Free George Zimmerman!

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#8122 May 31, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
Civil War.
Look up the causes. You clearly rest your assumptions on inane conjecture and insipid lunacy.
How can they be free in one part of this country and not the other at the same time?
High School history class doesn't teach that far. Nor did you bother to learn any further.
The Civil War sure as hell wasn't caused by slavery.
And tell me why I can carry a gun in Ohio but not in Illinois.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#8123 May 31, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>Still is, as long as you realize that "responsibility" is one of the things they are equal about.

[QUOTE]Just like a sheep to re-live your party's bullshit and irrelevance to boost your fragile ego.
Well played."

Not my party. I disagree with just as much of their platform as I do the Democrats.
All people can find common ground. If they are smart enough to look outside the box and silly misconceptions.

“MAGA”

Since: May 13

Columbus, OH

#8124 Jun 16, 2013
WiseAmerican wrote:
<quoted text>A semi-bald head that was rammed over, and over on concrete, and there's no blood, bruises, or bandages, not even a band aid??? C'mon, forget the media, forget the NBPP, forget about Obama's statement, use logic reasoning, intelligents, and most of all YOUR EYES! Police stations don't have DIM LIGHTING, are you serious! That video is not fuzzy! Sorry you can't accept the fact that blacks have every right to walk where they please, as long as no crime is being committed
Posting to show have stories have changed over time to fit the narrative.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1... !/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/ derivatives/landscape_635/arti cle-trayvon-4-1203.jpg

http://urbangrounds.com/wp-content/uploads/Ge...

“MAGA”

Since: May 13

Columbus, OH

#8125 Jun 16, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
I am absolutely certain that they have not seen the autopsy report, or it would be public by now. I do know that Trayvon's father said he was shown a picture of a face with a bloody mouth to ID Trayvon. Hard to tell what that means though--could be a blow to the mouth, or could be just expulsion of body fluids following the gunshot. But there would be important information in the report such as the entry wound, if there was an exit wound, the trajectory of the bullet, any additional internal injuries that might indicate blows.
But the film just out showing Zimmerman does not seem to match with what has been circulating--or what was in the police report--regarding broken nose, swollen lip, head lacerations. It just doesn't.
Posting to show have stories have changed over time to fit the narrative.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1... !/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/ derivatives/landscape_635/arti cle-trayvon-4-1203.jpg

http://urbangrounds.com/wp -

“MAGA”

Since: May 13

Columbus, OH

#8126 Jun 16, 2013
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/new-...

bad link here is the correct one.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#8127 Jun 16, 2013
Free Pizza 4 U wrote:
<quoted text>
Posting to show have stories have changed over time to fit the narrative.
http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1... !/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/ derivatives/landscape_635/arti cle-trayvon-4-1203.jpg
http://urbangrounds.com/wp -
Wrong the narrative that is pieced together changes to accommodate emrrging evidence.

Zimmerman's problem is that, having been there, ha cannot change his narrative.

His narrative does not fit the evidence, and the conflicts are more apparent the more evidence is available.
Wait what

Crestline, OH

#8129 Jun 16, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
All people can find common ground. If they are smart enough to look outside the box and silly misconceptions.
Like you? You can't even control your language, let alone your silly misconceptions.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#8130 Jun 16, 2013
Wait what wrote:
<quoted text>Like you? You can't even control your language, let alone your silly misconceptions.
I'm a grown ass man. I can speak any way I want.

Who are you to make that determination for me?

You fkn idiots are a laugh riot.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#8131 Jun 21, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>The Civil War sure as hell wasn't caused by slavery.
And tell me why I can carry a gun in Ohio but not in Illinois.
Top Five Causes of the Civil War

Leading up to Secession and the Civil War

1. Economic and social differences between the North and the South.
2. States versus federal rights.
3. The fight between Slave and Non-Slave State Proponents.
4. Growth of the Abolition Movement.
5. The election of Abraham Lincoln.

Even though things were already coming to a head, when Lincoln was elected in 1860, South Carolina issued its "Declaration of the Causes of Secession." They believed that Lincoln was anti-slavery and in favor of Northern interests. Before Lincoln was even president, seven states had seceded from the Union: South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas.

http://americanhistory.about.com/od/civilwarm...

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#8132 Jun 23, 2013
GZ about giltiest mfer ever come down the pike

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#8133 Jun 24, 2013
Did Zimmerman' lawyer tell a knock knock joke?

“I Offer You Truth!”

Since: Jul 07

Tampa, FL

#8134 Jul 1, 2013
a) George Zimmerman, against the advice/instructions of the 911 operator followed Trayvon Martin.

b) George Zimmerman exited his vehicle and physically confronted Trayvon Martin....making Zimmerman the agressor. Zimmerman can provde no logical explanation for this confrontational behavior.

Had Zimmerman a) heeded the advice/instructions of the 911 operator and b) remained in his vehicle Trayvon Martin would be alive today and George Zimmerman would not be on trial for murder.

George Zimmerman put himself in this situation by making two critical, stupid decisions.

George Zimmerman belongs behind bars so he has no more opportunities to harrass, attack or kill another young black male who is doing nothing more than walking down the street minding his own business and bothering no one.

This is essentially what George ZImmerman's minset was that night...

"You haven't done anything, but I just don't like the way you look. I'm gonna jump out of my car and harrass and/or physically attack or manhandle you, and if you take exception to being harrassed, or resist being physically attacked or manhandled then I'm going to shoot/kill you."

...and yet many folks actually think George Zimmerman was in the right?

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#8135 Jul 1, 2013
DapperDave wrote:
a) George Zimmerman, against the advice/instructions of the 911 operator followed Trayvon Martin.
Wrong. The "advice" was not utterred until AFTER Zimmerman had already exited the truck and began to follow Martin. After the dispatcher said "We don't need you to do that", Zimmerman said "OK", and the running noises stopped.

Apparently you listen to other people instead of listening to the evidence yourself.

“I Offer You Truth!”

Since: Jul 07

Tampa, FL

#8136 Jul 1, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. The "advice" was not utterred until AFTER Zimmerman had already exited the truck and began to follow Martin. After the dispatcher said "We don't need you to do that", Zimmerman said "OK", and the running noises stopped.
Apparently you listen to other people instead of listening to the evidence yourself.
Oh really? So, your claim is that Zimmerman stopped following Trayvon after the 911 operator advised/directed him to do so?

It that is the case then how could Zimmerman have come into contact with Trayvon, since Trayvon was walking away...unless Zimmerman continued to follow Trayvon?

Zimmerman has NEVER said Trayvon TURNED AROUND and came BACK towards him (Zimmerman). Therefore, Zimmerman had to have followed and physically confronted Trayvon. Which makes him (Zimmerman) the initiator, the aggressor and the perpetrator of the violence that night.

I suggest you go away, lest you make an even bigger fool of yourself than you already have.

Enjoy the rest of your day.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#8137 Jul 1, 2013
DapperDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh really? So, your claim is that Zimmerman stopped following Trayvon after the 911 operator advised/directed him to do so?
It that is the case then how could Zimmerman have come into contact with Trayvon, since Trayvon was walking away...unless Zimmerman continued to follow Trayvon?
Zimmerman has NEVER said Trayvon TURNED AROUND and came BACK towards him (Zimmerman). Therefore, Zimmerman had to have followed and physically confronted Trayvon. Which makes him (Zimmerman) the initiator, the aggressor and the perpetrator of the violence that night.
I suggest you go away, lest you make an even bigger fool of yourself than you already have.
Enjoy the rest of your day.
so the tooth fairy was at your house last night?

since when does anybody have authority to tell you not to protect your life?

and because a phone operator said something, we all must jump to it?

How about the brilliant dispatcher in Cleveland that answered the call from the girl kidnapped 10 years ago?

with such sound advice like that, we can cut the population in half in just a few years.

Trayvon turned around and picked a fight with a guy armed to protect himself. Sadly it cost him his life.

actions have consequences.....you best learn that fast.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#8138 Jul 1, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. The "advice" was not utterred until AFTER Zimmerman had already exited the truck and began to follow Martin. After the dispatcher said "We don't need you to do that", Zimmerman said "OK", and the running noises stopped.
Apparently you listen to other people instead of listening to the evidence yourself.
the media sells fantasy because it increases television ratings and network profits through advertising dollars.

the sheep believe in fantasy, because reality is scary.

you must blame someone for all your troubles, because this is the status quo in America.

PS: Tony this is not directed at you, but a continuation of your post.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#8139 Jul 1, 2013
against the advice of my ex-wife, I divorced her anyway.

Do I have to go to court again for refuting advice?

“I Offer You Truth!”

Since: Jul 07

Tampa, FL

#8140 Jul 1, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
against the advice of my ex-wife, I divorced her anyway.
Do I have to go to court again for refuting advice?
"refuting advice"? Is English a second language for you?

..as if your relationship with your ex-wife has ANYTHING to do with this discussion.

When one can come up with no logical, mature, factually based argument to support one's position one is forced to fall back on childish, vacuous, inane, irrelevent blather. The hope being they can slyly "beg the question" and, thereby, avoid having to deal with the facts.

You, little fellow, are obviously firmly committed to behaving stupidly and embracing all kinds of brainless paranoia, deranged conspiracy theories and irrational beliefs. I suggest you try reading something other than the blabbering, slobbering nonsense your fellow traffickers in idiocy generate. You just might learn a few new things.

Things like....

…the earth is not flat.
…babies are not delivered by storks
…the drunk occupying the barstool next to yours in not brilliant simply because he agrees with your lunacy
…the moon is not made of green cheese
…repeating a lie over and over again will not transform it into the truth
…your squirrel hunting pals are neither great philosophers nor renaissance men
…the earth is not the center of the universe.
…the scrawlings on the bathroom stall walls of your favorite beer bars were not put there by visitors from other planets
…your toothless, shoeless, shirtless, illiterate uncle Ned is not a reincarnated wise man.
…libraries were not built for the express purpose of brainwashing you - it's okay to visit them.
..."Google" was not created for the sole purpose of helping you expand your storehouse of brainless fables and myths.

And lastly, contrary to what you may have been led to believe, objective research and formal education ("book learnin" in your jargon) are NOT dangerous contaminants.

Enjoy the rest of your day.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#8141 Jul 1, 2013
DapperDave wrote:
<quoted text>
"refuting advice"? Is English a second language for you?
..as if your relationship with your ex-wife has ANYTHING to do with this discussion.
When one can come up with no logical, mature, factually based argument to support one's position one is forced to fall back on childish, vacuous, inane, irrelevent blather. The hope being they can slyly "beg the question" and, thereby, avoid having to deal with the facts.
You, little fellow, are obviously firmly committed to behaving stupidly and embracing all kinds of brainless paranoia, deranged conspiracy theories and irrational beliefs. I suggest you try reading something other than the blabbering, slobbering nonsense your fellow traffickers in idiocy generate. You just might learn a few new things.
Things like....
…the earth is not flat.
…babies are not delivered by storks
…the drunk occupying the barstool next to yours in not brilliant simply because he agrees with your lunacy
…the moon is not made of green cheese
…repeating a lie over and over again will not transform it into the truth
…your squirrel hunting pals are neither great philosophers nor renaissance men
…the earth is not the center of the universe.
…the scrawlings on the bathroom stall walls of your favorite beer bars were not put there by visitors from other planets
…your toothless, shoeless, shirtless, illiterate uncle Ned is not a reincarnated wise man.
…libraries were not built for the express purpose of brainwashing you - it's okay to visit them.
..."Google" was not created for the sole purpose of helping you expand your storehouse of brainless fables and myths.
And lastly, contrary to what you may have been led to believe, objective research and formal education ("book learnin" in your jargon) are NOT dangerous contaminants.
Enjoy the rest of your day.
hey Dapper....I am not buying your advice, or sophomoric illiterate rant.

My formal education....1983 MBA, University of Colorado.

contrary to what you believe, if you punch an armed person in the face, expect a bullet in your head.

a life lesson free of charge adding years to your life.

I hope you learned something today, or tragedy repeats itself.

I learned today you are clueless regarding reality.

“I Offer You Truth!”

Since: Jul 07

Tampa, FL

#8142 Jul 1, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
hey Dapper....I am not buying your advice, or sophomoric illiterate rant.
My formal education....1983 MBA, University of Colorado.
contrary to what you believe, if you punch an armed person in the face, expect a bullet in your head.
a life lesson free of charge adding years to your life.
I hope you learned something today, or tragedy repeats itself.
I learned today you are clueless regarding reality.
So, you're saying a single punch in the face, with no further aggressive behavior warrants a bullet to the head.

Well, let's explore this a little further...

How about a punch in the gut, with no further aggressive behavior?

How about a slap in the face...followed by no further aggressive/violent behavior?

How about an extremtly hard shove, with no further aggressive behavior?

How about if the puncher, slapper, shover is a female, or a teenager, or middle schooler?

So, if you're at a sporting event, or in a bar, or in the mall, or at a concert, or at the movies...a guy/gal starts arguing with you...people/friends get between the two of you...the guy/gal reaches over or between the people trying to seperate the two of you and delivers a punch/slap/shove. I suppose you're going to open fire...aiming for the person's head of course, because a bullet to the head is required, or to be expected, in such situations.

I don't believe I ever heard such a mindless line of reasoning publicly espoused. Your sub-human, brutish thinking is steeped in ignorance and violent barbarism.

And you want us to believe you possess and advanced degree from a respected univesity?

You are a sick, socially maladjusted, uncivilized, psycopathically violent, unthinking, murderous savage.

Good lord! You're crazier than a rabid skunk.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Robert Mueller Investigating Donald Trump 13 min 404 has been found 503
Why are Trump's Kids so ugly? 37 min Mud, James Mud 40
News Whitehall teens just 'headed to club' (Jun '09) 56 min Marquan is worm f... 75
Are Jobs More Important Than Our Environment? 3 hr Duke for Mayor 182
OJ & Barack High Struttin Togetha, Score 1 Blac... 3 hr Duke for Mayor 2
Burn in Hell White Pigs, Go Fight Real Crime, N... 4 hr Alternative Facts... 83
Dems in disarray- Well, yeah! 6 hr Duke for Mayor 934
News Scandal forces appraisal of gay issues | The Co... (Oct '10) 19 hr A Brutha Gotta Know 258

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages