If a school uses a devil as a scool m...
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#21 Apr 9, 2013
Logan wrote:
It seems Strel is a troll following me around on Topix. Apparently I offended him so he, obviously an immature, school child who can’t bear to be corrected, is conducting a vendetta against me. Mommie must have always given into his demands so he becomes agitated when others don’t do likewise.
I do find your lies and hamfisted propaganda it be rather offensive.

It offends logic and sensibility.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#22 Apr 9, 2013
helen wrote:
<quoted text> So those who worship the devil are not a religious group?
yes, they are, and if this expression (at a PUBLIC school, not a private one) conveyed any such message, that would be a problem.

Likewise, if it were a pic of the Devil with some kind of Bible verse underneath it, that would also be a problem.

Ditto angels. Without a specific connection to a religion, it's a cartoon...

“God Save America ”

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#23 Apr 9, 2013
Strel wrote:
<quoted text>
I do find your lies and hamfisted propaganda it be rather offensive.
It offends logic and sensibility.
I lie about nothing but that is obviously one of your character traits. You followed me to this thread after harassing me on the other one, where you resorted to the name calling because you couldn’t accomplish what you wanted with your bullying, and are now pulling the same garbage on this thread. I suspect you couldn’t tell the truth if you had to. I don't think you have the capability to understand what truth is.

How could I possibly offend your logic and sensibility when you have neither? You are an arrogant individual who can’t deal with the controversy on which you thrive, an intolerant, bigoted one who clearly deprives his pleasure from the ridicule of others and their beliefs. Your thinking is perverted, in that you feel your viewpoint is the only one that should be allowed. You feel Christians are not entitled to the same rights you have and abuse, so you spend your time on the internet seeking Christians with whom to fight. Is that not correct?
You claim you have done cases for the ACLU, and one could almost—not quite—believe it due to the similarity of your personality type to those in the ACLU.
My refusal to engage in a debate with you over ACLU cases not related to the subject of the thread we were on aggravated you to the extent you became angry, resulting in your intention to pursue me for the purpose of libeling me. If you are—as you have stated-- a representative of the mighty ACLU, you ought to know that libel is a legal offense. Your calling me a liar constitutes libel, a fact an attorney surely knows.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#24 Apr 9, 2013
I've already proven you a liar once, providing evidence that you conveniently ignored in your cowardice.

If you do not wish to be exposed as a liar, then stop lying.

As for how I feel about Christians, you obviously have not the slightest idea. You are, in fact, completely wrong in this assumption - and I have written absolutely nothing to support your view. You simply pulled that right out of your ass - just another lie.

But please do continue to assume facts not in evidence, it is a perfect demonstration of how you are not what you claim to be, but are simply another propagandist and a stranger to reason.

As for your libel threat - GO FOR IT. Bring it on, Internet Tough Guy.

In the meantime, I will continue to inform whatever audience is out there that you are dishonest and ignorant of constitutional law, whilst laughing in your face.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#25 Apr 9, 2013
Logan wrote:
<quoted text>I lie about nothing but that is obviously one of your character traits. You followed me to this thread after harassing me on the other one, where you resorted to the name calling because you couldn’t accomplish what you wanted with your bullying, and are now pulling the same garbage on this thread. I suspect you couldn’t tell the truth if you had to. I don't think you have the capability to understand what truth is.
How could I possibly offend your logic and sensibility when you have neither? You are an arrogant individual who can’t deal with the controversy on which you thrive, an intolerant, bigoted one who clearly deprives his pleasure from the ridicule of others and their beliefs. Your thinking is perverted, in that you feel your viewpoint is the only one that should be allowed. You feel Christians are not entitled to the same rights you have and abuse, so you spend your time on the internet seeking Christians with whom to fight. Is that not correct?
You claim you have done cases for the ACLU, and one could almost—not quite—believe it due to the similarity of your personality type to those in the ACLU.
My refusal to engage in a debate with you over ACLU cases not related to the subject of the thread we were on aggravated you to the extent you became angry, resulting in your intention to pursue me for the purpose of libeling me. If you are—as you have stated-- a representative of the mighty ACLU, you ought to know that libel is a legal offense. Your calling me a liar constitutes libel, a fact an attorney surely knows.
Its not libel if its true.

Sue him and find out.

woof
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#26 Apr 9, 2013
I don't know what is funnier, Logan's sad attempts to be taken seriously or that he actually thinks that an argument between two relatively anonymous arrangement of pixels on a screen can form the basis of a tort claim.

I think he should get a job.

“God Save America ”

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#27 Apr 9, 2013
Strel wrote:
I don't know what is funnier, Logan's sad attempts to be taken seriously or that he actually thinks that an argument between two relatively anonymous arrangement of pixels on a screen can form the basis of a tort claim.
I think he should get a job.
You lack comprehension. You misinterpret most of what you read; you gloat over imagined victories as if you’re frothing at the mouth like a rabid animal; and you have delusions of grandeur, convincing yourself you are in the legal profession, a “wanna-be” attorney.(Ah, perhaps you are in the legal profession—a file clerk for the ACLU, possibly?)
Instead of suggesting I should get a job, I feel you should be doing some job search yourself instead of wasting your time on the internet pretending to be an attorney.

“God Save America ”

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#28 Apr 9, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Its not libel if its true.
Sue him and find out.
woof
You are a genius. You are correct, therefore, it is libel.

BTW, that "woof" certainly sounds makes one think of you as intelligent and dignified.

“God Save America ”

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#29 Apr 9, 2013
Strel wrote:
I've already proven you a liar once, providing evidence that you conveniently ignored in your cowardice.
If you do not wish to be exposed as a liar, then stop lying.
As for how I feel about Christians, you obviously have not the slightest idea. You are, in fact, completely wrong in this assumption - and I have written absolutely nothing to support your view. You simply pulled that right out of your ass - just another lie.
But please do continue to assume facts not in evidence, it is a perfect demonstration of how you are not what you claim to be, but are simply another propagandist and a stranger to reason.
As for your libel threat - GO FOR IT. Bring it on, Internet Tough Guy.
In the meantime, I will continue to inform whatever audience is out there that you are dishonest and ignorant of constitutional law, whilst laughing in your face.
You have never proven me a liar, for I am not in the habit of lying, as you definitely are. Only an ignorant, unintelligent person would act as you do, spewing anger like a fool. With each post, you further demonstrate you are unethical and unstable, definitely not what you boast of being.
Unlike you, I never pretended to be an attorney and not once did I state I studied Constitutional law in college. I do study Constitutional law books on my own because that subject interests me; but I am not dishonest as you are, claiming to be a lawyer, disproving your claim by your ignorant behavior on Topix.
You imagine you have a brilliant mind but your comprehension level proves the opposite. All your accusations are totally false and you have repeatedly attacked my character without provocation. You are a pathetic being, one who needs anger control counseling.
I stated before that I was not wasting my time on you, one who behaves like an imbecile; therefore, this is it. You aren’t worth the time of day.

In conclusion, Mr. ACLU attorney, stop addressing me as a guy. I am female.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#30 Apr 9, 2013
Strel wrote:
I don't know what is funnier, Logan's sad attempts to be taken seriously or that he actually thinks that an argument between two relatively anonymous arrangement of pixels on a screen can form the basis of a tort claim.
I think he should get a job.
I see that Logan's arrangement of pixels on my ipad screen have far more credibility than your pixel arrangement simply by the fact that "he" has a registered account on Topix. I have never seen Logan resort to name calling, which you promptly did when "he" schooled you. By the way, you followed Logan from another thread to this one as result of that name calling. You call Logan a liar, I think not. That makes you a fool Strelboy.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#31 Apr 10, 2013
Logan wrote:
<quoted text>
You lack comprehension. You misinterpret most of what you read; you gloat over imagined victories as if you’re frothing at the mouth like a rabid animal; and you have delusions of grandeur, convincing yourself you are in the legal profession, a “wanna-be” attorney.(Ah, perhaps you are in the legal profession—a file clerk for the ACLU, possibly?)
Instead of suggesting I should get a job, I feel you should be doing some job search yourself instead of wasting your time on the internet pretending to be an attorney.
And you lack honesty, it's quite obvious.

Atgain, you are just a low-rent propagandist, spewing the same irrelvant nonsense and outright falsehoods as many have before you, on this board and others.

You really should get a job, because it is patently obvious you have precious little experience of the real world.

Or perhaps you would like to discuss the actual legal issues that are the subject of this thread?

You had better think twice about that, to avoid me further embarrassing you.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#32 Apr 10, 2013
Logan wrote:
<quoted text>You have never proven me a liar, for I am not in the habit of lying, as you definitely are. Only an ignorant, unintelligent person would act as you do, spewing anger like a fool. With each post, you further demonstrate you are unethical and unstable, definitely not what you boast of being.
Unlike you, I never pretended to be an attorney and not once did I state I studied Constitutional law in college. I do study Constitutional law books on my own because that subject interests me; but I am not dishonest as you are, claiming to be a lawyer, disproving your claim by your ignorant behavior on Topix.
You imagine you have a brilliant mind but your comprehension level proves the opposite. All your accusations are totally false and you have repeatedly attacked my character without provocation. You are a pathetic being, one who needs anger control counseling.
I stated before that I was not wasting my time on you, one who behaves like an imbecile; therefore, this is it. You aren’t worth the time of day.
In conclusion, Mr. ACLU attorney, stop addressing me as a guy. I am female.
I leave it to others to judge whether you are a liar or not. I've presented evidence that you are lying, you have been unable to refute that evidence. It is what it is.

Your so-called study of the law is laughable, your arguments from authority logically fallacious, and your insecurity thinly veiled with pompous and shallow narcissism.

You are, however, a cheap source of entertainment.

Dance puppet.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#33 Apr 10, 2013
mtkjim wrote:
<quoted text>
I see that Logan's arrangement of pixels on my ipad screen have far more credibility than your pixel arrangement simply by the fact that "he" has a registered account on Topix. I have never seen Logan resort to name calling, which you promptly did when "he" schooled you. By the way, you followed Logan from another thread to this one as result of that name calling. You call Logan a liar, I think not. That makes you a fool Strelboy.
Then you are a chump, because he has been completely incapable of supporting his wild accusations about the ACLU.

Perhaps when you can pull your nose out of his ass, you could address the subject of the thread - because Logan sure can't.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
SORRY Now I voted for trump. 6 min Elerby 23
Giant Coyote near Marysville 16 min Waikiki Vermin 21
!!Add a word drop a word !! (Jun '12) 45 min winner 615
vacation and golf. 1 hr Big B 4
Moving to Columbus 1 hr Big B 14
News Closed Columbus charter school still owes $340K+ 1 hr They cannot kill ... 1
FBI and the Trump brothers ..... 1 hr Big B 13
Russian investigation update🙀 2 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 18

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages