Why Your Boss is Dumping Your Wife
Posted in the Columbus Forum
“animis opibusque parati”
Since: Oct 12
#1 Feb 22, 2013
"No matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people. If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what.”
-- Barack Hussein Obama, speaking to the AMA, 6/2009
Why Your Boss is Dumping your Wife:
Companies are dropping health coverage for spouses to cut costs
by Jen Wieczner
By denying coverage to spouses, employers not only save the annual premiums, but also the new fees that went into effect as part of the Affordable Care Act. This year, companies have to pay $1 or $2 “per life” covered on their plans, a sum that jumps to $65 in 2014. And health law guidelines proposed recently mandate coverage of employees’ dependent children (up to age 26), but husbands and wives are optional.“The question about whether it’s obligatory to cover the family of the employee is being thought through more than ever before,” says Helen Darling, president of the National Business Group on Health. See: When your boss doesn’t trust your doctor.
While surcharges for spousal coverage are more common, last year, 6% of large employers excluded spouses, up from 5% in 2010, as did 4% of huge companies with at least 20,000 employees, twice as many as in 2010, according to human resources firm Mercer.
These “spousal carve-outs,” or “working spouse provisions,” generally prohibit only people who could get coverage through their own job from enrolling in their spouse’s plan.
Such exclusions barely existed three years ago, but experts expect an increasing number of employers to adopt them:“That’s the next step,” Darling says. HMS, a company that audits plans for employers, estimates that nearly a third of companies might have such policies now. Holdouts say they feel under pressure to follow suit.“We’re the last domino,” says Duke Bennett, mayor of Terre Haute, Ind., which is instituting a spousal carve-out for the city’s health plan, effective July 2013, after nearly all major employers in the area dropped spouses.
But when employers drop spouses, they often lose more than just the one individual, when couples choose instead to seek coverage together under the other partner’s employer. Terre Haute, which pays $6 million annually to insure nearly 1,200 people including employees and their family members, received more than 20 new plan members when a local university, bank and county government stopped insuring spouses, according to Bennett.“We have a great plan, so they want to be on ours. All we’re trying to do is level the playing field here,” he says.
While couples generally prefer to be on the same health plan, companies often find that spouses are more expensive to insure than their own employees. That’s because, say benefits experts, covered spouses tend to be women, who as a group not only spend more on health care, but also have more free time to go to the doctor if they don’t work. Indeed, JetBlue’s covered spouses cost 50% more than crewmembers themselves, according to the airline’s online Q&A about its health plan, which this year extended wellness incentives to spouses for the first time.
About a fifth of companies had policies to discourage spouses from joining their health plan in 2012, according to Mercer, though most just charged extra—$100 a month, on average—to cover spouses who could get insurance elsewhere, rather than deny coverage entirely. Indeed, large firms including generics maker Teva and supply chain manager Intermec have spousal surcharges costing $100 a month, or $1,200 annually, while Xerox charges $1,000 for the year.
But experts say more firms are likely to drop spouses altogether, whether they work or not—especially when the new federal health-care exchanges open in 2014, providing an alternative for spouses left out in the cold....
“Tenured Marxist Radical”
Since: Jan 13
#2 Feb 22, 2013
Memo to leftists: Your same-sex partners will get cut as well
“Ludibrium est onus genio”
Since: Dec 11
#3 Feb 22, 2013
And the breadwinner still has to pay for a family plan, PLUS a single plan for the spouse. I thought Obamacare was supposed to make it cheaper...
“Tenured Marxist Radical”
Since: Jan 13
#4 Feb 22, 2013
Two ways to cost control:
Tort Reform/Insurance across state lines
#5 Feb 22, 2013
Dumping, pumping or humping your wife. Any way you slice it she is getting screwed.
Add your comments below
|homosexuality is a "lifestyle choice"||3 min||Duke for Mayor||198|
|Update: dangerous Muslim travels||6 min||tranpsosition||85|
|Who Do You Support||7 min||Duke for Mayor||31|
|Jeb Bush for President!||39 min||mitt||1|
|Anti islam protesters in TEXAS||57 min||They cannot kill ...||53|
|Review: Moroccan Steam Spa||1 hr||Debbienotsnackcake||15|
|Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13)||1 hr||Reality Speaks||5,589|
Find what you want!
Search Columbus Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC