
http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2014/06/hillary-cl...
Hillary Clinton: I May Not Testify, If Subpoenaed By Benghazi Committee, If I Donít Like How They Conduct Themselves
via IBA
From ABC News:
"In the interview, Sawyer also asked about the new congressional committee that will examine the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. Clinton did not say definitively whether or not she will testify before the new committee if called to do so.
'Thatís going to be up to the people running the hearing,' she said.'We'll see what they decide to do, how they conduct themselves, whether or not this is, you know, one more travesty about the loss of four Americans, or whether this is, in the best tradition of the Congress, an effort to figure out how Ė what we can do better.' "
It's not up to her. If the House subpoenas her, she must testify. Can you imagine if John Dean just decided he did not like how the House conducted themselves, so he won't testify?
Fucking absurd.
Hilary, like Obama, thinks she can get away with anything.
This woman must go now.
waterboard the wench on live TV.

let's see how well she conducts herself then.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#6 Jun 11, 2014
And another shoe.

http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2014/06/report-spy...

This means THE WHITE HOUSE KNEW RIGHT AWAY THAT THIS WAS A TERRORIST ATTACK.

NOT A REACTION TO A YOUTUBE VIDEO.

From Newsmax:

American spy agencies were aware that the Benghazi attacks on Sept. 11, 2012 were terror-related immediately because they were listening in on conversations the attackers made on seized State Department cell phones, Fox News reports.

The information was confirmed by retired Air Force Maj. Eric Stahl and an anonymous U.S. official with information on the attacks, Fox reported.
The White House initially blamed the attacks that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, on a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim YouTube video produced in the United States, but later backtracked.

While the administration has stuck by the story that it initially did believe the video was the motive for the attacks, Stahl disputed that, telling Fox's Bret Baier that members of a CIA-trained Global Response Staff told him they knew nothing of the video.

Stahl was the pilot of a C-17 that transported the bodies of those killed as well as four injured to Ramstein Air Base in Germany, where he was stationed.

He said he asked the response staff the next day about the videotape because it was all over the news.

"They just shrugged and said,'I have no idea,'" Stahl said.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Where has Rowdy been 1 hr Ghost of G 9
Toddler In Stroller Hit By Car In West Columbus 1 hr Ghost of G 5
City to consider measures to reduce plastic bag... 1 hr Ghost of G 3
Chris from Columbus - Frequent Radio Talk Show ... 4 hr CCW 1
dub-v fan 4 hr Star On 47 2
Autopsy, toxicology report on Michael Brown 5 hr dpx55 159
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 5 hr Male 3,981
Columbus Dating
Find my Match

Columbus Jobs

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]